you can't say its obviously fake because someone not use to sex (eg. a virgin or someone with little experience) may look at porn and think that these moves are practical and maybe even pleasurable (and may just think that what they did or plan to do is not "up to scratch" or good enough). only someone with adequately sexual experience, or the knowledge of how porn works would understand fully that many of these moves are not feasible or pleasurable (especially for the women)
Actually, good point Messmer. We have referred to it as an ass site because that is how it is promoted (i.e. the 'crack' refers to the ass crack, not the pussy).
But you're right - a great many videos and photo sets aren't centred around the ass at all. For people (like me) who really appreciate proper girly back door action, and with no men featured, I recommend Lez Cuties a lot higher than this site. :)
I never subscribe anymore at any porn site for a long time.
Be sure that I shall give my opinion about this site, and this review site, about their content and about their behaviours, in more objective places and places which are not ripp-off places.
Sometimes it really depends on the girl. I'm thinking about Ashley from ALS SCAN who surely is a damn hot girlie and guess what ... no real breasts only nipples :-)
A search feature don't exist.
You find a particular movie, seen in an advertising ?
Good luck to find it.
If this movie, seen in an advertising, is really at this site.
Never found it, for the upper reason, and as says messmer, there are 19433 movies at this site....
messmer posted the day I posted a submission about easy elder, but my submission was censured.
As messmer talks about numbers, a customer who subscribes for a trial offer is billed 46 times the initial offer.
I let you consider about the quality of this site. My submission was censured.
OK, I didn't pick fully dressed as my first choice, but since you mentioned it, a beautiful girl in tights jeans or short shorts is often sexier than a complete nude.
Not scared of clothes, myself. I'll take a near divine Beauty in a Nun's habit over a Wilhelm Scream spreading wide enough to show her cervix any day. Usually.
Although we are about the same age, I prefer some fantasy in my porn. Any age is ok. I feel women are in their prime regarding attractiveness when they are under 30. Women as old as 40 can be appealing though. Women over 50 are just not on my radar for porn, but maybe in real life.
Normally I'd hate just to say ditto!
But messmer got another/good point here - which I apart from the technical quality will like to second - on the wife-point-of-view.
Anyway: enjoyed to read all the inputs here at this fine poll.
Well Mess, the reason for the watermark is to keep people from posting our pics as their own, or trading them as their own. We have thousands upon thousands of pics and a program that allows us to stamp them. We just stamp them before we post them. Did you mean the watermarks are blurred? If so, they just say suchsluts@mewbienudes.com . Anyway, glad you liked them. We try to keep the watermarks from getting in the way. We are in the process of creating our own site minus the watermarks ;)
I agree wholeheartedly that if you join this site for the nudity, you'll get bored and bored fast. It is the same models standing around naked day after day. However, I do like the site for its news content and the personalities of the models presenting it. I personally don't have access to normal TV news - though when I do I find that is uniquely terrible - and NPR just depresses me. The programming on Naked News is too short - I'd prefer 1 hour shows - but I find they are rather balanced and cover a lot of European news that you just don't get to hear about in normal American TV news (and yes, they are Canadian, but they obviously cater to the American market heavily). It is a niche genre, but they do it quite well so I don't mind supporting them.
Hey Messmer, that brings an interesting laugh out of me. I once heard of a site years ago that would give anyone who was reviewing the site, a different membership than those who bought memberships, so the reviews would be very high, but the work they put into the actual member site, very low.
Not that I think that is the case, but I do think browsers can play a part in problems. I do know that American Vice, DVD site with 5 free tokens for download for a free trial almost never works at all with any browser except IE. I generally use Firefox, and am using it right now. If I'm not using it, I use Flock, which is a new variation of Firefox that makes my sports blogging a lot easier.
You can still see the updates if your subscription ran out. Go to the main page and click, "New Releases". It will let you see all of the updates without logging in.
With the download speed, that one really doesn't make much sense. You're listed from Canada, I'm from the US, so we shouldn't see a big difference in download speeds, though if you ever want to see the difference locations can make on download speeds, go to speedtest.net and click one of the pyramids far from your location, make note of your speed, then do one closer to you and you can see the difference.
Here is an example of mine.
When I use the Los Angeles test, my download speed is 9,981, my connection is 10M, so that is almost exact.
When I use the Johannesburg, South Africa test, my download speed is 4,792 which is less than half the speed I was getting with the Los Angeles test.
Even worse, I just tried connecting to Calgary, and only got 2,355 download speed. I never realized there was this big of difference. I'm not for sure where Adult Movie Club is located, but those few tests makes me think that could be a problem that you are having with the speed. Just not making a good connection with their server. I also tried connecting with King Rupert, Canada but only got a 4,100 speed with it. Truthfully, anywhere I try to connect, I get a better speed with than the Canadian test sites. I actually got a higher speed connecting with Europe on one than I get connecting to Los Angeles, which is about 20 minutes from where I am.
Messmer, I was just on the site and they have updates listed, 3 per day, for everyday. Go to the site and click updates. There are 3 new releases listed for each day from the 15th to today.
The titles and date.
7-15: Amazing POV #3*, Anal Addicts, Girls of Taj Mahal #10
7-16: Amazing POV #6*, Cum Swallow, Eat Like a Real Man
7-17: Ice La Fox is a Dominatrix*, Fuel Injected #5*, Anal Addicts #4
7-18: Multiple Chicks #3, Tranny Hunter, Nautica Thorn aka Filthy Whore*
7-19: Teen Pink POV*, It'z A Black Thang #4, Girls of Taj Mahal #3*
7-20: Nasty Newcummers #21*, Strap on MILF Hookers, Raw Meat
7-21: Real Squirters #3, Nyomi Banxx is a Dom*, Latin X
7-22: Amazing POV #4*, Interracial Cream Pies #4, Pussyman's Fetish Party*
7-23: Pussy Foot'n*, Anal Addicts #9, Skin On Skin
*means good download
I don't understand the differences we are seeing, as you all are also seeing differences with the TBP reviewers as well. It really is like the site has two different personalities!
I had planned to come back to it to get the rare exclusive ones they have added lately.
As far as an email goes, I wouldn't hold my breath, they don't speak English. So I am guessing they don't read it either. Go back and check to see if those updates are showing up for you, just to make sure we're not getting a different site.
You summed it up perfectly when you said it's a community and should be free. The operators should just carry advertising to pay the bills. You are also spot on when you say it should not be listed on TBP- technically it is NOT a porn site.
As for the other individuals post you responded to, (#8) it clearly falls under "shameless promotions" in the posting rules. That person's post is clearly spam and why it hasn't been deleted I don't know.
Search-engine provides you with a lot of stuff you are NOT looking for.
Site only works in Explorer, not Netscape (which is my favorite).
The rutine for streaming is that it works once or twice - then nothing works - not even the downloads. Then you have to shut down the browser and start over again.
When searching for models: Mostly their name do not appear by the thumbnails for download.
Never got any answer after mailing them.
My membership runs out in a couple of days - and I won't be back
I have to agree with messmer's initial take on NewbieNudes. I would only recommend a paying membership to someone who is desperate to post pictures of themselves on the net, can't get paid to do it and isn't satisfied with just three pics a day.
I was a paying member (similar situation- a friend talked me into it. The friend later apologized) and over the course of a few weeks found it to be a complete waste of money. There are several issues I had.
First, they do not have 1.6 whatever million members. They've had that many people sign up during their existence, but my estimates are only 20,000 active users. Of those, less than half are posters. When a person deletes their account, (this happens A LOT) they do not lower thier "member" count. A small deception, but a deception.
Second is lack of quality material. Fifty percent of the content is blurry cock close-ups. There are also too many cell phone pics and just plain poorly taken pictures. Paying members can access "high resolution" versions, but I found the standard views far less grainy.
Third is the videos. Several people have told me this is what hooked them- only premium members can view them. I found 1 in 50 or 75 was watchable. The quality of these is usually so bad I can't fully describe it. Poorly edited, (if at all) absurdly short and terribly filmed. Quite a few are webcam/ cell phone captures resulting in unwatchable grainy images.
My fourth issue is more a personal pet peeve. A lot of people would go premium and then saturate the site with terrible pictures. I guess they wanted their money's worth, but I don't want to see 40 pictures every day of a woman I find totally unattractive doing almost the exact same pose in each picture. Slagging through all of the terrible content to find a couple of good pics was hard enough. This made it harder.
I'll make a sub-point to that last one. I found very few posters I liked, but when I did they were short lived. The best ones seemed to be standard members who would post for a week or a month and then delete their account. This was frustrating since quality pictures are so hard to come by on the site.
However, my biggest beef was people posting stolen pics. Being a paying member of a few real porn sites, I routinely recognized pictures that NN members were passing off as themselves. I got so frustrated with seeing material I had paid a lot of money to have access to being shown for free that I complained to NN. They completely blew me off and said that didn't happen on their site. They make it easy to report objectionable material, but not copyrighted images lifed from other sites.
In the end, I can only recommend this site to people desperate to be naked on the net. Even then, just do like 90% of NN posters do: start a standard membership, post 3 pics a day for a month or so and then delete it after you've had your thrill (or when the creepy private messages you'll get become too much).
Thanks, I had a similar review for the Abby Winters site last year. They're both really good sites, and I would hope that my review shows others that like glam porn, that they might not like this one, just like I would hope your review shows those that don't like glam porn, that is the site for them.
I will tell you a few of the girls I really liked on this site. I thought Pam, reddish/blonde hair was really cute, nice body too. Luna has a great body. Loved Lili and her red hair and freckles. Bridgette reminds me of Erica Campbell and my two favorites were Fluer and Lola. Those girls really caught my attention, especially Lola.
The thing that bothered me though, as much as I dislike lots of pubic hair, if the girl is pretty enough, I can deal with it, but hairy armpits are something that I've never been around, ever. That almost goes into too shocking for me. And several of the g/g sets had girls with hairy armpits.
Not that I think there is anything wrong with it, but it just doesn't fit my ideal of a fantasy woman. I will check that one out that you mentioned, made a notepad note here.
I remember talking to Snowdude last year about the areas we were raised in, and I was raised just outside of Los Angeles, beaches, blondes, bikinis everywhere I looked. So, I do like "regular" girls as well, as a contrast to my raising. One of my strongest fetishes is a woman in a long skirt with a tight sweater on, since I never saw women like that growing up. So, I can appreciate this site for the niche it is and as mentioned in the review, I really do applaud them for sticking to it.
Thanks for the tip on the Rachelle and Page videos and the reply. Will let you know how I liked them.
I think I said "no download options", meaning you can only DL one way. That's my fault, bad wording there.
All videos (and there are over a thousand now) average about five minutes and are each downloadble in a single mpeg file. The quality is excellent and they have been moving into hi-def over the past few months. I can't even watch the new ones because my pc can't handle it and the replay is all choppy. Even the oldest vids are high quality and look great fullscreen on my 22" monitor, though I have to mention I'm not an afficianado in technical matters. This is the best panty-video site I know of. Bear in mind, this is a British site and the Brits tend to be old school (full-backs) when it comes to knickers, though the emphasis is not on cotton. Also very few thongs or boyshorts here. There is no graphic nudity though the girls do get into their birthday suits from time to time and bare breasts abound. There is some masturbation and lesbian content but the emphasis is heavily on solo tease.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
