| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler asked: "Any chance that the question lengths for these polls be increased?"
Sorry, not for the foreseeable future at least. We'd prefer to keep the questions short and sweet and to the point.
|
10-05-07 07:15pm
|
Reply
327
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
Absolutely - it's the 21st Sextury ones that are the biggest pains in the ass - and then they changed my password to one that I haven't been able to memorize in months, so I have to find the e-mail notification every freaking time I want to go in the site and copy and past, because it's long as hell - gwwwaaahhhh!!
LOL - needless to say, I don't go into that site as often as I otherwise would!
|
10-05-07 06:33pm
|
Reply
328
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from SnowDude:
(Drooler's Reply)
Of course I meant you Drooler! Sorry about my slip up there dude! :)
|
09-28-07 10:35am
|
Reply
329
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from pat362:
(Drooler's Reply)
I agree with you that the purpose of thumbs is to give you a good
overall idea of the action in the video, and the written description should help clarify it a little more. I agree that written descriptions are sometimes vague, but I've noticed that the reason is sometimes because they know they can attract more people by lying.
I don't need a major story, but a description of the different action that is inside the video ie: straight sex, anal, dp, lesbian
and so on.
|
09-27-07 07:44pm
|
Reply
330
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from SnowDude:
(Drooler's Reply)
That's an excellent point Denner dude! I'm sure I've saved more money by not joining crappy sites than I've won in the raffles, that's for damn sure!
|
09-27-07 06:22pm
|
Reply
331
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from pat362:
(Drooler's Reply)
One thing that annoys me about thumbs/stills in the preview page is that they don't always show all the action in the video. I'm not asking for dozensof thumbs. I'd much prefer a mixture of written info with some thumbs. This way I can read about the action, and I
can see the performers. The websites handled by kink.com are a good example.
|
09-26-07 07:03pm
|
Reply
332
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Don't take this wrong but ...
Without getting into a protracted discussion (which would serve no purpose here) I'll just say that your speculation regarding production costs of creating content and the risks involved are inaccurate in the most part. While it could be argued that reselling content indeed keeps makes the cost per photo less, the speculation that creating content is "easy money" in any measure shows a certain lack of understanding of the subject.
Not a bad thing as it's not really a subject a consumer would need to be knowledgeable of.
|
09-24-07 03:24pm
|
Reply
333
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from pat362:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hi Drooler sorry for not replying sooner I was visiting a friend. I'm mostly a video website guy, but when it comes to a preview. I'll be honest and say I don't mind if it's in thumbs, video trailer or even a description of the action (like handsonhardcore.com). I'm like you in that if I can't get an idea of what the videos offer. I won't join the website. I haven't passed on many websites, because most have smarten up over the years, but there are still a few that I'd join if I could get a good idea of what exactly those videos look like.
|
09-23-07 07:09pm
|
Reply
334
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
You should be happy with your 1 "no" rating Drooler...it's the exception that proves the rule!
|
09-23-07 03:54pm
|
Reply
335
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Rick:
(Drooler's Reply)
Once implemented, the rule will start that day. So all previous "no" ratings won't require reasons and will stay as is unless the user ammends it. That was the only way we could justify adding this rule.
|
09-23-07 07:53am
|
Reply
336
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from apoctom:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hear, hear on the labels in the rankings!
|
09-20-07 10:13am
|
Reply
337
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Woodruff:
(Drooler's Reply)
Do or do not, there is no try :)
Sorry, even on a porn review site, it's probably pretty geeky to quote Yoda.
Anyway, luminous beings are we.
|
09-15-07 11:38am
|
Reply
338
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
I made it pretty clear that the "wait one month" rule was a rule that I enforced for myself and was not claiming that everyone else on this site should wait that length of time.
There are rules that I believe would help this site.
I just ran across a review for ALS Scan where the reviewer, in a later comment added to her review, said that she had not been a member prior to her review IN OVER A YEAR!!!!
That, to me, is just ridiculous, and should be grounds for that review being yanked from this site altogether.
|
09-14-07 07:43am
|
Reply
339
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
The thing is there is so much potential for good porn. I almost hate the HC videos nowadays. it's always the same...the cameraman (it's always a man) will pan up from the floor. Then he'll say something stupid, like "show us your tits". Then he'll cop a feel---I hate that! I wish one of these girls would tell him to fuck off. And then the cameraman will say something stupid like "show us your ass" and then it wil be a micro closeup, and he'll cop another feel. Then comes the male actor, stroking himself again on camera. Then the idiot male actor acts out his rape fantasy, with the stupid hair pulling and the stupid ass slapping, and the disgusting spitting. And the circus positions, and the scene always ending with the jerk masturbating himself, as if we must see that. Blah! And all the companies do it exactly this way. John Root and Suze Randall are outstanding erotic photographers, but most of the rest are just some schmo with a digital camera. Don't get me wrong---the girls are great, and actually understand the concept of relating to the viewer. But the idiotes running most of these sites don't have a clue. Not a clue!
|
08-22-07 07:36pm
|
Reply
340
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from apoctom:
(Drooler's Reply)
With regard to Office 2007, the default file format is a new XML-based format. It is open to more compatibility with other "Office" software, like StarOffice. However, because all versions of Office before 2007 used a proprietary format, older versions of Office can't open Office 2007 files. (Office 2007 can open all older version files with no problem.)
Don't worry: you can save all Office 2007 files in a format compatible with older MS Office versions. (Save As... instead of Save) I've used this function a lot since I am sending files back and forth with people who are still using Office 2003 or even Office 2000, while I am using Office 2007 (on Vista).
|
08-19-07 09:17am
|
Reply
341
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#27
from Pinche Kankun:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, you are the shit, man!!! Don't matter what time of the day it is, if my girl walks in front of me in my house in men's fruit of the loom underwear, I swear I will pull an American Pie on her...
"No wait Nadia, please don't yet, I got reserves!!!
|
06-21-07 11:47pm
|
Reply
342
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from roseman:
(Drooler's Reply)
lol, you forgot to check Anonymous negative votes for user Roseman.
I am against anonymous ratings but that's PU rules, if you don't like them you can stop posting and leave.
|
06-21-07 05:33am
|
Reply
343
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from roseman:
(Drooler's Reply)
If you find poll's question 'dump' or stupid you could just do not answer and NOT post replies that insult me or PU team that approved this poll.
I do not care about your trust rating, I am here because I think that some people are here for the same reason as I am for HELPING people and ourselves. Arguing in here seems stupid and of course lame to me :-)
So if you dont like the poll just be silent and do not use words that can insult someone just respect his question or opinion! Continuing replying with the way you did and you still do will lead you to a ban I think.
Thanks again.
|
06-21-07 05:30am
|
Reply
344
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from roseman:
(Drooler's Reply)
You are nothing more than a kid if you are acting like this.
You gave a negative vote to me calling me 'Coward' 'little man' etc because you did post a lame reply and got an answer, LOL
You gave a negative vote to anyone that didn't agree with your opinion, so I guess that you don't judge by reviews but ... by opinions?
Anyway, thank you!
|
06-20-07 11:44pm
|
Reply
345
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from roseman:
(Drooler's Reply)
hahahahahaha, geez!
okay, I am sure that you chose 'I can not tell, I am shy !', didn't you?
Pitty that I forgot to add as an answer 'At any time if girl drools' ;-)
|
06-20-07 04:12pm
|
Reply
346
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Marianna:
(Drooler's Reply)
L O L, were u drunk when u wrote this or something?
maybe .. u had just had .. sex? awwwww !!!
*drools* :-P
|
06-20-07 03:59pm
|
Reply
347
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks drooler! I enjoy reading good writing, and your writing is always fun to read.
|
06-17-07 09:02am
|
Reply
348
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
For people like me that look at membership status when reading reviews, it would definitely be helpful if you noted - returning member here - or something that let people know that your entire experience was not less than 1 month. I have seen notes like that in reviews, possibly in yours, and it was note-worthy to me.
In any forum that has a good amount of people posting, we're going to have people capable of, or interested in, writing solid in-depth reviews, and others who write reviews that are more "thumbs-up" or "thumbs-down". The good thing about the comments is that we can always try to draw people out some more if we care to.
Thanks for your comments.
|
06-16-07 01:40pm
|
Reply
349
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
>> "See, I don't know how to do that proxy thing with the IP addresses. LOL"
Haha .. right. Of course the fact that we require users to have 5 points before they can give Trust Ratings (hopefully) will discourage folks from doing the proxy thing. In a recent conversation with a User, Rick (TBP/PU's Founder) commented about why he selected such a high number for the Trust Badge. He said, "The goal was to choose a target that in the long run would be attainable and still somewhat challenging." Which as you point out, makes it really mean something special once it's achieved.
Your comment, "... there's the implicit message to write the reviews carefully, with a balance of positive and negatives and a reasonable enough score" really hits the nail on the head in regards to what we hope the Trust Ratings will do.
Again, thx for your feedback.
|
06-16-07 10:32am
|
Reply
350
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, you're quite correct in saying that *sometimes* a negative rating might have been a mistakenly cast vote. Because of that, it never hurts to reply to negative vote asking for the reasoning. You may not get a reply, and hopefully you won't be personally insulted if you don't, however, if it was a mistaken vote, it'll bring it to the users attention and they can easily recast their vote.
|
06-16-07 06:16am
|
