Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : lk2fireone (0)  

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203)

Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 851-875 of 2203 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
851
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

With an outgoing Bush and an incoming Democratic party administration, I would have guessed the US government would be more relaxed on the porn industry.

That's just my gut feeling, I certainly have no hard facts to back it up.

But you're implying that it's the financial strength of the porn industry that influences government control. I would have thought it was the other way around. If the government wants to, it could crush the adult industry, because few porn companies have the money or desire to fight government lawsuits.


11-23-08  04:17pm

Reply
852
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

I like your thinking. I was trying to select more than one choice in the poll, but the poll mechanism does not allow that.

I've seen very few sites where a real loyalty program offers a better deal for remaining a member. Instead, most porn sites (and other types of businesses) offer a better deal (price) to potential subscribers than they do to existing subscribers.

(I'm not including the type of "loyalty programs" where the longer you remain a member, the more sites you have access to, or the more areas of a site you have access to.)

That has always bugged me. I figure if I am an existing customer, I should be treated better than a potential customer (in price of a subscription/membership). But that's not the way it works in the real world.


11-23-08  11:18am

Reply
853
N/A Reply of surferman's Poll

Once they start to lose business, they could then reduce prices as well as cut back on new content. Very few businesses spend more money on the business when profits drop. In theory, by spending more money on the business you would gain market share. But few businesses operate that way in the real world.

11-23-08  03:38am

Reply
854
Visit 1 By Day

1 By Day
(0)
Reply of astonman's Comment

I'm not sure what you mean.
1 By Day is included in a DDF Network subscription.
You get full access to the site, with unlimited streaming and downloading privileges, I believe.
You do not have to pay an extra fee to access the site.

At Team Skeet, they use the word "unlock" to indicate their premium sites, that you have to pay extra for to access the site. Each premium site requires a separate fee, and does not give you access to any other site in the Team Skeet network.

But I don't recall seeing "unlock" used at DDF Network.
DDF Network gives you access full access to about 14 different porn sites. About 8 sites update actively, the other 6 sites are archive sites.
But there is no additional fee to "unlock" any of the 14 sites.

Again, where did you see the "unlock" phrase used?

Team Skeet is a separate network from DDF Network.


08-07-18  09:57am

Reply
855
Visit 1 Pass For All Sites

1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
Reply of insomniacxxx's Comment

Thanks for the warning.
I've been a past member of sites with terrible captcha systems.
Never again, if I can help it.
I don't have the time or patience any more.

Again, thanks for the heads up on the captchas.


01-19-18  01:03am

Reply
856
Visit 1 Pass For All Sites

1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
Reply of Tree Rodent's Review

Glad you found a network that has some content to your liking, even with the negative aspects.

Also glad you were able to get a discounted price through Amour Babes, and pointed that out for anyone else wanting to join the network.

There are some Eastern European teens at the network that are found at a lot of other porn networks/sites. But it seems like there are too many problems for the network to interest me.

Lately, I've been so spoiled by wanting my porn sites to be well designed, easy to use, with lots of good to great content.

At one time, I could search for hours through a lot of poor or just-OK material, hoping to find the good stuff. But not anymore. Now I want the good stuff on easy display. I just don't have the patience any more that I used to have.

When you write that: "First night of membership, most of the sites didn't load so any type of viewing or downloading was impossible."

I would have been so turned off by that experience, I would have tried getting a refund.


10-03-12  06:47pm

Reply
857
Visit 18 Eighteen

18 Eighteen
(0)
Reply of Tree Rodent's Comment

Glad you were able to find a site that meets your strict standards. Hopefully the sites you join will provide satisfaction for the price you pay. Looking forward to reading your review.

01-13-11  10:48pm

Reply
858
Visit 18 First Sex

18 First Sex
(0)
Reply of Goldfish's Comment

I don't understand the thinking behind offering only subpar video quality. TeenMegaWorld network usually offers good to very good quality videos at their different sites. So to open a new site as part of the network, where they only offer low-grade videos, seems foolish. Most people who join, who are aware of the TeenMegaWorld network (or whatever the network is supposed to be called), would expect a good quality video to be offered.

Separately, how much did you pay to join this site? Membership at many of the other sites in the network, or membership through TeenMegaWorld, is $19.95/month.

But PU lists membership for 18FirstSex at $29.95/month.

So did you have to pay the $29.95/month, or were you able to get in at $19.95/month?

Also, how many of the network sites did you get access to by joining through this site? You usually get access to around 20+ sites when you join any one of the TeenMegaWorld sites.


12-02-10  04:19am

Reply
859
Visit 18 First Sex

18 First Sex
(0)
Reply of Goldfish's Comment

I don't understand the thinking behind offering only subpar video quality. TeenMegaWorld network usually offers good to very good quality videos at their different sites. So to open a new site as part of the network, where they only offer low-grade videos, seems foolish. Most people who join, who are aware of the TeenMegaWorld network (or whatever the network is supposed to be called), would expect a good quality video to be offered.

Separately, how much did you pay to join this site? Membership at many of the other sites in the network, or membership through TeenMegaWorld, is $19.95/month.

But PU lists membership for 18FirstSex at $29.95/month.

So did you have to pay the $29.95/month, or were you able to get in at $19.95/month?

Also, how many of the network sites did you get access to by joining through this site? You usually get access to around 20+ sites when you join any one of the TeenMegaWorld sites.


12-02-10  04:19am

Reply
860
Visit 18 Magazine

18 Magazine
(0)
Reply of tangub's Reply

MY ADVICE: SAVE YOUR MONEY.

EVEN AT $5 I WOULD NOT JOIN. IF YOU KNEW WHAT YOU WERE GETTING.

THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF ATTRACTIVE GIRLS AT THE SITE.
BUT ALMOST NONE OF THE PHOTOS ARE WORTH COLLECTING.
THE SITE STRUCTURE IS POOR.
THERE ARE OTHER PROBLEMS WITH THE SITE.

YEARS AGO, I WAS A MEMBER AT SOME OF THE INDIVIDUAL SITES:
scarletpeaches
wildtarts
crimsonteens
mashastar

SOME OF THE GIRLS AT THOSE SITES WERE STUNNING.
BUT THE PHOTOS AT 18 MAGAZINE ARE POOR COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL PHOTOS.
YOU CAN SOMETIMES FIND MUCH BETTER COPIES AT FREE PORN PHOTO SITES, WHERE THE GIRLS STILL LOOK STUNNING.
IF YOU WANT TO SPEND THE TIME LOOKING.

I'M VERY DISAPPOINTED WITH MY SUBSCRIPTION. I JOINED TODAY, AND IT WAS A MAJOR MISTAKE. A WASTE OF MONEY. I WAS HOPING TO FIND THE PHOTOS I SAW FROM MANY YEARS AGO. INSTEAD, I FIND BLEH PHOTOS NOT WORTH COLLECTING.

ANOTHER THING: THE HELP GUIDE STATES THE ORIGINAL SITES ARE STILL OPEN, WITH THE ORIGINAL CONTENT. THAT'S WRONG.
WHEN YOU USE THE URL THAT IS SUPPOSED TO LEAD TO THE ORIGINAL SITE, YOU ARE RE-DIRECTED TO 18 MAGAZINE SITE. APPARENTLY THEY CLOSED DOWN THE ORIGINAL SITES. MAYBE SOME OF THE CONTENT IS FOUND INSIDE THE 18 MAGAZINE SITE, BUT THAT MAKES IT HARDER TO FIND.
AND THE CONTENT AT 18 MAGAZINE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED IS POOR: A POOR COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PHOTOS THAT COULD BE, BECAUSE OF COLOR AND LIGHTING AND FOCUS, WONDERFUL PICTURES OF ATTRACTIVE GIRLS.
THE GIRLS IN THESE POOR PHOTOS MIGHT BE ATTRACTIVE, BUT YOU WOULD NOT KNOW IT FROM THE CURRENT PHOTOS.


09-07-17  09:10am

Reply
861
Visit 18 Magazine

18 Magazine
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment

Do you know if they are updating again at 18magazine? Looking around the preview pages, the last update seems to be in late 2009. I joined a few years back, and the site was not updating at that time, all the material was from years earlier, I thought. A lot of cute models, but the material did not impress me much. The photos were just ok, and the videos were poor. This is strictly a softcore site, and the content is from years ago. The comparable content from mega-sites like met-art, mplstudios, etc. is so much better.

03-28-10  10:45am

Reply
862
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of uchuuji's Comment

Most of the old Diesel sites were merged into 18 Only Girls.
Some of the old material from different sites was dropped (no longer available).
But you wouldn't notice that unless you were following those sites closely.
As a newbie, you can now join 18 Only Girls, which contains most of the material from the older sites, as well as updates.

Wow Girls and Wow Porn are still treated as separate sites, from the old Diesel sites.

Young Legal Porn no longer exists as a separate site. Most of its material is now found in 18 Only Girls.


06-05-15  11:31am

Reply
863
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of Xearoleet's Reply

I've asked Dieselman (the webmaster at the Diesel Access Network) to clearly explain the rules governing how membership works in giving access to the different sites.

I asked him in an eamil or post at the Diesel Access site, and at the Porn Users site.

But I haven't gotten any explanation of what the rules are.

Maybe you would have better luck, if you posted a question at the Diesel Access site bulletin board.

Or you can ask at the site, if you can switch your membership, to Wow Girls, without paying any extra fee.

But I don't know what the rules are.

Sorry I couldn't be more help.


07-04-13  12:13am

Reply
864
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of slutty's Reply

Agree that video quality for the cam shows (the ones I was referring to) is poor. The video quality at their paysites are quite good, in contrast.

I assume that's because the girls shooting the cams are using low-quality, inexpensive cameras, as well as maybe being a function of the feed they are using (low bandwidth?--I am not technically inclined).

But for a free live cam show, that features a lot of nudity, some masturbation, sometimes sex between a model and a stunt cock, it might be worth checking out.

Depends on your tastes.

I have spent very little time watching these shows.


04-15-13  01:45pm

Reply
865
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of slutty's Reply

I've had the 5-month membership in the past, but I am currently on a special offer monthly subscription.

But I have access to all the Diesel Access network sites, and now with the new program, I now have access to the two Wow sites as well.

I like the videos and photosets at these sites, and the sites are much easier to use, because I don't have to hunt through a bunch of junk to find content that I like.


03-09-13  02:04pm

Reply
866
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

Here is what dieselman (the Webmaster at Diesel Access network) wrote in a reply to a post at PU:

10-15-12 09:33am

dieselman
Webmaster

REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :

Thank you lk2fireone!

Indeed, when you buy a membership of 5 months access, you will get access to all our sites in DieselAccess network. You can also join with TBP montnly discount link and after staying a member with us for two months, you will get access to all our sites at no additional cost.

WowGirls is a separate site but we will release soon a loyalty access for it as well.

Now, get there and enjoy the girls and the content :))


01-31-13  06:36pm

Reply
867
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Comment

Wow Girls and Wow Porn are marketed separately from the Diesel Access network of Young Legal Porn, 18 Only Girls, and the other 12 sites in the Diesel Access network.

I've joined the 14 site Diesel Access network for the 5-month membership. You get access to the 14 sites in that network, including Young Legal Porn, 18 Only Girls, and the other 12 sites (but not Wow Girls or Wow Porn).

Also, if you join 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn and stay a member for more than 2 months, I believe you then gain access to all 14 sites in the Diesel Access network. At least, that's what what the Webmaster wrote in a reply to some comment last year.


01-31-13  12:50pm

Reply
868
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of Jent's Reply

But the site management should definitely change the non-member pages for the updates, so that each non-member updates page accurately shows what content is available inside that site.

Otherwise, as you pointed out, someone who joins a single site, might feel cheated they are not getting what was advertised in the non-member's update page.


12-23-12  01:39pm

Reply
869
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of Jent's Reply

I am currently a member of both 18OnlyGirls and YoungLegalPorn.
When I look at the updates page for each site, I see two different pages.

There are no duplicate listings of the same content (video or photo shoot) at both sites.

I am writing about going inside the member's area, and looking at the update page for each site.

If you are not a member, or if you are looking outside the member's area for each site, and you look at the update page for each site in the non-member's area, you are correct: both sites, in the non-member updates page, show the same content (the same videos and photoshoots).

You could say that is false advertising.

I believe it's more likely a simple mistake (stupid, but understandable), where someone just put up on the internet the same page of contents (videos and photoshoots) to advertise both sites, even though those videos and photoshoots would not be available at both sites.


12-23-12  01:20pm

Reply
870
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of Jent's Comment

To be more explicit, if you are seeing a photo for a photoshoot or video at one site, and a matching photo at the other site, one photo is for a video, and the other photo is for the photoshoot of that video. They often distribute their content that way, instead of making sure that the video and matching photoshoot both appear at the same site.

12-23-12  08:07am

Reply
871
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of Jent's Comment

Not a clone.
Both sites feature the same models.
And sometimes one site has a photoshoot of a video that is featured at the other site, and vice versa.
But basically content that appears at one site does not appear at the other site.
Years ago, I believe, some content did migrate from one site to the other. But that does not happen today.
Both sites are owned by the same company, and the content at both sites are similar in style and content, but not the same exact content.


12-23-12  07:57am

Reply
872
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment

I just noticed that both 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn are now $29.97/month. The last time I checked, at least one of those sites was $19.99/month, with a PU/TBP discount, as far as I can remember.

A lot of sites are offering specials, where they reduce the membership price. But the Diesel sites are trying to keep their prices up, or even increasing them.


10-15-12  09:14am

Reply
873
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of Claypaws's Reply

I think, if you wanted to re-write your responses, it would make a great review of the Diesel network, or one of their main sites.

I honestly believe, because of your greater writing skills and other factors, that your reviews are outstanding. Far beyond anything I have written. Toadsith hasn't written any reviews in almost 4 years, but his reviews, like yours, are some of the best at PU.

I'm glad that you are finding some sites that you like. I thought, after re-reading your reviews, that your tastes were too specialized to finding sites you might think worthwhile:

"As I am not interested in bg, gg or video, it is hard for me to evaluate the quality of that content."



You say you like Metart, and would score it in the mid to high 90s. But you also say: "I tend to find their images beautiful but not very exciting..."

So when you give Metart a 90s score, do you mean that represents your personal satisfaction with the site? Or do you mean, instead, that is your "professional reviewer's" opinion of the site, apart from your own enjoyment?

When we write reviews for PU, we are supposed to score a site based on some objective criteria, apart from our own personal satisfaction. Which I find hard to do.


However, you say you like MetArt and Femjoy, but most especially ATK Galleria and Karups (and SuburbanAmateurs?).

My tastes are different from yours, but you've talked me into a ATK Galleria membership in the near future.

You write that MyPreciousVirgins "has some good photos but so few that you can find all of them within a week of joining."

I don't think MyPreciousVirgins is a mega site, but it has a large number of models and photosets. So if you could only find a week's worth of content worth keeping, then it seems that it would take years before 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn would build up enough photosets that would appeal to you. Because most of the photos they post (and all of the videos) would seem to be outside your interest, even if they improve their photography.

I am looking forward to reading your future reviews.


06-13-12  06:43pm

Reply
874
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of Claypaws's Reply

If that is true, most of the content at 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn would have little value for you.

I just re-read the three reviews you have posted. All I can say is, wow, your reviews are great, you put a lot of thought and intelligence and details into them.

Diesel is not a photo site that features a variety of professional photographers. The early photosets were amateurish, poor colors, not high definition, a wasted opportunity of attractive teens.

Recent photos are more professionally photographed.

One content provider for the Diesel network and Teen Mega World network is:

http://adultlabs.com/content

Browse the samples from that site. If the photosets appeal to you, then you might join Diesel after giving them time to build up content that you might like.

The quality at Diesel is far superior to what you get at Teen Mega World. Teen Mega Word is a video site. They have tons of photosets, but I assume the photos (and the videos) would not appeal to you.


In one review you wrote:

"What I want is for the model to look like she wants to rip my clothes off. Alas, with these photographers, few models look like they are thinking about sex at all, even though there are plenty of open leg poses and some mild finger spreading too. 'You can look but don't touch'. "

At the moment, I can't think of any sites that cater to your preference.


06-12-12  03:21pm

Reply
875
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of Claypaws's Reply

"I don't know why the the photosets at 18 Only Girls are so unsatisfying.
The quality of the photosets is far below what you find at a glamor-style site like Met-art or MPL Studios, in terms of definition, appeal, etc. The style of the photosets is like what is shown at sites like Teen Stars Magazine (an archive site) or My Precious Virgins. Except that what
is shown at Teen Stars Magazine and My Precious Virgins is done much better. The photosets at 18 Only Girls are like a pale imitation of themuch better photosets at the other two sites. And compared to glamor photo sites like Met-art or MPL Studios, the photosets at 18 Only Girls are almost worthless. The photosets are like snapshots from the 1960s or 1970s. Even though they are nude photosets, the 18 Only Girls photosets lack sexiness. My guess is that the lack of sexual appeal is due to the washed-out appearance of the colors in the photos."


There are a lot of things I like about Diesel. I like their videos, with the option of downloading in several definitions. And the newer photosets have multiple choices for definition, as well.

As far as theme: this is a teen site. But there is a wide range of sexual activity shown. Single girl, lesbian with two or more girls, boy-girl, boy with two or more girls. Some use of toys, but not a heavy emphasis of toys. The toys could be in a single girl masturbating, two or more girls, boy-girl, one boy with two or more girls.

The sets don't emphasize any themes, except for being teens.

"Are they doing multiple photo sets per girl or is it more of a one or two sets per girl kind of a site (like Pretty4Ever)?"

The number of sets a girl might have is completely random. A lot of girls have only 1 or 2 appearances. The model Maria has 7 videos and 10 photo sets. Katie has 13 videos and 13 photo sets. The model Mia has 56 videos and 27 photo sets.


Those figures are for 18 Only Girls. If a model appears at this site, she might be found at the sister site, Young Legal Porn, with additional sets.

As far as style, I would say the recent photosets are like Met-art, in that they are glossy photos, with high definition, professionally photographed. The difference is that Met-art, until recently, was nude softcore, but no overt sex. The models did not touch themselves sexually. If there were two female models in a scene, the most overt thing was the two models might kiss on the lips. No boys in the sets ever.

At Diesel, the girls are shown having sex, whether by themselves, with one or more girls, or with a boy and one or more girls.

I am far less technically inclined than you, and I don't apply the same expertise to judging a photo or video.

In your review of ATK Premium, dated 2012-06-04, you write:

"As I am not interested in bg, gg or video, it is hard for me to evaluate the quality of that content."


06-12-12  03:19pm


Shown : 851-875 of 2203 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.46 seconds.