| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1476
|
Silverstone DVD
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Denner:
Have not been at the site for some time (almost a year) - but I've read this fine review - and one question still pops up:
Quality of videoclips.
"You are not getting super high quality clips, but you are getting good quality clips"
Use to have a load of clips from this site in the archives, but deleted all. No problem with most scenes, but the "quality" has been rather mediocre: milky, blurred ect.
Has it grown better lately concerning the viewing-quality?
|
07-01-09 07:41am
|
Reply
1477
|
Lovely Lizzy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from james4096:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I have joined sites like this and still will on occasion. They can be frustrating though. On one hand the girl has to be good looking enough for you to be willing to pay to see her clothed. But on the other hand if you think a woman is that attractive, that means you really, really want to see her naked.
I don't know. Some people just enjoy the tease.
|
07-01-09 04:33am
|
Reply
1478
|
Body In Mind
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Drooler:
I'd say it's probably worth a month's subscription at $19.99 for someone who's never joined before. There's enough content buildup of exclusive material for that.
Each time before you download a photoset, you have to click this button that you agree not to post the material elsewhere. That's a small nuisance.
I've been pretty satisfied with the stuff of Claudia O (Orsi), Marketa Belonoha, Yvette Blanche, etc.
But there are some sets that are too dark, have blurriness, etc. -- the usual occasional letdowns with photosets.
|
06-27-09 05:08pm
|
Reply
1479
|
Purrfect Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from jd1961:
As I recall, lots of non nudity here. I still have lots of sets of clothing, but it was a long time ago so I can't speak to what's in there now.
Nice looking girl though.
|
06-25-09 12:06pm
|
Reply
1480
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from turboshaft:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for posting the link to the thread.
I still can't believe they see this site as explicit, since, at least as far as I know, they shoot girl-only content -- which technically isn't even hardcore -- and it is not exactly "hard" girl-girl or solo girl content at that.
|
06-23-09 11:33pm
|
Reply
1481
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Denner:
Awesome review ...
Just from reading this, I consider a rejoin.
AND -BTW - the site still got Silvia Saint as a bonus site - with great newer solo-videos - and of course a lot of the old hc/bg - videos.
Still a lot of the stuff here (videos) tends to be of a quality thats not really up-to-date for 2009 - more crisp stuff, here - please.
|
06-23-09 02:59pm
|
Reply
1482
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Veev:
For your feedback:
"The title name for the first one is: "18 year Olds Love Cum #02 - Scene 7"
The title name for the second one is: "Eight Teen Tryouts #09 - Scene 3"
We have an excel sheet of all the compilations. I can send them to you so you check it out.
|
06-22-09 08:09am
|
Reply
1483
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from hakan:
Not so easy to sign from Europe. Joined yesterday but still no access. Mail to support, no answer.
Hakan in Sweden
|
06-22-09 07:11am
|
Reply
1484
|
Curry Creampie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from ace of aces:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
thanks, i tried it...hope there will be no problem with that membership. and really you were in the spammail :)
|
06-21-09 06:35am
|
Reply
1485
|
Curry Creampie
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from ace of aces:
thanks for youre comment. think i will try that site later one out.
|
06-19-09 09:01am
|
Reply
1486
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from artnoir:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yeah, I'm still hoping to find a site that will blow my mind, but so far it looks grim...
|
06-18-09 04:23pm
|
Reply
1487
|
CL Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
You bring up a good point. The site is part of a network that does have some nudity and even insertions, so this restriction it mentions is apparently self imposed. Is this site porn? In my opinion, I don't think so either. However it is listed on TBP. This makes me wonder what standards TBP has regarding non nude sites being listed.
|
06-18-09 09:30am
|
Reply
1488
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from wiild1:
Yeah I got that offer too and signed up:
http://www.devilsfilm.com/promo/2009/dvdbox
I got this through mail as a previous member of DVDBox, but it seems to be open for all.
|
06-18-09 08:23am
|
Reply
1489
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Mr Fountain:
Femjoy, I admit, does takes my breath away with their beautiful models and elegant interior sets; and dramatic/gorgeous outdoor shoots. I also like that they are showing more lingerie in their sets insted of nudity. I didn't think I'd gasp at something so simple and plain but I do- great buy for 2 for 1; Femjoy has some beautiful models and sets.
I got what you have to say about Met Art. Though, I wish their resolution from set to set was more consistent. Some have nine MP pixels; others are much higher. otherwise- I agree. though both offer different qualities.
the opposite of Femjoy I can think of is watch4beauty very erotic- artistic/ erotic- I loved that site
|
06-16-09 07:11am
|
Reply
1490
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Great, thorough review, lk - while you put your opinion out there, as you should, you also gave a ton of info so anybody that is interested in the site should be able to have a lot to help them decide whether or not it's worth joining.
|
06-15-09 07:00pm
|
Reply
1491
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from mbaya:
Excellent review. Thanks for all the information and the comparison that gives your review some context.
|
06-15-09 05:25am
|
Reply
1492
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from bruce987:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Great idea.
I would like to hear from someone at Hustler that can indicate in a clear and specific way
what the number of latest updates have been made in 2009 and what is the normal update sequence.
Also, some of the latest movies are only steaming. I overlooked this but would like to know
why some are and some are not.
Thank you,
Bruce
|
06-14-09 06:11pm
|
Reply
1493
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from bruce987:
I've been looking around the various teen sites and have decided to check out some of the teen sites that have just been reviewed. The one that peaked my interest is 8TeenWorld which has 100's of movies and feeds to Barley Legal from Hustler. After reviewing the content which I have seen elsewhere, I'm thinking of rejoining Hustler again. But the only reason I joined was that they got rid of the DRM which was varified before I joined by Hustler. So to make sure, I went to my movie collection and several months later was able to play all the movies I selected at random. Guess the DRM has been removed and I can say that my movies are playing. What I don't know if they added enough movies to join again. That's the only concern I have.
|
06-14-09 05:28pm
|
Reply
1494
|
Curry Creampie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I forgot that not everyone obsesses over whether a picture is landscape or portrait. Imagine an ordinary piece of paper, let's say 8 x 11." If the 8" side forms the bottom of the picture that's portrait, if the 11" side forms the bottom then it is landscape. It's not really a question of anyone having to lie down, sometimes the model is actually smaller because the surroundings the set was shot in take up space but I like my wide screen filled from corner to corner. I find it more esthetically pleasing than having bars on either side of the picture. Of course, ideally, the model will be in a prone position, take up the whole picture and give me a nice detailed view without my having to scroll. :-)
|
06-13-09 03:56pm
|
Reply
1495
|
Curry Creampie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I am not usually the "teen glamor" type but enjoyed "Nubiles" despite my preference for more mature women. What's even more astounding is the fact that I'm tempted to subscribe to "Only Cuties" (some negative remarks make me hesitate a bit) so I must be starting to soften when it comes to certain niches and our tastes are starting to match ... well, in certain areas! :-) Same as I am gradually getting used to "shaved." That would have been unthinkable a year ago!
When it comes to "White Ghetto" I did enjoy the fact that so many sites catered to that which is different, same reason why I loved "American Vice" and ignored Silverstone while I was a member. Who knows if my tastes keep changing I might re-subscribe one of these days just for that site.
There have been other changes as well, the biggest change has been from my preference for pictures to a liking of videos as well even though I am not a hard core fan and most videos are.
My last few subscriptions to some of the ATK sites cured me of being a picture lover only because everything they presented seemed so repetitious with only the faces changing. Then there was also the fact that the portrait style seems to be preferred to landscape by so many. I hated the fact that high resolution pictures either had to be scrolled from head to toe or squeezed into the height of the desktop.
That practically drove me into the arms of the video places. :-)
PS. Almost forgot your question: No, I think the sites you discovered within the network are pretty well it when it comes to young women.
|
06-13-09 12:59pm
|
Reply
1496
|
Curry Creampie
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from messmer:
I just got finished subscribing to the network for one month and was pleased with my membership. I would not keep the subscription going any longer than a month because the updates are a bit of a shell game.
I subscribed to "White Ghetto" (see my review) and found that the daily updates were quite often on my hard drive already through another site of the network. But because it is so different in so many ways (glamor lovers forget it) it is still one of the best I've come across ... if you like different. I downloaded a disproportionate amount of material, more than from many other sites combined and to me the $ 14.95 for the month were almost a steal.
|
06-13-09 10:18am
|
Reply
1497
|
Naked Closet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from badandy400:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
In my email to them I did not mention TBP. I pretty much never do mention TBP in correspondences with websites. I mentioned them here because they have the same price displayed as the sign up page did and it was on the same day that TBP posted that site.
You are correct about the length of the trial. I knew it was two days when going into this, and it does not change anything here. I did not check on the duration of the trial before responding since that is not the part in question.
I sent them one email with everything in it, including quotes of the pricing. Also a request for a refund of the difference. I have no issues with paying the $14.95, since that is what I had expected to pay anyway.
Hopefully they are decent about it, I am still sorting out my last credit card issue!
|
06-12-09 04:15pm
|
Reply
1498
|
Naked Closet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I mention TBP because that is where I first seen the price, and it was on their update for that day.
I signed up for a 3 day trial to see if I liked it or if they had anything good. TBP showed that the site would rebill at $14.95 and the site said the same thing on the sign up page. TBP is not to blame because I seen the same thing they did.
The deal here worked just like any other trial. After a few days access it recurs at what ever the recur amount should be. Since the sign up page stated that the 30 membership for $24.95 or the trial for $4.95 would recur at $14.95 I thought it seemed like a decent deal.
TBP got their information from the same place I did, the sign up page. The issue is that is not what they charge. They have another set for rules listed in the customer service page. Of course a person usually only goes to this page AFTER having a problem, not before.
The point is that they advertise one price up front, and they charge based off a price that is displayed somewhere other than the sign up page.
As for me, my trial rebilled at the higher amount. Not the amount shown on the sign up page. So in effect I was billed $10 more than I had expected for the additional 30 days.
|
06-12-09 11:31am
|
Reply
1499
|
DVD Rack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Hi, lk2fireone, I don't think I am exceeding anything because the next scene down or the preceding one or the next video downloads happily, albeit slowly. Thanks for the welcome back!!
PS. I have had loads of trials along with all my fellow PUs and usually in connection with "bargain" sites. As my wife's aunt used to say: "You get what you pay for!" :-)
|
06-11-09 08:12am
|
Reply
1500
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Might as well call it "SuperNightGirls."
|
06-11-09 04:19am
|
