| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
776
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
Agreed. They have the ability to produce some great material so if they could improve a bit on the technical side that would be icing on the cake.
have you ever had a membership at Nude in L.A.? It's a decent site too, but lacks on the nervousness aspect of public nudity.
|
12-04-10 10:48am
|
Reply
777
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from rearadmiral:
Excellent review! As you note, I recently did a review and yet you somehow managed to write a similar length review and give people completely unique information. I thought I was fairly thorough, and when I read your review I kept thinking "yeah, he's 100% right... why didn't I think of that?"
I really like this site and hope they continue to add files and improve their quality.
|
12-03-10 05:37pm
|
Reply
778
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(mbaya's Reply)
It had been about two years for me too so I also wondered if there would be enough updates and if there would be improvements. I can tell you that there are new videos, and the highest resolution is an improvement over what they had in the past. In the past, the highest resolution was 630x470 and now it is 1280x720. Subjectively it looks fine.
I think I'll edit the review to give more objective information.
Thanks
|
11-25-10 04:09am
|
Reply
779
|
Public Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from bacardiancoke:
(mbaya's Reply)
yeah I agree and I think that it is a great pity that a site with such great potential has been allowed to stagnate.
|
09-10-09 04:56am
|
Reply
780
|
Public GFs
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from WeeWillyWinky:
After a look at the welcome page, it looks like a collection of stuff you could probably find for free at numerous adult pic-hosting sites. I've always been tempted to try a site like this, but have never done it.
|
09-13-09 10:11pm
|
Reply
781
|
Punish Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from marvin:
(mbaya's Reply)
I apologize for the confusion - some of the 24 scenes have multiple thumbs - well 25 scenes now :)
|
08-15-15 06:39am
|
Reply
782
|
Pure CFNM
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from elephant:
Yeah nice review, I'd probably give this site a whirl as I'm looking for a site completely different to what I normally join, just wish there was a discount to be $19.99 or better still $14.99. Still it goes on my to do list someday. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
|
12-22-17 09:17am
|
Reply
783
|
Pure CFNM
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from rearadmiral:
I'm not a fan of CFNM porn but I can still appreciate a thorough and well-written review.
I know that CFNM is a specific fetish and I get that, but I really like CMNF scenes and there is no specific label for that since it occurs in a lot of porn. I just wish it was a tag. It occurs a lot in BDSM porn since it is an easy way to set up a power imbalance (as it does in CFNM porn too) but I like scenes that have that power imbalance but don't go as far as BDSM does.
Thanks for posting the review!
|
12-21-17 01:37pm
|
Reply
784
|
Pure CFNM
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from dracken:
I have been looking for a good site with clothed women, after the bangbrothers network (if I remember correctly) got me hooked on that fetish. Now on the tour feature there are several scenes of girls actually having sex with the guy, are there scenes like that? I am not a big fan of BJ's and hardcore sex would make the site a lot more interesting to me.
Thanks for the very nice review.
|
08-16-10 11:27pm
|
Reply
785
|
Pure Smoking
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GCode:
(mbaya's Reply)
I'll have to second that and go so far as to say 480 X 320 is NOT acceptable by any means. Maybe in the early 2000's but nowadays, the standard should be at least 720 X 480 but I will admit that by the end of this year, 1280 X 720 should be the standard and become average.
|
07-23-09 08:38pm
|
Reply
786
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Shen:
(mbaya's Reply)
Apologies for misreading your reply. TBP still has value when it concerns factual nuggets and opinions here and there, but they do not match the depth and flavour PU reviews deliver. Do you think the TBP reviewers may catch wind of this review and reconsider their next review of Pure Taboo?
|
04-09-19 07:46pm
|
Reply
787
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Shen:
(mbaya's Reply)
I see. I did not know this was the third review in the 70s from TBP. I do concur with lk2fireone's sentiments.
|
04-09-19 06:54pm
|
Reply
788
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(mbaya's Reply)
I think that some of the videos at the Pure Taboo site are impressive.
Some might dismiss or not appreciate the artistic approach to hardcore porn.
And some of the plot lines can be foolish.
But the site tries to create a perverted sense of hardcore porn, that I find valuable. It's like watching early visions of The Twilight Zone, done in hardcore style.
So I disagree with professional porn reviewers, who score the site in the 70s. The site has some videos that are worth watching: you are watching movie-quality porn (except the acting or plot can be funky).
|
04-09-19 06:34pm
|
Reply
789
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(mbaya's Reply)
It does help, mbaya. Thanks!
|
01-28-18 11:50am
|
Reply
790
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(mbaya's Reply)
I believe that the P T producers would love to be able to do that but sadly the economics that govern the way they shoot porn are such that they are not given a budget large enough and probably never will.
That said I can't help but notice that sometime they don't know what they are doing and it as nothing to do with budget and everything to do with lack of talent behind the camera. That's a little bit less obvious with some of P T videos but glaring with Girlsway videos
|
01-28-18 11:27am
|
Reply
791
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from pat362:
Thanks for the review. I applaud the producers attempt to shoot porn with a scenario because that is something that is sorely lacking in modern porn and I even appreciate their use of lenses that make the scenes look grittier/darker because it makes their stuff look less fake.
Where they kind of lose me is in the execution because ultimately the producers ultimate goal is to shoot a sex scene that happens to have a simple story and what they should instead be doing is shooting a simple story that will at some point include a sex scene. That means that they should concentrate a lot more time to the story part of the scene to the point where they do dry runs, multiple shots and maybe even 2 day shoots to make sure that the story is as good as the sex scene.
If anyone is a fan of this site and also likes lesbian porn than you should check out Girlsway because most of the videos on Girlsway are also produced by these people.
|
01-27-18 07:26pm
|
Reply
792
|
Pure Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from messmer:
Good review, mbaya. I am constantly looking for plot driven. I am craving plot driven, rather than Gonzo, but I found that, even with plot, no one takes the time to undress. One moment the model is fully dressed, next moment she is naked, on her knees. How about this site, are we treated to a casual undress before sex or are we plunged right into the action? Thanks!
|
01-27-18 01:59pm
|
Reply
793
|
Rascal Dog
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(mbaya's Reply)
Foxes.com is an old softcore site that started up many years ago (in the early 1990th, I think) with photosets in very small size - now they are better and they have included videos.
BUT: You have to pay $9.95 for each set (crazy)
https://www.thebestporn.com/review/foxes/
.. and as mentioned Rascal Dog has a normal member-deal with a monthly price..with the same full content
|
01-17-10 03:35am
|
Reply
794
|
Raw Attack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Wraith0711:
(mbaya's Reply)
There was no insult taken at all. Thank you for your repliy.
|
04-10-19 04:56am
|
Reply
795
|
Raw Attack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wraith0711:
(mbaya's Reply)
I have never scored a site higher than 90 sir and I rated it higher than the reviewer for tbp did the same day. I only speak for myself here when I say anything higher than 90 is meet with skepticism. What raffle did I win? LOL I have not received any notification.
|
04-09-19 04:08pm
|
Reply
796
|
Real Black Lesbians
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Cybertoad:
(mbaya's Reply)
OOPs sorry, well thanks for the trust rating again :-)
|
11-05-08 12:28pm
|
Reply
797
|
Real Black Lesbians
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Cybertoad:
(mbaya's Reply)
If you look at my account I have 33 sites I have reviewed, I will have to check this site you reviewed out. PS feel free to look at my reviews if you like them , please give a positive trust rating too.
I will sign up for this site looks interesting.
Thanks
|
11-05-08 12:07pm
|
Reply
798
|
Real Black Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Cybertoad:
Nice Thorough Review , Gave you a positive plus rating
|
11-05-08 10:39am
|
Reply
799
|
Real Couples
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment from mbaya:
I see that the site no longer has this posted on it.
|
06-09-11 08:07pm
|
Reply
800
|
Real Couples
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from tangub:
It seems like they are admitting they don't put enough time and effort into bringing quality updates, if they did then the positive reviews would follow as a matter of course.
|
05-29-11 09:25am
|
