| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
526
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Denner:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks, RB
Some of these files in DVD is as close to "crisp" as I've seen at VB... SO: it can be done.
|
03-08-08 08:44am
|
Reply
527
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Hey RB
My PC works just fine - I have several/hundreds of absolutely crisp fullscreen videos on my HD.
At Videobox I've in this term of membership downloaded some 5-6 clips i both DVD and highresolution (ex. a couple of clips with Alexis Love) There's hardly any difference in quality - and certainly not compared to the file-sizes. The same goes for some older stuff - ok I may find some better quality along the way...
Still I haven't found the upgrade worth the money.
Do you have any examples were there's really a difference, please let me know...
|
03-08-08 12:25am
|
Reply
528
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Hum... I think I remember saying that about the perfect score. I do understand your point though, and it is very valid. However, keep in mind that I said that I score it at 100 because it is perfect for ME. You may have scored it differently. Please do not take me as a jerk for saying this, but please reread my posts and you will find answers to most questions you might have about my reasoning. Also, this is the ONLY site I give this high of a rating to. I love Brazzers, but I give them a 90 for reasons stated, although perhaps not perfectly.
Consider this: If a site is viewed as the best, than is it not perfect when compared to its competition? On what I have seen of other sites this is the most perfect site yet. Again, if I find something better I will drop my score, but until then it must stand, for me that is.
|
03-02-08 03:14pm
|
Reply
529
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from xxrrtt:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I use Nero for burning divx files (which is what they have at Videosz). It works perfectly for everything else I burn, and has for years, for every site I've ever belonged to.
And it's great because you can burn divx files as data discs, so there's no compression and you can fit about five movies on one disc.
There's just "something" about Videosz files that don't burn correctly.
I wish some magic wizard could swoop down and explain to me what might be going on, but I don't think that's going to happen.
|
07-20-09 03:09pm
|
Reply
530
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from xxrrtt:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah, you're right. I didn't think that through. I'm just bummed that I can't use the site. I'll do what I can to revise my score.
|
07-20-09 07:50am
|
Reply
531
|
Vintage Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jd1961:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Sorry it took so long,I've been away.
The watermark is on the bottom right hand corner, it's not too big,it's the site's address---however, many have no watermark at all. This site is kind of like going back to 1982 and entering a massive porn warehouse! It is impossible to get through this site; yet i can't quit because I'm finding the most amazing stuff.
|
01-12-10 08:29pm
|
Reply
532
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
It does work just as he said. If you download it you get to try it out, it works like a tour page with movie downloads that do not show the how movie. I will tell you though that you cant move the girl around the screen and it can get in the way at times. It also sucks system resources, sometimes a little too much. Personally I have had a lot of problems with my copy of it. I have had to redownload it a few times. It is pretty cool, but it sucks that once you cancel you lose anything you did not pay extra for....so it is find like a DRM movie, you lose it unless you pay more. The concept it cool, but they should let us keep the stuff that is downloaded in my opinion.
|
03-27-08 10:45am
|
Reply
533
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Celine:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Of course you need to understand what you will get BEFORE spending money, this is why I suggested you to download VirtuagirlHD, because it is free, you pay only to get nudity )
:-P
Celine
|
01-15-08 01:35am
|
Reply
534
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Celine:
Hi there, Celine here, from VirtuagirlHD :-P
The best way to understand it is to download it )
Cheers
Celine
|
01-14-08 07:07am
|
Reply
535
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from jd1961:
I ran out of space, so I'll explain more fully here. You download the free software that plays the virtual girl, then register at the site. You can just get dances (trailers) of the girls for free, but they're short non nude and tame. If you join, it's $14.95. While a member, you get a girl every day (of their choice). But you can "buy" a girl that you can keep forever. The price is $1-$3. They have the girls indexed, with all their dances for you to browse.You get her right away and you keep her. The daily updates expire when your membershp does I believe. About the videos and photos. At the site you have a profile which will show your collection of girls. Each girl has a set of photos/vids for each performance. You can download the sets from those in your collection. If you want the sets from girls not in your collection, you have to wait until she arrives, or buy her. Today I received another Eufrat. So you get 30/31 girls a month, that will expire with your membership, and you may buy girls for a few dollars that stay with you forever.
|
12-02-07 06:06pm
|
Reply
536
|
Voyeur Russian
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from WeeWillyWinky:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Foolish me. I just noticed a disclaimer on the bottom of the page at this site, and I quote:
"All the models on the site are consenting, know they are being filmed, and it is all staged for entertainment purposes."
|
01-25-10 06:29pm
|
Reply
537
|
Voyeur Russian
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from Denner:
Damn fine review here, RB - in spite of the cons it really looks like worth a try....
|
01-04-10 06:16am
|
Reply
538
|
Voyeur Russian
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from lk2fireone:
This is a minor point that is probably too minor for most people to pay any attention to; but, in the "preview" amateur free gallery, there are 6 photos of a cute blonde girl. I saw one of the photos years ago, never saw a full set.
Cute girl, stuck in my memory.
My quibble is that the photoset (of 6 photos) is dated 05 Nov 2009.
I wish the sites would be more clear or accurate about these dates. 05 Nov 2009 is probably when the 6 photos were posted on the site. But the photos themselves were taken years ago, because, like I say, I saw one of the photos of that set (partial set?) years ago, and have seen that same photo many times since.
I'm also a little disappointed that the quality of the photos isn't higher (better definition or resolution). I wonder if maybe the site is deliberately offering a lower-resolution picture to add to the "amateur" or "reality" effect.
These are just quibbles on my part. Easily ignored.
|
01-03-10 03:45pm
|
Reply
539
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Zoltan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks for the wonderful compliments! :)
I don't think you should expect too many more reviews from me though, as this is the only site I've been a member of over the past six months, and don't intend to join another site in the near future, as I'm quite happy with this site, as you would have figured out...
|
03-18-13 07:24am
|
Reply
540
|
Wax Punishment
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from JBean:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
DivX Player: This file dose not appear to contain a video track
Windows media: nothing happens.
A total of 27 .avi movies
4 not work
23 of them work
|
08-27-09 12:58am
|
Reply
541
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Basil:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
My pleasure RB ;)
|
03-17-13 11:43pm
|
Reply
542
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Basil:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Hello RB,
Thanks for your warm words and yes, you're absolutely right - we're still miles away from perfection but working hard to get there. You're not the only person with such complaints/requests and for us it's a matter of breaking "odd" habits of our photographers that were formed over the years of their shooting and as you may understand it's not that easy to do so.
So far we've got rid of many bad photographers and working hard with remaining to get the best content ever. It's a very long and painful process but I hope that you'll see the improvements soon.
Thanks for rejoining guys and all the best in 2012!
Basil
|
01-02-12 03:45pm
|
Reply
543
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Capn:
Welcome back, RB, good to have you around again! :0)
As you say the site has grown and has many positives, most importantly the 'can do' attitude shown by Basil.
For my tastes, there is still far to much 'touchy, feely' & toy play.
Clear, full body nude shots are still unfortunately way underused.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-02-12 12:24am
|
Reply
544
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Basil:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Cheers RB ;)
|
03-27-10 03:36pm
|
Reply
545
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Basil:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
We don't have any secrets and do not hide what's we got - you can always see all the content on tour ;)
I'd say in few months numbers will change, you'd see much better ratio ;) Just give us some time ;)
|
03-27-10 03:08pm
|
Reply
546
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Basil:
Just wanted to make clear that we don't count non-nude interviews as a proper update and it always comes out as BONUS (3rd update). Also, the video quality will be drastically increased next week - we'll be offering 2 mbit flash movies with 1 mbit option, so users of hi-speed connections would be able to get max of them ;)
Basil
|
03-27-10 01:36pm
|
Reply
547
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Considering how new this site is, the site has a large amount of content. And the update rate is extremely strong.
Besides, video fans are a breed apart. Photo fans are the ones who are constantly thinking. :)
|
03-27-10 10:13am
|
Reply
548
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Capn:
Yes, the weighting is very much towards photosets.
Non the worse for that IMO ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-27-10 09:57am
|
Reply
549
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from messmer:
The way this site is set up is as if the webmaster had gone to all the other sites, saw what they were doing wrong as well as what they were doing right, and then took what was right and improved upon it. It is indeed easy to get around and I love the tour because it lets you check out so many things others refuse to show unless you join first.
|
03-20-10 09:22am
|
Reply
550
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Basil:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I see you know, we're already working on implementing personal settings for each member and I can put this feature on our list.
With download speeds I've contacted hosting's support and we're working on this as well. I will get back to you as soon as I get any info on it.
Thank you,
WeAreHairy.com Basil
|
03-20-10 03:46am
|
