| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
726
|
Party Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from elephant:
Yeah I remember joining this site a few years ago with high hopes cause they seemed to have beautiful girls and I love an orgy scene but I didn't find them all too great and found them more frustrating than anything, too many girls full clothed and often the ones I wanted to see in the action. I don't think I watched too many of my downloads, don't remember any standing out. shame as it has huge potential.
|
03-27-16 09:48am
|
Reply
727
|
Party Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from lk2fireone:
Bottom line:
Would you recommend this site to your enemies?
Just kidding.
An excellent review. Sorry you wasted your money, but at least you wrote a review warning us not to waste ours.
|
03-27-16 07:54am
|
Reply
728
|
Party Hardcore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from asmith12:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks.
|
05-21-09 10:21pm
|
Reply
729
|
Party Wild Naked
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from badandy400:
Nice catch on the "beg offer" they have. I do not always try to leave a site before joining to see what better deal they might beg me back with. I need to remember to do that.
Glad to know to stay away from this one.
|
05-27-09 03:46pm
|
Reply
730
|
Party Wild Naked
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Cybertoad:
Nice Review, and nice warning
|
05-27-09 08:53am
|
Reply
731
|
Pascal's Subsluts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(mbaya's Reply)
It also included 3 AM, Ed Powers, and Bruce Seven Films. I found the extras underwhelming. I checked in quick and they all looked like it was produced years ago and bought up by someone for new packaging.
|
02-17-20 10:00am
|
Reply
732
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Pyrenees:
(mbaya's Reply)
Your being very kind lol. I will tell you frankly. I really wanted to take advantage of their 50% off multi site deal. But how could I with this experience? Their Mega site includes PassionHD, Casting Couch X, Exotic 4k, Fantasy HD, My very first time, POVD, Pure Mature and Tiny 4k. ALL of these sites were on my radar and at the time I did not know they were run by pornpros. They all had a similar look true but it took me joining then cross referencing with Pornpros to see most of the scenes came from there. Oh well lesson learned. At least I saved $70 additional bucks.
The reason I like Heartcore (Even though I am known for brutal sex and bdsm) is the very first porno I ever saw was pretty much a 70's version of heartcore. It was not until years later I saw the Devil in Miss Jones and New Wave Hookers and began my appreciation for sweat and pain lol.
|
08-19-15 09:18am
|
Reply
733
|
Pegas Productions
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
I've been to Montreal many times myself and the women there are very beautiful. One thing that seems to be different about women in Quebec is that they never go out unless they look presentable. You'd never see a woman walking down the street with sweatpants and her dirty hair pulled back. Actually, to be fair, the men also dress up to go anywhere too - it's just that I don't notice them.
The public sex scenes are really unusual in how blatant they are. They had to choose an off time during the off season for a lot of these scenes.
If you join, just be aware that the bitrates are low so they scenes aren't as sharp as they could be.
|
09-01-15 03:38pm
|
Reply
734
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from PinkPanther:
(mbaya's Reply)
No problem, mbaya - this site has some serious gaps, but this one they've got covered.
|
11-17-09 06:52pm
|
Reply
735
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from PinkPanther:
This review is incorrect about zips - from the home page, click on latest in the galleries area, then click on the latest gallery. You'll get a page displaying pics - 40, which is an average size for recent galleries - then you'll have "Download this gallery" at the bottom with a drop-down menu for choosing the size of the pics that you want from Small to Extra Extra Large - 5 choices. You click on "Extra Extra Large" and Save File pops up immediately. Click on that and you're downloading a file of 70 mb.
As to vids, they are pretty much non-existent when it comes to new ones. The most recent internet exclusive vid was released 1/01/09, the most recent before that were released 2/27/08.
They also no longer have live shows. The most recent of those was 2/03/09.
They do release bottom-of-the-run porn comps frequently - they have so little interest to me, I'm not even checking the specifics.
So it's all about pics for new stuff - and the archives, which go back a ways.
|
11-17-09 04:28pm
|
Reply
736
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from WeeWillyWinky:
I'm tempted to join due to your review. There's something about the old magazines that drums up a steamy nostalgia, and you can remember how it felt when you first saw them. There was a site somewhere that offered all the archives for the Brit mag, Mayfair, and free of charge. That was a trip.
|
11-17-09 02:27pm
|
Reply
737
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from rome476:
mr. smut- Good review; I have one question- how many of the more recent videos are b/g hc?
|
11-15-09 04:30pm
|
Reply
738
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Drooler:
I'm surprised that there weren't zips, because the last time I was there (to the end of July), they had them in several pic sizes.
Just yesterday, I gave up on trying to rejoin. First, they wouldn't let me because my email address was already in their system (?). So I contacted them through their website (which was a bit of an exercise in hoop-jumping). Never got a reply. Then I created a gmail account and tried to use that (after all, Penthouse recommends Yahoo, so I figured one free email is as good as another) to get the password sent from them. Again, no cigarillo.
And now I read that there are no zips. Guess somehow I've been done a favor!
For the life of me, I cannot understand why they run the site the way they do as far as getting subscribers is concerned. They precheck for a year's subscription for some (see markfx above), and utterly reject even persistent returners!
Fortunately, I do have recourse in this handy phrase: "Fuck it." And "fuck it" it shall remain.
|
11-15-09 11:31am
|
Reply
739
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from mr smut:
Thanks for this very nice review there's one sentence that made me wonder.
[quote]I enjoyed this site a LOT more than ATK Hairy, for example.[/quote]
Which is quite interesting to read but ATK of course is not for those that like glamour shots :-)
As for the comment on the missing ZIP-files I'm with ths captain. A site like Penthouse should really offer this in order to make me think of joining.
Cheers,
Smut
|
11-15-09 11:08am
|
Reply
740
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from markfx:
Be very careful when joining; I was charged for the year membership. Their join page automatically has the year option checked. Evidently even visiting this page signed me up, and when i revisited it they charged me twice!
In their favor, they graciously removed the charges.
|
11-15-09 10:49am
|
Reply
741
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Capn:
Well, I am into photos, but the lack of any zip facility at all is going to be a major downer.
:0/
|
11-15-09 10:41am
|
Reply
742
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thank you, mbaya, sometimes I wonder if it is just me? :-)
|
01-26-11 09:22am
|
Reply
743
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from Sevrin:
That's a pity. I hadn't known about this site until now and discovered a couple of my favourite models from Hegre, Amandine and Marlène. Still may check it out at some point for those two alone. ^_^
|
07-02-10 06:19am
|
Reply
744
|
Pin-Up Wow
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(mbaya's Reply)
OK thanks for the info.
A shame that.
Another one close but not there! :0/
|
07-25-10 03:13am
|
Reply
745
|
Pinup Files
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from eightinches:
(mbaya's Reply)
They offer 4 versions of each video one pc and one mac. the pc version is wmv and the mac is mov I guess quicktime. I downloaded the wmv. each format has a dialup version and a broadband version. Its not high def. The other site I just joined has 1 GB downloads. But I have no complaints with the video quality. My recollection is its better quality video than reality kings. But its been a while sense I have been on their site.
|
01-08-09 10:38am
|
Reply
746
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from exotics4me:
(mbaya's Reply)
You get 30 the day you sign up. Thing is there are, I think, 42 total, so it takes 6 months to get all 42. If you're interested in which sites you get instantly, go to the Pix and Video site. You'll see "Full Network" in the menu on your left. Click it. The next page will have a blank drop down menu on your upper right side of the screen, click it and a drop down box will open that lists "Instant access sites" and "loyalty sites", so you can see the ones that come with it instantly and then the order of the loyalty sites. You get two of those each month you let it recur and it does recur at $24.95 instead of the starting price of $29.95. Probably 3/4 or so of those first 30 are non-exclusive. The 12 loyalty sites are exclusive to their family of sites.
|
08-01-09 04:44pm
|
Reply
747
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from martinlongbow:
anyone knows if there is an anal version of this site? anal gaping instead of pussy? i know inthecrack but it is not exactly the same.
|
12-01-19 02:09am
|
Reply
748
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from WebmasterMartin:
Hello mbaya,
thank you for your review.
The account suspendation at PornUsers was a technical fault. PornUsers were acquired by TheBestPorn and as a result a lot of accounts were disabled and TBP aren't sure why because they are still looking into the code. So I wasn't a naughty boy :-) PU just had technical issues. In the end I had to create a new account and they assigned PJGirls to my new account.
Regarding the site name - we wanted to have a domain name that is easy to remember and "PJ" was free, that's the only reason. It sounds probably stupid but we couldn't think of anything smart in the beginnings and also our content was slightly different at that time.
Regarding content - we try to offer what's requested. Most people want gaping, some want toys, a minority wants speculum or gyno and occasional fisting is also very popular. So in the end people are always happy about a vast majority of our videos and unhappy about only a couple of them. It's impossible to please everybody but we feel we've found the right mix.
Regarding models - Czech models are by far the most popular girls in the porn business (even American model agencies often hire Czech girls and even pay for their flights etc.) so I don't see that as a disadvantage. If we wanted to have foreign models we'd have to grow first, it's not possible for such a small site (we're just two friends maintaining this site - webmaster Martin and cameraman Jiri) to pay for flights or hotels of models.
Regarding search engine - it works fine. If you select just videos with blonde models, you don't get just the most recent page, you can continue to other pages too and the blonde setting stays set.
Anyway, thank you for the review.
Regards
Martin, webmaster
www.PJGirls.com
|
09-19-19 02:23pm
|
Reply
749
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Loki:
(mbaya's Reply)
PJGirls is a one-trick pony. It focuses on very explicit gynecological views. I rated it based on how well it does on that basis. You come at the site with different criteria and explained your rating well. I liked your review a lot, and the differing criteria we use to judge the same site is what makes PU so valuable. You pointed out some really cogent points in your review that I hadn't thought about (like the camera angles), and I value seeing other opinions.
You wrote a good review. You might differ with me on how good PJGirls is, but that's what makes horse races, politics, and porn reviews. :)
|
03-03-19 08:32pm
|
Reply
750
|
PJ Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Loki:
I just spent a few minutes reviewing the webmaster rules for PU. I hadn't looked at them for the simple reason that I don't have any affiliation with any website.
It appears that there are two infractions meriting suspension, (1) that no incentives be given for reviews, and (2) any added text to a site must not ask or influence users to submit a review or comment with a specific agenda.
If PJGirls' webmaster violated either of these, they merit suspension, as without honest, impartial reviews PU is useless.
|
03-03-19 06:44pm
|
