I think the site design and ease of use at Metart is among the best of the glamor photo sites.
But the best thing about Metart is the huge number of lovely models, which keeps increasing almost every day. There are a huge number of photosets which do a good job of displaying those adorable girls.
Something is obviously very wrong. I gave MetArt the highest score I ever gave any site in my review. And all of my comments on the site were extremely positive.
Thanks for the confirmation, Sevrin, and also for the added information. I tried to show in an updated edit on my original comment that the met-art update page has been corrected, which is what I found on a later check of the page. The photosets that I checked now have the correct posting dates.
I use the updates page the same way you do, to see if there are any fresh photosets that I might be interested in.
I think Met-art is a very well-run site, that has very few technical glitches. And over time, as you indicate, they are working to improve the site even more.
As you can probably tell, met-art is one of my favorite sites. :)
Perhaps I need to clear my browser cache. But what I am seeing is still the mis-sorted/mis-dated thumbnail page. The page itself looks fine, as long as you don't care when the photosets were actually posted. But I usually like to check the daily updates, to see if there are any photosets I might be interested in.
And the page I am looking at has the wrong dates listed for the most recent photosets.
For example:
07.21.2010 MILENA D "GOODNIGHT"
07.21.2010 LORENA B "GRACIOUS"
are the dates listed for the two photosets above, which were supposedly posted today, July 21, 2010.
But those photosets were actually posted:
July 15, 2010 MILENA D "GOODNIGHT"
July 04, 2010 LORENA B "GRACIOUS"
Those are just a few of the photosets that are being posted with the wrong date.
If you use the Internet, you can find the actual date each photoset
was originally posted.
But it's not a major problem. I believe Met-art will fix it sometime soon.
But if your computer shows the correct dates for the two photosets I listed, then the problem is with my computer, which is still showing incorrect dates for many of the recent photosets.
If you are seeing the correct dates for the two photosets I listed, I would appreciate your stating this.
Or if you are seeing the incorrect dates for the two photosets I listed, I would appreciate your stating this.
Because I am interested to know if I am seeing the current update page, or if I am seeing an older update page, and need to clear my browser cache, or try some other fix.
For a while I was getting into Japanese flix, and I even bought the following DVDs:
Ichi the Killer (Takashi Miike)
Audition (Takashi Miike)
Gozu (Takashi Miike)
Shark Skin Man and Peach Hip Girl (Katsuhito Ishii)
ZATOICHI: THE BLIND SWORDSMAN (Takeshi Kitano )
And a bunch of others. Some of these are very bloody. Actually, the ones I listed are extremely violent and bloody.
But I haven't seen any Japanese flix for a while. I guess I was hoping Met-art would provide the blood and guts stimulus I needed. :)
News
Hello everybody! It's been ten years since I'm modeling and for almost three years we're doing my personal site. It was a wonderful three years, I never imagined I'd get so many friends and so much love. I had a fantastic team and gorgeous girls to 'work' with. But I decided it's time to move on. I want to start my own business and be more than a pretty face for who knows how long. You know, modeling is not something you can do for twenty years :) So I want to thank you all for your support and love. You are the best, guys and girls!
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Beginnings
So I am back and had first shoot on Monday. It was a very strange shooting, for Szilvi's new site nudefightclub.com. You know it is a vry strange style on this website, models are very natural and they wrestle and who wins will have sex :) It is no posing and no glamour and I don't do any regular sport to be very active here. Fortunately I was with Cindy Hope and she is soo crazy girl, I love her! So it was not hard to fight. When she put me on the floor she always whisper 'You allright? Is it okay?' :))) Yesterday shooting day again... the girl was late because of Lufthansa strike, so I had scene in the morning, solo, then scene in the evening. In between I just sit and wait, wait, wait... I was very tired when I got home!
The last porn update to her site was back in December 2008.
Then in January 2009 she posted she had retired from the business.
But in February 2010 she posted she had returned, and there would be new material for her site, as well as appearances at other sites.
So the Met-art photo set is just part of the new material on Sophie that will be available.
A lovely girl. Glad that she is back, but also slightly sad that her retirement apparently did not work as she wanted it to.
I agree that the videos are mainly a waste of time.
But you get a huge amount of photosets of yummy knockout babes.
You also get a huge number of contributing photographers, so the differing styles of the photography, while not wildly different from each other, should give most softcore teen fans of photosets plenty to find satisfaction with.
This is the best teen softcore site on the net for photosets, based on quality of photosets, quantity of photosets, the huge number of contributing photographers, the huge number of attractive models.
The large number of free live-cam hours for the models (part of the membership) is just a bonus.
There's no problem if you want to sign up for 1 month. Just sign up for the 1-month recurring membership for $19.99, then cancel your membership before the month is over.
Drooler, I wouldn't mind reading one of your reviews on Met-art. You usually manage to come up with something worthwhile to say.
Mbaya posted a couple of days ago that "The reviewers I respect the most are Exotics and Gcode. I feel their reviews are simply awe inspiring and wish I could write as well. The two reviewers I find most helpful as their tastes are similar to mine are Drooler and Denner."
I would put Drooler and Toadsith at the top of my list for the reviewers I respect the most. Though some other PU members come close.
It continuously surprises me how much personal tastes can differ.
I was thinking the models of the last year were not up the the previous standards of attractiveness. There were a good percentage of lovely young girls in the past, and I've found very few that I really liked this past year.
We agree on the videos, though, but I don't know what they can do, since Met-art is strictly softcore. I find that Femjoy videos are more watchable than Met-art videos, but not by much.
If the videos went very high-definition, that might help a little. Better music background would help a little. But the main problem is the girls don't do much of anything: they walk, they sit, they lay down, stand up. If there was some story to the video, that would help, but these girls are not actresses. And the photo people are not writers that would be able to write a short plot that makes sense and holds interest.
Solid review with nice details and opinions.
But if you were able to get through the massive photo content of this site in three months, you must have been spending a huge amount of time here. And that's if you skipped the video content, which I think is almost all skippable, anyway. :)
Mr Fountain, nice to meet a fellow softcore teens fan.
In my opinion, metart is the best in class in softcore teens:
-quality of gorgeous young models
-quantity of gorgeous young models
-quality of photosets
-quantity of photosets
-low annual membership of $99
There are other worthwhile sites that come close, that I've joined.
I've been at 5 out of 13 of the sites you've reviewed. I enjoyed them all.
Metmodels is metart lite, as Hondaman noted:
-Similar quality as metart, but much lower quantity in terms of models and photosets.
-Metart updates with 4 photosets per day.
-Metmodels updates with 1 photoset per day.
-So the difference in quantity will only get even bigger over time.
-(Metmodels is actually a sister site of Metart)
For the same price, Metart wins over Metmodels hands down.
Join Metmodels once a year with a monthly subscription, where you download all the photosets/videos that you haven't seen yet.
I'm more into pics than vids, because of bandwidth and hard drive storage concerns, but I can't help falling in love with the pics of these gorgeous girls.
$60 is a great price. But like you say, there aren't enough hours in a day (or week, or month) to spend at these sites.
{I'm switching to capital letters, because it's easier for me to see and read. I know it not proper etiquette, but fuck that. I am tired of squinting and trying to read the tiny letters.)
A BETTER APPROACH IS TO SIGN UP FOR THE METART NEWSLETTER. YOU CAN SIGN UP AT METART DOT COM FOR FREE.
IN THE NETSLETTERS, THERE ARE SOMETIMES OFFERS TO JOIN ONE OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK FOR A REDUCED PRICE. SOMETIMES AS LOW AS $10 FOR THE FIRST MONTH.
JOIN ONE OF THE SITES, THAT YOU THINK YOU MIGHT LIKE. FOR $10 OR WHATEVER.
ONCE YOU HAVE JOINED ONE ONE OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK, YOU CAN NOW JOIN ANY OTHER SITE IN THE NETWORK FOR $10/MONTH, RECURRING.
THAT WAY, YOU ARE TRULY GETTING YOUR MONEY'S WORTH, BECAUSE YOU NOW HAVE THE TIME TO EXPLORE EACH SITE, AT YOUR LEISURE.
BELONG TO ALL THE SITES IN THE NETWORK, OR 8 OF THEM AT ONCE, JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE BECAUSE YOU CAN ONLY DO SO MUCH IN A DAY. UNLESS MONEY IS NO CONSIDERATION.
METART IS MY FAVORITE PORN SITE. I'VE BEEN A MEMBER MANY TIMES. BUT NOT EVERYONE LIKES IT. IT'S TOO SOFTCORE FOR SOME.
THE VIDEOS AT METART ARE BORING. REECENTLY, SOME OF THE VIDEOS HAVE GOTTEN TO BE A LITTLE MORE EROTIC. BUT YOU CAN SPEND HUNDREDS OF HOURS LOOKING OVER THEIR VIDEOS, AND THE ONLY THING YOU WILL THINK IS: WHAT A WASTED OPPORTUNITY OF THESE LOVELY YOUNG MODELS.
LIKE PAT SAYS, A LOT OF THE SITES HAVE SIMILAR MATERIAL. SO IT'S PROBABLY BETTER TO IDENTIFY THE SITES YOU REALLY WANT TO JOIN, INSTEAD OF JOINING ALL OF THEM.
LIKE I SAID, METART IF MY FAVORITE. HIGH QUALITY PHOTOGRAPHY. MASSIVE CONTENT OF PHOTOSETS, NASSUVE NUMBER OF MODELS, YOUNG TEEN, MAINLY NATURAL, WHITE, ETC. BUT VERY SOFTCORE.
METART IS BASICALLY SOFTCORE.
EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE, YOU FIND A METART MODEL IN ONE OF THE METART SISTER SITES IN A HOT PHOTOSET OR VIDEO THAT GIVES YOU A NEW APPRECIATION OF THE MODEL.
OR, EVEN RARER, YOU COME ACROSS THE MODEL IN A COMPETING SITE, THAT IS HARDCORE, AND YOU DEFINITELY SEE THE MODEL IN A NEW LIGHT.
MAYBE I'M SLOW, BUT WHEN I VIEW THE METART PHOTOSETS, I THINK OF THE MODELS AS BASICALLY INNOCENT GLAMOUR MODELS.
WATCHING THE SAME MODEL PERFORMING HARDCORE PORN MAKES A DIFFERENCE. SOMETIMES THE DIFFERENCE IS JUST HOW HOT THE MODEL CAN LOOK. OTHER TIMES, I THINK THE MODEL IS WASTING HER OPPORTUNITIES APPEARING IN SUCH LOW-GRADE PORN.
BUT THAT'S JUST ME.
An excellent review. Easy to read, gives lots of details on the site, lots of your personal impressions. Covers both the inner details of the site, and the overall structure, as well.
For a first review, or a hundredth review, this is really impressive.
Hope to read a lot more of your reviews in the future.
I've never been a member. But from the preview area, I think I prefer X-Art or Diesel Access (the Diesel network) for this type of erotic video. That's just a guess, because, like I say, I've never been a member of this site.
But if you are a member of any of the MetArt sites, you can usually get a discounted membership to any of the other sites in their network. So that's a good thing to remember.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
