| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1476
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Like mr smut and The Squirrel I've seen this more and more - and like these fellow users I think it's a rip off and a speculation in earnings only - a bit like when some site "pre-mark" another site when joining one.
"Maybe those european do not notice the difference"
But ok, some sites have equalized the cost: $/Euro to the same in the end, Great!
And some sites even offers you a helping hand with a different link to join in US dollars even if your're placed in Europe (after writing to the webmaster) Great too.
|
12-02-08 03:59pm
|
Reply
1477
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
Agree with williamj - though the motherload-sites of the company Final Whistle Ltd - Only Cuties, Sapphic Erotica and In Focus Girls are topscores at TBP it could be time for new reviews - at TBP.
These sites are - just as williamj and cybertoad indicates going downhill.
The content is slacking, the memberservice is poor, the downloadspeed/use of DL manager a problem and so on. Remember just half a year ago or so things were much better - I like the price of $19.95 and not $ 29.95, but it's not enough anymore...
|
12-02-08 03:01pm
|
Reply
1478
|
My Angel Funs
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Yes, jd - I've heard that too. But I have some older stuff from Teenfuns - and as far as this user can judge: all the girls are of legal age. Not yuonger than you can find on a lot of other sites, anyway.
|
12-02-08 01:54pm
|
Reply
1479
|
My Angel Funs
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
Yeah, but the strange thing is, that the usernet or what it's called (binaries) is still comming up with some "new" stuff - or maybe it's a little older ditto - I cannot find out. But those two sites had some great things, anyway...
Some of the stuff from these two sites, I still keep...
|
12-02-08 01:42pm
|
Reply
1480
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
Yeah, I just saw it - a little too late late - but like I answered Khan after asking him to cancel my thread your citation is just great:
"No longer would the pornoholic have to fast forward through 10 minutes of inept dialog to get 5 minutes of sex. They got sex throughout the whole video."
Cheers, mate
|
12-02-08 08:52am
|
Reply
1481
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks, bro - Khan
Gonzo:
What really hit me was the fact that it's related to porn that does not "beat around the bush" - AND no "ten minuttes of inept dialog to get 5 minutes of sex".
Great!
|
12-02-08 08:50am
|
Reply
1482
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Review
Another user here who not sure what "Gonzo" stands for - there MUST be experiencend PUs who can tell us what it exactly means....
|
12-02-08 08:30am
|
Reply
1483
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Great first review of this Nubiles Co.-based milf site, Ace...
The preview offers - as at Nubiles - a fine overview of what the paying costumer can expect - good video-clips. And man, this site has some great mature/grown up girls I have not seen a lot of others places.
Also judging from the preview - and of course Aces review - the main cons here are the somewhat limited amount of stuff - and again compared to the relative high price.
But if the updates here keep comming in the same speed as at Nubiles this site has fine potentials - think I'll just pass it for a little while and follow - yes - the updates.
One more plus is that each model has 3,4 og more sets - photo and video..
|
11-29-08 06:56am
|
Reply
1484
|
Innocent High
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
Man, I'm not here to please our old buddy jd1961 - but again I read his reviews - everytime - and enjoy this one.
I know we can find a lot of stuff with Lexi Belle, Bree Olsen, Aubrey Adams ect. at for exampel Videobox (and a heck of a lot of others places).
But take a look at the previews for this site too!
Here are some great models in a mix of US, latina, euro and asians. You can browse through 45 pages and with preview of every single video - as far as I can see. Nothing to hide here - thats how a porn-site should present itself.
It looks worth it.
Don't you just hate those site where they offer no previews at all - I've learned (costly) to stay away from sites like that.
|
11-28-08 07:00am
|
Reply
1485
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
I maybe said it before, but I'll say it again:
Great that you're back here at PU - at lot of newcommers - and of course oldtimers - can really benefit from your inputs, reviews ect.....
BTW: That anonymous no-trust of 06-26-08 is absolutely nonsens. Khan, get rid of it, please!
|
11-28-08 05:27am
|
Reply
1486
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Of course, I miss something, sometimes.
Just went back, thanks - and yes, Gina is a "doll".
But, bro - this site has so/too many faults, alas.
The "deal" for a year is ok (pricewise), but when it comes down to reality, the "deal" is not so attractive as it seems - all PUs should be aware of that....
|
11-27-08 02:26pm
|
Reply
1487
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Reply
Well, wiild1..........after browsing a lot of both new and older material in this last week, I could easyly get different notions, for sure.
One thing I've noticed is that SOME new stuff has the advantage of fine HD or DVD-quality. But the more I scan through a little older stuff - stuff I missed earlier, I tend to agree with you. Here there is no difference in viewing quality if you download a 600Mb "DVD-quality" or you just take the "high" quality at ex. 200 Mb (compared).
That has over the years been the main problem for Videobox - and, alas - still is for quite a lot of download-options.
Still I'm a bit impressed with all the newer studios (like "Private") which Videobox now seems to get in the mix....anyway I've enjoyed my browsing this site more than before.
|
11-27-08 01:47pm
|
Reply
1488
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
jd1961 sure is our specialist in japanese erotica - and as jd states it's not just porn.
Agree - in the beginning when I first tried to get into the censored movies, I also found it a bit strange with the blurred stuff (mosaic).
But if you focus on the girl/model and not mainly genitals, it's great in another way. And here you also find some of the most beautifull girls - I really dig those "dancer-videos"
BTW, jd - great review, thanks!
|
11-27-08 02:19am
|
Reply
1489
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
BTW: Also joined LSG for a year - because it was a "good" deal - somthing like $ 44 - still regret it a bit - the videos on that site are generally just boring...
Can't recommend it - and twice I've been locked out (login/password suddenly did not work) and had to go through CCBill - because the site/webmaster never bothered to answer..
|
11-27-08 02:03am
|
Reply
1490
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
The vast majority I stay with for a month only - then rejoin the best after a period where there has been time for many updates.
And some sites I've rejoin several times over the years. Like: 1byday, Teendreams, Twistys, Nubiles, Videobox and a handfull more.
Only site I've stayed with for years without cancel (over 4 years, I think) is Easynews.
|
11-27-08 12:22am
|
Reply
1491
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I'm absolutely with you here - and I'm also sure this whole debate your review started very well could be a win-win situation for all - now I think I'll join AvErotica again, btw - AND I look forward to the development for the sites in the True Beauty Cash company.....
|
11-25-08 12:05am
|
Reply
1492
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
If the financial situation in general keeps rolling downwards like a snowball heading for Hell, siteowners has to consider the price for membership.
At some point most people has to deal with what kind of expenses can be spared - and maybe it'll be those costly monthly memberships?
I'd hate it, though....
|
11-23-08 05:47am
|
Reply
1493
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
It looks like the webmaster is not happy about most cons in Droolers review. That's easy to understand.
But that the same webmaster expects PUs NOT to make a review before consulting the site - and/or the webmaster - is a little far off.
PUs does reviews of what we see on the sites - the reviews is a place for consumers.
It's fine that webmasters/siteowners react to these review, but they cannot except us to hold back til after a debate about problems/cons.
|
11-23-08 05:39am
|
Reply
1494
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Guess you browsed through some of those previews too, fine/top video-quality btw - and according to the webmasters former reply to The Rizzo on the matter it IS a product from the Nubiles-folks.
And agree again, according to those top-quality videos this look like a great site for mature-lovers - going to join some day, for sure...but, alas, yes, we cannot afford to join all we like...
|
11-22-08 11:49am
|
Reply
1495
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tjpacinonetwork's Reply
Thanks for this update - in more ways.
Still not quite sure about the bonus sites for different sites. Went to Porninspector - and here the preview for GigiSpice it looked like you would get PacinosAdventures as bonus - but then again the the owerview not.
BTW: looking forward to up-to-date videoquality at the in all other ways magnificent PacinosAdventures - the models/the style here are just tops compared to any other latin-site....keep up the fine work - good luck!
|
11-22-08 07:46am
|
Reply
1496
|
Anilos
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Agree - just viewing the preview it sure looks like the Nubiles-folks have made another fine site...
|
11-21-08 11:42am
|
Reply
1497
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tjpacinonetwork's News
Hello, Kellie
Webmaster at La Zona - I guess.
First of all - this user been a member of several of the sites during the years - and ahd some problem with Pacino's Adventures before - regarding the quality of videos with too "milky" ways of exposing - I think, I remember Pacino himself went online about that - but is it getting better - the videos.
And BTW: It was mentioned, that you now get access to all sites with one membership - is that still at large?
If so does it also include the new site: Gigi Spice?
Just curious
Cheers!
Denner
|
11-21-08 08:34am
|
Reply
1498
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, let this user come up with the first reply (sorry, apoctom made it a couple of minuttes before me - during my writing)
I have a quote from the lengendary David Allan Coe:
"She does not have the body of the woman, I once loved, but she's still the girl that I once idolized"
("The Loneliness in Rubys eyes", 1974), man, could that DAC do lyrics back then.
So bottom line: Don't we all (men) have some kind of favorite body and charisma of some girl in our past/former lives.
But when you get the hang of it in a more mature life, it's always time for changes. You cannot live on old dreams...
|
11-21-08 06:26am
|
Reply
1499
|
Only 3X
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Just want to second Droolers: Great review.
Only 3X certainly does some good - man, like those videos of Christina Bella, as an exampel. Generally the site does not du much in the exclusive ways - but still has a heck of a lot of good stuff, both videos and photosets.
The review is also a fine info-update on this site, btw....
|
11-21-08 06:10am
|
Reply
1500
|
ChickPass Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
The "downloadspeed is awfull" - and yes, this site seems awfull - thanks again to ace for this warning.......and BTW, I like that punchline: "bunch of rubbish", well put!
|
11-20-08 10:19am
|
