Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Monahan (0)  

Feedback:   All (1736)  |   Reviews (27)  |   Comments (117)  |   Replies (1592)

Other:   Replies Received (734)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 551-575 of 734 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
551
N/A REPLY TO #7 from TheRizzo: (Monahan's Reply)

In my experience its the single girl sites that have the biggest chance of stopping updates. When you deal with just one girl there is too much riding on them not to turn flaky on you. One of the biggest reasons I avoid single girl sites to join. The upside to them is the ones with live cam shows included in the membership.

09-27-08  06:11pm

Reply
552
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(0)
REPLY TO #9 from Nubiles Captain: (Monahan's Reply)

Hey Monahan,

You said " Hardcore is good occasionally but I prefer the masturbation/pretty girl (no insertions) genre more."

Our members who like hardcore and who like masturbation WITH insertions have been very vocal telling us what is bad and what is good with our videos. We use this to create better future performances from the girls. However I have not got a lot of feedback from people who prefer pretty girl no insertion videos. I would really like to hear what you think of our videos in that area so I can provide a good balance of hardcore / masturbation with toys, and no insertion videos. I just am running out of ideas for the no insertion and unsure what the members like best of what we have for that. I am open to hear anything you have to say and our members area has a great message board where you can post what you think or if you want more privacy you can always private message me!

Thanks
Captain


09-27-08  01:25pm

Reply
553
Visit Big Tits In Sports

Big Tits In Sports
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from badandy400: (Monahan's Reply)

I guess I never noticed it.

09-26-08  05:11pm

Reply
554
Visit Busty Adventures

Busty Adventures
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from Denner: (Monahan's Reply)

Thanks, bro...

I agree - this is a part of the large Bangbros-network - they should be able to afford better quality videos. Among other things.......(including a variety of non face-tattooed men to serve the ladies....)


09-23-08  02:47pm

Reply
555
Visit Sharing Paris

Sharing Paris
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from hogboy: (Monahan's Reply)

Hi Monahan,

Unfortunatly I don't know. I only found her myslf fom a vid on YouPorn, and all I know about her is what's on her site. Sorry.


09-23-08  12:03am

Reply
556
Visit Sharing Paris

Sharing Paris
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from hogboy: (Monahan's Reply)

Hey Monahan, glad to be of service!

I can't say about frequency of updates since I only recently joined myself, but I can tell you that there are 44 vids on the site at present, and they're DRM-free. I guess if you have a decent download manager you would only need a one-month membership, which is what signed up for. There are loads of picture sets as well, although that's not my thing.

All things considered, I think it's worth the one-month membership. The current Porn User members questionaire asks if we keep an eye on particular models. I can tell you I'll be watching for Paris updates from now on!


09-22-08  02:33pm

Reply
557
N/A REPLY TO #5 from Drooler: (Monahan's Reply)

Changeups are important if you're going have effective workouts. ;)

09-20-08  01:23pm

Reply
558
Visit Alison Angel

Alison Angel
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from mbaya: (Monahan's Reply)

Very interesting information. Thanks for posting this.

09-16-08  06:39am

Reply
559
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from indybt30: (Monahan's Reply)

I appreciate you reading my review.

I try my best not to compare sites to their competitors in a negative way in my reviews, but the truth is that I like Abby Winter or even amkingdom.com better when I want to see good quality softcore pics.


09-13-08  11:35am

Reply
560
Visit Jaime Hammer

Jaime Hammer
(0)
REPLY TO #7 from atrapat: (Monahan's Reply)

JFYI, they have recently lowered the price back to $19.95.

09-08-08  12:10am

Reply
561
N/A REPLY TO #9 from Pinche Kankun: (Monahan's Reply)

Mon man, Would U please explain to me why cum has to go inside of a woman's mouth?!

09-07-08  02:55pm

Reply
562
Visit Rub My Boob

Rub My Boob
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from roseman: (Monahan's Reply)

Site updates once per week so I think that it would be better to sign up for 1 or 3 months (I signed up for 3) check it's content and then decide if you want to renew your membership.

09-07-08  02:22pm

Reply
563
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment from apoctom:

Sounds like it was a temporary hiccup. It would be really sad to see this site go under.

09-03-08  10:25am

Reply
564
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from The Clyde: (Monahan's Reply)

Thanks for the feedback. I have just joined this month and haven't had problems yet. I set up my DL Manager last night and it was slow for most of the evening, it picked up later in the night.

09-03-08  10:22am

Reply
565
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment from The Clyde:

I'm downloading content right now. The site seemed to have difficulties last night starting around 6pm EST.. Getting very good speeds right now.

Not sure why you would think they are out of business... seems like a connectivity or server problem on their end. Looks like they have it worked out.


09-03-08  05:56am

Reply
566
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment from PinkPanther:

Temporary problem perhaps - the site came up for me and shows updated on 8/30 and 9/03 - definitely doesn't seem to be out of business.

09-03-08  02:54am

Reply
567
Visit Exploited Babysitters

Exploited Babysitters
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from elonlybuster: (Monahan's Reply)

My subscription was a few months ago (almost a half year if not more) so I didn't feel completely right stating that information because some sites have sudden changes to attract more people. But at the time of my subscription as far as I could tell the girls are exclusive. I've never seen any of them on any other sites, but at the same time there was nothing stating that you'd only see the girls here.

The amount of videos was about 50, which is a decent number. The quality is nothing special, just expect to see a bumpy camera every so often.
And this was a full subscription, but it was only active for about a week before I canceled my subscription, which actually was very smooth.

Again I apologize for the lack of information in the original review, but as I said my subscription was a good time ago so this information I did not feel completely right in posting as some sites go through changes and updates for the better.


09-02-08  03:25am

Reply
568
N/A REPLY TO #6 from apoctom: (Monahan's Reply)

Copy that about being Shay's first.

08-31-08  03:13pm

Reply
569
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(0)
REPLY TO #8 from MargulisAZ: (Monahan's Reply)

You're telling me. I wish that there was an option at times to automatically teleport a camera man to where I am so I can punch him in the face at times.

08-30-08  09:03pm

Reply
570
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment from MargulisAZ:

Maybe you've already joined but I'll give you my take on the differences, I've been a member to both many times:

FTV Girls:

1. More extreme content. Here is where you are going to find the big toys, fisting, etc. None of that is on Nubiles. Also some lesbian content here, but no hardcore.

2. Better quality videos. Already has been touched on but it's definitely true in my opinion.

3. Better camera work. I agree that there are scenes that are worthless, but the ones that are good are filmed very well. At nubiles it has been fairly common place for me to be VERY annoyed with the camera man at times.

Nubiles:

1. More frequent updates. 3 girls a week compared to about 1 a week for FTV. Also, every girl does a variety of things usually. Even the hardcore girls also will have solo scenes. Keep in mind a model's content is uploaded over about a week to a week and a half's time on Nubiles.

2. Hardcore content here that you won't see at FTV, but the regular solo material is much more soft. Usually some small toys or a just a couple fingers is the most you'll see.

3. Video quality is lacking, and some camera men (they seem to have more than one) are just horrid. You may either get a ton of noise from the camera man or he may just be constantly changing shots or moving between the action and the model's face. And I mean switches that are so frequent you completely lose interest in the scene.

4. 80% Euro models. 90-95% thin body types. FTV seems to have a few more of the girls with a little more meat.


08-30-08  08:42pm

Reply
571
N/A REPLY TO #4 from apoctom: (Monahan's Reply)

Monahan,

I was actually just pointing out that "nonexlusive" was misspelled in the question.

I do appreciate your definition, though. Also, sadly, there is no Shay Laren content on VideoBox.


08-28-08  07:19am

Reply
572
Visit Jaime Hammer

Jaime Hammer
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from Khan: (Monahan's Reply)

Ahhh ... so you were.
My bad. Sorry for any confusion.


08-23-08  05:57am

Reply
573
Visit Jaime Hammer

Jaime Hammer
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Khan: (Monahan's Reply)

Checking now I'm still seeing the $24.95 price so either you need to get a fresh cookie OR else they are using regional pricing.

08-22-08  06:34pm

Reply
574
Visit The Real Me

The Real Me
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Review from atrapat:

Your review prompted me to join and I really liked what I saw. I haven't had time to watch all the content but so far, so good. For a trial membership, it's a real bargain if you like this type of content.

I was prompted to research around the site and the sad thing is that the site is for sale. I came across a webmaster message board where the owner of the site said he was listening to offers. I doubt that there will be any updates in the meantime. If the site is sold, it's unclear whether the new owners will be able to keep up with the quality of the first 14 updates.


08-22-08  03:16pm

Reply
575
Visit Jaime Hammer

Jaime Hammer
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from atrapat: (Monahan's Reply)

Glad that you found my review useful. It was my second review ever but I feel it's still accurate. Ever since I discovered Jaime Hammer's site, what's offered here is what I expect in other solo sites and most fall short for one reason or another. That's why this site stays at the top of my list of reviews.

If you like her personality, let me suggest that you try to make it to one of her webcam chats. As for her major assets, she is currently working mainly for her site so this is almost the only place where you can find her recent pictures and videos. She recently did, though, some pretty awesome sets for Digital Desire, which were being released here even before they were available at DD.

One more detail that, IMHO, sets this site apart is that there was a message board thread asking site members about their opinion prior to raising the price. They also added multimonth membership options then.


08-22-08  03:07pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 551-575 of 734 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.94 seconds.