| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from mr smut:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
It's Mature Housewives or Furry Housewives (recent example is Erica) if lots of pubes can be seen to be more precise ;-) I've just taken another look at Andie's latest Elegant Ladies update that's more like it! I was happy to see Beata do some jogging. India F with glasses is a stunning 9 to 5 lady.
All in all I'm quite happy and have signed for another 3 months yesterday :-)
But I agree that angel wings are a no-go ... this simply sucks!
Cheers,
Smut
|
01-02-10 11:00pm
|
Reply
302
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Ugh, no I would not say she has a very attractive voice at all. Sorry Drooler, I'm going to have to go with RB on this one. Don't you prefer photos anyway?
|
01-01-10 01:43pm
|
Reply
303
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from GCode:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
No problem brother, I'm always willing to answer stuff that I may have some insight to. I do think it is a good site and I actually scored it quite high myself, but I think we may not share the same tastes. If you have any more questions or want deeper info, I can pull out the external HD that has the sites content on it. I think I have every video and about 1/4 of the photos up to the date of the review I published. Good luck hunting man! I know how hard it is these days with the pickings we have....
|
12-30-09 06:41pm
|
Reply
304
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from GCode:
All the models are quite petite and the fake tits are the minority. However, these models are not as petite as models in maybe ALS Scan. Meaning, the models are usually skinny but smaller tits are not the main concern of the site. While I'd say some of the fake titty models are there, the site rarely shoots models with fake tits that are overwhelmingly big. So, if there is a shoot of a model with fake tits it is probably a model going from A to B or C or B to C but not really over this.
The only thing about the site that is my main concern is the overall routine that each scene gives a feeling of. For instance, I'd say the majority of the scenes (videos) are models going through the motions. Standard strip, masturbate, then orgasm (a lot of theatrics). Plus, the hardcore is your standard girl on bed/couch, man walks in, she sucks his cock, he goes down on her, missionary, doggy, cowgirl, reverse, jack off in her face. Also, the hardcore scenes are a minority here. I'd say about 1/4 of the content unless they have been doing a huge amount of hardcore updates since my membership.
While that may stray you away as it is from what I said, I can say that the videos and photos are at the right quality for this day and age. Plus, the lighting is quite well and the settings are colorful and bright. If you are a photo lover, I know the resolution is high and can be downloading via zip (plus the other sizes). However, I know the watermark is non-intrusive but I don't remember how much they are shopped up.
Plus, as I recall you are a fan of 'keeping the bush' and I do believe most of the models here are highly trimmed or completely bald. Hope some of this helps with your decision.
|
12-30-09 04:49pm
|
Reply
305
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Capn:
( 'Him' is a 'Her' ;0)
Advent is Customer Relations Officer for ATK
She is a very helpful & attentive lady, I have found. )
Whilst not being a Vid Person, I can appreciate your arguments.
That said ATKNH is still primarily a photoset orientated site, thankfully for me, as they do tend to be very much in the minority these days.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-21-09 01:45pm
|
Reply
306
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from anyonebutme:
I used to be a long time reoccurring member of ATK Galleria, but the reduced video quality & split scenes definitely I have not subscribed to them in almost two full years now. That's sad they haven't changed.
I have the software tools to join the files without re-encoding the video, but I fully agree, shouldn't have to do that anymore...
|
12-21-09 12:34pm
|
Reply
307
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
THINK the 'holding back clips' is still on - not a member of any ATK at the moment - but in late summer/fall it was so - have not heard about any improvements here....So it would be great with an update from a webmaster - who by the way was quite fast responding to an earlier input here on he subject....
|
12-21-09 07:52am
|
Reply
308
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Denner:
ATK - all sites - has some good material. But never understood those annoying deals where video-parts are not only spilt up, but 2. 3. or more parts are delayed days or weeks. This is 2009 or almost 10 - so let's get those videos in full/whole files.
Like RB - I'll join again, if they fix that
|
12-21-09 06:12am
|
Reply
309
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from redcreative:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Hi
Thanks for the comments. I agree totally that the site dipped for a while and became a little softcore for some tastes. It's interesting that your comment about my enthusiasm being merited if I was a first-time, i'm not ,but of course my review was written exactly for those people that have not yet been a member of the site and therefore my score of 90 takes into account all of the historical content. The score based on the site over the last 6 months would have been lower.
Incidentally, I think the site has been great the last couple of weeks with some very attractive girls and no softcore frustration.
Hopefully a sign of things to come. :-)
|
12-20-09 11:17am
|
Reply
310
|
Fully Clothed Pissing
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from anyonebutme:
It's because you're buying access to a network of about 10 sites that update weekly, and few more archive sites. I think they put out a good product, it's certainly unique compared to everything else that is out there. Because I'm really only interested in all-girl porn, I keep an eye on their My-fetish site, and buy a subscription just once or twice each year, whenever they get enough scenes up there that I want.
Probably the biggest downside to them is they allow the girls to speak in their native language, so depending on the update they may be speaking in Czech or Hungarian.
Bottom line, for a one month subscription you've got access to a history of hundreds of scenes. While the collection of updates each month may not add up to $45 in value, I'm sure there is more than enough in the archive to make one month more than worth it.
|
12-19-09 09:58pm
|
Reply
311
|
Skin Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
always happy to help where we can.
Glad it worked out ok for you.
|
12-19-09 06:14pm
|
Reply
312
|
Skin Video
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Khan:
I just checked and I am seeing the $9.95 we show in the listing. As well as cookies, make sure you clear your cache (Temporary Internet Files) and then revisit directly from our link.
|
12-19-09 08:22am
|
Reply
313
|
Teen Girlfriends
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from alexmedia:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah, it's getting harder to find quality site without hidden charges :(
|
12-17-09 10:34pm
|
Reply
314
|
Teen Girlfriends
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from alexmedia:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
After you enter you credit card info and click Complete Transaction, they don't show you any login/pass and just redirect you to another page where the only link to "Get Access to MeatMembers" and small description (1 day trial which recur for 39.95) and nothing else. After you click "Get Access to MeatMembers" they redirect you to the same page but with different site, and you have to click "Get Access...." again, only after that they redirect you to member zone.
|
12-17-09 09:57pm
|
Reply
315
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
To be sure, one must go through the full credit card process to sign up, they make it way too easy to join an unwanted site.
|
12-13-09 11:27am
|
Reply
316
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from lk2fireone:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
RB, feel free to talk back to me anytime, even on a wrong button.
|
12-12-09 05:41pm
|
Reply
317
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from big johnny:
brazzers.com are the biggest con artists ever! DO NOT go there! I used to be a loyal and happy member. I canceled my account due to feeling i needed a change. However, their payment processor manstermed.com gave away my card details to its own 'affiliates' who randomly started charging my card!!! I told Brazzers.com this and they didn't give a shit. The content is good but their customer care sucks ass and they're thieves. Join @ your own risk people. (and make sure you use a credit card!)
|
12-12-09 08:02am
|
Reply
318
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Denner:
Strange with this one time pretty ok site - it has now turned into one of the most criticized sites at PU.
Not that I'm a big fan, but still wonder how things turned out his way...
Guess we'll never hear from the site-owners/webmasters. And RB certainly has got a point. Won't even consider to join again..
|
12-11-09 06:44am
|
Reply
319
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Shap:
Regarding Silicone. I don't believe we have a higher than average number of silicone models. We try to book girls that are natural. However as time goes on there are less and less natural girls. We do our best to find the natural ones. As an example 4 of our past 5 treats have been natural and the one that was fake wasn't overly fake. We do our best to find the sexiest girls. Our members prefer natural so obviously we try to get more natural girls ;)
Regarding spam emails. I'll be 100% honest. About 3 years ago we had a problem. The backend software we had was not great and somehow a number of emails were stolen. We never spam anyone. Any spam anyone got was stolen emails. The problem has since been fixed and we have no had any complaints in over a year.
My best advice if you are worried about spam is to have an email account for adult sites only. We are clean but a lot of companies aren't. Protect your personal email ;)
|
12-09-09 12:41pm
|
Reply
320
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Shap:
Hi RagingBuddhist.
Our ex-member mailings can be opted out of. The most important thing for us is creating the best experience possible for our members. The experience starts prior to becoming a member and lasts forever, even after members have canceled.
|
12-09-09 12:36pm
|
Reply
321
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rome476:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I found that I just couldn't download and store all of the good content from the sites I've belonged to, so it's easier for me to do annual memberships to a couple of megasites like VB and then throw in another site for a month once in awhile from which I do some downloading. (I have about 1.8 T of stored downloads.)
|
12-08-09 07:54am
|
Reply
322
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from rome476:
I disagree; they have still add new features, keep everything on the site and with the 18 month deal it can't be any cheaper. If you're a porn hound I don't know how you could go without it.
|
12-07-09 05:31pm
|
Reply
323
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from messmer:
I just got finished with a three months membership to this site with a fourth month thrown in as a bonus. I got this deal at a very attractive price and yet I canceled because of your "Gonzo" factor and the lack of addition of niche contents. So you're right on in your comment. It's a boring run of the mill updates with different models but with basically the same libido numbing action on every damn DVD.
Sadly, I noticed the same trend when subscribing to / or taking a tour in sites like Videosz and American Vice. American Vice used to be my favorite but it's been a long time since I saw a title that catered to something other than Gonzo. Maybe that's what the public wants? :-(
|
12-06-09 08:04am
|
Reply
324
|
Her Sweet Hand
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Denner:
Good hint - that site has always had some decent/fine material - and maybe one of the best in handjobs. Look forward to the review....
|
12-06-09 05:16am
|
Reply
325
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yours is a very fair assessment, RB .. I was a member three times and last time was definitely my last because of the dive the sites had taken. As far as the review goes I think the "cons" are right on!
|
12-04-09 07:02pm
|
