| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1376
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from williamj:
(pat362's Reply)
A good old time 1980's massage parlor themed site where the girl has to talk you out of tips. The parlor girl has Big tits, a round ass, meaty cunt, and a cocksucker mouth. But once you pay up the girl tips she turns into a total whore.
|
01-15-09 05:28pm
|
Reply
1377
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Wittyguy:
(pat362's Reply)
Wow, it must be true. There really is nothing to do in Canada ;)
|
01-06-09 10:31pm
|
Reply
1378
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(pat362's Reply)
No problem, in their defense, they did seem to get it going strong again, so strong in fact that I had 6 connections going at 250 kb/s each this afternoon. My normal top speed is a total of 1,200 kb/s, so I was going over that. On a side note, similar to what Drooler said, most of the content on these bonus sites are already on 1byday. It kind of surprised me since I thought each site was exclusive.
|
01-01-09 08:18pm
|
Reply
1379
|
Her First Anal Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
from Wittyguy:
This is one I'd stay away from. They are part of the "usual suspects" lineup of 3rd party content that appear as bonus sites on a lot of other sites. From what I've seen on their bonus offerings the quality isn't that hot (clips only and smallish pics) and neither are the chicks. I've gotten a few keeper sets but nothing that could reasonably amount to an interest in actually joining the site.
|
12-26-08 12:00pm
|
Reply
1380
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from Drooler:
(pat362's Reply)
"Sadly many pf todays most popular stars are getting some large tattoos covering the back or an arm. I read a theory that the reason why some of them do it is because it's makes them hard to book. After a while they can't get any work and are forced to leave porn behind. Don't know if it's true, but it does make sense."
Sophia Santi (formerly known as Natalia Cruz) and Nikki Nova both have large, garish tatoos and they're still showing up at sites such as danni.com, inthecrack, and marquismodels. Liliane Tiger has shown up with her tats at Pier999, virtualgirlHD, and MCNnudes, among others.
The girls are obviously still in demand, but even without the counterexamples, why would the models actually decide to take that kind of poison-pill approach to leaving the business? Would it be that they are forced to stay unless they took some kind of drastic measures such as this? Who would be forcing them? And in such circumstances, wouldn't deliberately "ruining" their appearance be an invitation to retribution by the parties doing the forcing?
I'll agree that it doesn't make sense for models to get these tatoos when clearly the average porn user doesn't like them, but maybe the model will simply do as she wishes with what belongs to her, her body.
|
12-22-08 05:48pm
|
Reply
1381
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
pat362 wrote: "Sadly many pf todays most popular stars are getting some large tattoos covering the back or an arm. I read a theory that the reason why some of them do it is because it's makes them hard to book. After a while they can't get any work and are forced to leave porn behind. Don't know if it's true, but it does make sense.
Hi Pat. I don't understand. Could you explain this to me. Does this mean they're under contract, but they don't want to be in the business any longer and that's their only way out? To make themselves look ugly? Or do I read you wrong?
|
12-22-08 09:23am
|
Reply
1382
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Cybertoad:
(pat362's Reply)
Pat makes a great point I can not think of hardly any in my collection of lez where a guy is talking unless its leading to a BJ later i dont hear it.
BUT THE GUY TALKING, is my pet peave of all times, its gotten to where I avoid the sites now that are cronic about this.
|
12-16-08 09:29am
|
Reply
1383
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#84
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
Oh fuck it!!! =/
|
12-10-08 11:55pm
|
Reply
1384
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#69
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
Pat362, you didn't say too much on this poll, still as a fellow PU of mine, I ask that you please check out this information to prove I am not THE ASSHOLE EVERYONE SAYS I AM..... FUCK!!
Homemade Uncensored - Subscription ID # 208342701000000889 Signup Date: 12/07/08 CCBILL ICQ MAIL
Little Liana - Subscription ID # 208305501000009792 Signup Date: 10/31/08 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Little Lupe - Subscription ID # 107265601000014297 Signup Date: 09/22/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Raven Riley - Subscription ID # 107241301000002418 Signup Date: 08/29/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Pacino's Adventures - Subscription ID # 108271601000039085 Signup Date: 09/27/2008 CCBILL AOL MAIL
Nubiles - Subscription ID # 108202701000003673 Signup Date: 07/20/2008 CCBILL AOL MAIL
Best Teens.com - Subscription ID # 107147701000005429 Signup Date: 05/27/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
8th Street Latinas - Subscription ID # 107147701000002410 Signup Date: 05/27/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Exploited College Girls - Subscription ID # 107131501000001937 Signup Date: 05/11/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Night Invasion - Member ID # 1267666873 Order Date: 11/22/2008 EPOCH BILLING
Manila Amateurs - Member ID # 1270044479 Order Date: 12/05/2008 EPOCH BILLING
Real Ex Girlfriends, Nasty Angels and Karup's Hometown Amateurs might have changed their billing provider, HOWEVER WILL FIND OUT MY INFORMATION AND YOU WILL SEE!!
(KHAN, PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS INFORMATION!! I MUST DO THIS!! THIS IS IMPORTANT!!) >:D
|
12-10-08 12:50pm
|
Reply
1385
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
Your explanation of masochism is a very good one, Pat. A better one than I have. :-) Some have also suggested that it is a sign of very low self-esteem and that submissives are trying to expunge guilt about their perceived shortcomings this way.
As to Sadism, I have none. As past and present conditions under dictatorships prove there are plenty of sadists around, they come out of the woodwork once social conditions are right, but what makes a human being enjoy inflicting pain or humiliation on another leaves me without an answer.
|
12-01-08 08:32am
|
Reply
1386
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from messmer:
(pat362's Reply)
There are sites specializing in humiliation and I share your distaste when it comes to verbal abuse and spitting and face slapping. However the models are informed of this beforehand (anything else would make the site owners subject to a sexual abuse/assault suit) and these sites are not true BDSM sites in my eyes.
Real BDSM, despite Drooler's misgivings, is not usually a case where one of the participants is being degraded and there is no equality between the sexes.
For some people, for whatever reason, experiencing pain is actually an erotic event while for the dominant the infliction of pain accomplishes the same. Both are equal in their need and complement one another.
It is an aberration, and personally I don't have the slightest desire to either inflict pain or experience it. Just thought I'd set the record straight. This is a wild and wonderful world where sexual tastes range from the mild and "normal" to the absolutely bizarre.
In my case, despite my feeble attempts to understand human sexuality, I could never understand that head to toe latex or rubber fetish that goes so often with BDSM. :-)
|
11-30-08 09:12am
|
Reply
1387
|
Gag N Gape
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Tree Rodent:
(pat362's Reply)
Ah yes - you're right it is quite late. It's half past midnight. But as a Baseball and American Football fan I am sometimes up to 5am! I've always been a late person. I'm now off to watch some poker for a few hours.
|
11-29-08 04:38pm
|
Reply
1388
|
Gag N Gape
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Tree Rodent:
(pat362's Reply)
Cheers Pat!
|
11-29-08 04:14pm
|
Reply
1389
|
Gag N Gape
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Good review - I like the sound of this network.
|
11-29-08 12:57pm
|
Reply
1390
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from lk2fireone:
(pat362's Reply)
I like your thinking. I was trying to select more than one choice in the poll, but the poll mechanism does not allow that.
I've seen very few sites where a real loyalty program offers a better deal for remaining a member. Instead, most porn sites (and other types of businesses) offer a better deal (price) to potential subscribers than they do to existing subscribers.
(I'm not including the type of "loyalty programs" where the longer you remain a member, the more sites you have access to, or the more areas of a site you have access to.)
That has always bugged me. I figure if I am an existing customer, I should be treated better than a potential customer (in price of a subscription/membership). But that's not the way it works in the real world.
|
11-23-08 11:18am
|
Reply
1391
|
Teens 3some
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Cybertoad:
Can you gie some details on video quality ?
size etc?
Thanks
|
11-05-08 11:58am
|
Reply
1392
|
Gag N Gape
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from roseman:
Great review, thanks for the info.
|
11-04-08 04:29am
|
Reply
1393
|
Lezbo Honeys
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Cybertoad:
noticed in comments area says limited trial I see that as a con as well. Great review Pat362.
Looks like a great site.
|
10-30-08 11:35am
|
Reply
1394
|
Dirty 101
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from mbaya:
Please elaborate on what you feel is nastier lesbian sex. I am no expert on the subject, so please help enlighten me with more details.
|
10-30-08 08:09am
|
Reply
1395
|
Suze Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(pat362's Reply)
BTW:
Down along the track, I've decided to drop that deal about the ex. and concentrate things on marriage, and of course some fine porn... - thanks to some good friends and your well spoken words, pat362, from one PU to another....Thanks!
|
10-28-08 08:10am
|
Reply
1396
|
Suze Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(pat362's Reply)
About the P.S:
Good words there - of course it's stupid to risk a good marriage for the sake of some revived libido concerning an ex-girlfriend - sometimes we men are weak - and yes, our women are mostly smarter than us....
|
10-26-08 07:30am
|
Reply
1397
|
Suze Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(pat362's Reply)
Hey pat....
No review, I'm a bit fucked up in my mind at the moment (just met an old girlfriend - and my wife is gonna "kill me", if she finds out)so, yeah no review right now..how can I get my mind to it....?
But, man - I do not think you should hesitate. There's a LOT of HC photos and videos. I've already downloaded some newer and great HC-videos that Suze calls MEGA - that means better quality videos - even if they are not HD. Take a serious look at the preview.
The photosets - hardcore - are simply great (newer ones), ok NOT quite the high standard quality as for exampel METART, but worth it...
And the price of $ 9.99 for a 7 days fast browsing/download is certainly not bad....
|
10-25-08 09:57am
|
Reply
1398
|
Cum on Her Face
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
from gareth:
The site is still updating although sometimes a little erratically, they dont update thier public screen the only way to tell about updates is to join
|
10-25-08 04:30am
|
Reply
1399
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
> Does anyone think that a stuntman would allow himself to be set on
> fire for that big scene without first putting some protection on?
Right, they take precautions - EXACTLY PRECAUTIONS THAT THEY THINK ARE APPROPRIATE. Why models should be denied THE SAME CHOICE?
> Yes some of them do get hurt, but it's not because of the lack of precautions.
Come on, when anybody get hurt in an accident it's ALMOST ALWAYS because of the lack of precautions, and is ALWAYS this way for stunts (to start with, they could easily refuse to participate in the particular stunt if they consider it too risky). BTW, the same is true for car accidents - the very basic precaution is to avoid driving completely, but very few people are taking it.
|
10-22-08 07:15am
|
Reply
1400
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
IMHO it is MUCH more complicated than simple "people have contracted some serious illnesses". People get infected and even get killed in all kinds of jobs (starting with medical ones), so IMHO just mere EXISTENCE of the chance doesn't make some thing "too bad" or not, for me it is important to know HOW BIG this chance is. To complete analogy with stuntman - some of them die or get permanently injured, but this doesn't mean that I won't watch "regular" movies which include stunts. Also it's quite obvious that using condoms does not GUARANTEE anything, it just reduces the chance, which again supports my point of view that it is all about "HOW BIG the chance is". EVERYTHING has some risk, even driving to work (this one is probably MUCH higher than any job-related risk BTW), so I tend to consider SOME risks as "normal" (yes, it is very sad if somebody dies in the car accident, but we won't give up cars because of it, will we?)
Now to the "HOW BIG the chance is" question for condomless porn - while I don't have any statistics on it (maybe somebody has? - then it would be interesting to compare it to statistics on stuntman injuries), I've got a feeling that with all the people who REALLY HATE porn, any such cases would be made VERY high-profile as a tool to fight porn, so as I don't hear of it every second day, it shouldn't be too bad even as it stands now. This obviously is just a wild speculation on my part, and I will be glad to see any real statistics (which in turn can make me reconsider my view of condomless porn).
|
10-21-08 09:55am
|
