| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from MargulisAZ:
(badandy400's Reply)
No sorry, I never download everything a site has so I have no idea.
|
03-18-08 11:04pm
|
Reply
277
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from MargulisAZ:
(badandy400's Reply)
The content is still the same as it's always been really, it's just presented much better. There is still mostly teen girls and mostly solo pic sets and video, but there is always a lesbian and hardcore scene added fairly frequently. The updates are insane, with 5-8 new pic sets every day or 2 days, and 2 movies every day or 2 days. The main thing is just that the layout of the site is much better. It isn't just "Teen update 452" or "Lesbian update 220" anymore, it's broken up and organized a lot better according to the content type. Expect the same style of pics and videos though, the content itself hasn't changed in style at all. Probably 90% of the girls that have been added since you've been a member are hot though, I'll say that.
|
03-18-08 10:56pm
|
Reply
278
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MargulisAZ:
(badandy400's Reply)
Man, there is no way I could download the whole site. Well, maybe I could, but I tend to just pick through things to find what I will like and download from there.
I'm not exactly sure how much content there is compared to how it was whenever you were a member, but I just counted 1248 models. And of course each one usually has multiple pic sets and many with video. Rejoin man, it's worth it IMO.
|
03-18-08 10:11pm
|
Reply
279
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Ricky D Product:
(badandy400's Reply)
You say you didn't put down the site, but then follow it up with "I was looking for something other than a bunch of webcam recording and POV content. It comes off as very amateur, something anyone could do with a HD camera from bestbuy a guy and a girl."
We shoot on a high-end Canon DSLR, Rode mic, professional lighting, and I've been personally been doing this since 2003. Nothing you can buy at "Bestbuy". I've directed for the top video companies before launching this; they include Anabolic, Diabolic, Red Light, and others. I've even been nominated as a director by both AVN and XBIZ. We took our professional touch and put it into an amateur reality style site. Again, you came to our site expecting more than "POV" footage, what would you expect for amateur site? Would you like for us to put the camera on a tripod? If that's the only thing keeping us from looking professional in your eyes, I'll gladly shoot the next video update as so.
You speak in your post as if you're a creator or developer of the site. You're a reviewer with obvious bias towards pretty-girl porn (your reviews list Prime Cups and Twistys as tops) and shouldn't have joined Kayden420.com. I really can't believe people are tit-for-tat when getting a trial to a site that gives you full access to they have. Reviewers like you are the reason sites do limited trials and why the smaller producers are nearly gone.
I've never posted back to any reviews from users, but yours was so out of the blue that I had to reply. A user such as yourself is not in our demographic. You said yourself tattoos turn you off, we're more Suicide Girls while you're more Twistys. Good thing it was a trial, wouldn't have wanted you to pay too much money for our site that shouldn't be "taken too seriously".
There's a reason why Kayden420 is nominated year in and year out since launching by both XBIZ and AVN for Web Babe of the Year. You're not in our demographic and that's unfortunate, but this review you posted should've been kept to yourself. Better yet, maybe even sent to the company owner so he could fix your issues.
|
12-19-10 02:30am
|
Reply
280
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Ricky D Product:
Kayden420.com has been up since 2007, I highly doubt updating since then is considered having a small amount of content. If you're looking for multiple updates per day you're better off with Brazzers or Bang Bros, the small companies obviously can't keep up with their free content distribution.
We've never had any issues with members canceling their memberships, both links are clearly posted on every page's footer. Also, we have someone attending to our customers emails 24/7, an actual real human rather than the automated email reply. We strive to update and keep on the cutting edge, but with false reviews like these makes it even harder to compete with the companies who own tubes.
Kayden420 does weekly webcam shows, fully interactive and 100% hardcore. Again, maybe I'm just talking to someone who is spoiled by the big boys, but we try very hard to make our members happy. Tell some of this stuff to members who have been subscribers since the day we launched in 2007, Kayden's level of accessibility and interaction is second to none.
|
12-18-10 07:43pm
|
Reply
281
|
Kelly Madison
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Pyrenees:
I can confirm the DL limit is super small and there is no warning anywhere of this! This is very disheartening and I suggest people avoid this site like the plague.
|
06-21-15 09:21am
|
Reply
282
|
Kelly Madison
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Monahan:
Any news yet? I'm ready to sign on but if there's a ridiculously low D/L limit, I will look elsewhere.
|
08-12-10 04:14pm
|
Reply
283
|
Killergram
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mistake62:
(badandy400's Reply)
here is an excerpt mail they have sent me " ...our security software has detected that you are either using a download manager or a similar application to download video.Use of such software or configuring your browser to allow a large number of multiple connections to our server is not allowed par our terms...blablahblah
|
04-18-08 11:54am
|
Reply
284
|
Killergram
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mistake62:
(badandy400's Reply)
hi badandy400
i confirm they blocked my membership after a couple of week because they said i used internet download manager
but they refund me and since they forbid me to join again
|
04-17-08 01:53pm
|
Reply
285
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Khan:
(badandy400's Reply)
I've always found that when someone understands the reasoning behind a rule, that it help them remember it. It usually also guides them should they ever have a situation where they wonder if a specific action would be breaking the rule or not. Given that, I certainly don't mind explaining the reasoning that went into this rule.
I didn't see your question as being argumentative, at all. Hope you didn't see my reply (in any way) as chastisement for asking.
But yeah, as you've demonstrated with your hamloaf, we tend to have different standards when we've received something for free.
haha ... and I'm getting too old to want a lot of drama so I can't see, "because I fucking said so" as an answer I'll be giving any time soon. :)
|
03-14-09 06:00am
|
Reply
286
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Khan:
(badandy400's Reply)
Well, the short answer is, because it's against our Terms. You'll find it mentioned on both the Terms page : Review Rules, #4 under "Are there any other specific rules I need to know?" It's also is mentioned in the FAQ: #6 under General Questions Because it's against the terms each user here agreed to, I saw no need to explain further in my reply.
But, since you specifically asked ...
Since we do not list sites that are normally free of charge, writing reviews for those sites (like TGP's) is moot. So the only types of sites my remark would be addressing are sites we list ... pay sites.
There are a number of reasons we do not allow Reviews to be submitted based on free access. Among those are...
As you mentioned, they undermine the integrity of an unbiased review. Another issue is we needed to totally remove the temptation of users contacting webmasters asking for free access to write reviews. We had a problem with that early on and beefed up the wording in our Terms to address this problem. We also had webmasters offering free access to users (or to some users) in exchange for a review. Again, the fact that the reviewer got special treatment can call into question the ability to be totally unbiased.
We want users to be able to trust reviews they read here. We work very hard to see that the system isn't abused in any way. Doing reviews for sites you haven't visited or for sites you've gotten free access to is against the spirit of what our site represents.
Oh, and the problem with "special cases" is that once you start rationalizing exceptions, there's really no end to it. One can always come up with "good reasons" why they should get free access to pay sites "this one time". In the end, allowing it would not be worth letting the camel's nose in the tent ... if you know what I mean.
Hope that better answers your question.
|
03-13-09 07:31pm
|
Reply
287
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Khan:
(badandy400's Reply)
badandy400 said: "Personally I beleve the best solution to all of this is for the site to offer a one or two day free trail with no credit card information to at least a few of us. This way someone trustworthy can provide a honest and useful review."
Actually, that wouldn't work since we don't allow Reviews based on free access. Sorry. :(
|
03-13-09 04:47am
|
Reply
288
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from GCode:
(badandy400's Reply)
Yeah, the more I think about it I'd rather not even give my money for a review of this site. But who knows, maybe I'll just do it out of spite :) Seriously though, stinks that this site gets abused like this by places. I'm sure they have gotten plenty of hits out of curiousity...
-GCode
|
03-12-09 05:48pm
|
Reply
289
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from turboshaft:
(badandy400's Reply)
Justification for a high score, as well as lots of exclamation points, is what reviews should be about. We are all biased in some way or another, but I think a 100 or 99 can be validated, especially with the higher character counts that are allowed for reviews.
These reviews barely even read as advertisements, they just come across like every spam subject line we have had to read as we empty out the junk mail folder.
Is there a way to temporarily block reviews for this site until the flood of enthusiasm recedes some?
|
03-12-09 01:16pm
|
Reply
290
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from hogosos:
(badandy400's Reply)
Sounds to me as though you all are from a competitors site and are talking shit. Good...don't buy it! (And this is making the site look BACK?) (your quote)
I am having a hard time with people that complain about something they have never seen. So fine....stay away and save the good shit for us who know.
You stated "everything in this review I could have written, and I never subscribed to this site".......what the fuck does that mean?
If you never subscribed, then how the fuck do you know?
All I know is that Kim is the #1 when it cums to nasty!
THAT my friends is what porn is all about.
|
03-12-09 01:09pm
|
Reply
291
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from pat362:
(badandy400's Reply)
Giving videobox a 100 score may have been a little high, but in your defense that site is amazing for people that want to download porn movies instead of buying them. It's important that we all police the reviews because we have a few newbies that might fall prey to the B.S reviews that have been appearing. I've always thought that the most important thing that PU does is prevent others from being taken in by fake reviews.
|
03-11-09 07:13pm
|
Reply
292
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from pat362:
(badandy400's Reply)
I'm glad you are doing this. You might want to change your name to Genghis. This way we could warn newbies that if they post fake reviews, then Gengis-Khan will stomp on their balls. Just a thought.
|
03-10-09 03:25pm
|
Reply
293
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from pat362:
This review and the one just before it smell so much like crap that I feel we should flush them before they stink up the place. It's one thing to love a site, but I can't help to wonder when 2 reviews come up a 100 score and little substance in them. I also found the attitude of dhilon to be mean spirited.
|
03-10-09 02:02pm
|
Reply
294
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Tree Rodent:
(badandy400's Reply)
Ah, it looks like the review is gone, but looks like kinkykarl
is worthy of a "no" too."
|
03-10-09 06:26am
|
Reply
295
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Dillon:
(badandy400's Reply)
look at:
http://www.flickr.com/people/tv-kim/
Just look at the comments
You will need a Flickr account to view them tho
|
03-10-09 06:16am
|
Reply
296
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Tree Rodent:
(badandy400's Reply)
This is why I have awarded my first two negative trust votes to the people giving this site a ridiculusly high mark and a review containing no detail and no objectivity. I would have given a negative to the other guy, but it looks like Marshall Khan kicked his ass out of town.
|
03-10-09 05:54am
|
Reply
297
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Dillon:
Well I was horrified to see the negative comments on Kims new website, so I posted my own comments to put things right.
I am NOT a fuckin fake. How dare you say that I am!!!!
If you look on Flickr at kims following you will see that I am NOT alone. www.flickr.com/people/tv-kim/
I have joined Kim's site and I am entitled to my opinion.
I have followed Kim for years and she is in this business to give value for money and quality photos.
You are not the only person with a view on this badandy.
I dare say that someone seen the negative unfounded comments and came to Kims rescue.
The original comments made about her website are a bit like someone who goes to see a Film at the cinema, doersnt like it and wants his money back. Pathetic
Kims site makes it completely clear what the content is. He should have read that before joining.
|
03-10-09 05:49am
|
Reply
298
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Dillon:
(badandy400's Reply)
Why do you say that Andy?
Dont I have a right to say what I like?
Dill
|
03-10-09 02:10am
|
Reply
299
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from kinkykarl:
(badandy400's Reply)
Kims anal heaven is in my opinion a unique porn site for those that like not only beautiful trannies but large insertions. She is no doubt pretty and mistesrious and hot as steam when she fucks those humongous dildoes so easily. Her rose bud is adorable without a doubt. I give it a 100
KinkyKarl
|
03-09-09 11:46pm
|
Reply
300
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from turboshaft:
(badandy400's Reply)
There was a third one, by a user called Paulo, who gave it a 99, but now it's gone. It really wasn't much different from this.
|
03-09-09 08:33pm
|
