| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
526
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Great review. This reminds me of the truly bad old days. You know, the time when video was just catching on, and if you weren't careful you'd pay a lot of money for a real pile of old rubbish - pretty much what you have just described on this site. Thankfully, if people read this review, they wont waste their money.
|
11-18-08 06:14pm
|
Reply
527
|
Mano Job
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from 2 Free K:
(Monahan's Reply)
Hey man, sorry it took so long to reply.
To answer those very good questions:
1.) the vids are about 20 minutes each
2.) The trailers are truly appetizers for the videos. The vids are good, using excellent angles to please viewers of different tastes. The focus is on the girl the whole time. A+ on vid quality (shooting, image quality, performance, concept)
3.) The girls do a decent amount of teasing. Not too much (none of the hour of bullshit found in Bang Bus videos), and not too little. And, they change it up from video to video, per the requirements of the scenario. But they all have a good tease intro.
4.) The trailer set is actually a true representation of the membership archive, and you can see EVERY trailer! Talk about testing the product. In fact, I keep tabs on what's new through the trailer page, and they update about once to twice a week.
5.) I experienced no limits on my downloads, and believe me, I got my $$$ worth! No DRM, and fast downloads. The vids were high quality, while still being decently sized (I don't like those 1 GB HD files, it's just a porno vid)
My bad again for being offline for so long, I had forgotten the password to this account. You might've already joined. If not, I highly suggest it, I still check up on their updates weekly.
And the Victoria Vonn videos are HOT! God, her tits are a delight.
|
11-17-08 01:22am
|
Reply
528
|
Club Charlie
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from TheRizzo:
Thanks for the heads up. Still a reasonable price for a network but I am suprised they would try an price increase at a time when the economy around the world is so bad. I guess they hope if the members drop they can make up for it a bit with the extra $5.
|
11-14-08 09:03pm
|
Reply
529
|
Old Spunkers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(Monahan's Reply)
Thanks, that means a great deal coming from you, Monahan!
|
11-14-08 01:44pm
|
Reply
530
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from hondaman:
I dont think that seeing a woman's labia or vagina as can be seen in some met art sets would ever pass a 60's censor seeing as they airbrushed out labia back then.
|
11-13-08 01:53pm
|
Reply
531
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(Monahan's Reply)
About what Chuck Schumer said, I've been looking and looking and have only been able to find material in which he uses the idea of pornography to make a point about his advocacy of the so-called "fairness doctrine." He says that we should allow for a fair amount of time on the air for both (again so-called) liberal and conservative talk shows and such.
He compares the conservative opinion to pornography to make his point that both are far more widespread than their opposites are. I am paraphrasing here, as I wouldn't know what the "opposite" of pornography would be. Neutered humans sitting around talking about politics maybe?
Comparing conservative opinion to pornography is, I think, simply Sen. Schumer's way of drawing attention to the issue, which is a real can of worms because we always have to ask where to draw the line and with what. And then there's the First Amendment, of course.
Hopefully, this is just a tempest in a teapot. There are far more important things for the government to be concerned about now, and well into the future, than this.
|
11-09-08 04:33pm
|
Reply
532
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Khan:
(Monahan's Reply)
Ahhh ... got it.
Well, so far just elonlybuster (in reply #3) has given his reasoning.
|
11-08-08 09:38am
|
Reply
533
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Khan:
(Monahan's Reply)
errr ... in the forum thread "Where are all the trust votes gone?" it was explained to you why we allow (and will continue to allow) anonymous Trust Ratings. Just because you do not happen to agree with the reasoning doesn't mean it hasn't been explained.
And while I'm posting ...
Those that voted "No, Never" should problably do a review of all the Trust Ratings they've given because I know for a fact some of you have given anonymous ratings. Haha ... before you get all rhiled, remember many or the early Trust Ratings were made anonymously.
And to answer the person who selected "Is there a way I can check?"
If you're unsure of who you've given ratings too, check out post number 7 and 10 in the thread, "Where are the trust-rating?" for two different ways to check.
|
11-08-08 05:16am
|
Reply
534
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from Pinche Kankun:
(Monahan's Reply)
AND I GOT DISREGARDED FOR MENTIONING SIMILAR IDEAS PORN KEEPS COMING UP WITH... HA HA HA :D !!! Monahan, bro, U said a mouthful! HA HA HA HA :D
I cannot wait 2 find the prick who thinks I wanna focus on any man's muthaphuckin' scrotum and no part of the female anatomy!!! >:O
|
11-08-08 02:14am
|
Reply
535
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from elonlybuster:
(Monahan's Reply)
I've gotta say I completely agree with the last part. I can't count the number of times I find a gorgeous looking girl only to find out that half the video is focused on the guy's balls and dick than the actual girl.
|
11-06-08 05:00am
|
Reply
536
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Cybertoad:
(Monahan's Reply)
Nicely Said , Monohan .
|
11-05-08 11:57am
|
Reply
537
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(Monahan's Reply)
I have yet to see a good vid at Met Art - the vast majority are unbearable, they did manage to do a few that are OK, but this is not a vid site at all. It's a great pics site. They have a great variety of models and enough variety of photogs and styles to keep it as a site that I look forward to checking out every day - and the multiple updates a day can't be beat.
|
11-03-08 07:02pm
|
Reply
538
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from nygiants03:
(Monahan's Reply)
Have you ever seen Maria Kirilenko play, now shes nice.
|
10-31-08 05:05pm
|
Reply
539
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from obsessedoverit:
(Monahan's Reply)
Thanks Monahan for the reassurance on my review. Such a prompt response from a webmaster was beginning to make me think I had committed some sort of violation.
I didn't realize there was a similar discount at PU. For future reviews I will be much more cautious about including URLs with discounts and maybe curtail my personal preferences a tad.
|
10-29-08 01:13am
|
Reply
540
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from obsessedoverit:
(Monahan's Reply)
And as far as the customer support goes I can't really comment because I haven't had any trouble. I've been a member for over a year it's been smooth.
|
10-26-08 05:43pm
|
Reply
541
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from apoctom:
(Monahan's Reply)
I completely agree with #2. I forgot that FTV doesn't have full vid downloads, either.
I hadn't really thought of #3, but I can see how that would be really annoying. It also smells of being cheap since the can advertise long movies when it's really the same thing for big chunks at a time.
|
10-17-08 07:46am
|
Reply
542
|
AV9898
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Khan:
(Monahan's Reply)
haha ... actually, it was due to deadelvis' report that we got the TBP Editors to make the correction.
|
10-16-08 08:21am
|
Reply
543
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from atrapat:
(Monahan's Reply)
> "Extras section is just a couple of videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova."
I should have said "just TWO videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova and nothing more" : no bonus acess to other sites or other girlfriends sets. I've edited the review to remove any confusion.
Glad that you found my review interesting too.
|
10-13-08 11:15am
|
Reply
544
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
I'm probably 90% video to 10% photos, so the photo options aren't really important to me. I still give extra points to websites that offer it because if you have photos then you better have the search engive designed for them. I'll second your VLC recommendation. There are so many videos that only seem to play on VLC. Now that you mention it, I'm going to have to check which version of VLC I've
got.
|
10-12-08 05:58pm
|
Reply
545
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
I'm quite satisfied, if at the end of the day, I've steered only one person toward a great site or away from an awful one.
P.S: I would still like to win at the raffle.
|
10-11-08 05:27pm
|
Reply
546
|
Heavy Handfuls
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from badandy400:
I was a member there I while back, but I honestly can not remember too much about it.
|
10-06-08 06:14pm
|
Reply
547
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Miths:
(Monahan's Reply)
You initially sign up for a free account with no strings attached (actually I can't recall if you are required to buy a small VOD package at initial signup, but I really doubt it), and then I personally pretty much always go for the pay per minute option.
That means prepaid packages of a certain amount of minutes you can freely use to watch (stream) whatever scene or full DVD on the site (barring those I mentioned that are lacking pay per minute options, but they are fortunately still very much in a tiny minority) - whether you use all your minutes in one "session" (the smallest package is 15 minutes for $3.95) or spread them out over weeks or months (like you probably will with eg. the large 1000 minutes package for $84.95).
Other options are those downloads I talked about. They are DRM protected and will expire after the chosen "rental" period (7 or 30 days), and there's additionally an "own it" option now as well I haven't tried.
In that case you almost end up paying as much as you would have for the original physical DVD though.
In terms of content differences between AEBN and eg. VideoBox. Well, they share some, possibly even a lot of content, but VideoBox "only" has a little over 5,000 videos while AEBN has a whopping 55,000+ if I recall correctly.
Which is also why I consider this the best site when I'm looking for something very specific (released on DVD), as the chances of finding it at AEBN is much larger than anywhere else.
So basically I use AEBN as a supplement to my VideoBox membership.
|
10-01-08 06:53pm
|
Reply
548
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Nubiles Captain:
(Monahan's Reply)
Thanks for the info. Make sure after you join to let me know which videos of ours you really like. That will help me out a lot or any other suggestions you might think of. We have a lot of breast play videos. Hardly any public stuff and while that is exciting we just don't want the issues that go with it. :)
|
09-29-08 01:50pm
|
Reply
549
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from asmith12:
(Monahan's Reply)
> There is no real "fire" in many (most?) of the pics.
Exactly; thanks for expressing my feelings it this concise and exact way; IMHO it's a perfect way to describe it in one sentence instead of my long and maybe not so clear description.
|
09-29-08 09:08am
|
Reply
550
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(Monahan's Reply)
If you like oral, facials and beautiful women, nearly all of them are top level in looks, you will love this site. I'm surprised it hasn't had more coverage here!
|
09-28-08 07:25am
|
