4 girls at once would be my fantasy. Why not make it my top 100,000, as long as we're dreaming? Somebody would have to freeze me, because there's no way I could last that long, but what a way to go.
I voted for "one of my siblings".
That is based on my guess that Playboy magazine is/was considered porn. The Playboy magazines belonged to my older brother.
Actually, I was wondering whether Playboy is considered porn by this thread. That was before I read Drooler's reply, where he questioned whether Playboy is porn (proof that great minds do think alike).
If Playboy is not considered porn, then my vote should have been "No-one, I'm stealthy ".
shows "(You have 4 of 44 live tickets, 3 chances to win)"
It's no big deal, but there is no way the 3 chances to win could be accurate for 0 live tickets. And I doubt that it is accurate with 4 live tickets, because 4 tickets would represent 4 chances to win, not 3 chances.
Like I say, no big deal. You might want someone to fix/update the software that controls the printout on the page, or not. This is a very minor detail.
This is a great chance for PU staff members to soak up their free time.
They can review each thread and pick the best submissions on each one, then start a new uber thread with the best possible, most informative and witty ideas und answers.
I kind of admire almost all the posts by lk2fireone. He's someone I really respect.
Personally, I think if the PU members are going to take the results of this poll so seriously, and the PU staff members as well, the poll should never have been posted.
Even tho only 3 people out of 36 voted they had written 1 or more PU reviews without actually joining the reviewed site, I think the reaction of the PU members was to view those unknown voters with suspicion and distrust.
We really have no way of knowing whether the voters who voted they wrote a review without being a site member were stating the true facts, or whether they were being cute or provocative.
At least 1 PU member, Pinche Kankun, appears to have disabled his account because he feels the PU members no longer trust him.
Attitude, nice body, pretty face, nice voice all add to appeal.
How much does nice voice count? In most vids I've seen, girls are either moaning or quiet. When the girls do talk, for most, it takes away from the illusion of what you're looking for. Most girls are not chosen for speaking ability, but for willingness to perform and then body and then maybe looks.
I don't care if content is non-exclusive. There'a a ton of porn I have't seen before, and probably never will. I'm more concerned with quality and content of the porn. Do they have gorgeous girls? Are the pictures worth viewing?
Fake acting is a bummer. But's it's what you get in many porn videos.
Fake moaning, groaning, by the girl (mainly) and the guy. Can anyone believe the girl is so aroused when the guy just barely touches her, that she is already on the verge of orgasm?
There is very little value in writing a fake review of a porn site. There are also plenty of idiots out there, who can get their kicks from doing just about anything, no matter how senseless. When I read PU reviews, whether I think the reviews are informative or detailed or not, I give the benefit of the doubt to the writers, and I believe the reviews are honest. That's my opinion and attitude.
"My Christmas wish list: no toys, no silicone, no tattoos, no piercing, no talking camera men."
I wish to add really gorgeous models, high quality pix and vids, good, unobtrusive sound track, good lighting, natural skin tones, good acting or believable emotions.
Geez, doesn't anyone appreciate good old fashioned sex?
Or how about 2 girls together, without toys?
You get a bunch of people together supposedly having an orgy, it's hard to focus on 1 or 2 people in particular. Warm bodies by themselves don't really do it that well.
I don't drink too often, but why not lift one or two glasses in honor of freedom of choice? Sounds good to me.
Where do these PU members come up with these polls? I remember prohibition from history classes, but who pays attention to that today? Actually, I remember prohibition more from the Eliot Ness TV series back in the 1960s, and the movie about Eliot Ness with Kevin Costner in the 1980s.
I'm more into softcore.
But I saw "The Story of O" when it came out in the 1970s, and enjoyed it.
Also saw "Emmanuelle" around the same time.
They were rated X, I think.
By today's standards, they would be softcore, in my opinion. They were nowhere near as explicit as the hardcore porn that is being put out today. They were quality movies that were highly erotic.
I selected the once a month option.
Actually, if the poll refers to an adult movie that is 1 hr 30 minutes (or approximately that length), I've never downloaded any adult movie that long. I have downloaded short adult clips, mainly free clips.
I did join 1 adult site with hardcore movies, but the moves were well under an hour, and I was a member for 1 month. Did not enjoy the movies, thought they were trash.
I really enjoy softcore pics, tho.
Monahan, we've had a lot more years of Republican presidents than Democratic presidents since Lyndon Johnson.
Lyndon B. Johnson (Democrat),Richard Nixon(Republican),Gerald Ford(Republican),Jimmy Carter(Democrat),Ronald Reagan(Republican), George H. W. Bush(Republican),Bill Clinton(Democrat),George W. Bush(Republican)
I think it was more the changes in the country as a whole and the development of internet that led to the changes of:
1- full frontal nudity in Playboy and the emergence of the Hustler style magazines during Nixon,
2- full insertions displayed in men's magazines during Bush 2.
Nixon was a Quaker, and I seriously doubt he believed in any rights of porn.
Bush #2 is a Methodist, who said, "I believe that God wants me to be president."
Bush #2 believes in freedom, as a young man he was supposed to be wild, but as president, he is supposed to represent family values (which don't usually include the freedom of porn).
Porn is now a multi-billion dollar industry.
Larry Flynt and Hustler spent many years in the courtroom fighting obscenity charges. At least two cases went all the way to the US Supreme Court.
Hugh Hefner and Playboy also spent years fighting obscenity charges.
Most Democrats and Republicans believe in family values, which does not include the right of porn.
"Laissez faire" free market types do not normally extend that protection to porn. It's true that Democrats are supposed to be more anti-big-business than Republicans But any Democratic or Republican politician who stands up and says the US public has the right to enjoy porn is the exception. It's the US court system that has backed the right to adult entertainment, not the US legislative or executive branches.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
