| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from RagingBuddhist:
(jd1961's Reply)
On second thought, linking TBP to Stern does kinda suck. But, I guess you're right - exposure is exposure...
|
12-22-07 11:09am
|
Reply
452
|
Met Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Drooler:
Thanks, JD. I was really wondering about this site. In the previews I saw quite lot of familiar content. Your comment is what I needed to make sure of that regarding the inside content, which they so demurely omit from the visitor's area.
|
12-21-07 03:38am
|
Reply
453
|
Playboy's Fresh Faces
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Well, jd1961 - just right now things started to work again - but it's still annoying to have to wait almost a week - and not getting any usefull answers...
|
12-21-07 02:59am
|
Reply
454
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Bela:
(jd1961's Reply)
Working? :)
|
12-19-07 11:34am
|
Reply
455
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Bela:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hi again,
I have checked up on your membership in the meantime and the Christmas Membership link is working fine for me using your pass - it's just taking a little while to load because the database needs to check that the 14 days haven't expired and that you're eligible, so it knows to provide you with the link you need.
Just log in to OBJ, and go to the Customer Support page (link at the top right). Here, click on the "Get your free Christmas membership here" link.
This is the part where you need a bit of patience until the next page loads :)
You'll get a page with a simple drop-down list of our sites and a "Get Free Membership" button - just choose the site you want, click the okay button and that's it - you'll have instant access.
Things should be working fine for you, you need to wait a little for the age to load.
If you are still having problems (could be a browser issue I suppose) please contact me using the support page of the site so I'll get information on your configuration and browser which may be useful.
Best Regards
Bela
|
12-19-07 08:15am
|
Reply
456
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Bela:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hi,
Shouldn't you be contacting Customer Support about this rather than asking here? :)
If you're getting an error message when trying to activate your free pass it means that either:
1) you've run out of time - you have 14 days to activate your free pass, after that the link disappears (if you write to me quickly at support@ddfprod.com with the site you'd like, I'll set it up for you manually), or more probably
2) you have already been a member of (or tried joining) the site you would like your free membership to with the SAME username and our database isn't letting you add a duplicate entry. A quick mail to Customer Support (address above) and we'll delete the old database entry so you'll be able to get your free pass ASAP. Not a problem.
Please contact me if you're having a problem, we usually reply to everyone within 24 hours if possible.
Best Regards and Merry Christmas
Bela
DDF Productions
p.s. lets not start a special Pornusers DDF Support section here - please use the relevant Customer Support pages of our sites instead :)
p.p.s. you have read the instructions, haven't you? - link on the join page!
|
12-19-07 07:47am
|
Reply
457
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#35
from asmith12:
(jd1961's Reply)
I used to think this is your quote I've answered: "the first three answer options in this poll are not options at all", isn't it?
|
12-18-07 11:57pm
|
Reply
458
|
Dollar Act
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from asmith12:
To make a change in a pattern of our recent disagreements :-), I should agree with you here - it does look suspicious. There is also just one thing that puzzles me - how one of these guys managed to get "trust" rating by Marianna? Maybe she should check if her password was stolen/guessed?
|
12-18-07 12:54pm
|
Reply
459
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#28
from asmith12:
(jd1961's Reply)
> the first three answer options in this poll are not options at all
They can easily be options if interpreting the question the way as I've read it ("what would you do if you were making laws") or another way "what would you do if it would be legal"?
And as I understand US law (which I can easily misunderstand as I'm not a lawyer), this question and answers to it cannot possibly be illegal (in modern US; I'm not speaking of Iran or Orwell's Oceania, where most likely even thought about it would be punished) as they're covered by the First Amendment. Right to DISCUSS things freely is a fundamental right in modern liberal society, so let's not fear to DISCUSS even the most controversial (and even potentially illegal) issues.
|
12-18-07 10:48am
|
Reply
460
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Khan:
(jd1961's Reply)
Not sure how you're reading this but, the wording of the question is entirely hypothetical, thus, there is no admission of guilt to anything. It asks for an opinion and opinions are not a felony ... actions are. Had the question been worded to expressly admit guilt (i.e. When did you first let your kids watch porn?) then that would be a different matter and in that case, I'd agree with you, it would have been inappropriate wording.
But back to addressing how it IS WORDED ...
While I (personally) do not understand the reason for asking this question, I (as the one who approved the poll submission) allow that questions might be valid even if I do not immediately see the reasoning behind them. In this case, I'm not a parent so I wouldn't presume to understand everything a parent wants to know concerning rearing a child in today's world.
Who knows, perhaps a parent wants a feel for what fellow parents *feel* is appropriate? I have to agree with Drooler, I see nothing about the wording of the question suggesting that porn should be shown to the underage.
I would further point out that what is "underage" varies widely with different geographical areas and different time periods. It was not all that long ago that a woman who wasn't married by age 16 was considered well on the way to being an old maid.
So again, there was nothing so inherently wrong with the question that I felt it shouldn't be asked. As always, if there's a particular question you take exception to, just skip the poll that day.
|
12-17-07 08:24am
|
Reply
461
|
Taste My Own Ass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Toadsith:
(jd1961's Reply)
LOL - I may have gotten a bit off topic but I guess I was trying to point out that domination/submission fantasies can be solely sexual and have no interest in panning out into other aspects of life. The mixed-gender military rant may have confused the topic a bit rather than providing an enlightening addition, oops. Cheers!
|
12-16-07 01:49pm
|
Reply
462
|
Taste My Own Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Toadsith:
Alright - I'll take the bait. Ass-to-Mouth (ATM) is another fetish along the lines of the various aggressive submissive / domination role-play gonzo sex style that has made certain studios, both state side and abroad. "Unclean Practice" - at home, yes you are probably right. Professionally, not necessarily so - most professional stars that do anal have enemas performed before hand so there aren't any unwelcome surprises when the dick is removed.
Do I like watching ATM's? Actually I would be one of those freaks - yes, lol. Not a big surprise to people who have read my German Goo Girls review, I'm sure. I also am a big fan of Brandon Iron - he combines ridiculously dominate and sexually aggressive behavior with a very polite and almost quiet talking style - it is strange, somewhat disturbing and quite cool in my opinion.
Now when I review sites I try to evaluate the quality of the content, not necessarily how much I like the content (if I had more space I would do both) - but as for my personal tastes, well they are a bit contradicting. I love softcore glamour, I love extreme hardcore (with submissive females) - I'm not into pure Bondage though.
I don't know that I've explained the appeal of ATMs exactly. It lies definitely in the fantasy realm for me. It is something I wouldn't necessarily try, but the very taboo nature of it, combined with its domination/submission characteristics, make it fascinating. Half of me saying "holy hell! She is actually sucking that! I wouldn't!" and the other half saying "Damn. That's hot...".
I wish I could really pin down a specific nature of the act that appeals. It is similar to cum shots, Freaks Of Cock proved to me that just like in Hentai, the cumshot doesn't need to be real for me to like it - it is the idea, very much in the same manner of how I can happily enjoy AIF (Adult Interactive Fiction) as much as a full screen video. Porn is a very personal experience, much of the experience is in the brain, not as much a sensory experience as one might think.
I guess for me I like to fantasize about sexual dominance - I have no interest in dominating women in any other aspect of life at all. It astonishes me that people have physically or verbal abusive relationships - and really annoys me when I see women being put down for their intelligence or other ridiculous things people come up with. Granted there are physical difference between the genders, but this just means different strengths and weaknesses. I think it is silly that we don't have a 100% mixed gender military - as women have distinct physical advantages for certain military activities. So going back to the topic at hand - one can be interested in sexual domination and not be obsessed with domination across the board. It is simply role-playing, nothing more. (Again, in my opinion.)
Cheers!
|
12-15-07 10:22pm
|
Reply
463
|
Teens From Tokyo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Toadsith:
(jd1961's Reply)
Fujiko Kano has actually made a bit of a name for herself over here and apparently worked in the Japanese AV scene for awhile and, if I remember correctly, a Japanese brothel before that. However - yes, it is definitely a cultural style - and unfortunately one that I've never really gotten into. No doubt, with how rapidly porn is expanding, somebody will start a Western-styled Japanese porn site in the future - I'll just have to wait, lol.
|
12-15-07 11:08am
|
Reply
464
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from PosterDude:
Nice Review. I agree met-art is best glamore site, but sometimes want more explicit. Me and you have Met-art and alsscan reversed. For me alsscans have higher photo and video quality width better glamour plus hardcore. We agree both sites are top of class and I agree with your nice met-art review. Just not so high score.
|
12-15-07 06:31am
|
Reply
465
|
Hand Domination
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Drooler:
Great review, JD. Really got a good idea about the site. (Some reviews leave me wondering about as much as before I've read them.)
|
12-14-07 09:30am
|
Reply
466
|
Hand Domination
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from nygiants03:
By looking at the preview page it seems almost all the girls have big natural tits. That should be a pro, should it not?
|
12-14-07 08:00am
|
Reply
467
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Khan:
Might I offer that it is perfectly valid for JD to feel that a Japanese site NOT be faulted for blurring genitals. May I also offer that it is EQUALLY VALID for others to feel that the blurring deserves noting and even counting off for. Both are PERSONAL OPINIONS. To argue at length (beyond the initial explanation of why you hold your opinion) about someone else's personal opinion is (to a great degree) pointless.
|
12-14-07 07:35am
|
Reply
468
|
Diabolic
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(jd1961's Reply)
I wish I was that lucky! Porn shops in my area seem to have stopped carrying Diabolic stuff. Many other top studios too. It may be that the Canadian Border Services is being run by a bunch of Baptist women who deem Diabolic's stuff too offensive, but for now, the website is my only means of getting Diabolic.
|
12-14-07 05:50am
|
Reply
469
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from asmith12:
(jd1961's Reply)
Come on, there is no need to go that personal; I'm sure there are LOTS of people like me out there. See for instance review of m64bob. BTW, if being exact, it is not only cock which is covered, pussies are also covered, aren't they?
|
12-14-07 05:15am
|
Reply
470
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from asmith12:
(jd1961's Reply)
Just put it in caps so it will be obvious on the first glance at the review :-).
|
12-14-07 05:08am
|
Reply
471
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from asmith12:
(jd1961's Reply)
> If you do not like authentic Japanese porn, don't join.
While it's still possible to argue about the term "authentic", there is no point in it. What about the following: you will write in caps in your reviews of such sites: "THOSE WHO DON'T LIKE MOSAICS DON'T BOTHER", and I (and people alike) will never join such a site. Deal? :-)
|
12-14-07 03:52am
|
Reply
472
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from elephant:
agree drm should never be seen these days, its a major downer and a rip off, never would either join such a site, its a shame here cause they look to have some good movies and models I like
|
12-14-07 03:16am
|
Reply
473
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from elephant:
I don't understand japanese porn culture and why they censor genitals yet pretty much everything else goes, I just find it a little odd why they do it.
|
12-14-07 03:04am
|
Reply
474
|
Clown Sex.net
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from elephant:
clown sex lol, very niched market I would presume,
|
12-14-07 02:57am
|
Reply
475
|
Clown Sex.net
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Bigtime69:
Correction:
ClownSex.net opened Sep. 10, 2007. As of Friday, December 14th here are the totals for content which is updated daily:
Chica's Blowjob Photos: 1,843 pictures
Chica's Blowjob Movies: 292 minutes
Bonus Photo Sets: 1,930 with 168,390 pictures
Bonus Movie Clips: 871 clips lasting 18,085 minutes
|
12-13-07 11:34pm
|
