| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1451
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
largeun's Comment
One hint from this old "conversion-raider":
If you cannot obtain the price in US-dollars, but is charged the same amount in Euros (which is more expensive, of coruse - AND the Euro is still rising compared to the Dollar) - then write the webmaster or the Co. - they normally got a way around, so you can pay in dollars...thay also want your bussiness, from Europe, US or elsewhere...
BTW, KHAN is right here - just got a US-dollar membership at Video Box here in Europe (Scandinavia), no problems
|
12-18-08 07:58am
|
Reply
1452
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Hi Jeff
Yes, I've been a member on and off for years. The reason for that is of course quality and a well runned site/sites. And with a fine - or rather GREAT - selection of models - and that's top!. I think the collection of models is your foremost advantage.
This term I've seen some even better HD-videos - times has grown from blurred dittos - we (costumers) want them crisp now, don't we?. So it's my hope, at the Karup-sites in the future will consider doing that - and that would make the sites EVEN better...
Cheers!
Denner
|
12-18-08 07:51am
|
Reply
1453
|
Your Porn Community
(0)
|
Reply of
jezza's Review
According to the preview itself, I guess I'd never join this site.
But also thanks to a first review from a new PU, jezza for a good warning.
|
12-17-08 11:52am
|
Reply
1454
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
The rather short history of this Forum at PU shows NO.
Thought about this again: Apart from a couple of facts (that siteowners have to join to go along - good thing and we have to keep up) - look at other issues:
We often see older threads comming up again and again. Why? Because PUs keeps comming back to some of the questions that seems importend - and have been a thread earlier. I do not find that redundant.
BTW: Good poll (and discussion)
|
12-17-08 10:37am
|
Reply
1455
|
Ultimate Porn Zone
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
You hit it right on the spot, there - two only reasons I joined (trial) was the almost nothing trial-price - AND the fact that some of the previews looked quite decent - and thats whats easy to fall for at sites completely unknown to you - cheap or not.
But again this tells about some kind of sites and their socalled "previews" - and again, if we don't try it, we'll never know - so I'm kind of happy to have spend less than $3 and give the warning to fellow users here.
But of course your're right in the other matter: You get what you pay for..sometimes.
It can also be the other way around - you pay the high price $34 or more and get dissapointed (Teenrotica, for one - at this moment). A high price is certainly not always a garantee...
|
12-17-08 09:32am
|
Reply
1456
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Agree with badandy here - many threads can have somewhat similar content - BUT nevertheless it could "take the conversation in a different direction".
Well put!
So, yes: NO!
Keep it up, brothers! (and sisters)
|
12-17-08 09:11am
|
Reply
1457
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Thanks for this hint from jd....I've not been back lately, though..
But BTW: I think its funny how these well known sites seem to live up to their standards in quality and content - compared to a lot of - alas - new crap that keeps poping up.
That is probably the reason this user still go back to the "good ol' sites"!
|
12-17-08 08:46am
|
Reply
1458
|
Babes.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I was somewhat happy about this site when I joined last.
The videos - as you know is my game - was pretty good and I still enjoy some of them once in a while. Never cared for their photo-sets which I also know is your deal.
Agree, that the navigation is NOT the best - and the updates for, yes, again, videos cannot compare to 1Byday - for exampel.
Therefor this user is very reluctant to join at a price of $ 29.95 - to a lower price, maybe and - like suggested as a bonus-deal would be more interesting..
|
12-14-08 07:26am
|
Reply
1459
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Maybe once a week - or rather an average of about 4 or 5 in a month. Things do not go regular anyway - sometimes 2 or 3 in the same week and then a break in joining new sites.
I spend too much and am shaken almost every time the monthly credit-card overview drops in - but guess I'd rather save money elsewhere..
But it of course also depends on the flow of new quality-sites.
|
12-13-08 04:07am
|
Reply
1460
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
What I'd appreciate is a more regular update on amount of videos at the sites - but guess it's almost hopeless since the amount of reviewed sites are well over 5000...
Still I consinder those site facts very importend before joining.
|
12-12-08 11:58am
|
Reply
1461
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
wishdj's Comment
Fast reply from Simon Scans - great!
|
12-12-08 07:44am
|
Reply
1462
|
Walter Bosque Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yes, I remember ibill - and not to be trusted.
Do not know exactly when they got out of bussiness, but this may be right:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBill
BTW: Have to agree entirely with Drooler about the use of creditcard - got a couple - but always use ONLY one for porn-sites - that way it's much easier to follow the transactions!
|
12-09-08 04:07pm
|
Reply
1463
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Toy-action mostly is ridiculous...
VERY few sites and VERY few models/girls are able to handle those toys in a manner where things are natural (videos).
Some is well done by a few models at Nubiles and again at some licensend stuff at Teendreams (licensend, I think).
Too many US-models/girls SEEMS like it's acting ALL the way - in an exaggrerated sort of style...and man, I do not blame the girls/models - rather the photografer/video-ditto.
|
12-09-08 12:12pm
|
Reply
1464
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
Did another check:
No matter what hours, I get download-speed at approx: 650 kb/sec - AND it seems rather steady.
But one strange thing is: If I got 5,6,7 or maybe 8 web-windows open at the same time, thing go wrong (the browser stops running) but that might be something with my own pc and not Videobox - still It never happens with other sites...
|
12-09-08 09:00am
|
Reply
1465
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
No problems here i Scandinavia - normal download speed for Videobox...
|
12-08-08 01:57pm
|
Reply
1466
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
I agree with this review - in my own review the score was just a little higher - but that was mainly influenced by the bonus-deal with JustTeenSite - and some older videos of some of my favorite models - but, alas - this site needs SERIOUS work.....
BTW: lk2fireone gets around the the main issues swell here...
|
12-07-08 10:30am
|
Reply
1467
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
arnaud's Reply
Thanks for that heads up from the webmaster - agree, what a shame - Megane was something else!
|
12-04-08 10:05am
|
Reply
1468
|
Homemade Uncensored
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
Been looking for new amateur-stuff, so thanks for this first - fine - review.
BTW look like the username nygiants03 has something to do with the New York Giants football-team - even if its stated that nygiants03 is based in Florida? Just curious....here in Europe we have this thing about some danish/swedish soccers-fans who is entirely into british soccerteams - and it's not even regarded as treason...
|
12-04-08 09:03am
|
Reply
1469
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Reply
Your're right - and it's a bit funny, though.
It just shows that we all got a diffenrence in taste....well at least in some ways.
Thanks for the update on Megane, btw...
|
12-04-08 08:53am
|
Reply
1470
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Looks like Lupes little sister -:)
Not bad...
|
12-04-08 08:49am
|
Reply
1471
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
mr smut - yeah, hope you enjoy it - I did for some membership terms. And BTW I think they've grown better lately - earlier their videos were not of great quality - and (earlier too) they seemed to go for to many more boring/common looking models.
They have a rising star with the name of Megane - she's got her own site own (but way too expensive) - does she have newer content now - last time I was a member is maybe five months ago?
|
12-04-08 08:36am
|
Reply
1472
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan, please see my reply to messmer...
I will add to that: It's only CCBill that has these "reginal pricings" - as far as I have experienced - and Only for some sites - a growning number of sites with CCBill as the only billing-co. has changed that policy (or is it CCBill?) which means that the price in Euro are now exactly the same as if you paid in Dollars - even down to the smallest decimal..
A few - like the mentioned Teenrotica - has still not changed that.
|
12-03-08 06:33am
|
Reply
1473
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yeah, I think it stinks.
Strangely enough it's practically only CCBill that keep those high prices regarding difference in currency.
Epoch do not - a couple of times or more I've written to the webmaster about the CCBill-price, and - man, they send me a link to join via Epoch at the price stated at TBP....in US-dollars!
|
12-03-08 06:22am
|
Reply
1474
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Abolutely agree, but jd - some of the girls/models still look awesome - in the previe, anyway.
But again - the words "teens" are a little too much...
|
12-03-08 06:19am
|
Reply
1475
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yes - something like 90% of the sites I join is paid in US-dollars - typical through CCBill or Epoch.
BTW: Epoch is the best in regarding the dollars-payment...
|
12-03-08 06:18am
|
