| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
Good points, Drooler.
But I guess my biggest problem was the anonymous negative without explanation. I guess I'm thin-skinned, but when someone throws an egg on my car, I'm bothered and would like to know what's going on.
Not "trusting" is different from having an honest disagreement. I like porn that others might be uncomfortable with, ok, but to not "trust" me????
|
06-16-07 01:02am
|
Reply
352
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
What's to stop me from entering with a proxy and giving myself anonymous positive trust ratings? Not a thing. I am baffled as to why they allow this.
|
06-15-07 08:15pm
|
Reply
353
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from kingk:
(Drooler's Reply)
Great tip on Eurobabeindex.com !
Thanks, it's always a challenge to 'stay on top' of all the girls
|
06-05-07 02:22pm
|
Reply
354
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Gazette Risque:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yes, I agree. The editing is their job ;)
But I gotta say, if you are able to download the full gallery in one archive, it doesn't really matter to me whether there are some awkward pictures in there or not.
And a crowded hard drive is just nature's way of saying: "Hey! Throw out some old porn!"
|
06-02-07 12:34pm
|
Reply
355
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
ok, I've passed that one on as well.
Thanks!
|
06-02-07 05:40am
|
Reply
356
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
The 2nd one I'll pass on to the editors, thanks!
The first .. you might want to check it for being a typo. I say that because I'm seeing what looks to be a domain parked at godaddy
If you have any other pay sites you'd like to see listed, just pass them on here or in an email to support [at] PornUsers [dot] com
|
06-02-07 05:12am
|
Reply
357
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler, thx for the heads up.
While neither of those two sites technically fit the non-nude category, they should qualify for a listing at TBP. I've passed them to the TBP Editor so they should be added w/in a few days.
Thanks again.
|
06-02-07 04:05am
|
Reply
358
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, who do you suppose approved the poll question? In case there's doubt, it's me. And yes, it is interesting to see how the question is seen from the consumers' side of the fence.
I am not faulting you for the question or for that matter, anyone for having their preferences about the issue. As I stressed, my main reason for making my comments was so you'd have another perspective and perhaps not think poorly of sites who don't use the names you're used to.
|
05-24-07 03:14pm
|
Reply
359
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
You asked ...
"What would the implications be of having minor children in the house if you're a member of PornUsers? There's SOME sort of connection being drawn, isn't there?"
The only thing that was to be determined from that questions was if those who typically respond to questions here at PornUsers were good ones to ask about typical safeguards implemented by parents. As the majority say they don't have children, then this isn't the best group to seek those answers from.
Really sorry the question put you off so much.
|
05-01-07 04:18am
|
Reply
360
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hmmm ... interesting reaction.
I'll try to address a few of your comments here.
1. Perhaps you missed it but names of the staffer originating the poll question(s) has been dropped for a little while now. We do still show if it's a user submitted poll but having the staffer's name on poll questions served no real purpose so it was dropped. The point being, absence of a name there shouldn't be seen as anything suspicious. While a number of staffers come up with poll questions, a large percentage of them come from me.
2. I've been active in the adult webmaster community for over ten years so, I will only say that if I'm a "wingnut mole", I've been underground longer than many here have been surfing porn. :)
3. Might I humbly suggest that some poll questions might have a reason (and value) even if you do not immediately see what that reason might be? Many of the poll questions are things that webmasters are interested in knowing about those who purchase memberships.
As you speculated, this question was a qualifier with the idea that, depending on the response, it would be followed by one or more related questions. While that may make no immediate sense to you, looking at it from a webmaster's perspective, it might be perceived differently.
Specifically, adult webmasters OFTEN hear (from various private and gov't agencies) what they should be doing to "protect the children" from access to online porn. When those discussions come up it's often asked what parents are doing along those lines or if they (the parents) just think webmaster's should bear the bulk of the burden for keeping children away from porn.
Understanding all that, perhaps now you can understand why the question is quite germane to ask this group. However, as (to date) the majority of respondents have answered that there are no minors in their homes, it makes little sense (at this time) to ask the planned follow-up questions.
Anyhoo ... hope that helps you better understand that even when you don't perceive what it is, there is almost always a method to our madness. You are, of course, free to ignore any poll question that makes you uncomfortable.
As always, thank you for using PornUsers.com
|
04-30-07 10:36am
|
Reply
361
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from ksauz:
Yes, it seems something's going wrong these days! Give us the good old exclusive 1by-Day!!!
|
03-04-10 03:04pm
|
Reply
362
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(Drooler's Reply)
That's always good to hear. :)
|
08-26-09 06:15pm
|
Reply
363
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from turboshaft:
I found that 10th Anniversary deal and I am thinking of joining the herd and signing up. I have yet to be a member of any DDF site yet, so it sounds like my hard drives may have some serious spinning to do...
(I wonder if you guys will be pissed at me if I join and add to the slowness, or for not having ever been a member, or maybe even both! :) )
|
08-25-09 09:18pm
|
Reply
364
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from badandy400:
I have not had much trouble with DDFBusty loading pages. I did have issue the other day with the video downloads having a 10 second latency when queuing up. I am assuming that DDFBusty comes from the same place as 1 By Day. I have not had this problem since.
I will not condemn you for getting mad about long page loadings. To me 8 seconds is only manageable when I am loading a very large page while I am running my downloads full speed. So by all means chuck a brick at them.
Hopefully this issue gets beaten to death before too long, 1 by day is my next site after I finish DDFBusty.
|
08-24-09 10:57pm
|
Reply
365
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from pat362:
I concur and I'll add that it's so slow that I couldn't log in one day last week. It's not the only site. Last night House of Taboo was also quite slow. That's not my biggest problem. I'm actually quite diaspointed with the content on most of the sites.
|
08-24-09 06:28pm
|
Reply
366
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Ace DDF:
(Drooler's Reply)
Certainly! August is usually a slow month at DDF. Expect to see same amazing new sets in September. :)
Best regards,
Endre
|
08-15-09 05:50am
|
Reply
367
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
What's interesting is that while 1byDay posts these ALS Scan sets as their main post for the day, from what I've seen, ALS Scan posts the 1 by Day and Met Art material that they post as bonus posts in addition to their usual posts of their own material.
|
05-30-09 07:30pm
|
Reply
368
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from DickH:
I must admit, I have pretty much given up on DDF sites over the past few months for various reasons some of which I can even remember :-)
- lots of duplication as you say including the same sets across various sites for which you're expected to pay seperately
- fake cumshots pretty much everywhere, why why why etc
- women who don't look like they're even remotely enjoying being there. Clearly this is just my perception but there you go !
Don't know what the rest of you out there think but personally I don't think they're quite so hot any more !
|
02-26-09 04:56pm
|
Reply
369
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Ace DDF:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hi,
Thanks for the info about the wrong ZIP filenames. It was simply because the same ZIP program that created the packages was used. The problem has been corrected.
As for Windows blocking the ZIPs, that really is a Windows issue. Have you managed to solve it? Maybe it is worth looking at options in your Antivirus/Unpacker program.
Best regards,
Endre
|
01-19-09 03:06pm
|
Reply
370
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
I had considered doing the exact same thing, but 1byday has a model that I had never seen before, looks very exotic named Yoha, and she has several sets put up recently. So I figured with my luck that my 5 days to 1byday would run out and they would up 2-3 more new sets of her!
I think they have changed some of those bonus sites. I downloaded a couple of sets from "Euroteenerotica.com" of Eve Angel that have this for a file name on the zip, "Eurogirlsongirls" oops ha ha! I also know there used to be the very rare Anetta Keys blowjob clip on onlyblowjob.com but it isn't there anymore. Maybe they should just consider combining these similar to how Twistys has done? I'm guessing it would seriously boost their membership joins.
I had checked that taboo site as well, but didn't see much that interested me, though I did like the Zuzanna Z sets on it. She reminds me of Mia Stone. Oh, have you seen Wivien/Vivien/Wanda? Her new sets are some of the best I've seen from any model. What a body, fake boobs and all, that is probably the best boob job I've seen. I had only seen one set of her on vivthomas with Eve, she seems to have caught Denys eye now.
The only latex suit set that I've really liked is the Aria Giovanni ones. Aria has to be one of the few models that fills a latex suit out completely. I always wondered if Julie wore a girdle, if not she had an incredible hips to waist ratio!
|
01-01-09 08:44pm
|
Reply
371
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from DigglerFL:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well if they "decided" to scale back on their content, then they need to scale back on their pricing as well. If Mercedes decided to cut back on leather and AC, you'd expect them to adjust their price accordingly.
The value test is not necessarily how good something is, its how good it is compared to what you can get spending your money elsewhere. Dollar for dollar, this site is simply not worth the price, because you can get more and better content elsewhere for less money.
|
10-05-08 05:12am
|
Reply
372
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from ace of aces:
(Drooler's Reply)
i didn`t really see "reloded" stuff from the site an i have at least 162 gb downloaded at all. some videos from former times (2005 e.g.) but maybe it`s so much stuff that i have lost control of it :)
therfore i have to say, even if there should be "reloded" stuff in there, it`s not making the site bad.
|
09-05-08 12:41am
|
Reply
373
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
Two months of nothing but recycled material sounds like a huge con to me - especially when they don't even mention it. I guess they spent a lot of money when they went to two full pic & vid sets a day and this is their way to sit on their laurels and rake the money in, since they aren't paying models or all of the other costs of doing new shoots, which can be extraordinary.
At this price I can't justify paying them to just recycle their old stuff. But that's just me.
|
09-03-08 06:52pm
|
Reply
374
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from MargulisAZ:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yeah this sucks, this site used to be awesome and now I probably won't even join again. No reason to since there aren't any more new girls or shoots. How lame.
|
08-15-08 09:37am
|
Reply
375
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Blond Sandra Shine....Of course - what a lack of memory for my part: Her own site - well, you can't win them all...
|
08-02-08 02:39pm
|
