| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1501
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I keep all kinds of hours, but no time is the wrong time for porn, imHo.
But with you and BadAndy400 I do agree: There needs to be more QUALITY in EXCLUSIVE softcore sites. Some of the stuff that's come out more or less recently, like SuperNiceGirls and SweetAndNude have nice, big pics, but what's with this shooting the women in so much darkness? SuperNiceGirls is especially a noctural site at any hour! WTF!
Besides, I can NEVER get enough of good, quality softcore solo material that presents the women as craving a good booty-side rootin'.
|
06-11-09 02:56am
|
Reply
1502
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Staying up a bit late are we lk2fireone? :) I guess I can not say much, it is 4:15 AM here. Boy do I need to get a life (job)!
I agree with you on that as well. Those are a little more prevalent than many of the fetish sites, but certainly can not touch hardcore.
I guess the point is that everyone needs to take it upon themselves to make their stuff better. I would not say that major niches like hardcore necessarily need more sites, but they like all others need to make what the have better.
|
06-11-09 01:16am
|
Reply
1503
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
There is some great lloking girls there. Their media quality has gone up a good bit not too long ago. You will find some nice looking pictures and videos there, and plenty of them. They also had a $10 retention offer when I was there, so something to keep in mind if you join but want to stick around longer than one month.
|
06-09-09 08:27pm
|
Reply
1504
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from PinkPanther:
In this case, other PU members haven't expressed a similar opinion because you're just plain wrong!
Hopefully, you recognize that I'm kidding - well, to a certain extent anyway.
You're certainly entitled to your opinion but the refreshing thing about Femjoy is the unsullied beauty of their models - they look great and their photography is very high quality and there aren't very many sites around where gorgeous women are shown without TOO MUCH make-up or too much photo-shopping, so Femjoy is filling a niche that is underserved. They would be fools to reverse course and stop filling that niche. In my opinion.
|
06-08-09 06:31pm
|
Reply
1505
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from GCode:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
When creating these polls, you only get 6 slots for answers to your poll. So, when making polls, you are sometimes limited to which answers you can put in. Usually when I make these, I want to put an 'other' option in or even more responses. However, for this particular poll, I also wanted to address these other options as well, so I did not want to leave any of these responses out :(
|
05-28-09 09:30am
|
Reply
1506
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Goldfish:
If you look at the PU page again it looks like it's $29.96 for one month recurring and $39.96 non-recurring.
I'm currently a member of one of youngporn.net's sister sites, 18 Only Girls. It's a good network.
|
05-27-09 06:24pm
|
Reply
1507
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I've recently rejoined and while there are still those "take nothing off" photosets, sometimes they can be useful as aperitifs to the nude ones.
I did have to spend about 7 months away before I felt like rejoining.
One girl there who really hit me like a laser was the blond Shaina, who finally, in the third photoset, gets naked. (The first works as an intro.) She's just really sexy!
And most of the time now, at least, those older non-exclusives are just history and the newer stuff really is new. (One exception is Dona in the kitchen, set 06, which originally was at either TeenCharms or TeenStarsMagazine. But at least it's higher quality images this time.)
|
05-26-09 04:38pm
|
Reply
1508
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from asmith12:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
> your own opinions should be included.
ESPECIALLY your own opinions.
|
05-22-09 12:06am
|
Reply
1509
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from monty2222:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Heh, I started getting a strange deja vu feeling while browsing the Sapphic reviews. ;-)
|
05-21-09 11:39am
|
Reply
1510
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from jbgild:
Regarding DRM on Hustler:
So the webmaster says they are free of DRM?
Well how come they show this text when you DL a scene:
"Mac users can view WMV files with Flip for Mac but cannot view downloads.
Downloads will play as long as your site membership is active. You'll be prompted for your Username and Password every few days for security reasons."
Joined the site today and so far it's been nothing but trouble trouble trouble. Logging in..waiting for www.hustler.com..waiting for everything...and then white screen...nada.
Finally got to dl a scene. The speed is incredible! 35-75 kb/sec!!!!
On a fast site I can dl with 2.5 MB/sec!
I should have listened to the warnings, and so should you. Steer away from the Hustler sites!
|
05-18-09 10:37am
|
Reply
1511
|
Sugar Paradise
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from atrapat:
I suppose you're aware that TBP has numerical data from 09/2008 and info on video resolutions (74 photo shoots and 40 videos).
I'm not a member but all the Last-Modified headers for image updates on the home page are from the same date on 11/2008. It doesn't necessarily mean there haven't been more updates since then: it could simply happen that they haven't changed the tour for a while.
I found some samples following the webmasters link on the home page and going to the news section.
|
05-15-09 01:46pm
|
Reply
1512
|
Virtual 3D Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wittyguy:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yeah, the dudes on the preview page are pretty over the top in comparison to the girls who are only mostly over the top :) If this type of animation gets better and they can start making movies the only job pornstars are going to have is doing the 'screaming O' voice overs while leaving us pervs with a completely warped sense of reality.
|
05-14-09 11:40am
|
Reply
1513
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Jeffrey99:
I agree, I'd love to give the site a try but there is jut no way in todays market that I'm spending $34.95 for one site. Unfortunately, I have yet to be able to find a discount from anywhere.
|
05-14-09 09:21am
|
Reply
1514
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Mr Fountain:
if you join through pornclubcard.com; you can collect points and then cash in your points at a later time for a free membership.
MPL studios is currently worth 175 points on their site.
you will have to go to the site and learn for yourself how it works; but I've cashed in my points for a membership and it worked.
|
05-14-09 09:17am
|
Reply
1515
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from PinkPanther:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
All true - and the quality downloads from this site are the best I've found - I don't know, 15 gb limits doesn't seem like it's some crazy draconian restrictions to me so it's hard for me to go along with the outrage about them. I never had a problem when I was a member and I'll probably join this site again someday.
|
05-12-09 06:32pm
|
Reply
1516
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from mbaya:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Both of you make some good points. I was reacting emotionally, because I usually try out a download manager whenever I get to a big site. I could see myself innocently doing what I always do and then getting banned from the site. This warning is not at all easy to find without reading a lot of fine print. With my warning and the two of you adding your opinions of the site, it is a lot more helpful for any casual PUer what is going on here. At the price, I am still uncertain if I want to spend that much on a site that is not part of a network.
|
05-12-09 02:09pm
|
Reply
1517
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Drooler:
I've had that "no confirmation e-mail" with ccbill myself with another site.
Basically, whenever I sign up with a site at ccbill, I always save the subscription number so that I can look up the site at ccbill using my email and that subscription number. They don't always list every subscription, as they used to, findable just with email and credit card number.
|
05-11-09 12:49pm
|
Reply
1518
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from turboshaft:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
"Community standards" can be an extremely dangerous defense, and it can also be blamed for making a lot of American porn only come from one or two places in the entire country (southern Florida being one of them).
These sacred "standards" -- if that even means anything -- could vary greatly from community to community, and could apply to all sorts of material in porn. What if interracial is frowned upon? How about MILF porn, or anything that involves models that vary greatly in age? Hell, why not ban material if the producers don't use energy efficient lighting or recycle properly? If anything might possibly offend anyone at anytime for any reason whatsoever just make it illegal!
|
05-10-09 07:58pm
|
Reply
1519
|
Ambya
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
It is a good question. I watched one of Stephanie Sage from Ambya that was 4 and half minutes long and found myself skipping through, not because of boredom but just interest in what all would be shown and how. ;)
Thought it was a nice, complete show.
Maybe those 2-3 minute softcore vids would suffice, but it's a tough call. The numbers don't "look" long enough, so that's why I put it in the con's, trying to tap into the "ether" of the Great Porn Users' Spirit of Consensus.
As for the over-30 women, I actually prefer the ones that are now young enough to be my daughters. HEH-heh-heh-heh ...
|
05-10-09 08:56am
|
Reply
1520
|
Premium Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nostromo:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks a bunch for your suggestions lk2fireone.
I've used another browser -Firefox, although they recommend to use IE- and I've refreshed the page a great number of times to no avail before i initially posted.
I wrote multiple times to ccbill and they replied that they have no problem whatsoever when logging in this site. My US ans PW are okay. So, with very good manners, they told me to shut up.
From my brother's PC i pushed the site's members entrance button and we couldn't see anything before or above the access key blank.
CCbill is everywhere, and if i reject a charge from them i don't know how would that affect my future plans to join sites, since they run 40% of them. It could be a bad move.
Thanks a lot lk2fireone.
|
05-10-09 07:00am
|
Reply
1521
|
Ambya
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Khan:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
lk2fireone said: "Maybe you could make that a poll question."
It was a poll question. See the poll ...
In your opinion, what is the "ideal" Full Scene video clip length?
|
05-10-09 06:28am
|
Reply
1522
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Jeffrey99:
I completely agree with your review. I also signed up for the $5 access but just didn't really feel like writing a review. The site wasn't even worth my time for that. :)
|
05-10-09 06:23am
|
Reply
1523
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I started out with pics finding them more erotic than videos. Here at least you didn't have to listen to some male idiot conducting an "interview" in a condescending or contemptuous manner but I really have a hard time finding a good picture site that caters to my taste. Anilos comes close but they are too young, not in age of the models, but as a site.
AllOver30 isn't too bad either but last time I subscribed there would be days when I didn't download a single update because there seemed to be the same formulaic way of doing things at work as there is with videos. The female gets nude too quickly!! I want the tease factor brought back!
|
05-09-09 01:38pm
|
Reply
1524
|
Sardax
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Mr Fountain:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I took a look at those sites. Franzetta is very much dark fantasy. I haven't looked at enough of his work to see where hes coming from. I'll have to take a more in depth look at their sites when I have the time. I don't really buy art- never have up to this point- very expensive for one thing. Though I do like giantess art; where beautiful women are big scale and hold small scale men in the palm of their hands. Its the combination of beauty of the drawing of the female Mistress; and the truth that these women can be powerful with their beauty over men. Making men kiss their feet and humiliate themselves and do things for them. Sardax depicts that in his art drawings. womanworship.co.uk depicts that in picures- though I haven't been a member of their site; Nanshakh.com depicts beautiful women with male slaves serving them in at least some of his drawings. I haven't really been a member or a buyer of femdom sites. Though, after Sardax; I am probably going to check out his site.
|
05-03-09 10:00pm
|
Reply
1525
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yes. Another way of putting it: spin. There's nothing that the spin masters can't "spin" one way or another. Kerry actually SERVED in Vietnam; Bush did the National Guard. Then came the "Swift Boat" group ...
|
04-27-09 12:31pm
|
