| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1351
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
Definitely save your money by not joining this site.
In case you missed it, PU will not accept any reviews of this site for 30 days, because of the suspicious reviews.
I pasted below the comment by Khan announcing that no reviews will be accepted:
..................
..................
Khan - PU Staff 03-12-09 06:52pm
Talk Back TRUST USER? YES (1), NO (0)
OFFICIAL NOTICE !!
Due to the sudden and unexplainable number of new users submitting unusually high scores this past week ... at least a few shown to be shill activity, we are temporarily suspending Reviews for this site.
We'll revisit this decision after 30 days. But until then, any and all Reviews submitted for this site will be summarily declined.
We're sorry for any inconvenience this may cause but feel this action is warranted to curb the high score reviews that contain little or no substance.
|
03-12-09 07:43pm
|
Reply
1352
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Yes, I see Talk Back badge and my Trust vote registered.
Thanks for the heads up. You have a good eye for detail.
Regards.
|
03-12-09 07:39pm
|
Reply
1353
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
What kind of badge does he have? When I look at his profile, I see no badges. Maybe you meant he has a club (to hit PU miscreants over the head with).
Actually, when I look at his profile, it does not show any Trust votes, not even mine.
|
03-12-09 07:24pm
|
Reply
1354
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Comment
I approve your decision. I was not planning on joining this site anytime in the near future, anyway.
I notice that you have a 0 score for Trust Rating. I will go boldly where no man has gone before, and give you my trust.
But to get your Trust badge, you will need many more votes.
|
03-12-09 07:17pm
|
Reply
1355
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
Save your change. The opinion of most of the PU members that commented on the recent glowing reviews of this site is that the reviews were not trustworthy. The older PU members think this is just a scam, hyping the site to get new members to join.
You appear to think the same.
|
03-12-09 01:27pm
|
Reply
1356
|
Kink Men
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
WOW!
IMPRESSIVE REVIEW.
EASILY READABLE, COMPREHENSIVE.
|
10-08-17 02:51pm
|
Reply
1357
|
Ladyboy Flix
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
A lot of porn sites are run by people who speak/write very little English, so that might be part of the reason the responses from the web sites to questions can be poor.
Another reason for the poor quality of responses to questions can be a lack of interest on the part of the site personnel to answering questions.
Some sites have a positive attitude about customer service and try to provide a quality experience, or at least spend the time and effort to answer questions helpfully. But there are a lot of porn sites where the help section is apparently asleep or on vacation. I've found some sites that advertise 24/7 help for problems don't even bother answering requests for help.
|
12-04-09 10:07pm
|
Reply
1358
|
Latin Shemales
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
I'm happy that you think the review has some worthwhile details. Looking at the site, I thought it was a waste of time, since it was so small. But I tried to review it as a regular site, with pros and cons. But the cons far outweigh the pros on this one.
|
04-03-11 01:00am
|
Reply
1359
|
Latin Shemales
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Thanks, Capn. I'm kind of ambivalent about the badge. I don't think of myself as truly hardcore, but I will try to wear my badge proudly, as a member of the PU fraternity. :)
|
04-02-11 02:23pm
|
Reply
1360
|
Layered Nylons
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Excellent review.
Like you said, poor preview area. You click on a model's thumbnail to get a better view of what she looks like, and you are transferred to the sign-up page.
|
02-05-13 12:10am
|
Reply
1361
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
I don't mean to be picky.
But have you confused MB/s with Mb/s?
MBps stands for Mega Byte Per Second
Mbps stands for Mega bit Per Second.
My guess is that you have a 300 Mbps connection.
Which is very fast.
The fastest connection I've heard of, from a cable company, is 500 Mbps.
For a number of cable companies, the fastest they offer is around 100 Mbps.
( 1 MB = 8 Mb )
(I'm talking about consumer connections. Business connections are different.)
|
03-28-17 09:23pm
|
Reply
1362
|
Lesbian Girl On Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Reply
Thanks for the positive words.
I was afraid I was letting my personal bias flavor the review too much.
But the site criticism is justified: why have a site with only 8 videos?
Unless those videos are truly exceptional, which these are not.
|
05-25-16 12:27am
|
Reply
1363
|
LetsDoeIt
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
My favorite site in the network is The White Boxxx site, which I feel is, by itself, worth the membership price.
The site presents many of its models in such a gorgeous way that they look truly amazing.
Far better looking than they appear at many other competing sites.
There is a video with Lena Reief at The White Boxxx, Her First Threesome, that I thought was very impressive. The visuals were outstanding. Lena Reif was like a wet dream come true.
I posted a comment back in January about the captchas at LetsDoeIt.
Even after being a member for several months, I still need to pass a few different captchas to enter the members area, after entering my login details.
But I still think the network deserves a score in the 90s, because The White Boxxx site, by itself, is that good. If you are able to pass the captchas test.
|
03-12-19 01:01am
|
Reply
1364
|
LetsDoeIt
(0)
|
Reply of
Divinx's Comment
I did a review of porndoepremium yesterday.
But maybe I can do a new review of letsdoeit soon, since that is currently considered a new site.
LOL.
|
11-30-18 08:36am
|
Reply
1365
|
Little Caprice
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I feel the same way when I see a softcore model that I really like doing hardcore. That's her choice, but I like her a little less. It shouldn't make a difference, but the mind is a funny thing.
|
07-17-11 09:42am
|
Reply
1366
|
Little Caprice
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
One session with Sabrina would probably put me 6 feet under. But what a way to go! Lol.
|
07-17-11 09:14am
|
Reply
1367
|
Little Lexie
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Cute girl. Did she leave the phone numbers of any of her girlfriends?
Sorry that Lexy is a no-show on her site.
|
02-19-09 07:33am
|
Reply
1368
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Personal psychology can be a funny thing. I've been a member of a few sites where I've had problems with the site (navigation, downloading, whatever), and after the problems, I don't bother using the site, even though my membership may have several more weeks left on it. I've paid for the use of the site, but don't use it because I got so frustrated that it just wasn't worth the bother.
|
10-11-09 01:52pm
|
Reply
1369
|
LOL Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
gleem's Reply
Thanks for the fast response, and for the correction.
Sometimes our PU members don't get the facts correct.
And it's nice to know the site is still updating, for people who might decide to join the site.
|
11-29-12 09:53am
|
Reply
1370
|
LOL Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
doodoo's Comment
According to TBP, the site was launched March 2012. So if the updates have stopped, the site certainly didn't continue the updates for very long.
The TBP page says on their check of November 16, that there was an update that day (if I am reading the TBP page correctly).
Are you currently a member at this site?
If you are a member, did the site post a notice that they stopped updating? Or is it that no updates have been posted in the last 2 weeks?
If the site has stopped updating, that's certainly good to know before you sign up for a membership.
|
11-29-12 01:45am
|
Reply
1371
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
JOOK, THERE ARE PROBABLY SMALL SOFTWARE PROGRAMS THAT WILL CONVERT MY REVIEWS AND REPLIES IN UPPERCASE TO LOWERCASE.
IF THAT'S WHAT YOU PREFER.
ESPECIALLY SINCE I WRITE IN TXT FORMAT.
HOPE THAT HELPS.
(SMILE).
BUT I AGREE 100% THAT REVIEW SCORES SHOULD BE TAKEN WITH A GRAIN OF SALT.
THAT'S ONE REASON WHY I DON'T STRUGGLE AS MUCH, WHEN I GIVE A SCORE.
MAKES SCORING A SITE (OR NETWORK) MUCH EASIER FOR ME.
|
09-23-17 05:26pm
|
Reply
1372
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
PAT, THE TRUTH IS, I GIVE VERY LITTLE WEIGHT OR FAITH IN THE SCORE OF A SITE.
MANY YEARS AGO, I BELIEVED THAT A REVIEW, OF A MOVIE OR BOOK OR TV SHOW HAD SOME SIGNIFICANCE, IN WHETHER I MIGHT LIKE OR DISLIKE THE MOVIE, BOOK, TV SHOW.
I'M VERY SLOW IN MY THINKING.
OVER THE YEARS, I FINALLY CAME TO REALIZE THAT REVIEWS ARE OPINIONS. WHETHER THEY ARE PROFESSIONAL, OR NOT.
A MOVIE COMES OUT. IT BOMBS. SO THE DIRECTOR AND THE CRITICS ARE DISAPPOINTED IN THE MOVIE.
OVER TIME, OPINIONS CHANGE.
NOW THE MOVIE IS CONSIDERED ONE OF THE GREATEST MOVIES OF ALL TIME.
THAT MOVIE IS VERTIGO (ALFRED HITCHCOCK, DIRECTOR).
BLOCKBUSTER MOVIES: SOME PEOPLE THINK THEY ARE THE GREATEST (TO BE ENJOYED). OFTENTIMES, I THINK THEY ARE BORING, OR A WASTE OF TIME.
THE SCORE FOR A PORN SITE SHOULD HAVE SOME RELATION TO ITS VALUE.
BUT I GAVE LOLLY HARDCORE A SCORE OF 85, NOT FOR THE SITE ITSELF, BUT BECAUSE IT'S PART OF TEEN MEGA WORLD.
THAT'S MY THINKING.
ANY SITE IN TEEN MEGA WORLD, IN MY SCORING SYSTEM, DESERVES A SCORE OF 85, BECAUSE MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE OF THE SITES GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE ENTIRE NETWORK.
SO EVEN IF A SITE, BY ITSELF, DESERVES A 50, TMW ACCESS RAISES THE SCORE TO 85.
THAT'S MY THINKING.
I REALIZE THAT SOME PEOPLE TRY TO GIVE SCORES THAT EXPRESS THEIR OPINION OF A PARTICULAR SITE.
I'VE GIVEN UP ON THAT.
THAT'S JUST ME.
"BUT I ARGUE THAT NO ONE WHO PAYS 15$ FOR JUST THIS SITE WOULD BE HAPPY WITH HIS PURCHASE AND INSTEAD WOULD BE REALLY PISSED."
I AGREE 100%.
BUT--SOME PEOPLE WHO JOIN TMW WILL THINK IT'S A WASTE OF MONEY.
OTHER PEOPLE MIGHT THINK IT'S A GOOD VALUE. DIFFERENT PEOPLE, DIFFERENT OPINIONS. I LIKE TMW. I LIKE THE GIRLS. NOT ALL, BUT ENOUGH.
|
09-19-17 12:37pm
|
Reply
1373
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I don't think she's retired. The last update at lollyhardcore was 2010-08-20, but since then, she's had sets at zemani and vikanymph and other sites.
|
05-27-12 02:44am
|
Reply
1374
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Lolly is a cute girl.
But last update to the site was apparently 2010-08-20.
And like you wrote, it's cheaper to get this site by joining one of the other network sites. I'm a member of Teen Mega World for $19.95/month, which includes full access to the Lolly site and over 20 other sites (with the PU discount).
Joining through Lolly Hardcore directly costs $29.95.
|
04-04-11 03:11pm
|
Reply
1375
|
Love Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
COMMENT REPLY CONTINUED:
THE SAME APPLIES TO THE VIDEOS/MOVIES/FILMS.
THEY ARE NOT TRYING TO HIDE THEY ARE SHARING CONTENT.
IF YOU DOWNLOAD A VIDEO/MOVIE/FILM, THE TITLE WILL SHOW YOU WHERE THE VIDEO WAS POSTED.
DOWNLOAD A VIDEO FROM LOVE HAIRY.
FOR EXAMPLE:
MODEL: DOLLY DIORE
TITLE OF VIDEO: UNDERCOVER
DATE POSTED AT LOVE HAIRY: Jul 30, 2017
DOWNLOAD A COPY OF THE MOVIE: Undercover_The-Life-Erotic-270p FROM LOVE HAIRY.
CHECK THE LIFE EROTIC SITE.
THE SAME MOVIE IS POSTED AT THE LIFE EROTIC ON Jul 30, 2017.
ACTUALLY, YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE TO DOWNLOAD THE MOVIE FROM LOVE HAIRY.
JUST LOOK AT THE COVER PHOTOGRAPH OF THE MOVIE AT LOVE HAIRY:
IT'S THE SAME COVER PHOTOGRAPH USED AT THE LIFE EROTIC SITE:
THE LOVE HAIRY COVER SHOWS "THE LIFE EROTIC" SITE, NOT THE "LOVE HAIRY" SITE, IN THE PHOTOGRAPH.
(YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE LOVE HAIRY COVER WITH THE CONTENT SHOWN, NOT THE CLEAN COVER THAT REMOVES ALL THE CONTENT DETAILS.)
HOPE THIS HELPS.
DO I GET A GOLD STAR, LIKE THEY USED TO GIVE OUT IN GRAMMAR SCHOOL, BACK WHEN I WAS IN GRAMMAR SCHOOL?
|
09-25-17 07:56am
|
