| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
901
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from rearadmiral:
Interesting review, pat. I'm definitely not in her target market, not being interested in MILFs. But even if I was, the need to download in segments would keep me away. I really don't understand how a webmaster could get a site so wrong.
|
03-07-13 01:33pm
|
Reply
902
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Denner:
Funny, special, interesting to read this review - been a fan of Janet Mason for years - a cute, american milf - no a bit more than that - and that her own site is still alive - it was the site that turned me on a long time ago.
Later and now she's got zillions of material out there - and most of it great - got about 50 or more vids with Janet - love her.
And thanks to pat362 for bringing the site up again - even if it's gone down the drain.
|
03-07-13 07:26am
|
Reply
903
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Cybertoad:
Site like these often exist when the owners have no idea of their target market audience. And is a sign of poor management in my opinion. A site should never charge or charge a high price to get a discount. The result will be huge revenue loss far exceeding what membership brings. My opinion charge 4.99 a month and allow discount. Members will stay members longer and in turn buy more stuff. That's been my side job for over 15 year straightening out misguided businesses.
he looks smokin but I won't join a site with these limits.
|
03-07-13 06:00am
|
Reply
904
|
Jessica Jaymes XXX
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Cybertoad:
(pat362's Reply)
Thank you Pat that helped me out greatly
|
10-17-12 11:49am
|
Reply
905
|
Jim Slip
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from picdude:
Last time I went on seemed they were going for more European girls than British, is this right, is there a lot more Euro girls now?
|
12-24-12 04:52am
|
Reply
906
|
Jim Slip
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from rearadmiral:
I'd never heard of this site before. It looks interesting. A comment from 2010 complained of slow download speeds. Any issues with that?
Is there any anal?
Thanks!
|
12-23-12 07:37pm
|
Reply
907
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Agreed. Another annoying choice is how he splits material between Jules Jordan and The Ass Factory and expects $30 for each of those memberships.
|
08-03-14 10:04am
|
Reply
908
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from jupiter4686:
best site
|
08-12-13 03:19pm
|
Reply
909
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from stingerxxx:
Thanks for a great review Pat. I have been thinking of joining for a long time but have been put off by the high price for this site and the fact that he's split his work into two sites. However, I do like his work but I know there are other gonzo/anal sites that are far, far cheaper and have just as good a content. I'll probably join for a month and then move on.
|
01-20-13 01:19pm
|
Reply
910
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the info, pat. I will probably put off joining here until it is a bit cheaper or I come into some extra cash.
|
01-18-13 08:58pm
|
Reply
911
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from benmar51:
(pat362's Reply)
Hey pat, I was just wondering why you state "I know that I will NEVER join" ass factory. . . .I was a member there last year and thought it had superior content. Is it the fact that the site is new (with a small number of scenes), or the fact that their updates are incredibly slow (Only 25 new scenes were added in the 8+ months since I left them). . . or is there another reason?
|
01-18-13 10:34am
|
Reply
912
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from MiztaBlu:
Thnaks for the review.
I was actually considering joining, but the price compared to what I see that I want (or dont already have) doesnt make it a great deal for me.
Jules Jordan's stuff is very hit or miss for me. The action itself is usually great, but Im not big into anal and other stuff which they do alot of, so thats a down for me.
I dont know...I may give it a try sometime. If it were $10 cheaper I probably wouldve joined already. A $30 price tag for that site seems steep.
|
01-08-13 10:03pm
|
Reply
913
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from slutty:
Nice review, pat.
I have never really considered joining a Jules site, the stuff I have seen of his always seemed a bit too 'hard' for me, but perhaps I should consider it, as most of the recent places I have joined have been pretty disappointing...
|
01-08-13 12:07am
|
Reply
914
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I'll be putting up a review of the other JJ site, The Ass Factory, shortly. I had it ready to go but "theviv" posted a review just before I was ready to post and I don't want to knock him off the top spot so soon so I'll wait a few hours. My review will explain why I think that the main JJ site is the better choice.
|
11-17-12 04:02pm
|
Reply
915
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
My recoomendation is that if you want to join a Jules Jordan site then join this one and not The Ass Factory. The AF is just too small to be a decent value.
|
11-17-12 02:30pm
|
Reply
916
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Glad to have made the offer!
|
11-14-12 06:00pm
|
Reply
917
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I don't mind the newer stuff, but I agree that his older work is better. Trained Teens 1 remains one of my all-time favourite movies. It was the first time I had seen Stacy Carpenter and that scene was so well done. If that was the only great scene on the DVD that would have been enough, but the scene with Gauge and Aurora Snow is also incredible. And the remaining scenes only look merely good when compared to those two even though if they were on another DVD title they'd be stand-outs there.
If it would be useful for you I could either email you a list of series and editions or even post a list as a comment.
|
11-12-12 06:17pm
|
Reply
918
|
Kacey 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Caligula:
(pat362's Reply)
Yes I checked out the other sites and found basically the same thing -really cute barely legal teens with one or two hardcore videos and the rest just lesbian or masturbation.
|
08-21-11 02:35pm
|
Reply
919
|
Kacey 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Caligula:
(pat362's Reply)
Hi Pat, Of Kacey's 15 or so videos only 2 are hardcore with guys in their late 20s or 30s and clearly not daddy types. There is no role playing but the sex is pretty hot and she does take some anal but if you are looking for more young-old or babysitter action (especially anal) I'd probably spend my money elsewhere. The video quality ranges from good to HD quality.
The bottom line is if you like to watch cute sexy 18 year old girls in braces playing with themselves or with each other then Kacey and her tiny friends are the place to go. But hardcore video is going to be the exception not the rule.
|
08-15-11 01:45am
|
Reply
920
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
For me, 50plus/60plus MILFS (SCORE) came the closest, Pat. Too bad they changed their business model so that contents could only be streamed after a certain time. It's a site I would have returned to over and over, but I would never subscribe to it long term because the updates would be too slow to make it worth my while.
|
06-20-11 02:25pm
|
Reply
921
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from messmer:
Yep, the site, all in all, disappointed me as well, Pat, for the same reason: most of the models did not fit the "older" definition. I made a comment about liking many of the sets and videos for their lingerie contents, but find I haven't gone back to the ones I've saved on my hard drive since I downloaded them, so maybe it was just an attempt on my part to make myself feel better about a wrong move. :-)
|
06-20-11 01:05pm
|
Reply
922
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Capn:
Hi Pat,
Given that it was a site not geared to your preferences, I think you have been very fair in your review.
Yes, the Karup's sites are primarily photoset orientated.
From a personal point of view the thing that tends to downgrade my view of them is that they seem to insist in a lot of fake arousal & 'touchy, feely' at the expense of clear body shots.
Other than that I really like them.
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-18-11 11:23am
|
Reply
923
|
Kiara Mia
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from bebelover:
(pat362's Reply)
I am a huge fan of Kiara Mia. I wish she would bail on that megasite. The images are not of good quality. Minimum at best, not downloadable. Sizes are around 800 x 600
|
05-12-15 03:40pm
|
Reply
924
|
Kiara Mia
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from bebelover:
(pat362's Reply)
joined with Hope and Anticipation that these fools had finally invested in upgrading the quality of the site. I am a huge fan of Kiara Mia and want her to succeed in the industry. Sadly the site is pathetic nonsense for the price is NOt worth the hassle. Unless I get an email promising improvements or proof that they have revamped the Pic and Vid quality then I am not falling for it again.
|
10-08-13 04:35pm
|
Reply
925
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from badandy400:
(pat362's Reply)
Exactly, you do not think Videobox should get a 100 (you never have reviewed by they way) but you can see why I score it so highly based on my review and the replies to the review. I gave it a 100 with many reason that are very important to me. Since everyone is different we all rate things a little different but overall we are fairly consistent. If you reviewed and score them you would likely give them a high score, but if you did not I would suspect that you would give a number of valid reasons and why those reasons are important to you.
I agree. Keeping an eye on things is all of our jobs, not just the staff. Of course the staff is needs to keep things right here because they are financially invested in this site's success. We are invested by time and the fact we like being here doing our part to contribute to the porn world. So of course we must react when someone comes along to pee in our porn pool. This is why the PU staff gave us the option to of assigning "trust" to people, and this is especially effect I believe because we can say we do not trust people as well as trust them. The "NO" trusts are very important. They make ill-agenda people stick out. And since the staff have gone through the work of making this place for us we should help them out by stepping on bad people's balls!
|
03-11-09 07:32pm
|
