| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1151
|
Old Spunkers
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from TheRizzo:
Great review with good details so that I can make a good informed decision about this site. And based on how you feel about All Over 30 I know we have similar tastes in older women.
I will stay away from this one.
|
11-14-08 11:09am
|
Reply
1152
|
Village Ladies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from WeeWillyWinky:
(messmer's Reply)
Thanks for the reply, messmer.
I know you're a fan of mature women, as I am. As I said in my review, the premise of the site is good, and it's devoid of anything trashy, both of which are a plus. But if you're going to be a pictures-only site and steer clear of video, even in 2008, why not offer the best quality pictures you can? Why not offer zip-files? And why haul off a large percentage of the content to another site and charge extra for accessing it, when the content is not of premium quality to begin with? I'll admit, some of the newer pics are decent, but a lot of the older ones are smaller than 600x800. This move seems a bit stingy to me. Especially considering the 33.00 USD I paid for my month.
For a site like this, with small thumbs and no zips, not to mention generally slow-loading pages, it requires a good deal of patience and work to download each pic individually and hope to get some kind of genuine enjoyment out of the experience. Despite my low score, there are some very nice pictures here, as I said in my pros, but for 33 smackers I would rather not have to squint and hunt and click so much.
And like I said, seeing all those links to sets I can't access is sort of insulting, even though there's still a good deal of content I *can* get to. It's a bad idea, and without that the score might have been at least a 70. The spirited ladies themselves can be appreciated on their own merits, even though most of them are quite frankly not my cup of tea, and more or less transcend the whole scoring thing. The 63 is for Albert.
|
11-13-08 12:16am
|
Reply
1153
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from ksauz:
Hello...
I LOVE this site, but the zipfile download is very slow...
I don't understand why...
|
11-11-08 02:21pm
|
Reply
1154
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Rick:
(messmer's Reply)
GiftCertificates.com should be a great option. The only downside is when you go to cash in a "Super Certificate", some merchants advertise a 2 wk delivery time even for e-cards. Seemed strange to me. Some were immediate delivery though and the one certificate I did choose came within a few hours.
Seems like a solid choice for Canadian users!
|
11-09-08 03:55pm
|
Reply
1155
|
All Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from TheRizzo:
(messmer's Reply)
I totally agree. ATK has seemed to be regressing over the last year. I'd love to see a legit competitor though that offered hardcore hairy content. I had high hopes for All hairy when they debuted.
|
11-04-08 04:56pm
|
Reply
1156
|
All Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from TheRizzo:
(messmer's Reply)
Agreed Messmer. I hated to be so harsh but the site really shut it down in my opinion.
|
11-03-08 05:22pm
|
Reply
1157
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nygiants03:
(messmer's Reply)
It might just be personal preference with videos prior to 2007, as those videos really are pretty decent in my opinion. To me they just aren't totally clear, but they are not fuzzy which I consider poor quality. I view the videos on my laptop and all videos are fine. Maybe your high pixel monitor may make it appear worst then it is, because I don't own one.
Yea they could name the files for you, but it takes like 5 seconds of effort to change it to what you want. I really didn't find much problem in that.
Thanks for the trust Rating.
|
10-31-08 10:23am
|
Reply
1158
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from asmith12:
(messmer's Reply)
:-)
|
10-30-08 01:15pm
|
Reply
1159
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from littlejoe:
i was gonna join over the weekend til i realised i only had 4 gb free hard drive space. anyways, all 3 sites for returning members is $30
http://www.abbywinters.com/join/return
|
10-27-08 04:28pm
|
Reply
1160
|
XX Cel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from WeeWillyWinky:
(messmer's Reply)
The watermark is pretty big. I actually never heard of the site until a few weeks ago. Oh, and I should say, while Cel uses landscape more than the average site, on going through the pics I'd say he still uses it much less than half the time.
|
10-17-08 08:07pm
|
Reply
1161
|
Broke Amateurs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from OMF456:
(messmer's Reply)
Hmmm, I've never seen it have a glitch. I just checked it. It did come up a bit slower than normal but not that noticeable. Not sure what the problem is there.
The video quality varies. You can tell it's a brand new site. His earlier stuff was pretty bad, lighting wise, but he's improved that drastically since his initial stuff.
It is not HD. But, that's not my thing. Honestly, I don't really want to see it in HD. The girls look better to me in SD. :-)
Check out his tour. If you're going to join this site, it's going to be for the true amateur-ness of the girls. From all that I can tell, every single one of them but one is a true first timer or only timer. I get off on that. And he puts them thru their paces. And I get off on that too. :-)
How about you, care to recommend a site similar to BA? I'm not looking for sites where people send in their sex tapes. I love sites where the girls are true amateurs doing hardcore action. Hmmm, I just read the rules after I typed all that. Guess you can't promote other sites in here. Anyway, BA is my personal favorite right now but YMMV.
|
10-16-08 01:17pm
|
Reply
1162
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from atrapat:
(messmer's Reply)
Watermarks on the pictures I've checked are always on the top right corner. It's the same one they have on the videos. On large pics, the CHRISTY part is about 170x70px and it's an almost solid block because of the typeface; there's a 40px-high part below with "Marks.com" which has a much lighter typeface.
I usually don't mind watermarks but these might be somewhat obtrusive, specially on the portrait pictures : they have a long axis of only 1200px which I hadn't realised when I wrote my review.
As I said, I feel pictures are quite good. They are not taken while filming the video: model is always looking and striking poses at the photo camera.
|
10-13-08 12:00pm
|
Reply
1163
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from mr3633:
(messmer's Reply)
I had to cancel my credit card (one I owned for +10 years) when I signed up for one of the their sites earlier this year. So, I am interested to see if a response from the webmaster is given.
|
10-13-08 10:44am
|
Reply
1164
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from mr3633:
I sent an email to the Webmaster (PaulCS) for this network requesting that he respond to the comments regarding billing practices. We will see if he responds.
|
10-13-08 08:43am
|
Reply
1165
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from badandy400:
100% agreed.
This is sad for us because their is some good content, a lot of bad though, but still some good content and would be worth the $10 to join. They also have the fasted output I have ever seen for porn site and can sustain it. I was getting about 90 Mbit from them for hours at a time. This site would be a treasure chest for anyone looking for ethnic porn and big tits stuff.
Unfortunately they are still up to their usual shit. These guys have made a real name for themselves as a bunch of scammers. It would be nice if this site could be managed by a new group of people that want to make an honest buck and create good porn. I wish they would just sell the site.
|
10-12-08 04:09pm
|
Reply
1166
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from asmith12:
(messmer's Reply)
Ditto.
|
10-10-08 09:55am
|
Reply
1167
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from Cybertoad:
Was checking out the ladies at the site, started laughing when it said hobbies, some said riding horse, and fishing then one said Oral sex . lol as a hobbie wow ok now thats a hobbie I would be supportive of, guess it would have a low over head. Ok i'll stop the puns.
Good review look like a good site I was noticing a lady Madison wow looks how, but question about the review. How many videos does each model havedoesnt seem to show many models so wondered how big the site was.
|
10-08-08 07:56am
|
Reply
1168
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(messmer's Reply)
Wow! How did I miss that?? Thanks for pointing that out. I'll have to change my answer.
Basically, I'd try to change the subject, after saying something like, "You've known me long enough. Of course, I'd never do that."
|
10-06-08 12:54pm
|
Reply
1169
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from TheRizzo:
(messmer's Reply)
Agreed I'd love to see All Over 30 start producing actual high definition videos soon. Especially of Jordan K and Andie :) But really thats my only real complaint with them. Well they could use upgrading the top size of their photos now too since a lot of the top sites have done so and with people having bigger monitors and faster connections.
|
10-04-08 08:13am
|
Reply
1170
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from TheRizzo:
(messmer's Reply)
I just signed up for a month to see for myself how its looking there lately. No question the site is slipping and the movie quality is what is most disappointing. I am not put off so much by the quality of the photos but they seemed to have been losing their anchor babes that used to be there. One thing I liked about the site is they had some very hot girls but also mixed in hippies, older, bbw etc. Natural girls. I am seeing less of the hot teens with bush myself.
For $25 a month it still is a site I will join frequently though as its the only site that provides me with what I want when it comes to hairy girls. If the updates of the past few days become everyday for the next 6 months, I will have to re-evaluate and just take the hairy sets I get from sites like Abby and All Over 30 etc instead though.
|
10-03-08 03:15pm
|
Reply
1171
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from TheRizzo:
(messmer's Reply)
I do agree that they seemed to let their standards slip a bit of late with the updates. Hopefully its just a temp setback, but overall I still enjoy the site very much.
Allhairy is a joke. They seemed to make a go of it for awhile with some pretty good sets and decent sized updates but last time I checked they completely gave up and threw in the towel it seemed to me hence my low score for them.
|
09-30-08 09:40am
|
Reply
1172
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
from TheRizzo:
Honestly they are the only hairy site out there. My biggest complaints are the video quality still hasn't been improved and the fact they put all their hardcore hairy content on the Galleria site.
I still think you scored the site pretty low for a site like this that takes a niche and provides the vast ammount of content they do. The fact there is no real competition impresses me even more with how much new content they add weekly.
|
09-29-08 05:41pm
|
Reply
1173
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(messmer's Reply)
See. There is some good that comes from cucumbers!
|
09-29-08 03:02pm
|
Reply
1174
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from badandy400:
(messmer's Reply)
I was always irritated that they made me pay more for the lesbian content. It is not like lesbian is an obscure niche. It would be like a teen site charging more for access to photos of girls that are blonde.
I definitely agree with the greed split. I was not overly impressed with the content and this split has ensured that I will not be a member in the future.
|
09-21-08 08:31pm
|
Reply
1175
|
Lusty Grandmas
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
from TheRizzo:
I guess it depends how big the members area is of those bonus sites that no longer update. If its a good size collection in a niche I may not have otherwise tried out, I would still consider it a bonus for sure.
Most of the sites out there that I really would say "update" with lots of fresh content on a 5-7 times a week basis usually don't include their other sites in a network.
|
09-20-08 12:09pm
|
