If you could confirm that the girl in question really had her tramp stamp done in kosher ink, that might help qualify the site to legally claim the name of Jewish Porn Girl Sex.
But the truth is, like you, I am holding my breath for the time when "BaptistBlowJob.com" will be coming out.
I am based in United States. When I check the web site Jim Slip, I see a sign-up rate of euro 19.95, approximately USD 27.76.
The prices that are displayed to someone in Italy could be different, because of something called regional pricing (I think that's the proper term). For the same item (a membership, whatever), you can be charged different prices, depending on where you are located. Sector pricing seems unfair, and stupid, but it's another way for some people or businesses to make more money off of people.
There has been some discussion of sector pricing on the PU threads, and a lot of people are really angry when they think they are being charged higher prices than some US customers are paying for the same membership.
https is a security measure that means your connection is secure, so it's less prone to hacking.
If you do any online banking, connect to your credit card online to check your balance or pay a bill or whatever, you are using https.
(It's shown in the address bar at top of your browser.)
Not just financial institutions, but any site where you enter personal information should be using https: Amazon, etc.
Porn sites are starting to use it too: the PU site and The Best Porn site have started using https. The information you give to PU and The Best Porn is not as vital as credit card #s, social security #s, etc., but it's a nice feature that protects your data from hackers.
If you read the newspapers, you will see that hundreds or millions of accounts from Credit Card monitoring services have been hacked.
Theft is a multi-billion industry.
But when porn sites use https, it makes it a little harder for hackers to steal your data.
Also, the US government (and I assume other governments around the world) keep records from your ISP (your internet service provider) on your internet usage: what sites you visit, how long you spend, etc.
If a site uses https, the records have less information:
Yes, they know what sites you visited, and for how long.
But they don't know the exact member pages you visited, because that is hidden by the https. How long you watched a video or a photoset is your secret, until you volunteer that information to your friendly government agent. (Joke, but true.)
I'm not currently a member of X-Art or Joymii. And it's been almost 3
years since I was a member of Femjoy. Femjoy has a vast number of extremely attractive models and a vast number of photosets, but I like Met-Art over Femjoy for softcore teen photos. I think the teens are presented more attractively. But that's just my personal opinion. There are Porn User members who prefer the natural Femjoy approach over the Met-Art style.
Although both Femjoy and Met-Art fall into the softcore teen category for photos.
X-Art has been around much longer than Joymii. X-Art started with small photosets (small number of photos in each photoset) of gorgeous young models. I mean, they selected a small number of lovely teens, and presented them in a very attractive way. High quality photos. But no videos. Softcore teen.
Years later, they changed the site name to X-Art, and started offering videos along with the photosets. And they started to offer sex in the photos and videos. They started with female masturbation, then offered female-female lesbian, then finally started to offer male-female sex. The sex was explicit, but not gonzo. I think of the style as softcore sex, but that's not the best term. The sex is explicit, but not gonzo. The sex is basically tender, without the spitting, slapping, name-calling you find in rough gonzo sex.
Joymii is similar to what X-Art is offering today. But since Joymii is so much newer than X-Art, you won't find a lot of content. Joymii started late 2010. If Joymii can keep the same style in the future and keep adding new content, it will be a leader in the "softcore" sex style. Joymii started with female masturbation, but now offers male-female sex as well.
Joymii is a sister site of Femjoy. Femjoy, as far as I know, does not
offer any sex in their photos or videos. Nudity, but no sex. So Joymii is a natural extension of Femjoy. If Joymii can use even a fraction of the lovely models that Femjoy offers, then Joymii should enjoy a long-lasting career. Lovely models photographed and videoed in high-quality softcore.
I tried to answer your question. But I tend to ramble a lot. :)
The soft hardcore is what Playboy should have become a leader in. But they lost that opportunity many years ago. Just lacked imagination, I guess. But it was the next logical step in what they were providing. And now Playboy (and Penthouse) are basically has-beens.
The Old 'n Young site (part of Teen Mega World network) still updates with 1 or 2 videos per month.
The site started around late 2007, and has 107 videos currently.
So if you are fan of this niche, and haven't been a member of TMW for a while, the site (and network) might be worth a join.
Especially with a PU discounted price of $14.95/month.
I'VE NEVER REALLY THOUGHT ABOUT IT.
I DO KNOW I'VE TRIED READING LARGE-SIZED BOOKS MANY TIMES.
SOME OF THEM WERE COPIES OF BOOKS I HAVE ENJOYED READING IN THE PAST.
BUT FOR SOME REASON, THERE WAS NO PLEASURE IN READING THE LARGE-SIZED BOOK VERSION.
BUT I THINK THE FONT STYLE MIGHT BE WHY I DID NOT ENJOY THE LARGE-PRINT BOOKS.
I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THIS UNTIL YOU POINTED IT OUT.
I MUST BE DUMB, IN A WAY.
BUT I CAN ACCEPT THAT. BECAUSE IT'S THE WAY I AM, AND I CAN'T CHANGE IT.
AT MY AGE, I WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO OUTRUN DOBERMANS.
EVEN WHEN I WAS YOUNGER, THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN DIFFICULT.
BE WELL.
PS: (WHAT'S SURPRISING TO ME, IS THAT I DON'T LIKE READING LARGE-PRINT BOOKS. I PREFER THE REGULAR, SMALL-SIZED PRINT. IT MUST BE A PSYCHOLOGY THING, BECAUSE LARGE-PRINT WOULD BE EASIER TO READ.)
I'M GETTING OLD.
I WRITE IN UPPER CASE BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ, WRITE, EDIT.
NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE.
BUT IT'S EASIER FOR ME, THAN TRYING TO SEE LOWER-CASE LETTERS,
SOMETIMES I PUT THE REASON FOR THE UPPER CASE IN MY REPLIES/COMMENTS/REVIEWS,
SOMETIMES NOT.
I AM GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 79, BECAUSE OF NETWORK ACCESS.
IF THE SITE WAS SCORED AS A STAND-ALONE-SITE, THE SCORE WOULD BE LOWER,
BECAUSE:
1. THE LIMITED AMOUNT OF CONTENT AT THE SITE (80 VIDEOS).
2. THE SITE STOPPED UPDATING YEARS AGO.
3. THE QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS IS JUST OK. NO ATTEMPT IS MADE TO PRESENT THE MODELS AS ATTRACTIVELY AS POSSIBLE. THE SETTINGS AND CLOTHES ARE CHEAP.
Thanks for positive feedback. I read your review before I did mine, did not want to just echo what you said, so I hope I added a little to what you already reported.
When two people are reporting on the same site, I expect at least some common agreement. Unless the reviewers are totally opposite in type.
Specific site score, for me, is subjective. I don't calculate scores by the grading methods of TBP, because I have no idea how to do that kind of cold calculation. My score is a gut feel or how much I like a site based on what I see (content quality + content quantity + site ease of use versus price).
I actually joined Justteenmovie for the Justteensite, which I belonged to back in early 2006. I wanted to get updates on the huge amount of updated pix and vids at Justteensite. When I belonged back then, the site was small, and I only downloaded a small number of photosets. Now they are a mega-site.
Another annoying feature of the videos that I left out (because of space limitations on the review) was the poor sound track on many of the videos.
They need a new music editor for the videos. The music track on most videos detracts from the video; and the music track volume needs to be set much lower.
Unless you mute the sound completely, it is difficult to turn the stupid music soundtrack down enough on the playback software to a soft level that is not disturbing. Have to go into your PC
"control panel/sounds and audio devices" software to adjust the sound volume. Then, if you play a DVD movie afterwards, you then have to readjust the sound level for the DVD movie.
I guess you have to be realistic. But there are sites that have an archive of cute and attractive models that should still be worth something, but the sites go out of business, and that content can be lost.
It's happened in the past, I'm sure it will happen in the future, especially with the downturn that porn sites seem to have experienced in the last few years, whether because of the financial recession, or other factors.
It's not just porn sites. Automotive companies in the US and elsewhere have killed off brands that were around forever. The Oldsmobile brand was over 100 years old when it finally died in 2004.
I agree that the Just Teen Movie site is a disappointment. They started out with high-quality short videos (8-17 minutes run time) of lovely models. The videos were mainly boring, in spite of the attractiveness of the models. I say high-quality videos because of the high definition of the videos and the other technical aspects (good lighting, good color for the skin tone, etc.)
But it's been over 15 months since they added a new video. Anyone joining that site for over 1 month is wasting his money. You can download the entire site contents of Just Teen Movie in 2 or 3 days. They only have 42 videos. And most of the videos you probably wouldn't want to watch a second time, anyway, because they are mainly boring.
A real shame. They had a good idea of a high-quality video site of lovely young models, and then didn't follow through on the updates.
I guess you just have to take the good with the bad.
JTS just posted a photoset of Linda named "Merry Xmas", dated 2009-12-23. This Linda is named Masha F at Met-art. She's one of my favorite models. Gorgeous girl. Linda is wearing a Santa-type hat in many of the "Merry Xmas" photos. There's also a border of fake snow around many of the photos to set her off and to remind us of the Christmas season.
Truth be told, the photos would have been better without the fake snow.
But this is a gorgeous girl, and the photoset is worth keeping.
She also had a recent photoset at Met-art, dated 2009.10.28, named "PREXIOSI", under the model name of Masha F.
I've read articles about PC security, most of the technical details I did not understand. But I've read that just visiting some infected sites (without downloading anything) can infect your PC. Also, if you buy a brand new hard drive from a major disk drive maker (Western Digital, Seagate, whoever), the hard drive (or maybe it was the software that comes with the hard drive) can be infected before you even open the box to install it on your PC.
I try to keep all sensitive financial data off my PC.
I also run firewall, anti-virus, and anti-spyware, but there are geniuses out there who can get past any simple safety measures I am running.
Delete the comment if you want. Doesn't much matter to me.
This was the first time I came across the (AT) substitution for @.
I don't usually send many email messages to adult sites I join. The PU site is an exception, if my posts are considered emails.
Maybe I should join a computer club to pick up details on using a PC. I learned to use a PC by reading some books and trial and error.
Is this message considered email?
I personally get a small number of spam emails (6-10+) each day, but consider that part of the price of the email service.
So it was a mistake to post the email address for support at justteensite?
I've never posted publicly the email address of any person, as far as I know.
Patience is a virtue.
One I've never enjoyed.
Try sitting in a chair waiting in the emergency room for 6-8 hours before you see a doctor.
Maybe I will achieve patience once I get to heaven.
But the older you get, the more you wish it was like the old days. You're right about Met-art and the 404 files.
I didn't think that was funny, until I saw your comment. Now I really understand why they say, "Misery loves company." I'm glad other people are just as frustrated as I am. Lol.
It really was a simple pleasure, looking forward to the Met-art updates, and clicking on the photosets to see how good they were. Served fresh and hot off the server. Now it's better to wait until the next day, to avoid the dreaded 404 file syndrome.
If the two sites are the same price, and you get so much more quantity at the Ron Harris site, I don't know why anyone would join the Kara Duhe if they knew about the Ron Harris site carrying the Kara Duhe photosets.
But like you mention, to be satisfied with a membership at either site, you have to like the Ron Harris style of photography. You mention that a lot of pics are nearly the same pose. What bothers me more is his glossy style of photography. I can get bored with his glossy pictures very fast, for some reason, even though he has some very attractive models. That is why a site like Met-art, with a large number of contributing photographers, is so much easier to appreciate. Met-art has a huge number of attractive models, and the photographers can present them in photos that are worth looking at. Obviously not all photosets will be equally attractive to all viewers, but there is a wide selection of styles where you can find the photosets and models that appeal to you.
You discovered my secret shame.
But in spite of my glowing review of Met-art with its high score, and my other posts telling what a great site it is, I've never gotten a free pass to Met-art, or even a thank you from that site.
Nice, comprehensive review. I'm still searching for those sites where I could write: "great videos, great pics, great girls, what more can you ask, 100."
The closest I could find was Met-art, which was my first review, and that got a 97 score. No other site ever reached that high a rating. Lol.
I have to admit that I've been searching for a paysite with elegant design with ease of navigation, but I'd also like a bit of great content to go along with it. So I'm afraid that I'll have to keep searching.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
