| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1526
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from james4096:
I think an average score of 73 with the DRM was too kind. I never wrote a review or even gave hustler a score, but I'll tell you this, When I first logged in and I realized they had DRM, I canceled and never went back. I probably would have scored them a 51. I was left with nothing from that site. I still have a few videos from even from my lowest scoring sites. DRM, and download caps(especially ridiculously low ones) are total deal breakers. The site probably does deserves low 80's like TBP gave 'em now that they got rid of DRM.
|
04-27-09 10:36am
|
Reply
1527
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Jay G:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
You're absolutely right.
|
04-27-09 09:01am
|
Reply
1528
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Jay G:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
You are so right about Big Brother's ability to watch. There's no hiding if he wants to know everything you do.
Fortunately, Bush and his buddies were incompetent and really only interested in giving their cronies lots of money (Haliburton, etc.).
They said all the right words for the Taliban-like Christian Evangelicals, but outside of burning a few witches at the stake, they were only interested in their own greed.
Fortunately, even though our form of the Taliban (Christian Evangelical preachers) controls talk radio and cable, real life goes on and they can't prosecute every single person who breaks their "moral" code since that's more than half of America (non-Evangelical Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Muslims, non-believers, etc.) including probably the majority of their Evangelical followers who still fornicate and watch porn in secret.
|
04-27-09 08:06am
|
Reply
1529
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Right you are lk2fireone
I think Ken makes it clear when he says, "I am posting this for the People at Porn Access:" ,, who in this case, uses the handle "Stinger"
|
04-25-09 11:45am
|
Reply
1530
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from GCode:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yeah I have seen lots of paintings plus stories and heard of plenty of cultures participating in adrongyny type escapades with no strong protests (that we know of) in past and even present. Plus, during those times it was probably just make up and outfitss that made them look more feminine, so the confusion has to skyrocket with hormone usage and fake titties and so on! (But I also hear a lot of reports of man-boy love going on in the past a lot too also...errr..shudder....yuck). I've come to think of my attraction as something that only exists in my fantasy realm of porn that I could only be attracted to on a tv or computer screen. I have a feeling if I ever met a real life tranny (even the hotter looking ones), the attraction would'nt be there. I think it's like the actual confusion aspect that 'how can this be a man once' or something that initiates my fetish for them (I haven't really thought about it much). Plus, I remember seeing shemale content when I was younger and being downright disgusted by it, so it's quite weird to even myself that I find them attractive now. However, I can tell you that no she male can ever be just hands down sexy as a women with a great bod n' face spreading her snatch in front of ya!!! Also, maybe, I'm becoming more and more of a perv as I get older or something and that's it.... :)
|
04-20-09 03:58pm
|
Reply
1531
|
Blue Fantasies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks, but no luck with either - got to be them - well - there's a lot of other stuff to browse - in the meantime....lol
|
04-18-09 01:56pm
|
Reply
1532
|
First Sex Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
He does not have sex in many of the videos. I can't really say why. As to the pain level, I didn't think that was a factor here. The sex was in my opinion, standard gonzo type, often not on a good angle so it was not as closeup as in some videos I have seen. Thanks for the nice words as I feel appreciated to hear them.
|
04-08-09 12:28pm
|
Reply
1533
|
Perfect 10
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from messmer:
Nothing much to recommend this site, is there? Thanks for the comment!
|
04-01-09 06:42pm
|
Reply
1534
|
Perfect 10
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from james4096:
Like I said I do believe the site is being updated. The pictures have dates on them dated and I did see updates from this year.
When, how often and where to find the latest photos on the site? I don't know. It's all laid out alphabetically by model not by latest update.
It's a shame. It wouldn't be difficult to make that site work.
maybe Xororos can shed some more light on things.
|
04-01-09 12:55pm
|
Reply
1535
|
Perfect 10
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Denner:
Good questions!!!!
The preview is absolutely worthless - a shame because there seems to be some fine models here.
Untill now this user will settle with the two reviews - and that's a no join...a 65 and a 59 - AND according to the details/facts in those reviews it's hard to disagree....
Still it's got a 81 at TBP - confused? I am...
|
04-01-09 09:33am
|
Reply
1536
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
The page loads fine for me. All images load and when I click the covers, they load in a new window.
So yes, you may want to check your end or perhaps try a different browser because the site is working as it should. Clearing your temporary internet files is always a good place to start.
Good luck sorting it out.
|
03-31-09 07:38am
|
Reply
1537
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Goldfish:
Seems to be working now.
|
03-31-09 03:31am
|
Reply
1538
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jay G:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
http://xhamster.com/
http://www.m90.org/
http://www.porntube.com/
Quality is often poor, streaming often sucks, but if you go through lots of stuff you can find interesting free stuff.
|
03-27-09 04:59am
|
Reply
1539
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Khan:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
actually, the quote was from pat362's previous post ... but your pun is accurate.
For those not aware... (from Wikipedia)
Sic is a Latin word meaning "thus", "so", "as such", or "just as that". In writing, it is placed within square brackets and usually italicized—[sic]—to indicate that an incorrect or unusual spelling
|
03-25-09 07:15pm
|
Reply
1540
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Wittyguy:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I prefer to think of it as bad porn. They sucker you in, rip you off and take your money to pay royalties to the producers who left long ago after turning in their worthless turd productions.
|
03-18-09 10:22pm
|
Reply
1541
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Jay G:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
"Obscene" is a good word for the AIG thing. It really represents what's been going on in most of the biggest Wall Street entities in the last couple of decades where the store managers (CEO's, top execs) get to take as much money from the cash register as they want and put it in their pockets whether the store is making money or not. The stock holders get ripped off for years before someone realizes it's too often a POnzi scheme.
Also, these people really believe they're the only few hundred people in the USA who can run a company, so they deserve hundreds of millions while they cheat workers out of health care, etc., even if the company is losing money.
This is not pornography which is good. It's obscenity which is bad.
|
03-18-09 03:09am
|
Reply
1542
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from TalonIcefire:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
figure that's a combination of rape and greed...
|
03-18-09 02:27am
|
Reply
1543
|
My Sexy Kittens
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Khan:
|
03-15-09 11:44am
|
Reply
1544
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from atrapat:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Enter this in the Google search box:
site:pornusers.com "Avg Site Rating"
It's pretty simple: you limit the search to a specific site and search for a unique string. As a bonus, in this case I got all the information I wanted in the description right at the results page.
|
03-15-09 02:46am
|
Reply
1545
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from GCode:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Great decision by Khan and thanks for letting me know.
-GCode
|
03-12-09 07:46pm
|
Reply
1546
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Tree Rodent:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Look at the top of the page. He has a talkback badge. It's under "Khan PU Staff."
|
03-12-09 07:26pm
|
Reply
1547
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Khan:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
RE: Trust Rating
haha ... funny one guys. Actually it's just a fluke that it even offers a trust rating for staffers. You'll note the badges don't show on my profile. Still, I appreciate the vote of confidence.
Oh, and TheSquirrel, just be sure to leave a reason if you cast a negative vote. BTW, you do know who typically approves the no trust ratings, right? ;) But I promise, if you cast a no trust vote and leave a reason, I'll apply the same loose standard to that as I would if you were casting it for anyone else.
|
03-12-09 07:25pm
|
Reply
1548
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Tree Rodent:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
As a natural subversive with an evil sense of humour I was tempted to press the "no" button. But the poor old bugger doesn't deserve it.
|
03-12-09 07:19pm
|
Reply
1549
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from enigma:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Hi lk2fireone!
Thank you for your answer. I hope I could at least correct the problem with my "10-12 memberships" in 4 years. ;-) You are right, my native language is german and it seems this makes my English not as clear as I hoped it is.
When I write my next review I hope I can make it more comprehensible.
Thanks again and all the best!
|
03-12-09 04:55am
|
Reply
1550
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from turboshaft:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I agree with Ik2fireone here; I start reading PU more than daily newspaper. At least PU doesn't tell me what hot new pill I should take, or what new "crisis" or "epidemic" to worry about.
|
02-27-09 06:12pm
|
