| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
901
|
Little Lupe
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Denner's Reply)
I miss the look of the original Little Lupe but I do enjoy her new work. At least it's hardcore.
|
10-12-09 06:56am
|
Reply
902
|
Little Lupe
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from pat362:
I don't think that little Lupe is still active. It's a little vague on which came first Zulediy or Little Lupe. Now she calls herself Lupe Fuentes and she's a contract star for Teravisions studio's.
I beleive they are working on a new website for her but I wouldn't hold my breath on when it will be launched. I miss Little Lupe because the new bolt on's are rather large for a petite frane likes her's.
|
10-12-09 06:24am
|
Reply
903
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from JBDICK:
(Denner's Reply)
Hi Denner
is there an easy way to find out if a site is updating regularly...apart from them telling you. I just wondered whether the fact that google indexes sites, there must be a way that google can tell you how much they have to update in terms of statistics or is there another service that we PU could use...
This would be an invaluable information and can swing joining up...like you say...nothing worse than joining only to find that the site hasn't changed...i recently did this with LittleLupe.com...very disappointed. If she had a real regular site she would be worth millions...
|
04-27-08 01:25pm
|
Reply
904
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from exotics4me:
Sorry about that. For some reason, I really liked the site. Maybe I am having glam-burnout? My wife couldn't believe I liked it. It reminded me of Sapphic Erotica in a way. Very playful models. I also like FTV for the same reasons, I like to see that the models are having fun and into it. Another thing that may have boosted my review was that I'm a big Sarah Blake fan, and finding b/g of her isn't easy. Also, the model Ramona, she doesn't have a lot of fully nude content.
The sets I liked the best were the ones that Alex, the helper or photographer got involved. Seems like the first time I ever watched porn, I thought to myself, "Why doesn't the photographer get turned on?" it gave the site a real feel to it.
Again, sorry that you didn't like it as well. My newest joins have been back on the glam side where I seem to do much better in my reviews with. No offense taken at all.
|
09-10-07 12:42am
|
Reply
905
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(Denner's Reply)
Hey Denner, I'm going to review Little Mutt later today. I have really enjoyed the site. My only real letdown was that I thought it was all amateurs, but I know a few of the models aren't amateurs. Ramona who has been on FTV and in several hardcore movies and Peaches, the dark haired, tall gorgeous model who is on every Euro site. The videos are looking good for me 640x480. I will give more details in my review, but overall, it has made a good impression with me. The staff on the site are very nice too.
|
08-23-07 07:53am
|
Reply
906
|
Lizzie Secret
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks, 'bro. It is kind of funny how I went into more detail about the 5 videos than I did about the 263 photosets. Well, those progress slowly and the soundtracks are fine if you like total peace and quiet ... ;)
This site was a "stumble upon." I couldn't find it mentioned anywhere at Eva's Garden, but maybe I missed it. I can't say that they make it obvious.
|
04-23-11 01:43pm
|
Reply
907
|
Louis De Mirabert
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from turismo:
(Denner's Reply)
I prefer CC bill, never had a problem, and nice and easy to cancel subscriptions, I have had problems with other billing companies, especially when it comes to 3 day trials
|
09-02-07 01:54pm
|
Reply
908
|
Louis De Mirabert
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Drooler:
I visited. One thing that really stands out as a negative for me is the lack of light. I guess that Monsieur Mirabert is an expert at working the shadows and low light, which is fine if you like that kind of artistic approach.
But I want to see things with the lumens turned up.
|
09-01-07 04:29am
|
Reply
909
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from nostromo:
Come on, Denner! Wasn't the world a better place when there were scores like this in action movies...?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrLe54pyN...&feature=related
Thanks for making me remember such a fabulous score!
|
06-22-11 08:36am
|
Reply
910
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from TheRizzo:
(Denner's Reply)
Yeah I like when people post experiences like this. Its nice to get the pros of a site but also learn about the bad ones too. I do feel terrible for the people that get screwed around though for me not to.
|
09-23-08 07:11pm
|
Reply
911
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from TheRizzo:
Glad it worked out Denner. I am not sure if I would want my password restored or a refund after dealing with a site like that. But one thing I agree with you about is that CCBill is usally very good in dealing with issues like that. I always try and use them as my biller when I am given the option to choose.
|
09-23-08 09:51am
|
Reply
912
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Me, too. It's bullshit with a capital "S."
|
02-11-08 12:24pm
|
Reply
913
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Monahan:
Denner,
Sorry to hear that. So far the P U commentary suggested that this was a good site with an interest in high standards, including their business practics. Their pricing in sensible and their samples are efective. (I plan to try LSG after I've checked out FTV throroughly and have written a comprehensive review.)
The noton that you can pull a stunt like that suggests that the webmaster doesn't expect to maintain any loyalty even with the discounted price for renewing members.
I suspect that our friends in the business will discover how lousy practices like this really are. The old story in business is, if you make one customer happy, one person knows. If you make one person unhappy, five people know. If you make one person REALLY unhappy 25 people know.
Add to that if you piss off a P U member enough, it may result in "hasta la vista, baby" for the site itself.
|
10-13-07 01:06pm
|
Reply
914
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
Maybe we should change the phrase from "shilling" to "payola"!
|
09-02-07 06:01pm
|
Reply
915
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Well, as the saying goes, "Everyone has their price." If I could do as I wished for weekend with, say, Marina/Euphrat at LSG models, I'd hand out out 100 point reviews with no shame at all!
|
09-02-07 09:26am
|
Reply
916
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
I've been "approached," by e-mail, from various sites offering me free access and asking me to do this or that regarding my posts about their sites.
They haven't directly asked me to show any bias in my views, but the I think the implicit "understandings" have been there.
I've changed my e-mail preferences to keep sites from contacting me away from the posts that appear on PornUsers.
These "offers" are the kind of thing that could very easily undermine credibility here, to where one wouldn't be sure about reviews even by an established reviewer. It wouldn't take long for it to get out of hand.
And for all I know, maybe it has already started to.
|
09-02-07 08:42am
|
Reply
917
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
So, can we be expecting some "100% can't think of any negatives" reviews to be popping up here soon?
|
08-29-07 07:24pm
|
Reply
918
|
Lusted
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from DpornGuy:
(Denner's Reply)
I crunched, its been on my wish list for too long.
review coming in afew days!
|
04-13-11 08:35am
|
Reply
919
|
Lusted
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from DpornGuy:
(Denner's Reply)
did you ever got for it in the end denner?
|
04-12-11 03:44am
|
Reply
920
|
Lusted
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Spencer:
Hey Denner,
I took a quick look over the review again, and it looked like I mentioned that about 25% of the videos are in HD (the more recent ones) in the site details column. Even then, the HD quality wasn't top-notch, though it did look better than the SD videos of course.
I hope that helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.
|
01-07-10 09:16am
|
Reply
921
|
Lusted
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
I've put in my nomination for it. Let's see those vids of Tanner Mayes and Eden! (If they're good quality, of course.)
|
12-16-09 11:16am
|
Reply
922
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from badandy400:
(Denner's Reply)
Well now I cant comment on the 60s or even the 70s, but I do agree. Although, I have not "told the people" much lately. I have been working on a larger network.
I like it so much more I can say that a site is great or it sucks. There is now afterthought there. But the network I am working on now....I just dont know...grrr.
Hey man, keep these types of warnings coming....they save people money and frustration. I do not regret joining M&B previously, but I do not think I could justify to myself to do it again. Others I can not wait to rejoin, like Twistys an Sapphics. Good stuff.
|
04-24-08 11:27am
|
Reply
923
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(Denner's Reply)
That is what I have been thinking so far. I always recieve these update emails from them and they always show some damn fine looking women, so it has been a little tempting. I just do not want to spend THAT much money for their stuff. I am actually wondering if then the TBP reviewers looked around the site they missed the part out the extra charge for the zips. Nothing against them though, it took me a bit to figure everything out and I was looking for that specifically and they are not honest enough to mention this fee during the tour...at least that I noticed.
I believe I will stick to my gut feeling, and your advise, and spend my porn dollars elsewhere. Thanks Denner
|
04-24-08 10:20am
|
Reply
924
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
OK, I got who the blond, palm-tree hugging former PMOM was: Victoria Fuller.
|
02-20-08 03:22pm
|
Reply
925
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
Even exotics4me, who gave them an 80 last July, was lamenting the fact that their pics aren't "hi-rez." Their 1067s are too small to cut it anymore without at least 1600px available, too.
Actually, they did have a larger size of one of the models, at least at one time. Can't remember her name now, but she was a blond former Playboy playmate. She was hugging a palm tree, and the pics were somewhere in the 1400-1600px range. I'm just pointing out that they did, so they could, but they haven't, and I s'pose they won't.
I think Lonnie is quite deeply into nude modeling retirement by now. On her own site, she was starting to look a bit, well, less fresh and less trim. She was one of those killer gorgeous girls who came ahead of the times of better systems, bandwidth, pics and vids, and demanding users like ourselves on PU.
And then there's Linda O'Neil, Neriah Davis, Nikky Nova (before the garish tatoo all over her back, though she's still hot!), and ... I shouldn'a gotten started ...
Anyway, when I get an M&B newsletter, it goes straight into the bin. I doubt they'll ever change.
|
02-20-08 03:07pm
|
