| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
751
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Loki:
mbaya, thanks for the review. I too noticed the new download limit at PJGirls. I'm not terribly thrilled with it, but don't find it restrictive at all because I never use a download manager. It's not a limit on how much content you can download, but rather on how many connections you can make to the PJGirls servers in an hour. If you rely on a download manager, you'll find it restrictive, but if not, you'll literally never notice.
PJGirls staff wrote a post to all members explaining the issue, and laid out that too many connections from users were overloading the servers. They implemented the policy of 100 downloads in a hour to balance server usage for everyone on the site. I give kudos to PJGirls for good communications.
I don't have a very fast internet connection, and have never experienced timing out on PJGirls. It has at times been slow, but since the implementation of the download limit, it has been less likely to be slow.
I find it unusual that their webmaster was suspended from PU. Can anyone clarify why this occurred? I'm not familiar for what offences you can be suspended. They were suspended, but the site is still listed. Is that a reasonable reason to criticize the site? You obviously think so, but I cannot say because of lack of information.
Thanks for the good review. We differ in regards to the site's quality and you make a good case for your point of view in your review. Good job.
|
03-03-19 06:15pm
|
Reply
752
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from pat362:
The only thing I will say on Playboy is that I once joined and when I wanted to cancel then I had to call an operator to cancel something I had signed up online so while that may no longer be the case. I'm not going to sign up to any Playboy related site until I have that carved in stone.
|
04-25-19 06:50am
|
Reply
753
|
Playboy TV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
Maybe I'm out of line here, but I don't think that what I'm asking for is unreasonable. I'm not asking them to cancel the membership and let me walk away. I want to pay for what I intended to buy. If this were a bricks-and-mortar store this wouldn't be an issue. I'm hoping that the person on the 'support' chat this morning was just having a bad day. Heck, I'd even pay the full monthly fee and not the TBP discount price.
So I've emailed MBI Probiller and asked them for one of two things: either reconsider their unwillingness to help me or give me a contact email for the Playboy site. Every contact link on the Playboy site directs to Probiller so when Probiller tells me to take it up with Playboy that rings hollow.
Whether Probiller even responds to the email is another question though...
|
10-11-15 11:41am
|
Reply
754
|
Plumperd
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from clubseventeen:
Hi,
Thank you for the review.
We indeed stopped updating this site a while ago for reasons beyond our control. To make up a bit for the small amount of scenes we added the network with 13k+ videos.
Thanks again.
Gr.
|
02-11-20 10:53pm
|
Reply
755
|
Policeman
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from morgentau:
(mbaya's Reply)
The network is pretty awesome if you like ALL of the following:
- softcore content (playful posing)
- amateur content
- eastern european girls
- "barely legal" girls
The network has hardcore straight and lesbian content but apart from ivana fukalot's site it's rather tame and boring. If posing does nothing for you stay away from this network. I have a 3 month membership for 18onlygirls that gave me access to all 12 sites. I don't know the conditions for other membership types. The websites aren't very clear about the included perks for one month memberships.
|
02-23-09 08:01am
|
Reply
756
|
Porn Ultra Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from wiild1:
(mbaya's Reply)
Yeah, this is why I like PU so much: It gives us consumers a guidance + punishing the "evil forces" while giving incentives to companies to focus on quality, value for money etc.
PU is like Karma! :-)
|
03-01-09 07:29am
|
Reply
757
|
Pornstar Key
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from exotics4me:
mbaya,
I did a review of this same network just a few days ago, and had a chance to go through the content I downloaded. A few things, there are full scene downloads on some of the movies. I have 3 Georgia Jones ones that are full scenes, and just from glancing at the files I have, I would estimate around 30% of the videos are full scenes. I only mention that because your review says all videos are split. Here are a few of the full scenes by filename.
Georgia-Jones-greentoy 222 mb
Georgia-Jones-orgasm 183 mb
Georgia-Jones-stockings 214 mb
I do agree though on most everything else, I'm not really for sure on the exclusive part as some of the sets are from New Sensations, and I think they can probably claim those as exclusive since New Sensations owns this network. Just thought I would mention that about the full clips.
|
03-26-09 11:04pm
|
Reply
758
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks, mbaya! :-)
|
06-09-11 09:03am
|
Reply
759
|
Premium Bukkake
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Cum Play John:
Eye contact is everything.
I must say I once joined for a month and the video with Ria Sunn was the hottest single porn video I have ever seen.
She looks straight into the camera and repeatedly swallows load after load, never breaking eye contact with the viewer. Even when she wasn't swallowing, she looked directly into the camera with her waiting wide-open mouth. (This itself is a wonderful tactic rarely repeated.)
It was the most intense virtual-reality-like experience I've ever had.
BUT THEY HAVE NO UNDERSTANDING TO KEEP THIS UP.
I would have rejoined the site for Julie Red alone, that #1 video showing her sitting in a chair in fishnet and green boots, an absolutely gorgeous woman making EYE CONTACT WITH ME, but they seem (from the video clips) to completely miss the point with all their side-shots.
Viewers want Julie's eyes locked on them UNBROKEN FOR 30 MINUTES while she smiles and swallows. This is the WHOLE POINT.
WHY WHY WHY do they not get what a terrible waste it is to make a bukkake video with a young woman this hot and not keep the EYES ON YOU?
It's an incredible waste for such a sensual, filthy act. They must have paid her an enormous sum... Yet no continuous, unbroken eye contact? Give me a break!
It's a complete betrayal of what their site could be.
WTF cares about side shots for bukkake with a woman that hot?
|
04-14-18 05:48am
|
Reply
760
|
Premium Bukkake
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
I'm glad I was able to offer you some information. I hope it was useful when you made your decision to join.
If I had reviewed the site I'd have probably come in right around 85 as you did. Yes, it's a small site and very expensive, but I don't judge value on quantity alone. Bukkake / Gokkun is rare and it's even more rare when it's well done and that would push the score up here.
If they fixed their pricing the score would go up. I'm not saying that if they allowed full downloads at $20 per month then I'd recommend the site. I'm willing to pay for high-quality niche sites. And I do have to confess that the weakness of the Canadian dollar these days isn't the site's fault.
|
05-24-17 01:14pm
|
Reply
761
|
Premium Bukkake
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from rearadmiral:
I didn't have an opportunity to review this site when I had a membership a few months ago as it hadn't been listed yet, but I can confirm everything positive and negative that you've noted. The site offers some amazing porn in a very-rare niche and they do it well too. But the tiered membership has to be simplified if the site is to get a wider audience.
(I wonder if one of the cost drivers is that this site uses better male talent and therefore has to pay them? I read in Ashley Blue's book Girlvert that JM Productions would put an ad in a sleazy LA newspaper looking for guys to do the American Bukkake shoots. All they needed was a certificate showing they were STD-free.)
I also wonder if the site producers priced it this way figuring it was in a narrow niche and to make any money they needed a few perverts to spend a lot. I think they're wrong and that if they priced this site lower they could earn more by tapping into the large number of porn watchers who would buy in a at more reasonable price.
Let's hope your review drives some business their way.
|
05-23-17 04:53pm
|
Reply
762
|
Premium Bukkake
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from elephant:
(mbaya's Reply)
Nice one, look forward to reading your views on it. its certainly doing something different with the amount of guys so credit there.
|
05-19-17 05:37am
|
Reply
763
|
Premium Bukkake
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from elephant:
It is very expensive and in my opinion would benefit miles more financially lowing the price of the join price and get regular people joining who will spread the word about it. That said it looks very unique and well done.
Things that would put me off joining would be the price, but I fear after a while I'd become a little bored as it looks rather the same on each vid. Still some real beauties that look very tempting indeed.
|
05-19-17 03:01am
|
Reply
764
|
Premium Bukkake
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
Oops... I didn't answer your question on value. I really liked the scenes but I don't think I'd pay for the Diamond membership simply because of the currency exchange with the Canadian dollar. A Diamond membership would set me back something above $100. I don't mind paying for porn but that's a bit pricey for me for one site.
Your opinion may be different though...
|
05-14-17 06:04am
|
Reply
765
|
Premium Bukkake
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
I'm going on memory here...
The site looked like it had a lot of videos but that was deceiving because each scene was uploaded three times. There was an upload from two different cameras and then there was a BTS upload that was titled "Best Scenes." My experience was that the Best Scenes was the better of the uploads since it contained all of the bukkake footage and added in some extras.
When I joined back in March (2017) there were maybe 15 models available and each of those had three videos available. I just looked at the website and it looks like they've added a lot since then.
I had the least expensive membership available and there were several videos that I couldn't view for the entirety of my stay there.
This is subjective, but I liked the scenes. They were well lit and well produced which isn't the norm in this niche. There was a range of models too, in terms of age and body type though all were attractive.
I should also point out (again from memory) that most or even all of the scenes were more Gokkun than bukkake. I don't recall any where the model has her face covered in cum. In the scenes I recall they men came in the model's mouth and she'd take a dozen or so loads and then spit it into a glass and then take another dozen and so on. At the end of the scene the model would drink the cum.
One thing I recall that I found hot was that each model had a 'helper' who assisted. I'm not sure why I found that hot, but I did.
Let me know if you have any specific questions and maybe my synapses will fire and dust off some distant memory from last month...
|
05-14-17 06:01am
|
Reply
766
|
Premium Bukkake
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I was a member there a couple of months ago and can confirm mbaya's comment on pricing. If you want access to everything this will be a very expensive membership.
It is a good bukkake site though, and those are rare. Obviously a site like German Goo Girls is a better value but until they drop Centrobill as their biller they won't have me as a customer.
|
05-14-17 05:35am
|
Reply
767
|
Pretty Dirty
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from elephant:
Wow great review by the way, you have simply made my year finding out this info, I'm a member of Pure Taboo yearly subscription, and had no idea about any of this, just logged in and found and the top it mentioned this Adult time, I've never seen anything like this before its truly awesome, it's blowing my mind to see all this porn in one place. I can see me now renewing the yearly membership when it runs out.
I did see something at the top a couple of weeks back mentioning bonus sites pretty dirty but when I clicked it nothing happened so thought it was something they were working on adding, then I forgot about it, so think its maybe a recent thing on Pure Taboo but thanks so much for informing me as I wouldn't of maybe seen it or clicked.
|
12-08-18 03:24am
|
Reply
768
|
Pretty Dirty
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from lk2fireone:
I was told, in a live chat with the 21Sextury customer support, that if you join any one of the sites that are included in the Adult Time network, you automatically get a membership in Adult Time, with access to all the sites in the network.
I asked him several questions about this, asking if there was any extra charges for the Adult Time membership, is the access to Adult Time given to you automatically, etc.
And he basically said it's a simple process:
Membership in any one of the Adult Time sites gives you access to all the sites in the Adult Time program.
Like you, I got access to Adult Time with my membership to 21Sextury.
However, I also have a membership to Devils Film.
I've had that membership since 2017-08-01 (it's an annual membership).
So, according to what the customer service rep said, I should have gotten an Adult Time membership from my Devils Film membership, since Devils Film is part of Adult Time.
And I should have been given the Adult Time membership much sooner, based on my Devils Film membership.
The only way I can figure it, is that it takes a new membership in one of the Adult Time sites, instead of a recurring membership.
Since I renewed my Devils Film membership on 2018-08-01.
And was never notified that I had a new or old Adult Time membership.
So I guess the safest way to check would be: email 21Sextury customer service, and ask if you automatically get a membership in Adult Time.
Or, if you are joining one of the other sites in the Adult Time network, email customer service for that site if you get a free Adult Time membership with your site membership.
I don't know why it takes so many words, to describe a simple process.
|
12-07-18 07:40am
|
Reply
769
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
I honestly never figured that I’d give a 99 to anyone either, but this site deserves it. The volume of material they have, the uniqueness of it, the download speeds and the customer service all support a high rating. The fact that they produce some of the most innovative BDSM available is a big factor. The fact that it is easy to access at a fair price clinches the deal.
I’ve never gone wrong with a Kink site. I’ve had recurring memberships to several sites and have never been disappointed. There are some sites that I’d not have any inclination to join, but I suspect that they would reflect the same high standards that I’ve seen.
|
04-07-10 03:54am
|
Reply
770
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Torn4do:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks for the update! I guess this could be a good or bad piece of news depending on the point of view. :)
|
12-03-09 06:47pm
|
Reply
771
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from Wittyguy:
Mmmm, this is a tough one. Are they breaking the law? In the US some states have laws against public nudity but they can sketchy and not uniformly enforced (some states might also have laws against public sex acts but I don't know). If there is one distinction to make it is between exposing children to pornography and children coming across sex acts. If the producers showed porno movies in public then they would be in big legal trouble if children saw it. Filming people going at it in a public setting is a grayer issue. Hard to say. Sounds like a great PU forum topic, I would suggest reposting your comment there for more feedback.
|
12-11-08 12:06pm
|
Reply
772
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from mr smut:
Hello mbaya,
these are very good and critical thoughts. I agree with apoctom that someone from kink.com should answer these. In any case it's definitely not allowed to let children be witnesses of what happens while they shoot these scenes.
My other great concern is that the models will be those that get fined or maybe arrested for what happens in front of the lenses.
|
12-11-08 10:48am
|
Reply
773
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from apoctom:
mbaya,
You raise some very interesting points about the site. I only recently heard of this addition to Kink.com and I had the same questions about legality of shooting in public. Finding out that they shoot in E. Europe helps some, but the lack of control over the environment, while the main part of the attraction, also makes me nervous about the site.
I hope that somebody associated with the site will address your concerns.
|
12-11-08 07:25am
|
Reply
774
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
I agree 100% with you that having to use "Kink Dollars" can hide the price of the videos you want to buy. I'm no expert on using them as I only did it once. I bought the advance video for Public Disgrace because i really wanted to see it.
To answer your question though, I can't really say. The problem is that to get the PD video I needed a certain number of Kink dollars and since they only appear to be available in certain values, I had to buy more than I needed. So I actually had to pay more for the video than Kink was actually charging because I don't think I'll be able to use the remaining Kink dollars without buying more. (This is just a guess, but I think I had to buy 30 Kink dollars for $30US and then used maybe 22 Kink dollars for the scene.)
For me, I think that if you only want one or two scenes you are probably better off getting a one-month membership.
|
10-07-08 08:01am
|
Reply
775
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
Sterile... that's an apt description. I often wondered how they could take such a unique niche and make it seem so blasé and almost dull. But since they had Veronica Jett, I pretty much had to get a membership. I'd pay to watch her read a newspaper.
|
12-04-10 04:35pm
|
