| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
476
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from jd1961:
(badandy400's Reply)
You should write your "bottom line" like you wrote that reply !
|
03-02-08 02:17pm
|
Reply
477
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from jd1961:
Your response to Denner's reply was more detailed and thought out than your review.
|
03-02-08 02:08pm
|
Reply
478
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Boobs4ever:
(badandy400's Reply)
Why dont you add this kind of information in to the rewiew most users can never download on 45mb/s. Just submit a review with 5 sentences wont make me understand why you think the site is good or bad. Just writing that you have had 45mb/s and not telling how. Like you now have explaind in this comment.
|
03-02-08 01:57pm
|
Reply
479
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Boobs4ever:
(badandy400's Reply)
The Score system is not unattainble if any site/sites is perfect. If you read the rewiew rules once more its says
Under: Are there any other specific rules I need to know?
3. Consider your score carefully. If you don't like a site, don't rush to give them a 50 (or a perfect score if you love a site). Consider 100 being ABSOLUTELY PERFECT and 50 being a site the worst adult site on the net. We recommend following our rating guidelines (shown below the rating input field). You can change the score at anytime, but score it as best you can from the beginning.
So if its not perfect is it 100 in this scoring system then?
|
03-02-08 01:47pm
|
Reply
480
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from Boobs4ever:
a site with 100 is site that cant get any better do you think VideoBox really dont need to improve anymore?
|
03-02-08 11:50am
|
Reply
481
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from Denner:
hey badandy
You have two pretty serious/importend cons. where I totally agree.
How can you then add it up to an extremely rare 100?
|
03-02-08 10:23am
|
Reply
482
|
Wank It Now
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(badandy400's Reply)
It's one of the main reasons why we don't want to deal with sites that give us unexpected trouble (no access, broken promises, suprise billings): All of that judgmental subtext going on with the inevitable female rep at the credit card company.
|
05-31-11 02:55am
|
Reply
483
|
Wank It Now
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Drooler:
(badandy400's Reply)
Oh, yeah, that's the site that gets by at the bottom of the page, the one with the 3-day, $5 trial that, if not cancelled, turns into $40 per month! Ahhhhhhh!!!
Imagine the fun writing the letter to the credit card company ...
At least it's all just a nightmare.
|
05-30-11 05:23pm
|
Reply
484
|
We Live Together
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from PinkPanther:
TBP price is $17.95/month for Reality Kings, which includes this site - good stuff at Pure 18 and Cum Fiesta as well, in my opinion - and 8th Street Latinas has some nice stuff too
|
07-21-08 10:29pm
|
Reply
485
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Monahan:
Can you provide a brief commentary about your opinion of the site?
|
10-28-11 09:01am
|
Reply
486
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from mr smut:
Hi badandy400,
customer service plus marketing I'd say. Would be nice to know if you are now satisfied with this site.
Cheers,
Smut
|
06-25-11 01:16pm
|
Reply
487
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from careylowell:
(badandy400's Reply)
I've no idea from whom that 'No' hailed from. Maybe one of you computer jedis can unscramble his anonymous ID. My gut feeling is his dark designs haunt some other site, that he's an ex-member.
|
07-11-09 08:00pm
|
Reply
488
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from careylowell:
(badandy400's Reply)
I received the 'No trust' after reviewing nine sites. I had been a member of each for at least a month. Can't recall what led me to type "..I joined seven of the nine sites mentioned..." It should of read that of the nine, I belonged to seven for just a month.
I have since rejoined two but haven't updated my reviews due to sheer laziness.
So my rating is tagged with 'No' trust. That dude could of gilded the bitter pill by either not being anonymous or writing more than two sentences to explain his decision.
I appreciate your concern, Badandy400.
|
07-11-09 06:53am
|
Reply
489
|
X Movies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from deadelvis:
(badandy400's Reply)
When i go to TBP i look at the top say 10-20 rated sites in any one
niche that i am currently interested in.Usually the likes of videobox
and the top porn sites.
Why on earth don`t the staff at TBP regularly check the pricing
at the top sites,it would be no huge job if just one of them spent an hour a day checking.One of the major factors for me joining a site is the price as for most people i expect.
The best thing that has happened to TBP was the start of PU.
I value other users judgment,that is the genuine ones who do not
manage to join every large site in a short space of time.
cheers
|
11-11-08 09:15am
|
Reply
490
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wraith0711:
(badandy400's Reply)
Thanks for the reply Sir. Thank you for the info too. There are just so many formats that it makes a persons head spin anymore. The videos were awesome just wish they were the higher bit rate, I'm of the opinion that if your gonna charge for your content then it should be top notch. It's like buying a Dodge Challenger but finding out it's not an SRT.
|
01-18-16 05:29am
|
Reply
491
|
Xisty
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from exotics4me:
I didn't realize they advertised as exclusive. I thought that was just a error on the TBP page, remember that those original pages could have been posted awhile back. I do think there is some of what badandy is talking about, the content was exclusive at some point. I know that they use Fred the photographer and his work is on many sites. If you will look at Spencer's review he lists it as "semi-exclusive"
The way I would compare the two sites is that everything Babelicious has on Sexy Babes, UK Babes, is non-exclusive. The actual content on Babelicious though is probably 70% exclusive, but it only makes up about 1/3 of their total content. Xisty has a bit more exclusive content, especially the hardcore b/g sets they have.
To answer JD's question, the sites aren't ran by the same person. Babelicious' main guy is Nick. Xisty's is named here as Crazy8, but having talked to him as a member, I can say that his name isn't Nick.
The sites are similar though, and both sites are similar to Teen Dreams, Twistys, and the rest of the multi-model supersites. There is overlap of content on each site.
I still want to say that Xisty has more exclusive than the others, but I haven't been a member since December 2008. Have no idea why, but Xisty has the best looking photos of the sites listed. Their colors really jump out at you. In exclusives, I would say Xisty, Twistys, Teen Dreams, Babelicious, in that order.
|
06-25-09 02:18am
|
Reply
492
|
Xisty
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from jd1961:
I always had the impression that this site and Babelicious were run by the same person. Seem too similiar to be a coincidence.
|
06-24-09 10:24pm
|
Reply
493
|
Xisty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from GCode:
(badandy400's Reply)
Oh, when was the same material between both sites appearing the same? Was is recent or before a certain time? I suppose if the older content is the same that's a bit better to hear but if they are sharing extremely recent content that's a stinker :(
|
06-24-09 10:03pm
|
Reply
494
|
Xisty
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from GCode:
ugh, this is bad news. This was on my list for the next site to join next month. Man, I hate to hear bad news such as this :( Maybe, babelicious has the same content and even better?
|
06-24-09 08:41pm
|
Reply
495
|
XVN.eu
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(badandy400's Reply)
Well, no BA - have NOT have other problems with US-based sites here in Europe - fine speed allover...
And then. it's not such a big deal for this site - I'm not gonna join in spite of the good looking girls.
|
04-03-08 06:55am
|
Reply
496
|
XVN.eu
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(badandy400's Reply)
Hey, BA - They have some really great looking (jap/asian)girls here - and I've tried their preview (sample videos)several times. It may be the connection to Europe, but every time - the download of these samles takes forever...
But ok, if/when you join it might be different?
Is your experience from preview or as a member?
And one more: If you joined, how is it with their DRM now?
|
04-02-08 02:00pm
|
Reply
497
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from anyonebutme:
(badandy400's Reply)
You're correct on the new videos - I was looking through the tour today and there are many scenes listed with the HD tag on them, like for example:
http://www.youngbusty.com/s/98/m/busty_t..._monique2/index.html
But inside the site all those videos are max 640x480@2mbps.
|
12-19-10 10:20pm
|
Reply
498
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(badandy400's Reply)
Thanks for the reply - think I got it now - looks like it's worth to seriously consider once more!
|
12-02-10 08:38am
|
Reply
499
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from tangub:
(badandy400's Reply)
Thanks for the info....I really need to become a bit more technical and learn how to use a download manager.
|
12-02-10 08:24am
|
Reply
500
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from Denner:
Thanks for a fine update in review for this site, badandy...
It seems like it's been around forever - or rather a long time.
And it seems like the quality is getting better compared to early 2009/late 2008 - back then the main cons was the quality of both vids and pix.
Guess from this review where bandandy states:
"-Not HD, a little behind par on quality of media" ......... that the site still have not got the top vids viewing quality?
But nice to read that they got good updates now.
|
12-02-10 05:39am
|
