I agree that the new format 21st Sextury is using is confusing, but they have improved it some. I went through the whole process of finding the site that had the most sites I wanted with it. I didn't realize it is much easier than I thought it was. Here is how you do it.
Go to a site on their network that you are interested in. Click "Full Network" once that opens up, look over at your right, you will see a dropdown box, if you click it and scroll down, it lists all the sites you get instant access to. If you keep scrolling it will tell you the order you get the loyalty sites, 2 per month that you stay as a member.
You can also look just above the samples and it now tells you how many sites you get instantly by number and how many loyalty sites you can get.
I joined through zoliboy and got 35 sites instant access, including this one, Lezbo Honeys, Footsie Babes, Sweet Sophie Moone, Playful Hands about 8 sites that are really good, the other 27 are okay at best. Still, with 8 really good sites for $30, that became a good deal for me. On a side note, the ones that looked to have the worst bonus sites were Club Sandy and Pix and Video.
Ooops I'm so sorry I didn't realise yours hadn't been up long, an oversight I really am sorry. Maybe I could contact them and ask for my review to be put on hold for a while.
They have good photos there though. And a good bonus site with "The Dicksuckers".
However, as hard as they try, they still have trouble controlling the males.
Thanks Denner, I joined this site on your recommendation and have not been disappointed. I think you forgot a con though---no zip files. And you're right about the navigation needing a lot of improvement.
But it's a good site.
This is definitely Eve Angel, and definitely non-exclusive content. I haven't joined the site, but I have seen the DVDs they have been selling in Hotmovies, called "Marina Mendoza Volume 1"-"Marina Mendoza Volume 9", and I knew most of the videos, if not all. In fact, in one of the movies "Marina" appearse signing a t-shirt for a fan, and she signs it as "Eve Angel". That's goofy. :)
Hey Denner, as a longtime fan of Eve, I visited this site on a trial a few weeks ago. The content is from Eve's site and from her licensed content that appears on Twistys and a few other sites. I may be wrong, but my understanding according to the guys at her official site, she has retired. I'm guessing she got married. I had noticed that a lot of her newest material, she had a very large wedding ring on and several of her last sets were in a wedding dress and wedding lingerie. Her official site hasn't updated in over a month now, and that I know of, she hasn't had any new material surface on any sites, the newest I have seen is on Sweet Eva on the Teen Dreams Network, and she has lightened her hair color in it, still dark, but it has a light brown look to it now.
Some of the stuff looks "Eve Angelish," but that doesn't mean it's the same.
I see they've come up with a clever way around the pop-up blocker. You click "close" (or cntrl-w) and you get a box with two choices, "OK" or "Cancel." Either way, you get the pop-up, which is for other porn.
I am confused. I have never been apprised of a download limit for this site and today my IP was blocked until tomorrow because of bandwith usage. There is nothing on the site indicating bandwith usage limits.
While I am not a fan of the navigation, the quality of the wmvs, or the puny pics, I did like the cheap price to look at amateur talent.
But how the heck is any site worth it when the block you with no notice. Even Reality Kings has let the reviewers and the users know that their is a limit and I can't stand Reality Kings.
""I don't get it. From a users point of view - how can you guys at TBP honor this site with an average of 90,8?"
The answer to this question is The Best Porn and all the other review sites that rate Matt's Models so highly, review hundreds if not *thousands* of sites. That's their JOB.
They've seen the good, the bad, the rip offs, fraud and everything under the sun. They know they're business. They have an unbiased perspective.
They rate Matt's Models comparatively & objectively to the entire scope of adult pay sites on the net.
They don't base their reviews on a handful of sites they might have joined, a technical problem, personal taste, or the temperament of the owner :)
Here, here! I don't get that 90.8 either. The folks at TBP have explained why, but you know, I still just don't get it.
I do wonder if Matt himself is reading this stuff. I've just gone through some of his exchanges with some other people who've been critical of his site. He tends to take a rather hard tone with them! He really trashed Mudman's review, for instance. I think it says a lot about the guy (Matt, I mean). Talk about having a chip on the shoulder! Whew!
I won't be rejoining it anyway. I just don't care for the one thing about it that matters most: the quality of the content. And no Matt, should you be reading this, I won't go into detail to support that statement. Wouldn't be worth my time. If you don't get it by now, what difference would it make?
The concept that Matt's "couldn't be better" is patently absurd, so getting 4 90s completely discredits EVERY ONE of TBP's reviews. They should consider what these deal's are doing to the integrity of their site. A good review site MUST be detached from doing business with the sites they are reviewing. While getting special deals for their readers is a good thing, the price they pay: the believability of their reviews, might be a bad financial move in the long run. They should learn a lesson from Rodney.
I see your point about the differences of opinion about Matt's once I start remembering how some other sites get a wide range of scores and comments, too, either here or across the spectrum of adult review sites. People can really vary in tastes ... and also in experience (a-hem). And sometimes it might even be their motives.
And I'm with you about being disappointed. The quality at Matts ... it's time for that to improve consistently, especially in the lighting and image clarity. I've had enough of that kind of "amateur" shtick.
My last membership, which was recent, terminated a week short of the subscription time, but you know what? I didn't even bother dealing with it. Just didn't think it would be worth the trouble.
Pretty lame and unrespectful towards the girls to suppose them to give a shit about ... not much to say about something connected with personal taste and impression.
Actually, I'll have to say that the last time I was at the site (a few months ago), they'd at least solved their sluggish server problem.
As for the vids, I tried one or two and they were a bore to me, as usual.
The photos were a mixed bag. Some I found exciting of girls like Gwen and Thalia and Judith Fox and Lorena.
But the site does have an annoying tendency to present the girls in a "distant" way that I don't like.
I join every now and then after several months hoping to pick up some sweetness amidst all of the ho-hum, "so what" posing. And I agree that in spite of its strengths (volume, navigation, and speed), the site doesn't make it into the '90's.
If the models don't seem to give a shit, why should the user?
Yeah, I just made a summary statement in the review that there's too much "detached" posing -- what jd1961 coined as "JC Penny poses" because the models sometimes seem like mannequins. That's the lack of sensuality that you're talking about.
It really is a fundamental problem with the site, I think. I'd just like there to be more personality and a sense of "being with" coming through. Some of models like Susana Spears, Marketa, and Marina/Euprhat put it out pretty nicely, but that's because they're naturals at it -- so it seems to me. But they are among the exceptions!
More and more sites now offer only streaming videos. They are trying to protect their content.
It's not fair of course and I hope not all sites finally move on streaming only.
Hey Denner, the video files I have from Teen Brazil look pretty good, the specs on the videos look better than the actual videos though. The properties on the video files I have say 720 high end 2000+ bitrate, which should be near perfect, but they aren't. I would rate the video quality maybe a 7 on a 10 scale, though the video content, the girls and action are really great. I still have every video that I downloaded from Teen Brazil, which is rare. I usually delete some or put them on DVDs, but I still have every episode on my hard drive. I remember liking the Mega Pass network, but it was mainly for the Brazil/Latina sites they have.
There's a preview of Monika Vesela from a set that's been around for years. The preview doesn't show much, and the design is pretty quick 'n dirty. And "hi-rez" gets pushed up the nose with no definition. Been there, seen that enough.
It's claim of "amateur" is nonsense, I see a set of Teagan Presley that is from New Sensations. It looks like recycled material, maybe licensed from somewhere.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
