Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : mbaya (0)  

Feedback:   All (1686)  |   Reviews (308)  |   Comments (158)  |   Replies (1220)

Other:   Replies Received (1063)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 701-725 of 1063 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
701
Visit Oldje

Oldje
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from pat362: (mbaya's Reply)

I guess they probably have at least half of oldje's video. It might be worth it for someone who likes the content but doesn't want to pay the cost Oldje is charging.

11-26-10  02:29pm

Reply
702
Visit Oldje

Oldje
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from pat362: (mbaya's Reply)

I know they have some of oldje's content but no way of knowing just how much. Do you know how many videos are at beauty and the senior?

11-25-10  06:10pm

Reply
703
Visit Oldje

Oldje
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Drooler: (mbaya's Reply)

First question: No.

"How long" question: Segment length varies a lot. Samples:
6:30, 13:54, 9:30, 7:03, 4:11, 12:40

WMV quality question: Kbps on the WMVs varies a lot, too. Samples:
4157, 3496, 3321, 7509, 3674, 2538, 2873. These begin with some of the most recent end with a couple from when they started doing WMVs.

That's about all I can give in quality stats. I'm not fluent in "video."

Some of us here pay in Euros directly, so I really couldn't factor in price that much, though my score for it isn't quite as high as some.


02-28-09  01:49pm

Reply
704
Visit Only All Sites

Only All Sites
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from Denner: (mbaya's Reply)

Mbaya - I think you've made that quite clear - the 'BTW' in my reply was referring to the Capn's replies...

03-21-10  09:28am

Reply
705
Visit Only All Sites

Only All Sites
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Review from Denner:

Fine review of this 'old timer' - been a member three or four times in the past years.
And as a videomanic, I have to agree with mbaya - the videos are close to lame - the photosets are much better...
AND BTW: Do not criticize the site for the lack of nudity - it was never the purpose here - this is and has always been a site with 'outfits' and the tease - it's a niche - and I think it's quite clear even in the previews.


03-21-10  09:24am

Reply
706
Visit Only All Sites

Only All Sites
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Capn: (mbaya's Reply)

Yep, that is pretty much as I expected. :0/

I do appreciate that different folks like different things, but I really would have thought that a so called striptease site would feature a lot more frequent full nudity at the conclusion of the items.

Cap'n. :0(


03-21-10  09:15am

Reply
707
Visit Only All Sites

Only All Sites
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Review from Capn:

I was a member of OnlyTease a couple of years back and got very frustrated by the lack of full nudity.
Even sets that were billed as full nude often weren't! :0E
At one point I asked that they were flagged more accurately, but received no response.

Striptease I love, but for me, it HAS to go to full nudity.

It sounds like little has changed in that regard. :0(

IIRC I seem to remember seeing another negative fairly recently; the use of CCBills regional pricing 'service.'?

Cap'n. :0E


03-21-10  08:54am

Reply
708
Visit Only All Sites

Only All Sites
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Vegas Ken: (mbaya's Reply)

The special pricing for Only Tease has been added to the Epoch Join pages. So users should get the special price from both CCBill and Epoch processing. Just an FYI.

03-03-10  10:42am

Reply
709
Visit Only Blowjob

Only Blowjob
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Review from Goldfish:

I joined Only Blowjob about a year and a half ago. The concept is good but I ultimately didn't end up keeping much of the content and with the price and relatively low amount of content I don't think I'd ever join again.

06-20-09  06:15pm

Reply
710
Visit Only CFNM

Only CFNM
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Review from gaypornolover:

Sounds one weird site to me - like you I don't get the smoking thing at all. I guess it might be to make the women appear relaxed and like they're in control but to me it's a bit odd and makes it sound like they're not really into it - who smokes DURING sex if they're not bored?! After maybe!

The whole point of CFNM is fantasy so the gonzo style is just not appropriate for it - sounds like a lazy site where they haven't understood the genre at all, just tried to cash in one a new craze.

I hate non-updating sites too!

Great review, will leave this one WELL alone.


08-01-11  08:48am

Reply
711
Visit Only CFNM

Only CFNM
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Review from Capn:

Well, if nothing else, it distilled out another dislike for you. :0/

Cap'n. :0)


07-31-11  04:21pm

Reply
712
Visit Only Opaques

Only Opaques
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Mr Fountain: (mbaya's Reply)

Thanks, a year ago i came across a good review on OT. i was just going to give it a month. I just saw some of the hottest models like Carla Brown; and too many more to name. I went from that to joining OT about seven or eight times. Then this month; I joined all the sites- which is how I got Only Opaques membership; don't know if i can do that every month. But I will make myself useful and do some reviews of their other sites in the near future.

07-25-09  10:18am

Reply
713
Visit Only Secretaries

Only Secretaries
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Comment from Capn:

If I understand it correctly, it is a 'service' CCBill offer to webmasters. Only the greedy use it! :0(

02-28-10  11:14am

Reply
714
Visit Only Secretaries

Only Secretaries
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Comment from mbaya:

A while back I mentioned that even though I live in the US, my ISP has me in Canada. I will never pay a higher regional price through CCBill and I even sent them an email telling them so.

02-28-10  09:25am

Reply
715
Visit Only Secretaries

Only Secretaries
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Comment from Denner:

It seems like an everlasting problem with regional pricing: CCBill keep having it and Epoch not...
A pity - because it still looks like CCBill is the primary billing-co. for most sites - and when somebody in another region wants to join a site they have to go through a lot of trouble finding the site at Epoch - to save their money and get the right/fair price.
Then again, great - some sites have direct links to Epoch in joining.

Thanks, mbaya for bringing this up again - guess PUs in other regions just have to keep on stating this problem with CCBill!


02-28-10  08:55am

Reply
716
Visit Only Tease

Only Tease
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Capn: (mbaya's Reply)

Yes I really wish they would address this issue.

Even if they don't increase the proportion of full nude sets, accurate flagging of them would be a help.

Cap'n. :0(


09-27-09  12:56pm

Reply
717
Visit Only Tease

Only Tease
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Comment from EroticShot:

Replying to the above - Mbaya and others - your point is true - but it's not what OT strives to be. They are not a porn company - most chicks do not get naked. They are a tease site. This is not FTV.com where you do have both tease and masturbation. Very few if any (??) OT girls actually get fully naked and or masturbate. This is a clothing fetish company and for that - they are the best. THE BEST. You have hundreds of models from the UK here not to be found almost anywhere else.

12-21-08  08:47am

Reply
718
Visit Pacino's Adventures

Pacino's Adventures
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from exotics4me: (mbaya's Reply)

Hey Mbaya,

Cultural tattoos, especially in Pacific Island regions, South America, often have tribal/ancestry roots to them. Though these are not usually required, the tattoos are seen as tributes to their heritage/those who have passed away. You'll also see this some in California with the Chicano people having Aztecan tattoos. Sadly, tattoos, especially "tribal" ones have become so popular that ones with meaning are often overlooked and grouped with the fad tattoos.


03-30-10  12:20pm

Reply
719
Visit Pantyhose Addict

Pantyhose Addict
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Comment from Wittyguy:

Thanks for the update on this site. I've noticed it before but the reviews on it weren't very well done and they are over a year old now.

09-24-08  06:15pm

Reply
720
Visit Pantyhose In Public

Pantyhose In Public
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Comment from roseman:

Thanks for the info.

09-17-08  09:08am

Reply
721
Visit Pantyhose Lane

Pantyhose Lane
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from Capn: (mbaya's Reply)

Many thanks for the extra info.

I feel it will probably not hit the spot for me, but I will give it a whirl at some point. ;0)

Cap'n. :0)


06-28-10  03:59pm

Reply
722
Visit Pantyhose Lane

Pantyhose Lane
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Review from Capn:

A very interesting review.

So do all photosets start off fully clothed, please?

Cap'n. :0)


06-28-10  09:14am

Reply
723
Visit Pantyhose Lane

Pantyhose Lane
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Review from roseman:

thanks for the info!

06-09-09  01:03am

Reply
724
Visit Pantyhose Lane

Pantyhose Lane
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from GCode: (mbaya's Reply)

On the preview page they had nothing with the amount but I found the res and bitrate.

Copy and pasted from site:

1024 kbits/sec at 720 by 480 pixel


05-28-09  09:53am

Reply
725
Visit Paradise GFs

Paradise GFs
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Comment from Jimmy Regina:

Nope, just friction with you and one or two of your inner circle-jerk buddies here who think they are the World's Gift to Porn Reviews.

We love 99% of our members. (And they love us back, if the rebill & returning customer rate is any indicator)

But don't take my word for it, folks. You should take mbaya's word here.

He clearly has no personal agenda or bias.


04-08-19  01:19pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 701-725 of 1063 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.59 seconds.