I thought personally that the score I gave was fair as a gesture towards the fact that the site had stuck to it's niche. The quality beyond that dragged the score down heavily.
Another site I reviewed bore little to zero resemblance to its niche and that got a worse score.
I sure hope so! Because crap porn is getting extremely frustrating! And that's why we have professors... to teach told suckers to know better and to stop believing that this horseshit porn is the greatest!!!
Have you ever had some pussy you just could not fuck fast because it felt so good?! I mean everytime you moved, that pussy brought you closer to releasing your ammo something massive!! It felt like your dick muscles were over-expanding and you either had to stop so the feeling would subside a little or you had to pull out and slap your dickhead around... then when you put it back it there, after about like 10 strokes, the feeling came right again, then the sudsiding process had to be used again!!
I WANT TO SEE MORE AND MORE PORN FLICKS WITH THIS KIND OF FUCKING IN IT... ESPECIALLY YOUNG TEENAGE PORN!!!
Young teenage girls should NOT appear easy to fuck, simply because they have REALLY PRETTY LITTLE BODIES AND REALLY TIGHT LITLE PUSSIES!!! Seeing a man super plowing the shit of some pretty little tight for 30 whole minutes straight without any urge to nut, then pull and still have to jerk off in order to nut... MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO PHUCKING SENSE TO ME WHATSOEVER!!!
I am not even a woman and it offends me to have to witness that this G's up - Ho's down porn makes it appear that these really gorgeous girl's tight little pussies are not having any effect on these guy's dicks!! THAT'S COCKSUCKIN' BULLSHIT, MAN!!!
That why I said they need more hornier unfamiliar guys to fuck these girls because they will actually get urges... and that is what I want to see in porn... girl's bodies covered in nut, not their faces!!
You see the bullshit us porn viewers have to go through just to locate descent porn?! And I'll bet you a few things:
1) The webmaster is on some fucking shit, dude!
2) The webmaster is bi-sexual... if not, he is political (PHUCK POLITICAL PORN, DUDE!)
3) His mentally is probably, "You don't like it, don't watch it!"
The last comment accounts for 90% of todays porn producers and website masters! And to add to that, you have psycho asshole porn customers out on Earth who actually request for this shit! The result is porn consisting of bukkakes, gangbangs, double penetration, toys, abusive or bondage!! Then you have the porn that I am always complaining about... JACK YOUR MEAT OFF THEN CUM ON HER FACE!!!
Oh, and to add more icing to the cake, the asshole is tighter than the pussyhole and you STILL have guys that pull out and have to beat their shit in order to come! What is wrong?! They were not interested in her?! They did not feel anything?! How is that possible?! Man, those guys that get too much pussy, they need to fuck the girl on the "BEHIND THE SCENES", and have the hornier guys fuck them on the regular scenes... or they need to just be producers! I am tryin' to find out how good her pussy is by how hard she makes him shoot his week long load all over her!!! Them muthaphuckas that jacked off before their session or that got some pussy before their session are fuckin' it up for us porn viewers!!
If I did not click on a gay url, I do NOT want to see no gay website, I don't want to see no guy's asshole bouncing up and down on the camera!! STRAIGHT IS FOR STRAIGHT AND GAY IS FOR GAY, and I hate how producers are tryin' to cross that shit over into straight porn!! Bukkakes, double penetration, and gangbangs involve a LOT of dick and guys asses and this shit is occuring way too much... It is not fair!!!
I started watching porn when I was 16. I saw a few flicks when I was like 4 and liked it, but couldn't get into it full blast until I was old enough!! That's when they had the regular fuck some tight pussy until you can't handle it anymore then pull and shot it all over her body!! Now... NO MORE!!
I am here to fight for descent, woman tease the camera for 7 minutes naked, eat pussy, blowjob, fuck her tight hole cowgirl, froggy, missionary, doggie 'til it feels too good, pull and shoot it all over her, naked girl takes a soapy shower to wash it off... porn!! I'll start a friggin' revolution if I have to!! These fuckers can call me what they want, I don't give a damn! The porn world is going to know about me cuz I am going to cause a RUCKUS!! Somebody is gonna join me on this crusade!!
SHIT, sign me up for the next LA EROTICA!!! If they hold a commentary on porn session dude, I am gonna giva a full speech!!! Laugh at me, call me what you want, humiliate me, it won't stop me from letting those producers and webmasters HAVE IT!! My e-mail address is pinchekankun@yahoo.com ... e-mail me and cus me the PHUCK out if you have to!!
Funnily enough I came across this site the other week, thought it looked interesting and bookmarked it as a possible join so I was delighted to see that you had reviewed it and rated it highly. It looks like you can join the network of sites but it's $49.95 for a month as opposed to $24.95 for the single site access.
REPLY TO
#4
from rome476:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I found that I just couldn't download and store all of the good content from the sites I've belonged to, so it's easier for me to do annual memberships to a couple of megasites like VB and then throw in another site for a month once in awhile from which I do some downloading. (I have about 1.8 T of stored downloads.)
I disagree; they have still add new features, keep everything on the site and with the 18 month deal it can't be any cheaper. If you're a porn hound I don't know how you could go without it.
I just got finished with a three months membership to this site with a fourth month thrown in as a bonus. I got this deal at a very attractive price and yet I canceled because of your "Gonzo" factor and the lack of addition of niche contents. So you're right on in your comment. It's a boring run of the mill updates with different models but with basically the same libido numbing action on every damn DVD.
Sadly, I noticed the same trend when subscribing to / or taking a tour in sites like Videosz and American Vice. American Vice used to be my favorite but it's been a long time since I saw a title that catered to something other than Gonzo. Maybe that's what the public wants? :-(
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I can understand people going for cheap but can't understand a high rating for this site, especially since price isn't supposed to influence our judgment. I really believe that my last subscription WAS my last no matter how many DVDs they add on a daily basis because only the titles seem to change. Open any of them and after a while it's ho hum time. Unless you are VERY young! :-)
REPLY TO
#8
from lurifax:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
It was a few years ago when I last was a member to 'videobox'. Hence I am not sure about exactly how it happened.
However, I am sure it was when doing the editing in 'Windows movie maker' and therefore, I believe that it happened in conjunction with dragging the clip into that application.
I may go back to 'videobox' in a couple of months time...
REPLY TO
#7
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I really dont want to agitate you RB, but you gave the site a 97. There is not a lot of differences between a 97 and a 100. Things that some people see as cons I see in a different light. So far this is the only thing I have seen that we disagree on. So I ask you, is a negative trust really necessary. Hell, I even vote for you, and left a nice comment. I am not here to make people mad, it just happened with that review although it should not have. So far you are the only one still biting at it. So out of what, 26 review, I write one that you dont like and even defend it and you still dont trust me? Is there something wrong with my logic on the VB review.
Also, the difference between what you say about me and what I say about other people when they give a 100 or so is that I am willing to retract a negative trust. And, these people are not giving any reason at all why they feel a 100 is warranted. I gave many reasons and explained them. Explained them well I might add.
I understand you dont need to approve my VB review, but check out my others and set aside any differences you might have. Ask yourself "does most of what he is saying about all these site check out?" I really dont want you to think to yourself "what is this asshole saying now" every time you see me post a review or comment!
Sorry for stealing your thread Denner, RB did not have an email link on his personal page, so this seemed like the better way.
REPLY TO
#6
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Okay. I never said I took off from Twistys based on the DVD section. I always believe that more content is better, and if the extra content is junk it should not matter as long as it does not take away from the real content. I just do not see Twistys as a DVD site. Months ago when i was a member there they did not have a huge quantity of DVDs and they were slow coming, so i would rather them put that time into making actual updates. Then Twistys posts a part of a new DVD it counts as the daily update. I would rather see something that I have not seen elsewhere as the daily update.
VB is specifically design for DVDs, so I expect them to post DVDs from external producers. If Twistys posted the DVDs sperately from th normal updates I would not care because it would be considered extra content. Instead they are posting is the daily update making it main content. I would like to see something I could not buy on DVD posted as main site content for the daily update.
It is based on what I expect from the site. I expect DVD updates as the main content from VB, but I expect something brand new from Twistys as the updates. DVDs is just nor their thing. Also, there are other reasons for the difference in score, such as the file names and media quality.
REPLY TO
#4
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I dont mind fake tits, but they need to be within reason. I do much prefer naturals with nice shape, but fake do look very nice when clothing is worn..obviously not the case in porn! Again, this is a personal preference between each user.
Yes, BV does "steal" their stuff. In other words they do not produce it. They just take a bunch of it and put it where we can all get it. When you go to a porn store, assuming you do perhaps you dont, you want to see stuff from Hustler, Zero Tolerance and all the other producers. No one want to go to 12 different sores to shop for porn. VB is like an online porn shop that you pay once a month and watch all you can. Twistys just did not have enough DVDs to do this well. Also, they way the did posted them was one scene every few days or whatever. At VB they post the whole damn thing at once and dont make you search around for the other half of the video.
I hope I have sufficiently "spun" this for you RB. :)
If I have not please let me know and I will dream up something else!
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
What can I say, Brazzers is about big titties and who cares how they got there! They could use some more big naturals I agree, but it is there thing. But it is not really right to compare VB with Brazzers. VB doesnt have to make their stuff, they just steal it from everyone else and put it in one place and try to have so much that new people shit themselves when they see the video count. It is very easy to get a few hard drives full a month from them.
Brazzers makes their stuff and they make what they like. It is a different story when you actually have to film the scene and find the women and averything else involved. I wish brazzers could be bigger and better, but they can not simply insert the DVD they just bought and push the upload button. Do have to give Brazzers credit though, they are 600 GB so far and that is nothing to be ashamed of! But they will never match the amount of content the VB has.
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Can't argue with you about getting your money's worth, RB. Because you do. I would rate the site highly for that alone but it has been taking a lot of sifting on my part during the past two weeks to find some scenes that I found erotically stimulating. Maybe it's just me, after all thousands like the place and not just because of the price. I guess after a while one gets jaded and I seem to have reached that point, at least when it comes to modern American made hardcore.
REPLY TO
#3
from malikstarks:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Not to beat a dead horse, but you know what the funny thing is, the most recent poll running the the Brazzerspass site asks: Which possible site improvement would most influence you to keep your membership? Among the choices are, higher quality video (my choice), more sites (I'm like hell no enough already), and others.
Lo and behold boneheaded users of the site have chosen OVERWHELMINGLY that adding yet more sites would help to keep them a member. Mind you this a network with about 20 sites already, many of which have long since been abandoned, go figure.
REPLY TO
#26
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Then lets have the webmaster delete the option to leave a 100. But then I would give them a 99 because that would then be the perfect score! This is an endless cycle.
Worth noting, any time someone says "Valid but ignored." it throws up an immediate flag saying that "what I am about it say is in ignorance because I am ignoring statements that I myself classify as valid." Please do not take that as a personal attack, I do enjoy this debate.
REPLY TO
#25
from badandy400:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Very nice point! It does make thing more interesting, and I like to play devil's advocate. But I do honestly believe they are the best. Every other site is lacking something as well. Videobox lacks the least at this point. I do promise however that if someone comes along and beats Videobox in my eyes than I WILL adjust my score. If a perfect site does exist, there can not be two, unless they are identical in which case that would be pointless. There is always a best out there. And the best is always the most close to perfection, and therefore would be our closest approximation to perfection. As this site words it...they are looking for approximate perfection.
Also, no one has defeated the logic behind my statements!! :)
REPLY TO
#1
from malikstarks:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I just checked out your review of Brazzers Pass, and I have to admit that you aren't completeley off the mark. For a site that robust both the picture and video content could be better. In comparison, Reality Kings has far superior pic quality, (not quite sure about the vids).
That said I would have given the site a higher rating than a 70, if for no other reason than the sheer volume of content (and most of it at least watchable). I myself am still a member, basically for the loyalty discount of 9.99 a month I can't see quitting. Too many hot pornstars, even if the content IS a bit repetitive and cliche.
03-09-0804:55pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
