| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
876
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Gazette Risque:
(pat362's Reply)
Can't really make out if the navigation has been improved from the TBP facts.
So, I'm relying on the fellow PU'ers experiences. Which I prefer when it comes to things like navigation.
|
03-02-12 05:57am
|
Reply
877
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#19
from thaavi:
(pat362's Reply)
There is variety in locations - very stylish scenes indoors and lots of scenes outdoors (I don´t think any of adult models has so many nice outdoor scenes), variety in models, variety in hairstyle, makeup, clothing (which is very elegant and classy), and there are even some scenes with toys. I wonder what variety is missing. I´m just curious.
I only hope you stop judging other´s reviews, this is very rude to anyone who gives his original and sincere approach that you may don´t like, please don´t be so smartass about this, this is really something useless:)
|
06-05-13 02:37am
|
Reply
878
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from thaavi:
(pat362's Reply)
1) the number of realised scenes had increased, there were about 30 updates since the review:)
2)I tried to offer info I think is relevant and important, not everything you can measure or count
3)I personally think no review is unbiased, it´s a basic contradiction, only some of them tries to look unbiased, only unbiased review is a review that recites facts
4)I think there were some cons mentioned, I will try harder to find more, I promise:)
5) The scenes in interiers are subordinated to certain meaning, atmosphere - with the decorations and with the clothes used, make-up and also music used. For example there was a scene with broken mirrors placed on the black walls giving interesting reflections and Jo wearing special outfit to accent the scene or there was a noir-like scene or stylized scenes in a rent castle rooms. Another thing is great work with natural light from sun, windows, candles and camera filtering, there is also a big variety in outdoors - scenes on a cliff, river bed, autumn wood, at a lake, on a watchtower, etc. There was also storyline lately including 12 episodes.
|
06-04-13 03:42am
|
Reply
879
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from exotics4me:
(pat362's Reply)
Hey Pat, I'll probably give it a try since I too like Jo and especially if it has new Eve Angel content. The webmaster seems pretty genuine in what he's saying. The reviewers seem like nearly all other fly by night reviewers, looking for or getting a discount.
I did think that was funny about the November 2013 updates. Someone defended it somewhere on one of these as a "typo". Looking at my keyboard, I don't see how Nov could be a typo from May, maybe on the first letter since those are right beside each other, but the a-o keys are on separate sides. The future date bothered me mainly because Eveangel.com used a similar method when Eve left their site. They just mass removed the sets from 2004 and listed them as 2007 (which was the current year at the time). Maybe Khan at least gets a chuckle out of all this mess!
|
06-02-13 11:58pm
|
Reply
880
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
I agree about the last review, Pat!
|
06-02-13 10:10pm
|
Reply
881
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
Oops, you know I had no idea that I did a review, Pat. I thought it was a comment. Must go back to see what I wrote at the time! :-) In any case, I agree, when I saw all those very short reviews with high marks .. for ONE site ... my suspicion meter went way up as well. I'm just saying that fans of a site, in their enthusiasm for it, may write a very inadequate review at the suggestion of a web master without being shills. Just sincerely in love with it.
|
06-02-13 12:28pm
|
Reply
882
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from thaavi:
(pat362's Reply)
If you want facts and data that btw DO NOT TELL ANYTHING about how unique and special this or any other site is, you can always read the major review, over there are all the facts. People in their reviews were trying to from their heart and mind describe nicely what is the main attitude and what REALLY is going on there. But this is something some people are I dunno why very suspicious about and missing the whole point...
And btw. number of facts doesn´t mean the review is good.
Ok, just my opinion
Regards.
|
06-01-13 05:38pm
|
Reply
883
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from thaavi:
(pat362's Reply)
Excuse me, Can you please describe me what you consider as relevant data???
I´m sorry that you haven´t met women in their 30´s that still has the next door girl look.
And btw. she is 31:)
No big deal, no offense:)
|
06-01-13 05:29pm
|
Reply
884
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from thaavi:
(pat362's Reply)
Hahaha, funny, when someone tries to sincerely describe his feelings about the site and open his heart, people start to telling him, damn, it looks weird and not believable:)
|
06-01-13 05:23pm
|
Reply
885
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from thaavi:
(pat362's Reply)
"there is nothing in them to excite a possible fan in joining." Are you sure you have read the reviews?:) BTW. you can see some snippets from IDOJ on tube sites and you will see with your own eyes.
|
06-01-13 04:56pm
|
Reply
886
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RagingBuddhist:
(pat362's Reply)
In my mind, one of two things is happening. Either the mistress is sending people here (which HAS happened in the past) or some members are talking amongst themselves and are telling people to come here to rave about the site. In either case, it doesn't help the site's standing here in the world of reviews.
|
06-01-13 10:56am
|
Reply
887
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Elmien:
(pat362's Reply)
You know what if you take up every thing literally you will never be satisfied with anything. What I meant by the "girl next door" look is that she is down to earth, and very humble person.
For the nervous people that can't decide to join....
1. I can assure you there is a weekly update on this site.
2. It original and very artistic porn
3. The models that is used in this site is of the best.
4. Passion and sensuality
5. Photos and videos are of high quality.
|
05-31-13 11:49pm
|
Reply
888
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Marcus:
(pat362's Reply)
I agree. When a lot of biased (even if well-meaning) reviews flood a website profile page here on PU, it does nothing to encourage me to join.
|
05-31-13 09:59am
|
Reply
889
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from inthecrack:
(pat362's Reply)
This subject touches upon perhaps my biggest pet peeve. I don’t know why truth in advertising has to be such a foreign concept to most people. Any business that claims to be the greatest “this” and have the best “that” has absolutely no credibility with me, particularly when that claim is coming from within. If 10 competing companies all claim to have the best widget then 9 of them are lying. As soon as one of them volunteers information that some aspect of their product is not as good as it could be then I know every other claim they have is probably spot on. It’s obviously not any different with an adult entertainment website. You know if every single scene on some porn site is claimed to be awesome then something doesn’t add up. Any customer that takes the time to read through what is written on our site will certainly be able to take our word as genuine since we have established some pretty solid credibility with our honesty.
As for blow back from models? If there is any I have not heard of it yet. Off the top of my head I can think of 2 or 3 models in the last 16 years that have ever said anything negative about their ITC shoot and they were all because they didn’t like the camera getting up close, not because of anything that was written. I think most girls just love that they are getting some quality images where they are not getting cum on or smacked around or made to look like a ditzy teenager. I can say that there is no “can of worms” that comes from providing an honest website.
|
01-16-17 05:42pm
|
Reply
890
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(pat362's Reply)
I suppose it could turn into a problem for them. On the other hand, I've seen ALS Scan post similarly blunt assessments of scenes, or shoots, or particular models with no blow-back that I'm aware of.
|
01-04-17 04:53pm
|
Reply
891
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from exotics4me:
(pat362's Reply)
Hey Pat,
I checked on this, the three newest updates showing up for me are, Breanna Benson, Melanie Jane and Misty Stone.
On those three you mentioned, the release dates in the membership section are:
Dakoda: 1-8-08
Bree: 1-22-07
Kinzie: 7-31-06
The Innocent High site itself seems to be very well maintained with a update list by date or alphabetical. The other sites in the network are pretty much listed in order of release, but none of those have that many updates to begin with. Also of note, if you like these models that are on Innocent High, most of them also have a set on Solo Interviews as well. Hope that helps
|
02-16-10 09:55pm
|
Reply
892
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(pat362's Reply)
The updates on Innocent High are all dated. The other sites are not and that is why I had some trouble figuring out their update schedule. What it does show though are the sites that are still updating. It's kind of a strange way they do it, one minute clips on Monday, photos/screencaps on Tuesday and full scene on Wednesday. They do have a nice "update" section that shows each update as they are coming in. I'm still hesitant about anything more than a month. The archives are good enough for the 1 month deal though.
|
02-16-10 06:59pm
|
Reply
893
|
Ivana Fukalot
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Marcus:
(pat362's Reply)
Have to say I'm not sure if she's still active which is why I stopped short of saying it was regularly updated. I was a member 2-or-so months ago and hadn't been a member for a long time before that so although a lot of content was new to me I can't remember if there were any updates.
Sorry I'm not much help!
|
01-01-12 08:07am
|
Reply
894
|
Ivana Fukalot
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from DpornGuy:
(pat362's Reply)
hey,
yeah i know what you mean.
Well wait off till you're bored with your current subscriptions, and then when its time for something new, you could try it out. 30 bucks isn't cheap. That said there's afew years worth of movies up, which is a good few gigs of porn.
|
01-03-10 10:43am
|
Reply
895
|
Ivana Fukalot
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from DpornGuy:
(pat362's Reply)
Hi there,
Nope, complete access, download movies and pics from all the sites, no samples or trials or anything.
Basically allot of the sites are not updating anymore (like Mashaworld), so they have them as archived material or bonus material if you will, and there's allot. Some of the material is the same on some sites, but there is a fair amount of stuff to atleast make a months membership worthwhile.
Basically once you log in, you get a page which has all the sites which you can log into, or you can click on an updates button, which shows you all the updates from across the network of sites.
The membership is pricey, but i also believe that ultimately that's how Ivana makes a living, and in all fairness, they're doing good quality videos, allot of sites still aren't doing that. This is definately one of those sites where you join for a month, then stop, and come back several months later to download the updates. I'm not into live cam shows or interacting with the models so that doesn't appeal to me.
|
01-03-10 10:23am
|
Reply
896
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from tboy:
(pat362's Reply)
I can answer on his behalf, no there are no movie format options and no split scenes, it's all or nothing. So far i've just had WMV format ranging 900MB to 2GB+. Also if your downloader fails half way through, I believe the full size of the file is counted towards your limit (easier for them I guess). So whilst you can download 3 or 4 vids at once, I would download 1 at a time if you have an unstable connection/pc/browser etc.
|
09-20-11 03:31pm
|
Reply
897
|
JAB Comix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from karl1984:
(pat362's Reply)
There's information on uploads in the forum, it updates at least once every week. The forum itself is free but to view the updates you have to be a member. I myself haven't been a member for a long long time but in a year or so the new content will be enough to validate another membership.
|
07-25-10 03:10pm
|
Reply
898
|
JAB Comix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Sevrin:
(pat362's Reply)
This is the 4th review of this site posted by new members in the last 24 hours. I'm starting to think it's not a coincidence.
|
07-25-10 11:01am
|
Reply
899
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Nor me. But even if I were interested in the female model the business model is enough to keep me away.
|
03-09-13 04:47am
|
Reply
900
|
Janet Exposed
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from marcdc1:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the review Pat. I've had janet on my radar for a while, having seen some of her other work in other places.
Glad I've put off buying long enough to see it's not worth the membership.
|
03-08-13 08:49am
|
