Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : RagingBuddhist (0)  

Feedback:   All (1009)  |   Reviews (43)  |   Comments (112)  |   Replies (854)

Other:   Replies Received (577)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 551-575 of 577 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
551
Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Review from Basil:

Hello RagingBuddhist,

First of all thanks a lof for the great review ;) Won't talk a lot about pros as they are quite obvious so I'll go straight to cons:

- For image quality you set it once in the beginning of each set and once you're in the picture viewer you don't have to change it for each picture. If it doesn't work for you please drop me an email with what you do and I'll be happy to investigate this further for you
- They are slow because files are big (around 2 mb each) and browsers aren't using more than 1 http thread compared to download managers that's why you can't take full advantage of your connection speed.
- We're working on this, we'll have some asian-american models to be added to the site soon, I'm also talking to photographers about ebony models ;)
- We're trying to make splashscreen as short as it's possible, to my mind it's only 2-3 seconds and contains title of the movie so it'd better to know what movie is it.

The good news are that we're keeping the same pace with additions of new content, also you'll be amazed with new flash movies - they'll be released soon, quality is outstanding (I'd say twice better than what we have now) and members with good internet connection speed would be able to appreciate new quality and guys own slow connections will continue to enjoy current quality of the movies.

Once again, thanks a lot for your review!

Basil


03-20-10  01:18am

Reply
552
Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from messmer: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

"No tattoos, piercings, fake tits or shaving sounds good to me too - but, unfortunately, I don't see it happening tomorrow."

I'm afraid you're right, RB. A lot of wishful thinking on my part.


02-05-10  12:27pm

Reply
553
Visit Wet And Pissy

Wet And Pissy
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from critic: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

No, that's close to the procedure I would use too. I'm just a bit tired having done so much work to identify what I've unloaded already.


Thanks for all the input and good words!


04-07-13  08:32am

Reply
554
Visit Wet And Pissy

Wet And Pissy
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from critic: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Thanks, RB-

I do use a bulk renaming app (A Better Finder Rename) all the time. But with all the other research and renaming that has to be done to WAP's files and folders after downloads, renaming the image files themselves is just one more nail in the coffin. The vido files are so inconsistently named that bulk renaming doesn't really work: it has to be done manually.

THE FILES AND FOLDERS SHOULD BE NAMED PROPERLY FROM THE SITE.

As to VLC: I stopped using it a few years ago. If I remember correctly, it was because it kept losing prefs across updates. Again, if I remember, I had to enter custom prefs to get arrow-keys to serve for video FF/REW/SKIP functions; it was a lot of work and after VLC trashed that work I stopped bothering to use it. Again: this was years ago and I may not be remembering correctly.

The wmv files have 1440 horiz. resolution: better than HD video, and enough for me. They also save a bit of drive space, which accumulates.


04-07-13  05:55am

Reply
555
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(0)
REPLY TO #7 from lk2fireone: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

An Irish Budda? The hat is for St. Patrick?
Your avatar has really changed over the years.
Somewhat frightening at first, but now almost friendly.
I'm hoping that reflects the change in your inner life. Lol.


03-05-13  12:20pm

Reply
556
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Review from lk2fireone:

Great review. Fine overview, and lots of nice details.

03-05-13  11:44am

Reply
557
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Denner: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Funny, strange, weird...and then again not: got the same feeling: been a member of quite a few sites, lately - and the same sites as earlier....but how can you repeat or even update a review without getting bored....?

03-04-13  05:54am

Reply
558
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Review from Denner:

Excellent review, RB. There seems to be some time between reviews from "we, ol' timers" here at PU - but this one seems to prove: better a few great ones, than "a lot of useless ones". And btw: I enjoyed the way you parted up bottom line - and it makes a fine, long review easier to read/overlook....this site could - also easily - be my next. Thanks.

03-04-13  05:17am

Reply
559
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Review from gaypornolover:

Superb review of what sounds like a superb site - I wish other sites would do something about watermarks - I knocked off 5 points for intrusive watermarks on my last review!

03-03-13  06:29pm

Reply
560
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Monahan: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Update. Wayne, the webmaster saw my post in the Wet And Pissy comments on PU and provided me his email address on 1 Sept. I responded and he replied saying he would refer the problem to is technical associate. Yesterday, 10 days later and at my suggestion, he provided me a different member name and password which actually worked, which i was rather surprised about.

Meanwhile, I drained all the videos offered on Wet & Pissy while I was waiting.

I will post a review of both sites once I've had a chance to see what Wet & Puffy offers.

First impression is that it's all HD (or damned close to it) and is directly focused on PUSSY as advertised, with all kinds of activities involving PUSSY including pissing, beads, dildoes, bedposts, candles and many other items that can be stuffed inside a PUSSY.


09-12-12  12:48am

Reply
561
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Monahan: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

When I was checking out the preview site for Wet And Pissy it specifically said the other two sites were part of the package and that my logon credentials would provide me with full access. For some strange reason I actually believed it.

That said, I thought about signing up directly with Wet And Puffy, but because the two preview sites were very similar in style and both offered the same deal, I just went ahead and signed up on Wet And Pissy. My mistake.

And with no customer support access, there's no way to resolve the matter.

BTW I've cancelled my membership through CCBill, one day after enrolling. That way I am reasonably sure I won't be rebilled.


08-30-12  08:31am

Reply
562
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from pat362: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

I didn't use a download manager/accelerator so I can't say if it would be faster. Yes, the videos still have that large watermark at the bottom of the screen. It's strange that I hadn't thought about it until you asked me the question. I'll add that to my review since it's can be a fairly big negative for many people.

05-03-10  07:00pm

Reply
563
Visit XL Girls

XL Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #10 from BubbaGump: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Hello Buddhist. Thanks for the feedback. I only have two other sites I belong to so only a couple more reviews to do.

01-17-12  03:28pm

Reply
564
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from mbaya:

There is a big difference between being rude and being wrong. I hope they see that.

11-28-19  09:50am

Reply
565
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from mbaya:

Hey RB,
Most of the time this is the biller. I see one here I don't recognize. I see Epoch and CCBill both of which don't sell information. I also see Netbilling. Is this the one you used?


11-28-19  08:40am

Reply
566
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Yanks: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

I am not ignoring your point. I am disagreeing with it. We are shooting more girls and more masturbation videos in the period 2013-today then we did in past years. So you are not correct in that we are shooting less masturbation videos. We are shooting the same, you just like to cut our update schedule and post it in a way that supports what you are saying. Last time you did this had you gone 1 or 2 updates forward and backward there would have been two more videos, you cut your dates right before and right after.

If you joined last year for a month and then came back this year you would have found 72 new shoots, 144 new orgasms for $19.95. That is $.14 cents per orgasm with supporting content. If that isn't worth it for you. That is fine. I think it is an ok deal.

I am not going to agree with you that our bios, interviews, and photo-sets do not count as content. We will need to agree to disagree.


03-28-17  10:35pm

Reply
567
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Yanks: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Sorry to tangle. I can assure you our updates haven't changed. And I just did tell you your review was wrong, because it is wrong. I have been in this business for 15 years, so I am happy to respond to any "old timer" that would like to discuss our site. Please have them join and we will review the site here. I welcome that.

As for the chart you posted above, you are speaking once again to the specific content you like, this does not represent everyone who likes the site. I am sorry you don't like all updates, others do.

Good day


03-28-17  02:03pm

Reply
568
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from Yanks:

Hello RagingBuddist My response is the same as last year. We do daily updates and have updated in the same manner for over a decade. Your chart shows daily updates and then some. This is what we advertise and this is what we deliver and have delivered for 15 years.

You have a preference for only certain types of video content, that is ok, that is your taste, it is not the taste of all of our customers and it does not dictate to us what is considered content. Many of our customers enjoy the other very unique facets of our sites. Hand written honest biographies and interviews with girls that have only ever appeared on our site do have an appeal to others. Photos appeal to others even if they don't appeal to you. These are things that you cannot find on the free tube sites. All of this is crystal clear on the review of our site on this very site.

I am sorry you are disappointed with a site that has a library spanning 15 years. We have almost 700 amateur girls who each have at least 2 videos of the highest quality we could produce on that date. Almost all of these girls, 99.9% have real orgasms. I am sorry if you want an "orgasm factory" of some sorts. We do things the right way, our girls are hand selected and they are all as promised. Real girls, real orgasms. There are not many sites out there that offer more for the price you can get it here.

We have not changed our pitch to you as a customer. We did not advertise that we increased our video uploads per week. I agree, I think you should be more pissed at yourself for expected something different and then chastising our hard working team for delivering the same quality product we always have at a great price, as advertised. $10 less than you could have bought it for in 2002 BTW.

If you don't want to join again, I am truly sorry, however I am ok with risking not having your money to tell you that your review is wrong and quite frankly rude.

Good day
Todd


03-28-17  10:32am

Reply
569
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Yanks: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Looking at this layed out like this you are correct. Billie is talking to our CMS manager about this now. Our current shooting schedule has not changed. We shoot 6 girls a month (2 masturbation videos with each girl) Any given two week period should than have 5-7 videos depending on the days. I apologize for this. We will figure out where these videos are and what the issue is. Thanks for highlighting in detail.

EDIT: We will also make sure they get added.

Todd


04-08-16  03:10am

Reply
570
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from Yanks:

Hello RagingBuddist As always, we sincerely appreciate your loyalty and your passion for the site. I would however like to clarify our update schedule so that it is more clear for everyone. Our goal is to do daily Yanks.com visual updates, we do this 99.9% of the time.

Biographies do come through as updates because we do want people to know when one has been posted, however they do not count as a "daily update" by our scheduling standards. The same goes for ATK and GOW updates, they also never count as "daily updates" to us. If you look through our update calendar you will see that whenever there is a ATK, BIO or GOW update there is also a Yanks video or Photo-set of some kind.

That being said there are some time anomalies that happen between when the content is released from our servers and content management system and what the local time is on your computer. Daylight savings time also happens at different times around the world which will also bump a set one day ahead or back. Once again if you refer to the calendar you will notice that when the schedule above is not accurate there is an extra Yanks update the day before or the day after that would be realign to our goal according to your time zone.

Our hope is to eventually add 7 high quality video and photo partners like GOW and ATK so that each day there will be a Yanks visual update, a video partner update (full video) and a photo partner update (full HQ set). This in addition to the bios that we release from time to time. That will be 3-4 updates per day with one Yanks visual update daily everyday.

I hope that clarifies the schedule. Thanks again for your loyalty and hope to see you back before a year, however it is not until then we will be more than happy to show you what we have next time we see you.

All the best!

Todd


03-22-16  10:47am

Reply
571
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment from Yanks:

Thanks for noticing RagingBuddist. We have in fact sped up and increased our updates so that we are doing daily Yanks visual updates (pics and vids) along with other updates such as bios and friend site content. In other words there is always something to look at every day. ;)

I am looking forward to what you think of our next members area coming out in a month or two. It will be easy to use, visually appealing and a bit less linear which will make discovery of some of the gems of our past a bit easier. So whether or not you stay the whole time or swing back in, we would welcome your comments on the next layout. :) All the Best!!!

Todd


02-16-16  12:38pm

Reply
572
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from Mort: (RagingBuddhist's Reply)

Great review, and agree with just about everything you have said.
As a further update, about a month after the RagingBuddhist's last comment, there are still a fair few "updates" that are not really updates, and I have just discovered that they have some sort of software running to limit downloads and image viewing. I logged a job about it, and got a reply that says the limit on viewing images is 500 per hour. However, if I worked flat out on my relatively slow connection, there is no way I could hit 500 full size images in an hour. It also complains you are trying to open too many images at once if you pop up images in a tab, even when only one image at a time is downloading. So, beware of the undeclared limits, and the dodgy limit-checking software they are running.


05-19-13  12:57am

Reply
573
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Review from RagingBuddhist:

I'm dropping the score. The updates in the last six days were:
4 biographies - two of them back-to-back
5 photo sets - one of which is a low resolution Girls Out West set
One short non-nude interview
And one full-length video.

If the photo sets were of better quality, this might not be so bad, but they're just not that great. Believe it or not, I'd still recommend the site for a first time join, but after that, it's just not all that.


04-06-13  04:19am

Reply
574
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Review from Cybertoad:



RB, very nice review as always !


04-01-13  08:19am

Reply
575
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Review from Denner:

Thanks, RB - exeptionel review. Never took a look at that site before - but it seems like a good idea.....

03-31-13  09:58am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 551-575 of 577 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.9 seconds.