AMANDA, IF YOU WANT TO DO A STEP BY STEP COMPARISON OF CONTENT POSTED AT LOVE HAIRY AND THE SAME CONTENT AT ONE OF THE METART SISTER SITES:
1. LOOK AT ANY PHOTOSET POSTED AT LOVE HAIRY.
2. CHECK THE POSTING DATE, AND THE TITLE/MODEL.
3. LOOK AT THE DEFAULT TITLE OF THE SET.
THE DEFAULT TITLE OF THE SET SHOWS THE METART SISTER SITE WHERE THE SAME CONTENT WAS ALSO POSTED.
FOR EXAMPLE:
MODEL: DAKOTA
TITLE OF PHOTOSET: Teniri
DATE POSTED AT LOVE HAIRY: Sep 12, 2017
DOWNLOAD THE LOVE HAIRY LOW-RES ZIP FILE OF THE PHOTOSET (CHOOSE LOW-RES, FOR FASTER DOWNLOAD TIME).
CHECK THE TITLE OF THE ZIP FILE: MetArt_2017-09-12_TENIRI-DAKOTA-by-MATISS_315d5_low
METART (AND LOVE HAIRY) IS NOT TRYING TO HIDE THAT THEY ARE SHARING CONTENT.
IF YOU CHECK THE METART.COM SITE, YOU WILL SEE THAT THE SAME PHOTOSET WAS POSTED ON THE SAME DATE AT METART.COM.
THE SAME APPLIES TO ALL THE PHOTOSETS I CHECKED.
MODEL: ULIA
TITLE OF PHOTOSET: Zacine
DATE POSTED AT LOVE HAIRY: Aug 31, 2017
LOVE HAIRY LOW-RES ZIP FILE OF THE PHOTOSET IS TITLED: MetArt_2017-08-31_ZACINE-ULIA-by-RON-OFFLIN_8de5b_low
CHECK THE METART.COM SITE, YOU WILL SEE THE SAME PHOTOSET WAS POSTED ON THE SAME DATE AT METART.COM.
IF YOU ARE INTO HAIRY WOMEN, THE SITE IS WORTH JOINING.
JUST BE AWARE THAT MOST OR ALL OF THE CONTENT WAS PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED AT OTHER SITES ON THE METART NETWORK. OTHERWISE, WITHOUT THAT UNDERSTANDING, YOU WOULD PROBABLY FEEL CHEATED IF YOU WERE A REGULAR MEMBER NETWORK MEMBER, AND JOINED THIS SITE LOOKING FOR NEW CONTENT.
BOTTOM LINE:
MAYBE IT'S JUST ME: BUT WHEN I ENTER THE METART.COM SITE, MY BRAIN JUST SHUTS DOWN SLIGHTLY. I KNOW THERE ARE BEAUTIFUL MODELS PRESENTED ALMOST EVERY DAY, BUT IT'S JUST TOO MUCH. I DON'T APPRECIATE THEM LIKE I SHOULD.
BACK IN THE 1960s AND 1970s, WHEN PLAYBOY AND PENTHOUSE CAME OUT WITH THEIR MONTHLY MAGAZINES, THERE WAS THE THRILL OF ANTICIPATION, OF SEEING BEAUTIFUL WOMEN EXPOSED. EACH SPREAD HAD 15 PHOTOS OR LESS, BUT THE IMPACT WAS MUCH GREATER THAN THE PHOTOSETS AT METART OR FEMJOY OR MPL STUDIOS WHICH HAVE OVER 100 PHOTOS EACH, BUT MANY OF THE PHOTOS ARE ALMOST DUPLICATES OF EACH OTHER, OR THE MODELS ARE PUT INTO TWISTY, UNNATURAL POSITIONS TO EXPOSE THEIR CUNT OR ASSHOLE, AND THESE MODERN PHOTOSETS DON'T HAVE THE IMPACT THE PLAYBOY OR PENTHOUSE PHOTOSETS DID. IN SPITE OF THE TECHNICAL ADVANCES IN PHOTOGRPAHY THAT CAN NOW SHOW YOU ALL THE GLORY OF 4K. WHICH IS NOT THAT WONDERFUL. WHO WANTS TO SEE PIMPLES AND RAZOR BURNS AND TATTOOS ON THEIR FAVORITE MODELS?
SOME PEOPLE, MIGHT. BUT NOT ME.
FOR ME, LOVE HAIRY IS A NICE CHANGE OF PACE FROM METART.COM.
I THINK IT'S WORTH JOINING. ESPECIALLY SINCE THE PRICE IS LOW: $7.99/MONTH, OR $60/YEAR.
I'M THINKING ABOUT A LOW-COST SUB TO THIS SITE.
Some people can enjoy being frustrated.
Some people enjoy the tease.
But satisfaction is the best. :)
That's why I go for the nude sites.
And with the nude mega-sites, there are a large variety of very attractive girls, which is what I focus on. Single-model sites, unless the model is absolutely fantastic, are too expensive. I only have a limited number of porn dollars, so sites like met-art, mplstudios, justteensite, mypreciousvirgins are where I usually spend my cash.
I agree with you.
But...
There is a recent poll, dated 06-27-09, that asks if you would consider joining a non-nude model site. 42% of the people voting answered "yes". There were 38 votes total as of today. Frankly, I was suprised the percentage was so high, because most of the members posting reviews and in the forums seem to prefer nudity and more explicit sites.
Evidently there are a lot of PU members that might consider joining this site, if they thought the girl was hot enough. This is a good-looking girl, and the sample photos are nice tease. So for people who really enjoy this niche, it could be worth joining.
YOU SHOULD BE WRITING MORE REVIEWS YOURSELF.
SOME OF YOUR PAST REVIEWS WERE FINE: HUMOR, NICE DETAILS, NICE OPINIONS.
AND YOU MIGHT WIN THE WEEKLY RAFFLE AS A BONUS.
NICE REVIEW.
I ALSO APPRECIATE YOUR TIP ABOUT UPGRADING MY ESTATE VALUE BECAUSE OF MY INCREASING AGE.
ANYTHING I CAN DO TO HELP MY HEIRS WILL BE APPRECIATED BY THEM WHEN THE GREAT DAY COMES WHEN I MEET MY MAKER IN THE SKIES ABOVE.
LOL.
The truth is, there are plenty of good and bad sites willing to take our money.
I don't mind an archive site (no longer updating), as long as there is good content available and I know beforehand that the site is no longer updating.
But like most things, there are plenty of porn sites that are a complete waste of time and money.
Just as an aside, the reason given for lack of zipped photosets at Glamdeluxe is basically the same reason messmer said was given by this webmaster: fear of piracy.
Fear of piracy does not make a lot of sense to me, as a reason to not include zip files. Is a pirate going to refuse to download pictures from a web site from some sense of honor or horror because there are no zipped files?
But different people believe different things. That's life. It's certainly easier to have zip files on a site, and most sites I've joined have them.
Maybe if enough members complain, or--to put it more politely--suggest that zip files would be an important feature, that might make a difference to some web sites.
But we don't control the world. Not even the porn sites that we have joined.
If there are no zip files on the site, you could probably use a software program like BlackWidow (nonfree), or a freeware version of the same type of program, to download your picture sets.
Glamdeluxe had no zipped files of its photosets when I was a member. So I paid for BlackWidow to download the photosets. Downloading individual pictures took a large amount of time. After I paid for BlackWidow, I found there are free programs that are supposed to do the same thing, and a couple of those programs are highly rated.
It doesn't make a lot of sense, but I've found that met-art, with its huge collection of models, photosets, and videos, is easier to search and find what you're looking for than sites that have far less content.
Met-art has the basic search engine, which lets you search by model name, photographer, etc.
And it also has a complete, alphabetical listing of the models, with a thumbnail of each model beside the name, that you can browse.
Simple tools, but really effective.
One quibble is that the same model can have different names for different photosets.
Thanks for clearing that up. I keep learning that people can get turned on (or off) by almost anything. I've seen a porn site where the turn-on was a girl picking her nose (for snot). Ugh. But that's certainly not the worst that could happen, I suppose. Lol.
Language can be strange. In America (the U.S)., straight, when referring to sexual orientation, means heterosexual.
But this is a British gay site. So what the word "straight" means here, I don't know. The site itself advertises "all straight". I doubt these are supposed to be heterosexual models that gay men are supposed to lust after. But maybe that's a niche I've never heard of before.
@Selena,
My login problem was fixed.
Thanks for the help.
I appreciate your fast response, and think that MetArt customer service is one of the best services available.
Excellent review.
Almost poetry
The review reminds me of Kubla Khan by Samuel Coleridge, that I haven't read in over 50 years, it's just the feeling that is more important than the facts.
Weird, but in a good way.
"I'm going to give a more unique point of view from the site."
I think you nailed it. Impressive.
MetArt sites normally give excellent service, so when you have a problem, it can be irritating.
However, their customer service is excellent: fast responses, and usually helpful.
So problem solved: except you don't expect problems with these sites.
As I get older, I have less patience. But that's just me.
I WOULD SENT AN EMAIL TO SelenaMetArt, SHE IS THE WEB MISTRESS.
SHE OFTEN FOLLOWS THE REVIEWS AND COMMENTS ON METART AT PU.
SHE HAS ALWAYS BEEN HELPFUL AND CONSIDERATE IN THE PAST.
I'VE GOTTEN SEVERAL OFFERS FROM HER FOR EXTENDED DAYS ON MY METART SITES MEMBERSHIPS, BUT I NEVER TOOK HER UP ON THEM.
I WOULD BE VERY SUPRISED IF SHE DIDN'T AUTOMATICALLY OFFER TO CANCEL THE CHARGES FOR THE SEXART CROSS-SALE. METART USED TO BE THE GOLD STANDARD OF CUSTOMER SERVICE, AND ALSO FOR EXCELLENT SITE SUPPORT.
THEY'VE HAD SOME TECHNICAL ISSUES LATELY.
BUT IT WOULD BE A BLACK MARK IF THEY CHARGED YOU ON A CROSS-SALE THAT YOU DIDN'T SEE.
THEY USED TO BE ABOVE THAT.
THANKS FOR THE EXPLANATION, SELENA.
THE METART PROBLEMS CONTINUED FOR A WHILE.
EVEN AFTER I WAS ABLE TO LOG IN TO THE SITE, IT WAS DIFFICULT TO LOAD PHOTOS FROM A GALLERY ONTO MY COMPUTER MONITOR.
OR TO DOWNLOAD A ZIPPED FILE OF THE GALLERY.
BUT LIKE YOU SAID, METART HAS USUALLY BEEN A SUPERIOR EXPERIENCE, AND I HOPE THE PROBLEMS WILL SOON BE FIXED.
ECHST SEEMS TO GET MORE COMPLAINTS THAN CCBILL OR EPOCH.
IF YOU DON'T HEAR FROM METART SUPPORT IN A COUPLE OF DAYS, I SUGGEST SENDING ANOTHER EMAIL TO THEIR SUPPORT, AND TELLING THEM ABOUT THE OVER-CHARGE FOR METART MEMBERSHIP.
IF YOU READ SOME OF THE COMPLAINTS ABOUT ECHST, PEOPLE COMPLAIN ABOUT POOR/RUDE CUSTOMER SERVICE, AS WELL AS FRAUDULENT CHARGES TO THEIR CREDIT CARDS.
PLEASE LET US KNOW WHAT HAPPENS. METART USED TO BE WONDERFUL WITH THEIR CUSTOMER SUPPORT. FAST AND RESPONSIVE AND CARING.
ECHST IS NOT A NEW BILLER COMPANY. BUT I'VE NEVER USED IT, EVEN THOUGH I'VE SIGNED UP WITH A LOT OF THE METART NETWORK SITES OVER THE YEARS.
SEVERAL YEARS AGO THEY USED TO OFFER $10/MONTH MEMBERSHIPS TO ANYONE WHO BELONGED TO ONE OF THEIR SITES.
BUT THEY STOPPED THAT DISCOUNT YEARS AGO.
I THOUGHT IT WAS A NICE BONUS FEATURE FOR BELONGING TO ONE OF THEIR SITES.
ONCE IN A WHILE, THEY WILL OFFER A NICE DISCOUNT TO ONE OF THEIR SITES.
I FOUND AN OFFER TO JOIN EROTIC BEAUTY FOR $1/MONTH A FEW YEARS AGO, AND JOINED.
SO I'M STILL PAYING $1/MONTH FOR EROTIC BEAUTY.
BUT I'VE NEVER FOUND ANY OTHER OFFER THAT WAS THAT GREAT.
P.S.: I'M TYPING IN CAPITAL LETTER BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ. I'M NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BEING RUDE. AS YOU GET OLDER, YOUR EYES DON'T SEE AS WELL.
BUT I STILL LIKE PRETTY PICTURES OF NAKED WOMEN. LOL.
I've never been a member of MetArtX, and don't plan on being one any time soon.
I've been a member of MetArt for many years, on the monthly, yearly and finally a lifetime subscription.
MetArtX is a newish site, and I would suspect that you would get a lot more content from one of the other sites in the MA network that features harder content than what MA features.
Actually, since you are a MA member already, I suggest you log in to the MA site itself.
Once you log in, I assume you will see the "free access" advertisement, that gives you access to one or more of the MA sites as a trial offer.
I am doing that right now, and I am being offered 2 free days to three sites:
MetArtX Viv Thomas
Love Hairy
So I assume you should have the same opportunity to explore MetArtX for free for 2 days.
If you don't see that offer when logging in, I suggest you send an email to MetArt support, asking if they will give you 2 free days to MetArtX to sample their wares.
I see no reason they would deny this request.
And maybe you can post your experience with MetArtX in a comment at PU: whether you liked what you found.
Open a browser window.
Paste into the address bar the following: metartx.com/
This brings up a metartx page for visitors.
The page has thumbnails of this week's videos and photo sets.
However, if you click on any of the thumbnails, instead of getting a short video or sample gallery, you are re-directed to the Metartx signup page.
My guess is that the visitor page is very elementary, and just has the introductory page with a few thumbnails, that leads to the join page.
Maybe in the future they will expand the visitor page with actual sample videos and sample galleries.
But unless one of the Metart staff lists the content statistics of Metartx in a reply on the comments section or blog, I don't know how you will determine what the contents of Metartx are.
And since the join prices of Metartx are very high, I think it will be expensive to join, without having a clear idea of what you are paying for.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
