Poll Replies (11)
|
Replies to the user poll above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
What kind of question is this? Is there some wingnut mole lurking around, posing as a true PornUser? There's no name associated with the poll.
I suppose the next questions will be on the order of "if there are minors in your household, do you try to keep them away from pornography?" and "how much time do you spend with your children?" and "do you consider yourself a religious person?"
I really don't think I'm overreacting here. After all, who wants to know??
|
04-29-07 05:17pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :
Hmmm ... interesting reaction.
I'll try to address a few of your comments here.
1. Perhaps you missed it but names of the staffer originating the poll question(s) has been dropped for a little while now. We do still show if it's a user submitted poll but having the staffer's name on poll questions served no real purpose so it was dropped. The point being, absence of a name there shouldn't be seen as anything suspicious. While a number of staffers come up with poll questions, a large percentage of them come from me.
2. I've been active in the adult webmaster community for over ten years so, I will only say that if I'm a "wingnut mole", I've been underground longer than many here have been surfing porn. :)
3. Might I humbly suggest that some poll questions might have a reason (and value) even if you do not immediately see what that reason might be? Many of the poll questions are things that webmasters are interested in knowing about those who purchase memberships.
As you speculated, this question was a qualifier with the idea that, depending on the response, it would be followed by one or more related questions. While that may make no immediate sense to you, looking at it from a webmaster's perspective, it might be perceived differently.
Specifically, adult webmasters OFTEN hear (from various private and gov't agencies) what they should be doing to "protect the children" from access to online porn. When those discussions come up it's often asked what parents are doing along those lines or if they (the parents) just think webmaster's should bear the bulk of the burden for keeping children away from porn.
Understanding all that, perhaps now you can understand why the question is quite germane to ask this group. However, as (to date) the majority of respondents have answered that there are no minors in their homes, it makes little sense (at this time) to ask the planned follow-up questions.
Anyhoo ... hope that helps you better understand that even when you don't perceive what it is, there is almost always a method to our madness. You are, of course, free to ignore any poll question that makes you uncomfortable.
As always, thank you for using PornUsers.com
|
04-30-07 10:36am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
The value of some of the questions is clear from context -- this site being about porn. An example is the question about how users react to DRM.
The one about minor children in the household wasn't, as it's not obviously a question that's relevant to porn.
Your explanation, which is that webmasters find the poll responses to such a question useful, sheds some light. This is what I had not understood. And I did ask: "Who wants to know??"
Do you really think, though, that a member of PornUsers is going to make this webmaster connection to the question involuntarily? Is that a reasonable assumption?
Having a gun in the house doesn't by itself implicate the owner to a life of crime. What would the implications be of having minor children in the house if you're a member of PornUsers? There's SOME sort of connection being drawn, isn't there? Otherwise, why ask? And that point has yet to be explained.
You said the question made no immediate sense to me, and you were right. I hope it's now clear to you why that was the case.
BTW, sorry if you took the "wingnut mole" thing personally. It certainly wasn't intended to be taken as such. I had no idea who had posed the question.
|
04-30-07 03:41pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Drooler :
You asked ...
"What would the implications be of having minor children in the house if you're a member of PornUsers? There's SOME sort of connection being drawn, isn't there?"
The only thing that was to be determined from that questions was if those who typically respond to questions here at PornUsers were good ones to ask about typical safeguards implemented by parents. As the majority say they don't have children, then this isn't the best group to seek those answers from.
Really sorry the question put you off so much.
|
05-01-07 04:18am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Pinche Kankun (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :
That's funny, Drooler!! I have to agree with you on your comment because I also feel that this question has no relativity to what we discuss within the PORNUSER website... BOOBS, BUTTS AND BABES!!
Like I said before, I feel like we are starting to run out of polls to discuss and starting to put anything on the web that comes to mind, including, "Are there minor children in your household?!! :)
|
11-21-07 10:34pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Pinche Kankun (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Khan :
You are also right too, Khan. I do believe in child pornography protection for children.
|
11-21-07 10:36pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #6 - Pinche Kankun :
The point is, there may be times when *you* do not understand the reasoning behind a poll question. Just keep in mind, just because you don't immediatly see the reason, it doesn't mean there is no reason.
Of course, you should feel free to ignore any poll question that you don't care to answer ... even if it's just because you don't see the reason for it.
|
11-22-07 04:57am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #5 - Pinche Kankun :
Yes, I thought that was among the odd questions. Those who answer provide such a small sample size to whomever the answers might interest (content providers?) that I doubt that they're valid samples anwyay. So I can't see the value in such questions.
Polls and discussions on the questions we ask each other about the really important stuff -- the "Three B's" you list -- are lot more interesting.
Now Kahn might not immediately see my reason for saying this, but that doesn't mean that there is no reason. This is, by the way, an empty locution that could conceivably be used to justify practically ANYTHING. And it amounts to a tautology (circular reasoning) that expresses this idea: "There's something that some people understand but that you apparently don't, but we can't say what that is because you don't uderstand it."
|
11-25-07 02:47am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Pinche Kankun (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #7 - Khan :
Da reason y n some cases I can't ignore a poll is becuz I have tried so many timez 2 suggest what most viewers I see n rental stores grab off da shelf, but fail miserably!! I can't even find customer suggestion catagories to submit suggestions when I am in a particular website!!!
They must not want to give us what we want!!!
Just dis past weekend, I rented 10 adult videos. 5 uv dem wuz quite good, and u know me, I judge dem based on their nutshots!!! Datz y I don't like watching videos wit Lee Stone, Evan Stone, Marco Banderas, Talon, Mark Ashley, Davis or Woods... cuz all they want to do is shove their dicks in a woman's mouth and cum on their face!!! I am so sick of that... it's unbelievable!!
I was watching a scene on a Jazz Duro DVD called ASSCHEEK FREAKS, where he was fucking a brazilian chick and you can tell she had some GOOOOOOOOD pussy, because after he couldn't take anymore, he pulled out and was rubbing his dick right on top of her pussy lips at the same time shooting WUT you would call the BIGGEST nut all over her like a volcano blew!!! I mean it got everywhere, on her face, armpits, boobs, stomach, pussy, hair, some got on the floor, some got on the pillow, some got on her hair... That told me I need to go look for this woman cuz she must got some tiiiiiiiight pussy!!! I mean she looked like she had cumfetti all over her!!! THAT IS A REAL NUTSHOT, NOT THAT OTHER BULLSHIT!!!
|
11-25-07 08:56pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
Pinche Kankun (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Khan :
Oh so webmasters DO observe what we talk about here!! In that case, do they give a care when I or anybody with the same mentality as I have, discuss the want for more body nutshots?!
|
11-25-07 09:06pm
Reply To Message
|
11
|
Homegirl (Disabled)
|
No minor children ever come to my house.
|
05-30-20 07:20am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
