| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from asmith12:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Do you mean that guys from the site members are GETTING PAID for doing it? :-) If yes, it would probably simplify things, though as the guy has paid for the site, to qualify as "getting paid" for it they will likely need to pay ALL of his previous membership dues, PLUS something "extra".
And obviously even then it will depend on specific location GREATLY (California is one thing, Tennessee is another one, and Europe is a different game altogether), which alone is enough for me to re-iterate that personally I still wouldn't risk it.
|
11-13-09 01:35am
|
Reply
352
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from asmith12:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
> I have to ask how you've missed all the comments and reviews about this site...
I didn't really miss them, but there are two reasons why I still wrote this comment:
1. Even after reading reviews, I didn't expect it to be THAT bad.
2. with average PU rating being in 85+ range, I don't think it is yelled loud enough :-).
|
11-13-09 01:24am
|
Reply
353
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from asmith12:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
> If the porn itself isn't illegal, why wouldn't it be legal?
I'm concerned about some *@&^#*!&@ thinking it is "sex for money", a.k.a. prostitution, which is illegal in many (or most) places.
And as it is indeed possible to organize such a site as a cover to brothel (like "pay $500 and you WILL get sex with our 'stars'"), I'm afraid courts in places where prostitution is illegal won't be really excited about it. While there is no precedent, nobody knows for sure, but personally I wouldn't take risk trying it.
|
11-12-09 08:54pm
|
Reply
354
|
Graphis
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from mr smut:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Strange as I haven't seen this mosaic stuff. I've been watching samples for many picture series and haven't seen anything like this but sweet asian pubes instead.
|
11-08-09 10:58am
|
Reply
355
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from NMC2008:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Collecting porn can become obsessive if not handled right, and being obsessed with anything is unhealthy, I will just say this.
I have over 1000 normal porn dvd-r discs(joining rental sites), and then I have over 1000 porn data dvd-rs(joining paysites), that's crazy and expensive, so the less room I have to work with the better imo, but this is just me talkin about me.
|
11-05-09 12:09am
|
Reply
356
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah, it's might nicer than a hobby such as:
1. shoot innocent people with high-powered rifle through hole in trunk of specially adapted "DC Terrorist" car
2. relocate
3. reload
4. repeat
And I said I'd buy a new hard drive. In fact, I'm probably going to get ANOTHER ONE fairly soon. I'll shunt my videos on to that.
I collect mostly pics, and I'm really choosy about them. I already went through months of tossing out old stuff last year. Or was that the year before? Whatever. What's left is primo! It stays!
|
11-04-09 05:56pm
|
Reply
357
|
RedClouds
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from picdude:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks for your nice comments I hope you enjoy the site, I do admit if you are a picture hound you may go through the pictures quickly so If you really enjoy the site then getting the archives access is a worthwhile purchase (huge number of photos though not very well organised (just a ontinuation of the date format in redclouds)
Remember though once you have your RC membership you get a discount on the archives purchase.
I'm not such a fan of homeclips (though admittedly last time i visited that or the archive site was a good while ago but i have a feeling it's not changed a huge amount)
|
11-04-09 03:08am
|
Reply
358
|
Homegrown Video
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Khan:
I checked with an editor and there's really no standard.
They did say that if the watermark is clear (pic able to be seen through it) it tends toward the "medium" specification whereas a big solid watermark would be judged as large.
Hope that helps.
|
10-28-09 02:17pm
|
Reply
359
|
UK Flashers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from bacardiancoke:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I'm glad to be of service!!!!
I thought personally that the score I gave was fair as a gesture towards the fact that the site had stuck to it's niche. The quality beyond that dragged the score down heavily.
Another site I reviewed bore little to zero resemblance to its niche and that got a worse score.
|
10-26-09 06:41am
|
Reply
360
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from james4096:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
No, you're right the entire "review" is biased and written to promote the site. I looked at the heated discussion that went on years ago about this site. You were one of the ones who rightfully opposed the shilling reviews for this site by people who were contributors to the site. Khan allowed it, but I think the link disqualifies this review.
Hopefully the staff here have changed their stance on this type of thing. If you ask me, reviews by people(porn users) who pay for the content is what we do here. Reviews by those that contribute content is not what this place is about.
|
10-18-09 12:14pm
|
Reply
361
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks for the suggestion, but I have the same problem of non-loading thumbs with Opera that I have with Firefox. I rarely use Internet Explorer browser, because I've heard so many complaints about security issues. There are security issues with Firefox and Opera, but I read about them much less often. But that is because Firefox and Opera are used by far less people than Internet Explorer, so the hackers concentrate on the most popular browser (Internet Explorer), and devote less time to hacking the other browsers. But there are security issues with all the major software (browsers, office applications, Adobe software, etc. etc.
If I knew more about PC software, I could probably get my PC to load the thumbnails in Firefox and Opera, but for now, non-loading thumbnails is something I just have to live with at some sites (other sites load the thumbnails with no problem, so it must be related to the server/software at the sites themselves as well as the software settings on my PC.
|
10-18-09 11:04am
|
Reply
362
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from newbielulu:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
No, Sir...just a regular ol'girl whose found a place that I really like and support :)
|
10-18-09 01:52am
|
Reply
363
|
Pornstar.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jd1961:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Come on!
Not being able to share login info is not a con!
That is funny.
|
10-12-09 01:46pm
|
Reply
364
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from ControllingMind:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
LOL Teh internet has just about killed off the porn mag. I remember once buying a newspaper then checking the coast was clear and grabbing a mag. Then about 10 people from out of nowhere piled into the store. Using the newspaper to disguise the mag didn't help because the old trout store assistant purposely held up the mag to read the price.
Yes, if a site is very good, members will stay longer and they will get more custom. If a site gives problems then members will cancel and others won't join. Whatever you pay for, you should get full uninterupted use for that term. Sites don't seem to grasp this though and think people will still join even if they make being a member a more difficult experience.
I'll give allover30 a whirl next instead, never joined them before either.
|
10-09-09 08:47am
|
Reply
365
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from ControllingMind:
The 'problems must be at your end' excuse from the site starts to lose credability, when another member has similar problems.
Hmmm wonder why the two most popular browsers are affected. What about google chrome?
You are losing part of your membership because of this, with no sign of a resolution from the site itself. Two people have been hit and no-one else has posted to say the site works fine. This is a shame, the site does looks great, but I'm not taking any chances here now.
Thanks for the warnings.
|
10-09-09 06:03am
|
Reply
366
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment from RagingBuddhist:
The login issue persists. Giving them the benefit of the doubt and figuring the problem might be on my end, I went ahead with an overdue reinstall of Windows. And I'm right where I was before. I can't get in on Firefox or Internet Explorer. The only way I get access is to install yet another browser - Opera. This still sucks.
|
10-08-09 06:30am
|
Reply
367
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Denner:
Hello again, RB
This is this first site I'm joining for a long time - and yes, got almost the same problems - even tried my ol' Netscape - sometimes it works - sometimes NOT.
Have not yet mailed them, but it won't take long....
Let's all be aware here - get back to you...
And oh, yeah - it sucks
Denner
|
10-06-09 08:18am
|
Reply
368
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from ControllingMind:
I feel your frustration and hope you get this sorted out. I don't understand how your pass/username will work for them but not for you, unless its some kind of I.P ban.
You've been struck by reviewer's curse. Give the site a very good review and look what happens soon after.
Anyway, good luck with this. Please let us know how you get on.
|
10-06-09 08:01am
|
Reply
369
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I would say their update schedule is really only an issue for longtime and regular members because everything else is archived.
|
10-04-09 03:53pm
|
Reply
370
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from turboshaft:
Great review RB!
Pretty close to my score and I have to agree with a lot of your points. The "search" feature is definitely weak, especially considering it only applies to the videos and the photo sets don't necessarily have the same content. The alphabetical order is annoying too, but I like to organize by release date since that is how they are numbered.
I never had any login issues with Firefox, so maybe your browser is the problem? I also love the 1920x1080 videos since that's my monitor's max resolution, so combined with the wide angle lens it can make for some interesting videos.
Lastly, I think the number of girls with implants can be counted on one hand, and breasts really are not the focus of the site, unless they change the "C" from crack to cleavage. My favorite models are generally not these anyway. I like the ones who look like the girl-next-door with a nasty imagination and they usually are quite slim with reasonable proportions.
|
10-04-09 03:51pm
|
Reply
371
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from ControllingMind:
RagingBuddist, are you sure you didn't miss anything out in that review?
I like it, lots of detail.
I'm not too happy about that download speed, but this site is still next on the hit list.
|
10-04-09 08:57am
|
Reply
372
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from mbaya:
I totally agree with your assessment of the photographic style on the site. The closeups come well after a lot of whole body showcasing. This I felt was the perfect combination of whole body and closeups. In the site the closeups were really CLOSE.
|
10-04-09 08:51am
|
Reply
373
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from Drooler:
I've had Firefox remember my login for it, so that it's already typed in when I go to the login page.
My big, really big, gripe with the site is that even though it's an "ass" site, there are almost never any shots of the models cropped from the mid-upper thigh to the top of the head when they're showing off their booties, evenly cheeked. It's either "ass fills the shot" or head to toe.
And I've pointed this out in a polite tone to the site when they were soliciting suggestions. Yet they remain locked in to their habits.
I find it very strange that "ass" sites are usually the worst when it comes to the subject, but that's been my experience.
InTheCrack should have 4000 pixel photos for the high price they charge.
|
10-04-09 03:13am
|
Reply
374
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review from RagingBuddhist:
Here's the layout of the site:
When you first enter the site, you're on the first of six headings - Models, What's New, Searches, FAQ, Contact Us, and Links.
• The models page starts with the last 8 shoots, with a page index for the rest - currently 43 pages of 8 shoots each
• The What's new page gives you 6 large thumbnails of "Coming Soon" and a list of the last dozen and a half shoots.
• Searches, as mentioned above, lets you search by fetish, date, model name or keyword
• The FAQ is kind of weak, although it does start with a cancellation link. It then goes onto briefly talk about video issues, model requests, Mac users and membership options (there are no options)
• Contact us - has (Surprise!) an email link and a CCbill link
• Links has five links to other sites (all nice and out of sight unless you want to see them)
To wrap it up, this site's a keeper. Expensive - and not without some issues, but still one to check out.
|
10-04-09 01:52am
|
Reply
375
|
Pornstar Classics
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from jd1961:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yes, it's on the bottom right hand side.
|
10-01-09 05:15pm
|
