| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1401
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
What Pat362 said, that's me...but I answered "Model Videos" because that's what I'm interested in. Adding to my inventory of videos of my babes list.
If the new site has reruns of old stuff that I already have I will still download it to compare quality and content (some vids have been edited down) and keep the best one.
Then I'll check out the inventory of babes to see if there are any that are new to me that catch my interest.
I used to be into photo heavy sites, I guess because I've been doing this since 2001 when videos were lousy and short. But the video quality and quantity has exploded so dramatically I've lost interest in stills.
{RECOMMENDATION} The new version (ver. 9.4) of the VLC alternative to WMP offers a neat snapshot feature that is instantaneous so anyone can make photos from a video that are as good in quality as the video itself.
VLC is free at VideoLAN. It's got some great features like the snapshots, a fast aspect ratio correction, and a better operating console. The one negative is that, unlike WMP, you cannot adjust color and/or contrast.
[I'm repeating this recommendation on the Forum, so if it seems familiar, that may be why.
|
10-12-08 10:14am
|
Reply
1402
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
I agree with pat362. The raffle is a bonus, not the objective. If it's handled fairly, then there should be no "affirmative action" added to the process.
This site has made me and, no doubt many others, more money through the great reviews by people like me that steer me away from sites that are not up to their hype.
|
10-11-08 09:53am
|
Reply
1403
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Cybertoad:
(pat362's Reply)
With the conomy I wouldnt be surprised to see that. I have heard that godaddy is taking a huge hit the last year with many ppl not renewing site names. I think the net as a whole may feel the pinch.
|
10-01-08 08:47am
|
Reply
1404
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Miths:
(pat362's Reply)
I haven't gone in and counted them all to check, but hasn't it "only" been the last three months or so that they've had virtually no new HD content updates?
Except for a couple of the Summer months, I've been a member for most of the year (rejoined again in August), and I rarely found myself particularly disappointed. But granted, for some strange reason - given the popularity of the site - I only came across it for the first time back in December, so all the "reloaded" content was pretty much new to me as well, even though it is of course rather easy to tell when you're you're looking at a six year old video with one of your favourite models :).
Regarding Hands on Hardcore, my last membership to that site expired a few months ago, but up until that point at least I didn't notice any recycled content at all. But I obviously won't rule out I've missed something.
|
09-30-08 07:05pm
|
Reply
1405
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Miths:
(pat362's Reply)
I can confirm that the last two weeks (since September 15) they've been back to their original schedule of one brand new HD update in the morning and a "reloaded" update in the evening.
So for now at least it looks like they are back on track.
Some of the most prominent models featured in the new HD content are probably Zafira, Cherry Jul, Sandra Shine (I really much preferred her as a brunette), Blue Angel and Zuzana Z.
|
09-30-08 06:52pm
|
Reply
1406
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Cybertoad:
(pat362's Reply)
Looks to have some new stuff, but I noticed some older quality missed in. I wasnt a member before so could comment on whether it was reused or not. But I saw somethat wouldnt look good at full screeen but many awsome ones too. on 22" hd screen I have was nice but yea might be some rehashed. How can I know or help pass info along to you?
|
09-29-08 05:39pm
|
Reply
1407
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from roseman:
(pat362's Reply)
I can not say that I like Mila as well, though she is a good actress.
|
09-19-08 09:06pm
|
Reply
1408
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Toadsith:
(pat362's Reply)
Don't worry - if they could replace Lloyd Bridges' tongue with one supplied by a Labrador Retriever, I think they can do it for your nose. They have the technology. They will rebuild you.
|
09-19-08 03:17pm
|
Reply
1409
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from roseman:
(pat362's Reply)
You have my invitation too.
We can stay home watch Resident Evil on DVD and eat LOTS of popcorn and then have a complete discussion about zombies nature (if there are any of them lol).
|
09-19-08 12:26pm
|
Reply
1410
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Toadsith:
(pat362's Reply)
By that point, I think it will smell like Victory.
|
09-17-08 08:03pm
|
Reply
1411
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Toadsith:
(pat362's Reply)
You are more than welcome in my fortified zombie-repellent compound, pat362. I hadn't thought of large snowblowers - those are designed to take some serious punishment, no doubt.
As for the reason zombies eat brains - well there are a number of possible explanations. Most experts say zombies need living human blood to get the right nutrients, enzymes, chemicals and so on to function optimally. The brain is an excellent blood source and is a great protein source. Another idea is that zombies can regenerate some of their brain either by eating active synapses or perhaps the stem cells. The idea is that your basic zombie has little more than their brain stem working. That is why almost all upper level functions are down - they are like a common house fly, running on nothing but reflex. It is possible that a zombie fed healthy human blood regularly will retain near human appearance and cognitive abilities.
Of course, a zombie is also 100% uninhibited. This means that unlike normal humans, they have a continual supply of adrenalin, so they aren't exactly inhumanly strong, they just will happily tear their own ligaments and break their own bones to achieve their goal - whatever it may be. Eating you is probably pretty high on their list.
All things considered, it is unlikely the goal of a zombie is to eat your brains specifically. The idea that zombies hunger for the brains of the living may stem from a witness seeing a zombie consume the head of a human. A zombie will eat your brain, but that is because they will eat just about anything with a heart beat. (Though only human blood is certain to benefit human zombies.) It is important to note that zombies do not need their heart. They will continue operating without any part of their body excluding the brain stem. If you destroy that, you destroy the zombie. It is unfortunate for those who behead zombies low on the neck only to find the disembodied head gnawing on their ankle moments later.
Another note on killing zombies, while fire can destroy them, it'll take a little while. Just because a zombie is in flames doesn't mean it isn't still dangerous. Keep your distance from any active zombie.
|
09-16-08 08:12pm
|
Reply
1412
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Duante Amorculo:
(pat362's Reply)
your exactly right on the money, in my opinion. good example
|
09-14-08 10:47am
|
Reply
1413
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(pat362's Reply)
Pat362 said: "... but I'd classify the movie "The Wild Side" as porn. I don't think anyone remmebers the incredible complex storyline, but they sure as hell remember Denise Richards and Neve Campbell making out."
For the sake of accuracy, I'm pretty sure the movie you're referring to is "Wild Things".
|
09-03-08 04:56am
|
Reply
1414
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks. That's why I was in the affirmative on this question. If it's intended to cause arousal, it's porn, no matter what the form or medium is. Little Annie Fanny, for example. Part porn, part satire.
|
09-03-08 03:20am
|
Reply
1415
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from MargulisAZ:
(pat362's Reply)
Where have you seen such things? Fisting is my favorite niche and I would like to know where you have seen it in behind the scenes footage. :D
|
08-17-08 07:46pm
|
Reply
1416
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
If the review comments support the score, I'll remain silent about the score but may comment on some aspect of the review with which I disagree.
Otherwise I'll post a question if the reason for the score isn't explained in the commentary.
[If it's a newbie review I'll ignore the review altogether,)
|
08-02-08 07:31am
|
Reply
1417
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from moshic:
(pat362's Reply)
agree!
|
07-17-08 03:53am
|
Reply
1418
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment from pat362:
Thanks Arnaud. I'll keep my eyes open for it.
|
07-10-08 06:27pm
|
Reply
1419
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
from arnaud:
Hi,
SPECIAL OFFER is coming back soon. Is 5$/3 days a decent price to you?
Arnaud
|
07-09-08 05:06am
|
Reply
1420
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from visor:
(pat362's Reply)
Sorry this all took so long, but I've been away - both literally and figuratively! No, I didn't see any porn star I recognized in the new batch - hence I assume, to use an Abby Winters word, they're all newbies. Hope this helps
|
06-19-08 08:39am
|
Reply
1421
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
I figure for what I used to pay renting and buying just a few DVD's, I have huge amounts of content I can download for a fairly low price. Also, I do like the instant gratification of getting the scenes in just a few minutes instead of ordering online or driving to the video store.
Best wishes!
Jay G
|
06-11-08 08:48am
|
Reply
1422
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
Yes, Pat, all 21 websites listed in The Best Porn are available. The formats are Flash Player, Windows Media Player, & Quicktime Player.
Whole scenes and clips are both available. Whole scenes can be very long (some over an hour) and can take a long time to download. I simply choose a scene and watch another scene or surf the net while the scene downloads (often 15-20 minutes).
While there are new scenes, a lot of the content is the old video stuff which is good quality, but not high definition by any means.
Read the join page carefully, though, since I've been told there are some poorer offers out there with the "Evil Angel" name. I always read the join page VERY carefully to try to avoid getting scammed.
The join page I used was:
http://secure.analacrobats.com/signup/signup.php?nats=bestporn:ppsnoexit:analacrobats,0,0,0,0&step=2
Best wishes,
Jay G
|
06-09-08 06:32am
|
Reply
1423
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
You should go to some of the European topless beaches, pat362. The first couple of times you ogle, after that you still appreciate feminine beauty but breasts are no longer a fixation. I am not entirely sure if the guys on the blogs and forums are entirely honest because I've read too often, coming from women, my boy friend (husband) would like for me to get my breasts enhanced. But I sincerely hope they are lying and that YOU are right. I love natural! :-)
|
06-04-08 04:05pm
|
Reply
1424
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
I voted yes, but reluctantly, because after a while topless women would become such a normal sight that breasts would lose their sexual attraction and resume their rightful place as sources of nourishment for babies. Still nice to look at but no longer idolized! Come to think of it, that might not be such a bad thing. No more silicone, no more botched boob jobs and scars under breasts. No more unscrupulous plastic surgeons who mess up what nature created. Yeah, let's go for it, equal rights for all! :-)
|
06-02-08 07:30pm
|
Reply
1425
|
Club Micah
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Denner:
Agree - she's cute.
But this review I'd consider as a warning and a well founded one.
Just great that fellow PUs also do a serious reveiw on these traps.
Had my eyes on this - won't go there even for the low trial price - better to buy a cold beer...
Good review, pat362 - and why make it any longer?
|
06-01-08 11:01am
|
