| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1501
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks for the tip, PP - I'll try that....
|
11-20-08 10:15am
|
Reply
1502
|
Jana Rocks
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
A fine and very well put review - AND warning, thanks.
A somewhat nice looking preview hides the fact that this site sucks, excuse my french.
Generally we do not see too many replies (if any) of reviews with low or middle scores, but the trafic here shows different - ok, maybe because this review gives us all the necessary fasts.
Keep it up, Monahan....but sorry you wasted your money!
|
11-19-08 08:54am
|
Reply
1503
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
I'm certainly not a tech-wizard here - but according Windows XP, those files I mentioned are 720x480 (not 740, sorry) - there are ALSO files at 640x480.
But bottom line - the fullscreen quality has improved a lot for most newer clips...
|
11-16-08 05:57am
|
Reply
1504
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Unlike some fellow PUs - the Drooler for one - I do not care to collect too much of photosets. I pick a few from some sites like Teendreams, Twistys and 1byday - AND some older sites which I do not remember the names of any longer.
So a very small collection - compared to over 800 Gb of videos - which I seem not to be able to arrange any more (time for a serious clean-out).
Bottom line too: My system with my large amout of video-files sucks - and it'd be like weeks "work" to get it better....
|
11-15-08 08:10am
|
Reply
1505
|
Sex A Mexican
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Yes, bro - I'm a bit surprised - (and than again maybe not) that we - somewhat experienced porn-user - has to meet this, excuse my langauge: shit!
It's amazing that some webmasters still think users are dumb - but ok, maybe they have other targets than PUs here at TBP....
|
11-15-08 07:58am
|
Reply
1506
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Yup, agree - but, man, we've seen so many other new PUs doing 99 or 100 without any serious arguments - just la,la,la...
I think hondaman done some fine things here after all - you remember how difficuelt it was in the start - I do anyway and got scorned a few times.
If a new PU shows some serious signs, he/she should get every chance.
In this case I do not "feel" any kind of faul play.
But, bro - we'll see in the future - guess there's never any 100%..
Cheers!
Denner
|
11-14-08 12:20pm
|
Reply
1507
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
The Panther kind of speak my meaning here: As a fan a fine solo-videos Met Art does NOT do it for me - they are simply too, yes well spoken PP:
BORING.
Been a member many times, but never saved any videos - only photosets.
Solo-videos: Go for Nubiles, Teendreams, 1byday and quite a few others.
|
11-14-08 12:13pm
|
Reply
1508
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Well, bro - you cannot take it from him (the new user, hondaman) that he THINKS it's "the best erotic art site on the net" - just because hondaman is new HERE - he - like so many others - could have been browsing for years - and then just joined PU.
And this user once also rated Met Art to 96 - because of the great models/quality in photosets - that I've since downgraded it had to do with the less exiting videos.
Anyway, I still think our new fellow PU has done a pretty good review here....
|
11-14-08 12:03pm
|
Reply
1509
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
hondaman's Review
Fine review - and also from this user: welcome to a new - what seems to be a serious PU.
A bit high score, but ok - if the score only goes for photosets, it's ok - because the videos are - alas - still too boring....Would it not be great if this particular site could do better in the way of sexier (solo) videos?
I gave it almost the same score long time ago, I know - but if I should make a new review it'll go a bit lower (90-92) - the downgrade is only because of the videos.
|
11-14-08 10:25am
|
Reply
1510
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Fine to hear from/read this thorough reply from a webmaster...
|
11-14-08 09:30am
|
Reply
1511
|
HDV 19
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
The content is certainly not exclusive (judging from the prevew) - and with that small amout to a high price - even with the two bonus sites (also small amount and not exclusive), I'd suggest you wait for a TBP-review or a PU-ditto....
|
11-13-08 09:13am
|
Reply
1512
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
rwprof's Comment
It looks bad....
But rwprof - did you try to cancel via the website itself? They have this form to cancel.
Didn't you get feedback from that cancel?
It's also bad news that the webmaster has not given you an ok respons from your e-mails.
I think it would be appropriate of the site/webmaster to answer to this problem here at PU....
|
11-13-08 07:30am
|
Reply
1513
|
N/A
|
Reply of
dghillza's Poll
Well, folks - this is maybe "gettin' too close to home" - why does anybody want to know about that? To compare, probably.
But anyway, I'd like to respond: As I've mentioned earlier I have a good and fine looking wife ten years younger than me.
For a middelaged man - of course it's easy to get "a hard on" from fine porn - it's a GREAT appetizer and makes the sex with my wife even better...
|
11-13-08 07:20am
|
Reply
1514
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Someone once mentioned here: what do I do with all that stuff I almost never see/watch.
Well, this user sometimes dig going back to older, saved stuff - both videos and photosets - so much that I just got me another external harddrive - found it on sale: 1 terabytes...a LOT of new free space to collect, yuppiii!
Now I look forward to save even more.
|
11-09-08 09:34am
|
Reply
1515
|
Panty Amateur
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Reply
Well, WeeWillyWinky - it's great to have joined this site, for sure. What a fine offer of - some known, some unknown - british models here. And what I really like too - is that most models have a good amount of videos in different outfits...
I'm a sucker for a couple of them, especially - like Lorena (known as Laurena Lacy - with an upcomming site of her own - see that) and that sweet little Annalease - wauw - but all along - very softcore or not - it takes the price of best british girls I've seen for a long time....
Thanks again for the fine tip! The preview is rather lousy and you get the feeling that the quality of videos may suck - so if it had not been for your review, I probably never would come come across this great material.......
|
11-08-08 08:18am
|
Reply
1516
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
Reply of
wishdj's Reply
Well, wishdj - I'm really glad a fellow PU has the same experience - here is a good amount of fine videos and photosets of (mostly) great-looking east euro-teens - AND in a way not many other sites can come up with..(and, man, some rare hc-videos)
Just a little downgrade lately - the updates are suddenly comming too rarely - don't know why. Maybe we should ask the webmaster, because they seem to care according to my former e-mails with them....
|
11-08-08 08:12am
|
Reply
1517
|
DDF Beauties
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well, it's always easy with hindsight (is that the right word?).
Anyway I think that could be my case here - like some kind of thought that exactly DDF's new sites are a matter of known content.
I've run through every new thing they come up with - trying to scan the content - which sometimes are NOT that easy. But when succeding, yes: I've seen that, and that and that before....
Sure, you could have left them alone, but then again they are good at promoting new sites and wet your appetite.
But as you state: They must realize, that they'll get called on it...
|
11-08-08 06:55am
|
Reply
1518
|
DDF Beauties
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Another fine review from Drooler - and somewhat of a good "warning".
It's maybe not strange that DDF keeps comming up with new niche sites - they are also in it for the money.
But for the sake of the users I think they are a bit too smart. Every new site I've seen from DDF has content where an overwhelming amount is taken from other sites and, yes as Drooler points out: If you have been a member of the motherload: 1byday, you have seen most of it before.
I'll suggest that users who are not familiar with the DDF productions start up with 1byday.
|
11-08-08 02:28am
|
Reply
1519
|
Panty Amateur
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
Thanks to this review - even if it's of a little older date it caused me not to rejoin Panty Maniacs - but try this site instead - and it's worth every penny with more and better quality content that PM.
Quite agree with your score here, www....
|
11-07-08 01:26pm
|
Reply
1520
|
G Queen
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
Good warning, thanks...
As a fan of good asian AND japanese-porn I'm glad not to have joined.
|
11-06-08 08:23am
|
Reply
1521
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Your're absolutely right - once a site that seems somewhat promissing - now more likely "dead" - and also many of the softcore stuff, especially videos are none exclusive. I'd say even the $ 9.95 is a waste of money...
|
11-05-08 08:10am
|
Reply
1522
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well, Drooler. Like always:
You said it!
And, man, I like that one:
"Basically, they stepped backward more so they could then step forward less. Not terribly exciting, is it?
The predictable never is."
|
11-01-08 09:26am
|
Reply
1523
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Like I said: I'm NOT sure....
Especially about the 21 Sextury deals in general. I'm not saying it's a rip-off - still I have this thing about their signup policy where they promiss those 30+ sites.
I've been a member of Pix and Video many times, but when I first joined - I think it was Magic Blondes a long time ago too - and thought I got a hell of a lot of other sites, I was quite disapointed by their policy about staying for months and months...
Still Club Sandy is a great site, too!
|
11-01-08 09:23am
|
Reply
1524
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I not quite sure about this post - PP gives us a fine tip about Club Sandy as a "bonus"-site when joining Pix and Video.
Club Sandy sure has some fine alternative videos - and also a few alternative models - compared to Pix and Video. So long so good!
But if it's only a socalled "loyalty bonus", the deal is minimal. 21st Sextury has this system where you have to KEEP PAYING for quite a long period to get what they promise to new (and old) subscribers - which means keep paying or get nothing else. If Club Sandy just is a part of this relatively old 21 Sextury "longtime" deal, I'm not impressed. PUs just have to keep comming up with our money for a longer and longer period....
They have this claim when joining:
INSTANT ACCESS TO 30+ WEBSITES WITH 1 SUBSCRIPTION
But you do NOT get access to 30+ websites - unless you stay member for a very long time.
I will not say fraud - but, man I think it's close to it.....
|
11-01-08 08:48am
|
Reply
1525
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Andrea's Reply
Yes, it must be her - according to the photographers name, too...
Hope for a video or two or more. She's a doll - watch out - other photographers and/or sites will find out about her -:)
|
10-28-08 11:10am
|
