| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Bletch:
(badandy400's Reply)
Badandy400
I've already said that during my time with Videobox I was with other US sites too, and not really experienced any problems with them. Whilst Videobox might work for you (wherever you are) I didn't for me, and it's only fair I point that out for other international users who might get stuck with the same problem.
Thanks for your thoughts.
|
06-26-11 01:39am
|
Reply
452
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Vegas Ken:
(badandy400's Reply)
Hi everyone!
I figured I would just drop in and let everyone know that you guys will also get the 18 Month Membership (12 months + 6 months free) for $119.96 as well. If not, please let me know and I will get in touch with Videobox.
Thanks for using our site!!!
Vegas Ken
|
08-25-09 09:49am
|
Reply
453
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from PinkPanther:
(badandy400's Reply)
Yeah - it's lame. Now they've got the FAQ up and it still doesn't talk about what the pricing is or what it would be for someone who upgrades in the middle of their monthly membership.
And the owner is dismayed that members are negative about it all - what was he expecting?
|
03-27-09 10:11pm
|
Reply
454
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(badandy400's Reply)
The VideoBox owner put a blog up yesterday that they haven't figured out their pricing on the premium upgrades yet and will put up an FAQ once they figure it out.
I thought that was rather ass-backwards of them - put up the upgrade with no roll-out, then, after their members get thoroughly inflamed, start figuring out what their pricing will be.
|
03-26-09 09:41pm
|
Reply
455
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from exotics4me:
I ran into that same page last month and thought the prices had gone up, and just now checked and my prices were listed as the ones you are seeing too, but ran CCleaner and it went back to the regular prices of:
Premium - $14.95 reviewers special
10 months non-recurring $99.51
Basic - $9.95
The Vivid upgrade says $17.95 as does the Evil Angel upgrade
Not for sure why they are having so much problems with their cookies, but if you CClean, you will get the regular prices we are used to.
|
03-24-09 07:05am
|
Reply
456
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Skip:
(badandy400's Reply)
Yeah they are down for maintenance right now.
|
03-23-09 10:34pm
|
Reply
457
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from turboshaft:
(badandy400's Reply)
Yeah, maybe a month or two of free membership so you'll never stop downloading, or maybe they just have a lot of content they have never released. :)
|
03-12-09 08:59pm
|
Reply
458
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from TrashMan:
(badandy400's Reply)
Well, I never save the DVD quality. With the amount of porn I store, I can't afford to store DVD quality considering that DVD quality is around 3.5 times as large as the "High" quailty. I guess I could go and buy a 2TB hard drive from WD, but that is $300, a little to pricey at the moment (be aware that when the 250GB, 300GB, 400GB, 500GB and 1TB hard drives came out they were all $300, and eventually dropped to more affordable prices around $100).
|
02-08-09 01:04am
|
Reply
459
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from TrashMan:
(badandy400's Reply)
I definitely have downloads from their site which are widescreen and have the bars. So it seems isolated.
It seems, though, that I missed the fact that the DVD res is 720x480. I viewed the stream of the DVD quality and as I'm sure you are aware, the flash viewer is only 4:3 so I saw it squeezed, not realizing the source is actually 16:9 (as opposed to 4:3).
|
02-08-09 12:55am
|
Reply
460
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from TrashMan:
(badandy400's Reply)
Yes, this is true. I have seen this in several releases.
However, this recent release, of Breakin Em In, they squeezed the 16:9 image to 4:3, and it looks pretty fair.
|
02-07-09 10:23pm
|
Reply
461
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from TheRizzo:
(badandy400's Reply)
Yeah I must say the download speed considering the price is actually very good. I was impressed!
|
07-07-08 08:28pm
|
Reply
462
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from mr smut:
You have to be one of the greatest fans of this site :-).
Hell, I'll give it a try soon as I need to have some Rubee Tuesday vids in good quality (and there's other stuff that makes me greedy too!) after I updated my PC and the connection to the Internet as well.
Thanks for this comment even though it makes the decision for what porn site I should spend this month's budget much more difficult!
|
06-10-08 08:59am
|
Reply
463
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from RagingBuddhist:
(badandy400's Reply)
Nope - still don't understand how you can give a perfect score to Videobox when you took points off Twisty's score for doing the same thing. At least where I stand, if one site loses points for "stealing", they all should. Release schedules or amount of material they have at hand doesn't have anything to do with it.
|
03-23-08 03:48pm
|
Reply
464
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(badandy400's Reply)
The only reason I chose to compare Videobox and Brazzer's is because Denner wonders how Videobox can remain so high in the rankings and I wonder the same about Brazzer's. But, when you say "Brazzers is about big titties and who cares how they got there", that tells a lot of the story. Me? I'll say it over and over again - I don't like scars on tits. I don't like huge tits that stand up, looking like someone stuffed 'em with a grapefruit, or worse yet, a volleyball. The state of porn today makes me reminisce about the good ol' days... Annette Haven, Tracey Adams, Ginger Lynn and all the lovely natural women we could watch - before someone decided bigger was better, no matter how it comes about.
You just told me Videobox merely steals their content from everyone else and yet it's the site you rated as perfect. It would seem to me that that's quite a con - a con you cited Twisty's for by saying you wish they'd "have more exclusive content than DVDs". I'm sure you'll have a spin on this to help me understand the apparent discrepancy here?
|
03-21-08 11:44pm
|
Reply
465
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#31
from messmer:
(badandy400's Reply)
Glad you feel the same way about the moans! :-) Just checked my speed again between NS Canada and New York City and it came to a
1986.8 KB/sec transfer rate. I would say that's not too shabby! The downloads from VB were about one eighth of the speed I get from other sites I subscribe to which is usually between 450 - 800 KB/sec.
|
03-12-08 07:59pm
|
Reply
466
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#29
from messmer:
(badandy400's Reply)
I guess when it comes to speed it sometimes depends on where you live. I am connected to the fastest Internet Service Provider in Canada (according to the speed tests I've done), have blazing speed with some sites and am reduced to a crawl with others. VB is a crawler for me. Took me over two hours last night to download five high quality wmv clips. And I'm certainly not knocking VB in other regards, those folks who gave them 80s and 90s can't all be wrong. :-) I guess I'm a picture guy at heart. Maybe because pictures, despite the fact that they can be quite explicit (hooray) leave something to the imagination and I can't hear the lusty yelps.
|
03-12-08 01:28pm
|
Reply
467
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from messmer:
I have to agree with many of the others that a site that has ANY cons cannot rate 100. Contrary to your remarks, I find the speed terribly slow when compared to other sites especially when downloading various clips at the same time. I do agree with one of your cons that various categories (hairy, lingerie, mature, natural, housewife, girl next door etc.) are under represented. There are thousands of titles but all basically with one plot: get the clothes off as quickly as possible and get on with it! And don't forget to scream "Yess .. yess!" on top of your lungs. I'm going back to pics. :-)
|
03-12-08 11:08am
|
Reply
468
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
Okay - I'll concede that this site's definition of perfection and mine are different. I'm now on my third tour of Videobox and I'll easily agree with you that they are definitely lacking in certain areas when it comes to content. But, even allowing for a site having little to improve, I couldn't call a lack of niche content something that doesn't detract from it's perfection. So I guess we just see it differently. But now, given your response to Denner, I'm wondering if you're not just sticking to your guns because you like the controversy a 100 score brings to the table.
|
03-05-08 05:49pm
|
Reply
469
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#22
from Denner:
(badandy400's Reply)
I get your drift. Was a big fan of the site some time ago - I also agree this is still a very good deal for us users. But I still think a 100 - as a max. is way too much, but....
As JD puts it: your answer is pretty good.
Look forward to your comming reviews with maybe more details.
Best and welcome among us "old timers"
Denner
|
03-04-08 11:09am
|
Reply
470
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#21
from Boobs4ever:
(badandy400's Reply)
LoL yea Im a member atm aswell and yea I have done rewiev of it there is 42 rewievs of VideoBox and mine is probably in the middle when its sorted in by date you reviewed the sites
|
03-03-08 06:35am
|
Reply
471
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Boobs4ever:
(badandy400's Reply)
your first review looks better now youve added some more information that makes it easier to understand why you rate it good. If you read the review rules it will give you some guideline tips what to write. The more detail information you give the better I think, about like download speed, site-design, Video quality and other stuff ppl may think is important ore is good ore bad on the site you review.
My View of this rating system is that only the absolute perfect is 100 so if you think its absolute perfect personally your doing the right thing rating it 100 if the site still can improve in some point its not 100 from my view of the rating system but im not the judge and Im sorry for calling you un-trust worthy review, your not, I was little to harsh. Sry
|
03-02-08 03:44pm
|
Reply
472
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from RagingBuddhist:
(badandy400's Reply)
Valid but ignored. I don't need to read anything but "100" and the couple of cons you listed to know you're missing the point. Perfection (whether for you or anybody else) + defects = something less than perfect. Therefore, a score of 100 is not possible.
|
03-02-08 03:38pm
|
Reply
473
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from RagingBuddhist:
(badandy400's Reply)
It's not about hazing a new guy. It IS about trying to get the "new guys" from coming in and ignoring the fact that perfect scores are ridiculous to begin with. Even more so when the review contains cons.
If you can't see this, your challenge to provide evidence of your being mistaken is a moot point.
|
03-02-08 03:00pm
|
Reply
474
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Boobs4ever:
(badandy400's Reply)
If you generally just want post Information like download speeds. Me myself would probably just make a comment about this issue then and you can still rate sites with out adding a review.
|
03-02-08 02:35pm
|
Reply
475
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Boobs4ever:
(badandy400's Reply)
If you think its perfect fine, But you dont explain in more detail why you thinks its perfect. Atleast I wont trust your reveiws, and I wouldnt bee surprised if your reveiws wouldnt bee approved
|
03-02-08 02:24pm
|
