REPLY TO
#7
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I agree with this view most of the time, though a good scene doesn't necessarily have to have penetration or any toys...but it certainly doesn't hurt.
Also, I would be inclined to call these scenes girl-girl instead of lesbian as I think there is a significant difference, especially in the target audience being primarily straight (if still pervy) men, not homosexual women. 'Real' lesbian porn tends to be less of a girl-only interpretation of hardcore porn and more of a focus on intimacy and emotion -- and it can still involve toys.
Sorry if you were disappointed and if my review was a little misleading.
I still believe that the content pushes it up because even in the tgp's the content is too mixed and too much fake (ie pornstars)
I've never seen a fake image on here.
the censored versions are older pictures outside the months archive redclouds holds so you need to be a member of funbags.
It's a good couples site I think
Silicone - I do not think Twistys has more models with silicone breasts than the average site 'like this' - european as well as US-sites.
Oh, yes - lots af models with fake boobs - but many with naturals, too - actually quite a lot with 'normal and smaller ones'.
This site has a large variation in models, so most known models are here - including those with silicone....and again a LOT non-exclusive material...
About spam mails from this site - well, I never got any like: 'Hello Former Member' - or alike - though I've been on and off at this site for years - guess I've been lucky, then.
Bottomline: If you never been here, you should try it out - a fair deal through TBP and the amount is incredible. I've been a member A LOT of times, but never more than a month at a time, and then return later - there's got to be a reson for comming back - but ok, RB - I like to watch some of those fakes from time to time...
Silicone is pretty damned common at Twistys. And I've gotten multiple emails within days telling me that they were "sorry" to see me go, even though I hadn't gone.
After a signup to Twistys, I also noticed a big increase in sp%m, tho0gh Ai Knt be syuRr eet ws thru Zem.
REPLY TO
#19
from exotics4me:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Can't say I agree RB. Western Digital has a whole line of externals that are pre-formatted in Fat32 as were the four WD MyBooks I have. Iomega had been shipping from the factory in Fat32 also until the Prestige line came out. It is listed as one of the features on the box, "Now in NTFS out of the box". The Seagate I have also was pre-formatted in Fat32.
There is at least one thread, maybe two, in the forum talking about externals coming pre-formatted in Fat32. Seems like Drooler had a problem a year or so ago with a pre-formatted Fat32. The newest of my WDs was manufactured in March 2009 and it was Fat32 also.
REPLY TO
#11
from Monahan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
They all were FAT32 out of the box. Seagate and WD had software onboard that I copied off then reformatted to NTSF. No problem at all.
IOmega, however, had software that was copyright protected so I could not copy it. The software was not important to me because it was a basic automatic backup utility so I decided to just reformat the drive and lose the software.
But the copy protection apparently blocked the reformat
Actually, they've gotten better with the videos recently. Over the past several months (sorry I can't be more specific), they've been doing entire vids and not segmented clips. They also now have an online viewer, which usually works well, though not always. (I had to give up a couple of times and just download to view.)
854x480 are dimensions I remember from a recent clip I got from there (like a couple of weeks ago). The quality is OK. Not bad, but not 3Mbps, either.
They do video updates twice a week, on Mondays and Thursdays. Each of those days, a few vids come out in the range of 5 to 8 or so.
They don't have nearly as much hardcore as they do softcore masturbation, but they've got like over 450 video update days, which is quite a lot. And you can search for only hardcore vids, if that's what you're interested in.
I was on there back in the summer and have some of their videos from then.
One is of Tanner Mayes, it is split into four separate parts, each part labeled like this tan035MAR_171305001, the second part is the same up to the underscore and changes to _171306001, third part is _171307001, fourth _17130801. The total scene is around 40 minutes long, but the downloaded parts are only 10 minutes each. There aren't any splash screens though. Each part fades out and the following part picks up right where it left off.
They do have some good videos, especially some of the older videos of now well-known models early in their careers, but the older ones are split into as many as 10 parts. About the only way to watch those is to line them up in a row in a media player playlist or else each part in those older ones are only 2-3 minutes each.
The technical quality varies a bit, but of the newer videos I have they are 640 high end with 1,900 bitrate. Occasionally you'll find a HD video that they've licensed from some other site.
From my experience, all of the ATK sites are much better for pictures than videos.
Im glad i logged on to this site today- i was thinking of re-joining as i saw "Cate" & "christen" was back but saw the review of cate and thought oh no they are still "Non nude" videos.
But saw sue ann had posted explaining why, im praying that the back log of rubbish videos are nearly over.
Looks like i shall save my money untill feb and see how things go as i do like abby winters and the non recuring membership suits me, saves so much hastle.
One comment i do wish to add is about all the "Model attractiveness"
i think alot of reviews are very unfair, i love seeing the normal lady and if she is not so pretty but with a nice body and lady bits this makes the experiance even better this to me is what "Amatuer" really means/the girl next door type & i wish that some slightly more chunky girls would show their bodys off, im not meaning LARGE whales but someone with a little puppy fat.
Roll on next year !!!!!!!! ~( If they do upgrade their site )
REPLY TO
#5
from Monahan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
That says what I was about to say.
TBP was my go to site before PU came along anyway, so when I checked it out I really liked it.
I voted interaction, but the no bullshit reviews as well as the occasional posts by webmasters explaining why they do what they do is not available anywhere at all on the internet.
I said before and it bears repeating. PornUsers is the Consumers Reports of porn. The only source for unbiased, real people info and an opportunity to share with others infp about sites, downloading, organizing, etc.
Yeah, you think they'd do something... Like at the least maybe give me complementary access to the sister sites? Nothing. It is renewing users like me that keep them fat and happy.
id join this site if it werent for the 3gb dl limit. i can deal with 10gb, but for a 1st time subscriber, 3gb is absurd. its clear site leechers isnt the reason for the 3gb limit, its so subscribers will have to stay a couple months to get the majority of vids
you try and be clever with the 3gb limit thinking youll force site leechers to stay longer. well guess what, they just wont join AT ALL
As always, thanks for your feedback. It's cutting, clear and honest, which is always good... but it's not entirely fair.
We went through a phase in the middle of this year where our shooters neglected to get some of the most obvious best stuff - lotsa nudity - in favour of other stuff. There is a lag from when we shoot stuff, to when it appears on the site (So, the shoots that are appearing now, were shot in that "dark" period).
We have since fixed that problem, and luckily we're now nearing the end. All the shoots we have shot since are much better, and are already appearing on the site. Soon, we'll be entirely rid of the shoots that lack nudity (of course, then we'll get the equally-agressive feedback that the shoots have too much nudity, an can-we-tone-it-down-a-little-please).
Of course, most of your quotes there select out particular models who do not have much nudity (or more), but totally ignores the other models who have plenty. Our recent "dark period" definitely lowered our average some, but it's not like every single shoot has NO nudity!
Another thing to keep in mind is that not all models are up for the more revealing poses. We respect their choice in this. We try to maintain a mix of explicitness in the updates where ever possible, and historically have a very even balance.
As for model-attractiveness, that's always a a tricky one. We log how much positive and negative feedback we get on models we add to the site, to make sure we're not totally insane. We get consistant results (for example, Mary gets a +1 and a -1). The average is pretty much 0 or higher over any period of time (ie, models get as many positive comments as they do negative. Sometimes a model will get a more positive than negative, other times, a model will get more negative than positive, but mostly, it's 1-for-1, or more positive).
One of the things we do - what our whole site is based on - is to shoot models who are a little left-of-the-middle. We freely admit that not every model will be your personal cup of tea, but we also have a heck of a lot of models - 1000 or so, and at least two newbies each week.
Hope this clears some up, and please always keep the feedback coming - it never falls on deaf ears, and we respond to every email we receive.
Good point/comment here, RB.
Never understood how AW can get a 95 at TBP.
Been a member quite some years ago and NEVER went back.
Those lines above are/seem very accurate - this could well be the most boring site of all in the Top-10 at TBP - Let's get a fresh TBP-review - soon...
REPLY TO
#1
from jaypegged:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I would estimate that about 40% of the models have fake boobies. Not my cup of tea either, but they make up for it in other ways, and it is overall a good site. There are only a few models that are in the 50+ category.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
