| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
926
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from badandy400:
(pat362's Reply)
I like that, it definitely has a nice ring to it. If I was not so used to my normal name I would do it.
When I was newbie I gave Videobox a 100 and people stepped on my balls about it. I had to justify that score and I believe I did through a long and at times a little heated discussion. So when a newbie comes along a posts extreme high scores I tend to jump at them a bit much the same way I was. I do not press as hard as I was about it, but I do like to see some genuine justification.
These reviews and comments about Kim's site read something like this "It is great because it is great" or "it is what it is because it is what it is." Neither of these really justify themselves but this really is the simplified summation of what they are doing.
I am hoping this people will see this as negative advertising and stop doing it. If I ran a site I would rather people not say much about it than say negative things about it. Perhaps they feel negative advertising is better than no advertising, at least people have heard of them. It is hard to say, but I do hope they let it go and try to get attention the honest way.
|
03-10-09 06:15pm
|
Reply
927
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from badandy400:
(pat362's Reply)
You are absolutely correct. This is the reason why I have been stepping on their balls and Khan is keeping a close eye on how all this works out.
|
03-10-09 02:31pm
|
Reply
928
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Keep it up:
(pat362's Reply)
Interesting analogy with the term BS. Yes I too have had many memberships with them over the years.
That is the very reason I started with the heading in my thread.
Your the one with the BS ideas as I still cannot login with any of my past user names or passwords.
My last email to them was this morning and still no reply.
Thanks to the other members helpful reply s in this thread though.
Cheers
|
06-30-12 03:52am
|
Reply
929
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Wow thanks for the nsight into the sites there Pat, Me to with the guy getting treated bad by a femdom, it doesn't excite me. I looked at a couple of trailers and thought no defo not for me. I think Whipped Ass does have the best genre that I like and i especially like group scenes in when they pick on and punish a girl. Yeah the ultimate surrender, looks again good for a couple of vids to have as a variety change but wouldn't want many of them so joining would not be something I'd do I don't think. It is an odd one the public disgrace, I do like public nudity and love FTV girls when they send out 2 girls to flash and kiss and stuff in public but looking at the trailers of some of that public disgrace stuff it looks a little to samey, girl gets tied up girl gets fucked somewhere. The scenes indorrs do look more exciting and random things happening. I might wait to see if they have a deal for 2 sites for the price of one come up and join whipped as again and boundgangbangs when they have some more material.
Thanks for the help, appreciate it.
|
08-09-11 12:52am
|
Reply
930
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Hi Pat
Yeah they must be doing something right and although it would still in my eyes be profitable to have the one network, its obvious they are not needing to do that to survive and it would need a whole new system developing to have as a network so easier for them to stick at what they are doing, they've been around for years and with it being niche content they are the leaders of what they do aren't they.
No didn't know they had a calender to be honest, I'll check it out. which is your fav sites of them all then, I like the lesbian femdom element so love the whipped ass best, I have never joined the wiredpussy one but some scenes look like they would appeal. Not really into the men being punished though. Does hogtied have many lesbian stuff or mainly guys involved. The bound gangbangs looks good though and it would be great to see how they develop that niche.
|
08-08-11 06:26am
|
Reply
931
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Yeah I liked a few of the trailers for fucking machines on some cute girls, the Jessie Andrews one looks especially nice and Veronica Avluv looks rather nice too. My only problem is I get bored easy when a site has the same formula on all the movies, I like variety much more on a site, I know if I joined fucking machines I would soon tire of them loud machines banging women so I dont know but the 2 month thing wouldn't really draw me in so uch, I would get all I'd want in my first month from a site like this. I've been a member of whipped ass and everything butt before so again 1 month would be enough on these sites to grab all the new ones that I'd like with heavily tattooed women. I'm a fussy bugger I know lol. Yeah you are right though tattooed ladies do tend to go hand in hand with ladies that like sex rough and bdsm. That is a good feature though the honesty and I do like the reviews of scenes, looks like the kink sites has some loyal followers. Be great if they had a whole network access site, maybe charge $50-$60 it would be a way of bringing in more revenue, I'd join to to grab all from all the sites that interest me.
|
08-08-11 12:54am
|
Reply
932
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Argh that will be it, it will be the yearly price, should of guessed.
I'd like the deal more if it was 2 sites for 1 month for $29.99. I'm a fussy porn users and I love certain kink scenes if the women are real cuties and tatoo free or not heavily tattooed. So there is only a selected few scenes I'd be interested in, some of the women there are too tattooed for my tastes.
|
08-07-11 09:37am
|
Reply
933
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Hi Pat
Yeah you are probably right with the high price factor to just get you to join but they would make more money if it was like £19.99 for 20 kinks but each scene was one kink.
Maybe its a new pricing scheme now though or I'm not seeing it right but when I go to sites it lists them all as $14 a month and water bondage as $30, is that not right, has it come down in price.
|
08-07-11 09:18am
|
Reply
934
|
Kirtu
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from mbaya:
Let me be the first to congratulate you on moving into the number two spot. Good job and well deserved.
|
09-24-13 01:52am
|
Reply
935
|
Kiss Me Girl
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Goldfish:
(pat362's Reply)
I think there is potential for this niche to fill a whole site and be more satisfying than a tease (if you like the kissing in the first place, of course).
One thing they could do is have some storyline and build up of sexual tension. This could lead to some petting, caressing and maybe some stripping. Then the main event would be the kissing.
The kissing itself could also be improved. The directing and filming of the kiss wasn't always done well.
|
08-01-10 06:46pm
|
Reply
936
|
Kscans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from littlejoe:
(pat362's Reply)
i remember having a few clips back in the day and loving it. just wondering if its worth it for a single month?
|
03-09-14 04:09pm
|
Reply
937
|
Kscans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(pat362's Reply)
I agree, any site with sketchy cancellation processes is a poor site in my mind and I would skip it. Although, I would skip it anyway given the content...
|
08-29-10 01:52am
|
Reply
938
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Salvo:
(pat362's Reply)
Thank you. Yes I did go back and read that after I cancelled but Im not sure what she is talking about in terms of new laws. I subscribed to Jim Slip and Miss Hybrid both in England and they post hardcore content.
|
05-31-15 03:40am
|
Reply
939
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Salvo:
Clearly something has happened over the past year. She took down all the explicit hardcore videos and now it is softcore to say the least. CCBill was nice enough to issue me a credit as I called within 15 minutes of rejoining.
|
05-30-15 05:48pm
|
Reply
940
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Cybertoad:
I have joined this site awhile ago not sure why I didnt do a review. She was hot about 7 years ago but slowly in my opinion turned from older milf to grandma, and I lost interest. She went way off the original site as well. Good review, just doesn't float my boat anymore.
|
10-27-14 02:34pm
|
Reply
941
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mike11w:
(pat362's Reply)
Yes you can download, I haven't tried many, they were not worthy of a download.
|
10-19-14 11:30am
|
Reply
942
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Amen to that! LP is becoming a bit of a circus these days.
|
03-29-17 03:56pm
|
Reply
943
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Your comment here makes me almost certain that I'll not ever rejoin. The evidence suggests that your theory is correct and if that's the case this will be a really expensive rejoin if there is nothing more 'free' being added.
What a strange business model...
|
12-28-14 01:18pm
|
Reply
944
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the comment again pat. And I can say that the trailers reflect the actual scenes.
|
12-28-14 01:14pm
|
Reply
945
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the comments pat. Your original comment was a big help to me. I know I'd have been pissed off if I had joined this site without having the information you provided. I'll answer your questions in the order you asked them:
1) A lot of is like that. There are extreme gapes, large toys, hard anal, pee play, stuff like that. DAP seems to be something they pride themselves in. There are even a few TAP scenes with models like Proxy Paige who are known for extreme acts. This isn't normal hardcore porn. You're certainly right that the focus is not usually on the woman's pleasure.
2) Hard to say. They're less 'medical exam' and more 'endurance test.' I'm not sure how to quantify sterile, but the scenes have none of the sexual tension that I like. But I knew that going in.
3) That's really subjective. It does push the boundaries but it isn't unpleasant to look at. Certainly anyone who prefers artcore wouldn't be happy with this kind of porn.
4) I think there is an element of that. I don't find the makeup is often overdone, but the clothes tend to the garish. My preference would be for a more natural look. You can't go wrong with natural.
I'm fairly sure I've missed the mark in some of these answers so feel free to ask anything else. I'll try to be objective in any answers I give you.
|
12-27-14 12:33pm
|
Reply
946
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the reply Pat. Yeah you'd think when you get the chance to work with these incredible girls that you can't fail to make money, especially when they agree to do the hardest type of anal porn on the net. I guess some people must be buying into their site as they keep going and hiring girls so somehow they are making it work, dunno how like.
I do agree with your statement its like circus porn and they could learn lots from watching other successful studios to how to setup lighting and filming techniques. I also like and find it much hotter when models are enjoying it too, hate anything when it looks like the model is really looking sad and just going along with it to get some money. I guess most of the Euro girls are as they come and go so fast and don't have the long careers like some of the American girls.
|
03-31-14 03:08am
|
Reply
947
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
from elephant:
Cheers for the warning Pat, I've often wanted to join this site and really wish they'd see sense and make it a normal membership site, would make heaps more money.
One of the annoying things is they have some really great looking scenes there. I'd join in a shot if they'd make it a normal website, but if you read all about their progress (On EBF)on even getting the site they have now up to see daylight I won't be holding my breath on them making it a normal membership.
99%of other sites on the internet can't be wrong with the pay and be a member and have access to all movies system. Ticket base system are so flawed in my opinion.
|
03-30-14 04:29am
|
Reply
948
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
Thanks for the warning. Conmen are everywhere, and this sort of thing gives online porn a dirty reputation. We know there are many decent customer oriented ones around who are happy to give you a good deal at a fair price. Places like this hurt the good ones. Let's hope this warning helps others.
|
12-02-13 09:48am
|
Reply
949
|
Lela Star
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RLane:
(pat362's Reply)
Thank you for your reply and information and I'll take that into consideration when I'm looking into solo models.
|
02-23-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
950
|
LeLu Love
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from devmsr:
(pat362's Reply)
hey pat,
ive told u before how much respect i have for you on here..however, i was alittle disappointed in your follow up reply once Lelu posted her reply comments...
i can understand your reasoning for wanting the hard facts of the site..and you even said "I'll pass on this one unless I see a lot more info."...now granted it took over a month for lelu to reply with her post...but with all due respect pat, you were provided with those hard facts that you were looking for...
then, when i read your final comments, (this one im replying to), i was kind of surprised to see that rather than commenting (now that you had a few hard facts you requested), basically all you replied with were YOUR own OPINIONS..ie site is not something that does anything for you, you get the feeling her content is like a cam site etc etc...i guess i just felt like wait, isint this the very reason he criticized marcdc in the first place?? your opinions are fine, i was just hoping to see more than just that now that you had those site facts you were looking for...not to mention, although constructive, i felt you were pretty harsh in your initial reply to marcdc's review for his lack of hard facts..(sorry to sound repetitive)
that said, i agree that his initial review lacked many necessary hard content facts..but that is not my point here...
and not that you care, but i want you to know i still respect the hell outta ya! lol
ADDENDUM:
after re-reading this after i posted it, im not even sure if i made any sense..lol..if not..ignore me. :/
|
10-11-12 05:14pm
|
