| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1251
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Mort:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yes, I have also just made the mistake of re-joining for another look, and am even more disappointed than a few years ago. Really boring photosets - the latest look like 20 or so shots of almost identical poses (perhaps a hand moved?) and the girls are way too made up or photoshopped for any of their natural appeal to show.
A site to avoid if you are looking for anything with lasting interest in pics, and the videos are no better.
Oh well, I won't be renewing or getting caught again.
|
09-18-12 02:30am
|
Reply
1252
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from TalonIcefire:
(Drooler's Reply)
I have yet to decide whether to showcase any photos from Ron Harris. I believe he relies more on his previous achievements than his current endeavors. In my study, I’ve got two projectors (portrait and landscape, respectively) set up to randomly showcase the various models. Natural behavior is a key element in my taste and for me to display.
Although I am not into huge watermarks, one should at least take pride in your work and seal. The update pages gives you five tabs of model indexing yet does not highlight any changes. My niece has designed better websites than this. Additionally, I’ve looked at his “site bonuses” but frankly, I do not care to sift through the forgotten garbage.
The only way I’ll ever join again is if it’s offered in a two for one package deal with a site I trust and respect such as Met Art or Femjoy.
|
01-28-12 03:56am
|
Reply
1253
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from anyonebutme:
(Drooler's Reply)
It's just porn.
Are we paying for the pixel dimensions, or for the visual of the images? Don't let things like this piss you off. Make a quick note of it and move on. Site put up probably $10-15k to create the 50 photosets, to which they are asking $30 for access to all of it. Is this worth letting such things get under your skin?
|
03-13-10 04:03pm
|
Reply
1254
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
Oh, yes - way smaller pics and/or videos/clips in horrible 3-5 GB sizes...how come people behind some sites think that's what paying users want...?
BTW: Rookie Babes webmasters can shake hands here with 21 Sextury in a new line of smaller pics....
Even as a video-clips collector, I go for some photosets, too - and it's not getting any better...in general!
|
03-13-10 09:06am
|
Reply
1255
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Capn:
Just took a look.
Placeholder pics all over the tour pages.
Not a good sign. :0/
|
09-12-09 08:46am
|
Reply
1256
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RBmarc:
(Drooler's Reply)
*Update*
The slide show default has been changed so that its not 'auto start' :)
Cheers,
Marc
|
06-09-09 02:22pm
|
Reply
1257
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from RBmarc:
Hello Drooler,
Thank you for your interest in and comments about Rookie Babe. We have made steps in the right direction lately and can learn more from reading comments like yours.
The slide show can be stopped by clicking on the text link at the bottom of the image: "stop slideshow". Also, the ability to download just single images in the larger sizes is something I will add to the "to-do list".
To be blunt, at this time, we have limited WM resources and so things get done much slower then I would like but we have made great progress overall.
The aggressive updating that we are working on will get us back up to 120+ babes very soon and each babe will have 2-4 sets/videos on average. We have gone from only 40+ babes active with about 40 photo sets to 60+ Babes with 75+ photo sets in just over 1 month. We are also adding completely new Babes biweekly and most of their content is much more explicit with pink and toys.
The server speed and ability to navigate while downloading are points that I am addressing with my WM again. I will post further on that when I know what can be done and how soon.
Best Regards,
RBmarc
|
06-04-09 04:34pm
|
Reply
1258
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Khan:
I passed this on to the TBP Editors (thanks) and they've now updated our listing.
BTW, they said they got the trial option to work ok so you may want to give it another try.
|
05-16-09 09:57am
|
Reply
1259
|
Sandra Shine Live
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
Cruising Girls is now open - oh, and for Sandra fans - you might want to be aware that she posts - fairly often - at Freeones' message board - just search for her name and you'll easily find the thread where she posts.
I just downloaded an amazing vid of her at ALS Angels - Sandra close-up in full-screen squeezing her awesome boobs in my face is one beautiful sight, let me tell you!
|
07-16-07 08:31pm
|
Reply
1260
|
Sandra Shine Live
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, I have gone through most of the site and have found some sets that go up to 1500. Surprisingly, the first set I found at 1500 was the Eve Angel set. I would still say that less than half of the sets are 1500.
I've seen a video of Sandra in a bar, where a guy stands back and watches her masturbate on a pool table, and the CS video, after going back and watching it again, the guy actually gives her oral in the video. It is probably the hottest video I've seen of her. I would say it is her husband. You can tell she is really comfortable with him. At one point, he sits her on his lap, and uses her dildo on her, including sliding a finger in her butt.
I'm still happy with her site. I do tend to prefer solo sites where I get lots of content of my favorites. She seems like a really sweet person. Her journal talks about her real life, not the typical porn diary of, "I woke up wet". I even like the non-porn clips of her on the site. I had seen one of the on location clips with her on CS, with 4 or 5 other models. She came off as the very shy one of the bunch. While Sandy and the others were dancing, she sit off to the side, laughing at them.
|
06-21-07 12:39am
|
Reply
1261
|
Sandra Shine Live
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler,
The ones I have downloaded so far are coming out at 800x1200. I don't know if there is an option for bigger, the site doesn't work with Firefox, so I'm plugging away with IE7, which I'm not real familiar with, but a straight right click, save as, is giving me 800x1200, but I've only downloaded 5 sets as of right now.
A side note, a little frustration set in on the site tonight. It finally happens, Sandra Shine hardcore, but only in picture set as of right now. The only thing is, it isn't for her site, it is for some other site and to download it you have to pay 3,90 Euro which I believe is a little over $5 (US). Which sort of ticked me off a little. I hardly see one picture set being worth that much. It didn't help that she also sells each of her sets individually for exactly the same amount as this hardcore set. Don't get me wrong, the videos are great quality, especially if you are used to .mov files. I just hope it doesn't become one of those sites that wants extra money for the hardcore sets, especially since the most hardcore b/g I have seen with her is on Clubsandy, where a guy gets her off with a dildo.
|
06-05-07 03:46am
|
Reply
1262
|
Sandy's Fantasies
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Ace DDF:
Hi Drooler,
This issue has been fixed! We apologize for the problem.
Best regards,
Endre
|
08-10-09 04:40am
|
Reply
1263
|
Sandy's Fantasies
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Ace DDF:
Hi Drooler,
We will look into this problem tomorrow!
Best regards,
Endre
DDF Productions
|
08-09-09 10:49am
|
Reply
1264
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wittyguy:
(Drooler's Reply)
Mmmm, after taking another look it appears that you might be right. I haven't joined this site before so I can't say for sure but I'll take your word on it. Too bad they can't seem to come up with more original content.
|
04-16-09 11:17am
|
Reply
1265
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from nygiants03:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yea I changed my review. I was an idiot not to notice that. Hopefully they update again!
|
06-08-08 12:01am
|
Reply
1266
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nygiants03:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thats not right. I'll keep an eye out for that. They must of deleted the material, and added it with new dates to look like they are updating? I mean the members area is similar to the preview page, and shows the same dates.....
|
06-05-08 09:58pm
|
Reply
1267
|
Sex And Grades
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wittyguy:
(Drooler's Reply)
What's up with that? "Cogniscenti" sent me to the dictionary. Who says porn pervs don't have an IQ bigger than their shoe size ... unless Drooler has really really big paws.
|
02-01-13 03:09pm
|
Reply
1268
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from lk2fireone:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yes, I first noticed Sherilyn Fenn either in the The Wraith (with Charlie Sheen) or Two Moon Junction. Like you, I found her extremely attractive.
A very young Milla Jovovich (she was around 11 years old) was also in Two Moon Junction. Actually, a number of very good actors were also in Two Moon Junction, so although erotic, it wasn't the cheap brand of erotic movies.
|
04-29-12 07:46pm
|
Reply
1269
|
Sexy Cassia
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from SnowDude:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks for the reply, but after I read it my first thought was, "Duh, I should have figured that out!" So, no worries. :)
|
04-27-07 01:44pm
|
Reply
1270
|
Sexy Cassia
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from SnowDude:
What does HC mean?
|
04-24-07 06:15pm
|
Reply
1271
|
Sexy Employee
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler
Saw this a bit late - but thanks for the support in this somewhat tricky debate - and your outstanding answer at 08-26-07.
I kind of envy good folks who got the english language so well spoken as you do.
Thanks again....
Denner
|
08-29-07 08:02am
|
Reply
1272
|
Sexy Employee
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from igolli:
(Drooler's Reply)
I don´t think that I am overreacting. I am just taking offense at the style of review. A review must concern about facts. These facts have to be related to the content. For this what does it matter where the "russian mob is a lot going" etc. Instead of trying to be ironic Denner should first analyze the site well. I see almost exclusiv content. I see also psp and ipod vids which was 1 reason to join for me because there are not so many sites out there with those content in acceptable quality.Denner even doesnt mention this vid formats. The site has no wmv parts. The "normal" vids are in DivX -avi format. Thats totally different from wmv-format.
What is a frustrating navigation? Go to the models list click on a model and get a video or picture set, mostly both. I dunno what is difficult with that.
|
08-26-07 09:36am
|
Reply
1273
|
Sexy Employee
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Wauw, that's very good research, Drooler
I might sign up to amkingdom.com
Thanks
|
08-26-07 02:14am
|
Reply
1274
|
Sexy Employee
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler m'man:
At this point (BTW) you're not quite right:
The girl I'm describing as Monique is named Monika Cajth at 1 By Day/1 By Night, which I'm am a member of at this moment.
But, Drooler I had a slip i my memory: at European Glamour Girls her name is Katharina - my mistanke which probably made the confusion for you - still all those different names are bull..........
She's in a lot of places - but even at 1 By Day/1 By Night she's NOT doing hardcore.
If anybody seen her in hc at other sites, please let me know (apart from a single handjob at Her Sweet Hand). I'm rather stubborn as a mule on this one - I do not think she done hc anywhere else - but it'd be great if I'm wrong. I'd like to see more of her fucking....
And Drooler, - a plesure to give info that are of some use, at least.
|
08-25-07 03:21pm
|
Reply
1275
|
Sexy Jamie
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from plan b:
Thanks for the heads up! I'm about to cancel my subscription too.
|
07-08-08 05:10pm
|
