| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
LBFM
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lurifax:
(badandy400's Reply)
Firstly I want to apologize for not having noticed before that ‘www2.g-queen.com’ has a daily download limit of 1.5GB (the last item on F.A.Q.), which makes the site less interesting: No information is given about the video clips sizes, which makes one doubt if it is possible to download the lot (presently 121 of them) within a month.
That apart, (I quote “…something that is not truly unique…”) maybe you would be generous enough to let me know where else one may find a plentitude of Shaved Japanese girls?
I have seen enough amateurish drivel (“reviews”) to let myself into that business. It is, in my opinion, better left to the professionals. Besides – they are paid for it.
|
10-26-08 06:07pm
|
Reply
302
|
Lietuva Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(badandy400's Reply)
Lietuvagirls has videos that simply are not worth watching. The quantity of videos that are worth keeping is miniscule. The photos are just barely ok. Nudesportvideos is a site with a lot more quantity of videos that are of much higher quality. On originality alone it is a significantly better site. The hotness factor of the two cannot be compared. No way could I ever rate the two sites with nearly identical scores. Anyone is free to disagree with me or my ratings, but one site I rate as 90 and the other as generously 70. My major gripe is that NSV was not rated at least an 80 after praising it in his review. I probably would have said nothing if he had not, or had found fault with it. If you like a site, give it an appropriate score.
|
05-01-09 01:13am
|
Reply
303
|
Lisa Sparxxx
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Lisa Sparks:
(badandy400's Reply)
Yes my site when you join gives to FULL ACCESS just like it says it does. :) I was just saying the longer you stay a member you will get fresh and new updates.. Granted the updates are not always movies there are some days with photo galleries and some days with movies, it varies.
Not trying to toot my horn by no means here. However I feel I would not offer a trial if I did not think you would enjoy the site and want to stay around longer to see more. :0) At least I am hoping this is how people feel.
I think offering a trial shows I have nothing to hide and it gives an option to fans who can't afford the full amount. With this in mind I did drop the prices to the site from $7.95 2 day trial to $4.95 2 day trial and I lowered the monthly rate from $24.95 to $19.95. The trial does recur at $21.95 which is still cheaper than before.
As for the publicity okay okay there are a few exceptions such as life. :)) Anyway I hope you all enjoy your weekend.
|
08-29-08 06:50pm
|
Reply
304
|
Lisa Sparxxx
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from exotics4me:
(badandy400's Reply)
Hey badandy, I couldn't help but laugh when I read your reply and realized that is Lisa replying, "Got you by the balls" ha ha. Anyway, I think she explained it better in the replies, and I will try it for a month and review it soon.
She will probably read this, and I say this again and again. All most of these models need is a good push into the spotlight. Between her hair, which is a big deal to me, her pretty eyes which is also a big deal to me, her big natural boobs which is a big deal to 90% of our members here, nice butt which is a big deal to me and hardcore content, also a big deal to many. Her site could do great. It is like Real Estate, location, location, location. Except this is, exposure, exposure, exposure and most importantly showing that they are a regular person like us, the members will eventually start showing up.
As we have said before, this is the beauty of Porn Users. It shows that not all of us are porn freaks that watch porn 24/7 and it shows that the stars/webmasters aren't just here trying to take our money for little in return.
Talk to you later.
|
08-29-08 05:10pm
|
Reply
305
|
Lisa Sparxxx
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Lisa Sparks:
(badandy400's Reply)
It is all new content when the content runs out, I have fans emailing me right away asking me for more..I don't rotate the content what so ever. Ask members if this is true. Once you seen the content it stays in the members area. The content is fresh and not deleted and moved around..
I hope this does answer some of your questions..
:0)
Lisa
|
08-29-08 02:30pm
|
Reply
306
|
Lusty Grandmas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(badandy400's Reply)
Nope, no restrictions. I can go as long as I want, browse as long as I want, download as much as I want. The only thing that might constitute a restriction is that they recently decided to do away with the binary section of their news server. I guess it was being used too heavily. But nowadays most people don't even know what the usenet is so there was only muted protest from the few who did all the downloading of multi-part binaries ... read videos. :-)
And I keep thinking how great it will be to have a forum for general discussion of things exactly like this one, rather than tack our remarks on to a review.
|
03-30-08 06:40am
|
Reply
307
|
Lusty Grandmas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(badandy400's Reply)
Yep, it's ultra high speed through our Cable Company. They give it to us for quite an attractive price if we subscribe to their bundle of phone, cable and Internet. Of course, high speed's only as good as the site you visit. And thanks for the explanation I never caught on to the difference between bits and bytes. :-)
|
03-29-08 10:28am
|
Reply
308
|
Lusty Grandmas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(badandy400's Reply)
Just noticed the mistake I made, badandy. It should have been KB, so you were absolutely right. I'll try to go back to see if I can correct things.
|
03-28-08 01:06pm
|
Reply
309
|
Lusty Grandmas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(badandy400's Reply)
Sorry about that. I go by what I read and am not a technophile, even though I like computers. :-) This is the reading I got on a speed test a moment ago: 14976 kbps (1872 KB/sec transfer rate) and my transfer rate for the site reviewed always shows as approx. 300 KB/sec transfer rate.
|
03-28-08 12:50pm
|
Reply
310
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Drooler:
Well now, that's a step forward from far backwards. Now if they'd get their image sizes up at least to 2000px, I might consider. Maggie's right in her recent review that they're not competitive anymore because of the image sizes. She's absolutely right.
|
11-28-09 09:18am
|
Reply
311
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from avatar:
I was looking to join so i asked them if they still have a zip fee and they told me in there reply that you have to be a VIP member to have the zip format but i cant find a price or anything about a "VIP membership
|
01-17-09 07:36pm
|
Reply
312
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Monahan:
Mac & Bumble was a great site several years ago and was rather popular with great content.
Two possibilities since then, both not particularly good:
1. The site's owner has lost and is just letting the site sit dormant while he collects revenue to support his retirement.
2. The site was sold to someone who has decided to use it as a scam operation.
These days there are so many great sites at great prices, and there's also Porn Users where many will be educated about shit sites like M&B that their approach to doing business will fail.
|
07-17-08 07:11am
|
Reply
313
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(badandy400's Reply)
When doing a kind of "warning" like this - I often think afterwards: Was I a little too harsh???
In this case, No...
Follow your gut feeling, buddy!
And, man - lets find some GOOD sites out there!!!!!!!
...and then....like they said it in the 1960/70th: Tell it to the people!
|
04-24-08 11:02am
|
Reply
314
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Denner:
Was too late to edit my reply, but just this:
Heard from another source, that my example about Lonnie Adams and M&B is right on the spot: She does not make more photos/videos - so the promise of Lonnie Adams-updates is - well..........if the source is right?
Hope we all get some reaction/answer from M&B!
|
04-24-08 09:04am
|
Reply
315
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Denner:
You got no reply!
That may say it all.
Badandy, you've been around for some time here, so just this: Don't go for it. M&B have this fine looking preview, but when you join very little is new - VERY little. I'd never go there again.
Joined this site 3 or 4 times - and man, was I disapointed.
There are swell photos in the preview - and a promiss of updates with - for exampel - Lonnie Adams. When you join it's all the same ol' photos and videos of the lovely Lonnie. Noting new.
90,8 at TBP need an updates, for sure - see PU-reviews........
Sorry, don't know about the charge for zip-files now.
|
04-24-08 08:42am
|
Reply
316
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from TheRizzo:
(badandy400's Reply)
I agree with you the quality could use an upgrade even if it is amateur in nature. Also I hate bw caps but they do tell you upfront that its there. I guess with their price point they gotta cut corners somewhere I suppose. Must not do enough volume or something to compete with sites like videobox.
But with the price I paid from paysitediscounts for Matts, I was more than happy last month when I joined even with the cap.
|
05-03-09 12:43pm
|
Reply
317
|
Melissa Midwest
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from PinkPanther:
(badandy400's Reply)
I agree - most reviews this short give you nothing - this site is the best ever or this site is the worst ever. This reviewer fleshed out the few points that were made, which is more than most minimal reviewers do.
|
05-27-09 07:52pm
|
Reply
318
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from Wittyguy:
I've been looking at this site recently and I'm sorry to here that even the newer pics are still pretty small (from what I've seen on tgp sites they're still 800x600, basically what they were when I was a member years ago). I was hoping they'd beef it up but whoa is the picture lover here at PU. Thanks for the review. I think I'll keep my money for now.
|
07-15-08 11:07pm
|
Reply
319
|
Miss Hybrid
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from GCode:
(badandy400's Reply)
Look at the forum. Where have u been lol? That's all I'm saying and I'm not getting involved. However, I do believe his review was well thought out but...well...just look elsewhere. But, I can guarantee u that this guy was prolly not gonna review anything else....
|
04-12-10 11:21pm
|
Reply
320
|
Mommy Got Boobs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(badandy400's Reply)
I have Big Naturals on my A list of sites that I'm signing up for when I cancel my membership in a current site. The PU reviews are great and I like the public site.
|
06-18-08 03:48pm
|
Reply
321
|
Monster Curves
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from mr smut:
Some nice and round asses but with pics that have such a small dimension it's no fun at all. Thanks for this excellent review guess I'll put that one on the maybe-I'll-join list.
|
06-26-08 09:20am
|
Reply
322
|
Murder Lily
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from monica:
(badandy400's Reply)
That is a lot of fantastic information. It's always been a bit mystifying to figure out how best to serve everyone when you are a growing site. I think your advice for video resolutions and sizes is sound and I think you are right that I will need to offer much higher resolution in the future.
I will absolutely post when I've got new videos to talk about. ;)
|
11-11-08 09:49pm
|
Reply
323
|
Murder Lily
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from monica:
(badandy400's Reply)
I think that's a fantastic suggestion and one that I will definitely take to heart for all future videos. I really appreciate your input!
I will look at my existing videos and see if any of them can be offered at 3000kbps.
Besides the bit rate, do you have suggestions for good video dimensions?
|
11-11-08 06:16pm
|
Reply
324
|
Murder Lily
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from monica:
(badandy400's Reply)
I just felt that it's much better to let people know what they can expect so they won't be disappointed, and as you say, be an unhappy customer.
The six newest videos are offered in 1000kbsp, 512kbsp and 256kbps with the largest playing at 640x480 and the smallest at 320x240.
All of the videos are softcore in that they do not feature any men or fucking. They are all of women stripping, teasing, and some feature masturbation.
So far, my entire site is aimed at the softcore crowd with masturbation being the raunchiest fare, but if enough viewers want it, I would absolutely add hardcore to the mix.
I want my members to be happy!
|
11-11-08 09:41am
|
Reply
325
|
Naked Closet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(badandy400's Reply)
I only mentioned leaving out PU from your email because normally it's better to keep things simple. Less confusion that way, easier to understand.
I agree that you should have gotten the $14.95 rate when you were rebilled for 30 days, because that's the rate the signup page shows.
If you don't get that rate, instead are charged $24.95, send a second email explaining you sent a first request, and this is a second request for a refund since you are being overcharged for your subscription. And send the details of why you are being overcharged in the second email.
If you don't get satisfaction, go to your credit card company, and they should credit you with the $10 difference.
One quibble: I see a "$4.95 Two Day Trial Membership". This is shown both at PU and at the nakedcloset site signup page. Unless you specifically remember that your trial membership was for 3 days, it was more likely for 2 days.
Best of luck with the problem.
|
06-12-09 02:11pm
|
