| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Basil:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I see you know, we're already working on implementing personal settings for each member and I can put this feature on our list.
With download speeds I've contacted hosting's support and we're working on this as well. I will get back to you as soon as I get any info on it.
Thank you,
WeAreHairy.com Basil
|
03-20-10 03:46am
|
Reply
277
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from Basil:
Hello RagingBuddhist,
First of all thanks a lof for the great review ;) Won't talk a lot about pros as they are quite obvious so I'll go straight to cons:
- For image quality you set it once in the beginning of each set and once you're in the picture viewer you don't have to change it for each picture. If it doesn't work for you please drop me an email with what you do and I'll be happy to investigate this further for you
- They are slow because files are big (around 2 mb each) and browsers aren't using more than 1 http thread compared to download managers that's why you can't take full advantage of your connection speed.
- We're working on this, we'll have some asian-american models to be added to the site soon, I'm also talking to photographers about ebony models ;)
- We're trying to make splashscreen as short as it's possible, to my mind it's only 2-3 seconds and contains title of the movie so it'd better to know what movie is it.
The good news are that we're keeping the same pace with additions of new content, also you'll be amazed with new flash movies - they'll be released soon, quality is outstanding (I'd say twice better than what we have now) and members with good internet connection speed would be able to appreciate new quality and guys own slow connections will continue to enjoy current quality of the movies.
Once again, thanks a lot for your review!
Basil
|
03-20-10 01:18am
|
Reply
278
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from bacardiancoke:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Though, to be fair, it could have been any number of different reasons.... guess we'll never know what it was that prompted them to choose you.
I get picked on a lot at security, though nearly always in lands foreign to mine. Guess I just have that kind of face......
|
03-17-10 12:00pm
|
Reply
279
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rita52:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Sorry, I know you don't have anything to do with this site. I am new here. I was just responding to what you sent me. Just more info on how messed up the site is
I am very sorry for any inconvience I have caused. Please forgive me.
|
03-13-10 09:06pm
|
Reply
280
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rita52:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Sorry, that is not how is happened at all. While I was on your site on the left hand corner was a link for recomendations. Three to be precise. That's all it said was recommendations so I clicked on one to see what it was. The next thing I saw was this.
rita2052
BrazzersReel - Transaction Details
Transaction ID: 110856248174
Member ID: 286269
Username: rita2052
Password: brava2005
Print Transaction
View Sample!
CHANNEL DESCRIPTION:
Punished 18 - An Exclusive Premium Channel
Fresh, young babes getting a hardcore punishement like they've never had before! Watch their tight, pink, slits get turned inside-out and they're sexy little bodies ravaged by experienced porn perverts!
yes, I want to upgrade and save 50%!
All girls appearing on this website are 18 years or older. Click here for records required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2257 Record Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. By entering this site you swear that you are of legal age in your area to view adult material and that you wish to view such material.
Members Area | Terms and conditions | Epoch | Support
© Copyright 2008
BrazzersReel Tour 1.1.0
I was not asked if I wanted to join the site nor asked for any credit card information. Brazzers had no right to charge my card. I signed up to their site only.
Brazzers also offers a no risk money back guarantee. Its right on the web site. I would like to take advantage of that offer and have my payment refunded as I will not go on either site again for fear of clicking the wrong link and getting charged again.
I hope you don't think I am affraid to file a dispute because of the porn thing because I'm not. I have many times in the past.
Fair exchange no robery. What your site did was very misleading to say the least and is not good business. I will either get a refund or at the very least help put a stop to what you are doing. In the information age there are many ways to get the word out. All I want is what I have comming nothing more nothing less. I have not entered Punished 18 nor will I and I will not go back to Barzzers again either. If I do not get a refund I will warn others of the perils of bacomming a Barzzers member.
|
03-13-10 06:55pm
|
Reply
281
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Monahan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks a million RB.
I use the clunky windows WMV editor. (Or, rather, I once used it but stopped.) The editor was very clumsy and error-prone and the quality of the end product was reduced. So my stash is loaded with great scenes that have a whole lot of crap that I'd like to edit out just as I used to do back in the old VCR videotape days.
I'm doing as Denner is, downloading the trial to make sure it's Monahan-proof.
|
02-22-10 08:37am
|
Reply
282
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Thanks a lot for this ...
I'll go for the trial version first - no matter the watermarks - then I'll get the idea and....
|
02-22-10 07:55am
|
Reply
283
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Hey RB
I was one of the:
'I'd like to but don't know how' ... simplyfied..
My main thing is to edit some maybe 1-1,5 Gb videos and grab a scene that's like 300 Mb and delete the rest - tried some freeware - but it seems to take forever and skipped it...
Is this Tmpgenc 4.0 Express easy to use and does it wotk somewhat fast - if so, guess in the long run the $ 99 is well spend....
|
02-22-10 07:00am
|
Reply
284
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from inthecrack:
Addressing some of your cons....
The collections page is now customizable in that you can sort it by release date, model name (alphabetical), model age, nationality, and shoot location.
There's only 2 out of 383 current videos on the site without audio. It was not a conscious decision to shoot them without audio but in fact an audio screw up. We just released them anyway.
Download speeds: See this thread https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=44350 There may be something relevant to your issues here.
Your login not remembering your password appears to be a browser issue. We have not been able to duplicate that.
Oddly cropped pictures: We don't see how that is a con. The pictures are cropped according to how they work the best. If a shot is originally 2400x1800 (horizontal) and shows a model standing then there's going to be a lot of useless background on the left and right sides. If we can crop it 2200x2200 then the model is going to be larger in the picture with less pixels waisted on useless background. That's a good thing for everyone is it not? Just curious, if a picture is 2200x2200 that would be a bad thing WHY???
|
02-11-10 12:38pm
|
Reply
285
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
"[T]heir ankles up around their ears." Around their ears? Ouch! :0
|
02-05-10 10:45pm
|
Reply
286
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
"No tattoos, piercings, fake tits or shaving sounds good to me too - but, unfortunately, I don't see it happening tomorrow."
I'm afraid you're right, RB. A lot of wishful thinking on my part.
|
02-05-10 12:27pm
|
Reply
287
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from RON B:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
COULDN'T AGREE MORE MY FRIEND LMAO.
|
02-01-10 02:32pm
|
Reply
288
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jd1961:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Ipad. Coming soon.
|
01-31-10 08:45am
|
Reply
289
|
Voyeur Russian
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from WeeWillyWinky:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Foolish me. I just noticed a disclaimer on the bottom of the page at this site, and I quote:
"All the models on the site are consenting, know they are being filmed, and it is all staged for entertainment purposes."
|
01-25-10 06:29pm
|
Reply
290
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Sorry. My misunderstanding.
|
01-24-10 06:19am
|
Reply
291
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Advent:
You can go here to unsubscribe also:
http://www.atknewsletter.com/lists/?p=unsubscribe
|
01-23-10 05:13pm
|
Reply
292
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Advent:
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I will send this to IT right away and find out what it going on. I hate when I "unsubscribe" to something and I still get the stuff. I am sorry I site sent you unwanted emails.
|
01-23-10 04:39pm
|
Reply
293
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Drooler:
For this site, I cancel directly at the billing provider, which should be ccbill or epoch. Never had a problem. I wonder what's going on.
|
01-23-10 02:50pm
|
Reply
294
|
Vintage Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jd1961:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Sorry it took so long,I've been away.
The watermark is on the bottom right hand corner, it's not too big,it's the site's address---however, many have no watermark at all. This site is kind of like going back to 1982 and entering a massive porn warehouse! It is impossible to get through this site; yet i can't quit because I'm finding the most amazing stuff.
|
01-12-10 08:29pm
|
Reply
295
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from WeeWillyWinky:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Ok, disabled it.
File coming in at around 600k with AVG disabled, without download manager (I've never used one), which is on the high end of what I typically get.
|
01-12-10 01:05pm
|
Reply
296
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from WeeWillyWinky:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I will try as you suggest, RB, and let you know how it went.
edit: OK, how do you disable AVG?
|
01-12-10 12:51pm
|
Reply
297
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
"I'm with you on the French maid outfits, although it's not quite as bad as angel wings. If I ever see a woman on this site with angel wings, I'll be absolutely done with it!"
Couldn't be worse than those phony nurses' outfits made of vinyl. :-)
I think I hate all uniforms. School girl outfits (usually worn by mature women) are another pet peeve.
|
01-04-10 03:28pm
|
Reply
298
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
from Advent:
I am so sorry. You caught me on vacation so I have not looked at the site as much as I usually do. Most of you know I am new to ATK so I had to ask what you meant by splitting the clips. I was told that we use to do that but that is no longer the case. I could not believe they use to do that. That must have been terrible having to wait days to see a girl cum. I hope it makes you happy to know that we no longer split clips. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do for you.
|
01-04-10 02:58pm
|
Reply
299
|
Voyeur Russian
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from Denner:
Damn fine review here, RB - in spite of the cons it really looks like worth a try....
|
01-04-10 06:16am
|
Reply
300
|
Voyeur Russian
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
from lk2fireone:
This is a minor point that is probably too minor for most people to pay any attention to; but, in the "preview" amateur free gallery, there are 6 photos of a cute blonde girl. I saw one of the photos years ago, never saw a full set.
Cute girl, stuck in my memory.
My quibble is that the photoset (of 6 photos) is dated 05 Nov 2009.
I wish the sites would be more clear or accurate about these dates. 05 Nov 2009 is probably when the 6 photos were posted on the site. But the photos themselves were taken years ago, because, like I say, I saw one of the photos of that set (partial set?) years ago, and have seen that same photo many times since.
I'm also a little disappointed that the quality of the photos isn't higher (better definition or resolution). I wonder if maybe the site is deliberately offering a lower-resolution picture to add to the "amateur" or "reality" effect.
These are just quibbles on my part. Easily ignored.
|
01-03-10 03:45pm
|
