You should make that fact a separate comment, BadMrFrosty, because the fact a site stopped updating in 2008 is a major factor in the value of a site or network. It would certainly stop most people from choosing any membership that went beyond one month.
A comment gives the fact greater prominence than if it's buried in a reply to a comment. :)
What is the next step beyond "Most of the models are beyond beautiful"??
There are hardcore and softcore porn sites where they feature gorgeous models.
But I also like some sites where the girls are nice-looking to extremely attractive.
LOL.
I agree that MPL Studios is one of the finest softcore sites on the internet.
Also, you state there are specials sometimes. But I don't recall ever seeing a monthly price at at special rate. And I keep looking.
I think MPL Studios is a good site.
But I also don't think it's a better value than Femjoy or Metart, both of which currently offer a 1 month membership at $19.95/month.
Different people, different tastes.
But my favorite of the 3 sites is Metart.
Then MPL Studios.
Then Femjoy.
But if Metart is priced at $19.95/month, the other sites should be priced about the same.
Of course, these prices go up and down, at different times, but it's worth waiting for a special price.
And if you sign up for a newsletter, you can sometimes get a nice discount for joining.
I know I've saved money on joining Metart Network sites because I signed up for their newsletter.
I'm not an IT professional by any means. I can turn a PC on and off, and that's about the limit of my tech knowledge. (I can also click a mouse at the screen, and hope that will accomplish whatever it is I want to do).
But CCBill is one of the better payment processors, in my opinion. I've always had a good experience dealing with them. They send confirming emails when I subscribe or cancel a membership, which seems to be rare today. And it's nice to be able to search their site for membership information.
I don't like random passwords. But aren't those a function of the paysite, and not the credit card biller?
I certainly understand your frustration. But instead of blaming CCBill, the problem seems to me more with the paysite. The few times I ever had to contact CCBill customer support, it seemed to me I got courteous agents who tried to be helpful. CCBill can only do so much, they are only a billing agent, they don't have complete control of the account.
I've had problems with paysites in the past. But I don't blame CCBill for those problems. I think CCBill is a positive factor for me in joining a site, because I know that it will be easy to cancel a membership.
I've stated my opinion on Met-art videos several times on the PU forums, and in my review of Met-art. And my opinion of Met-art videos has changed very little over the years. The Met-art videos have improved quite a bit since the first videos they posted, many years ago, on a technical basis. But almost all Met-art videos are, in spite of lovely young models, boring and a waste of time to watch. Met-art has created an artform in boring videos of naked, lovely young girls. What a wasted effort.
The erotic and sensual value of most Met-art videos is close to zero.
If it's a contest, I'd say that Nubiles and X-art have much more erotic vids than Met-art and MPL Studios. Nubiles has softcore and hardcore, the same with X-art, but the X-art approach is more softcore erotic, even when doing hardcore.
But if you are doing a straight comparison of MPL Studios and Met-art, then MPL Studios has more erotic videos.
Personally, I think the main value of Met-art and MPL Studios is in their photosets.
Nubiles and X-art have value in both their photosets and their videos.
X-art is the smallest site of the 4 sites. But if it had the same amount of content as the other 3 sites, I personally think it would be the best site to join. But that will never happen, because Met-art keeps adding content at a massive rate. And the other 2 sites are much larger than X-art.
But I think that all 4 sites are fine choices, to join. That's my personal opinion, because some PU members think Met-art is a waste of time and money.
Totally agree. I mentioned in a comment over a year ago that the site was very expensive, and wondered if there was a discount available. But there is no easy way to get a discount to this site.
It would be very difficult to find any site where the videos are less erotic than Met-art videos. The main value of Met-art is in the massive collection (and massive updating) of their softcore teen photosets. MPL has very fine photosets, as well, but in much smaller numbers, than Met-art. I agree the MPL videos are slightly more erotic than the Met-art videos. But I have not really found any softcore teen site where I thought the videos were truly erotic. For me, it's much easier finding erotic softcore teen photosets, than to find erotic softcore teen videos. There are many fine sites that feature teen glamor photos. But I have not found any site that has, for me, outstandingly erotic softcore teen videos.
Edit01: But X-art, which has become more hardcore lately (not truly hardcore, but definitely not the softcore it used to be), has extremely fine quality videos. Lovely girls, fine lighting, professional camera-work.
Thanks for the tip. I will study pornclubcard to see if I can use it in the future. I've had 1-year memberships at met-art in the past, so I might try it that way the next time, unless I go with a 1-month membership.
But I think you're right. The site was designed "to feed my curiosity - but not my libido."
Which is why I said that the erotic scenes lack impact.
What was erotic in the movie, is now a snippet of naked flesh that has lost the eroticism that made it meaningful.
Excellent bottom line summary:
"The site is what it is. You get a well run inexpensive site but not one to sign up for to get off. If you are just curious to see the stars, you may find it interesting. On the other hand, if you are a fan of a particular star, you probably already saw the scenes that are here. Now you can own that 20 second clip."
That was my main knock against the site: the clips which feature nudity lose the impact of the scene or nudity because they are so short, without the setup that the movie or other source provides.
Also, many of the scenes seem to be low definition, and have lost the crispness of the original source material. So for porn, that loses a lot of impact, as well.
My opinion is that the site is very good for finding if an actress has done nude scenes.
So it's an easy way to check.
But the site is not erotic.
However, back when I was in my teens, just seeing a nude breast was erotic.
But I'm past that now.
I want more to get me interested or excited.
I like softcore and hardcore.
But quality softcore.
The hardcore can be more varied.
So Mr Skin is excellent if you're into celebrity nudity.
But it's not really erotic.
Although, if it was put into a library, it would be in the erotic section.
Or maybe the porno section?
I was not aware that Mr Skin offers a streaming-only membership.
My guess is that since you are a new member, you haven't found out how to download clips from the site.
In the member's area:
Go to to clip you want to download.
Directly underneath the thumbnail of the clip, to the right of the clip is a hot link with the icon of a small arrow pointing down, and a small horizontal bar under the arrow.
Click on the arrow icon, and a pop-up box appears.
There are two options
-Open with.
-Save file.
Put a dot in the Save file option (click that choice).
Select/click the OK button at the bottom of the pop-up box.
If the OK button is not active, click the "Open with" choice, then click the "Save file" choice. That should activate the OK button.
I'm a current member of MrSkin.
I bought a lifetime membership for $100 on one of their specials.
Anyway, I can still download the clips.
The hot link to download a clip is:
a downward pointing arrow, with a _ beneath it.
(The hot link icon is small).
Click on the hot link icon, and, depending on your file-saving mechanism, you should be able to download a clip.
I checked different clips for different celebrities, and they all were able to download.
I did this today, March 10, 2018.
So I don't know why support said downloads are not available.
IT'S A GREAT PRICE FOR LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP.
I TOOK THEM UP ON THE SAME OFFER A WHILE BACK, AND I VISIT THE SITE ONCE IN A WHILE (BUT I DIDN'T GET THE PLAYBOY PLUS MEMBERSHIP OFFER).
THE NAKED NEWS AND PLAYBOY PLUS ONE-MONTH MEMBERSHIPS MAKE IT EVEN BETTER.
BUT THANKS FOR THE POST.
HOPING I WILL FIND GREAT DEALS IN THE FUTURE, LIKE THIS ONE.
I can't tell you how often the site is currently updating.
My membership ended last week. I had problems trying to enter the site. I kept getting the error message that I was not authorized, even though my membership was still current.
I sent emails, asking for help.
No replies.
I also sent emails asking for my membership to be extended, because the site advertised, for a while, that 1-year memberships (and I paid for a 1-year membership) would be extended due to the site not updating in 2008 and most of 2009.
No replies to my emails.
So I just gave up in frustration.
The site has a number of very attractive models.
But the photosets are very small: about 15-20 photos per set. So even though the model might be attractive, the small number of photos per set is just enough to make you hungry for more. Or frustrated. I want a larger number of photos in a set, where I can look at the photos, and focus on the ones I like best. I can get large photosets at most mega-sites, where you get 50-100+ pictures in a set.
The site says they are emphasizing quality over quantity, but the quality is not any better than at the mega-sites like met-art (where Richard Murrian, the site photographer for m-u-s-e.org, has some photosets), or mplstudios, or a bunch of other mega-sites. Actually, the quality at the other sites is better, in my opinion, because the photographer tends to put a lot of shadows and "artsy" focus in his small photosets, making the number of photos that I really like even smaller.
You are not substituting quantity for quality if you join one of the quality mega-sites. You get both quality and quantity.
This site has a much smaller content. The archives go back several years, but I just don't like the idea and practice of a small number of photos in a photoset.
I believe you will be better satisfied, spending your money on a softcore mega-site, than at this site.
But if you are a Richard Murrian connoisseur, then the site might be worthwhile. I thought one Murrian photoset at met-art was really striking. But when I looked at the same set at m-u-s-e, I found a small set, with a smaller number of photos. Grrrr.
There were no updates in all of 2008.
The updates in 2009 just started a few months ago.
That is why the site is offering a free one-year membership to anyone who had a 1-year membership in 2008.
They are also offering a free 6-month membership to anyone who bought a 1-year membership in 2009 during rhe period it was not updating.
I joined for 1 year in March 2009, so I am supposed to get a free 6-month extension of my membership. I sent an email requesting the extension on Dec. 01, but have received no reply yet.
Team Skeet premium sites (require a separate membership for each premium site):
Name of site + Number of movies
BFFS Movies 102
Black Valley Girls Movies 23
DadCrush Movies 97
DaughterSwap Movies 76
FamilyStrokes Movies 160
Shoplyfter Movies 91
SisLovesMe Movies 123
Submissived Movies 117 Teens Love Black Cocks Movies 97
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
