| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1376
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
obsessedoverit's Review
Just a comment.
As I see it the review was in conformity with the normal expectations of we Porn Users and was well written. I re-read the review and don't think that obsessedoverit ever suggested a bait and switch occurred with Nubiles. He simply said he likes ebony and flashing and that it wasn't available on Nubiles.
While I'm OK with ebony and flashing, it's not something I look for so that observation has no impact on my interest in the site.
I guess the only issue I have with the review is that P. U. offers the same discount as paysitesdiscount.com and he didn't mention that.
His review reinforces my interest in the site because his "pro's" are what I want and his "con's" are of no significant concern to me.
In fact, his credibility is really established by his comment that the site's focus is "not his niche" which explains his score. The site is definitely my "niche" because it has some hardcore and does a far better job of editing than FTV Girls.
obsessedoverit's review was very well done, in my opinion.
|
10-28-08 07:45pm
|
Reply
1377
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
I'll give you a quick reply and when I join I'll be more complete (so other members can supplement my comments).
I really enjoy watching an uninhibited girl who likes her body and happily shows it off. One of your models is Andie (aka Andrea) who also appears on FTVGirls. She does heavy masturbation but some of her FTV stuff is PG where she dances, plays with her labia, gets really down with breast play and leg spreads.
Some ideas for pretty girl stuff would be floor level upskirt stuff, breast massage underneath a transparent bra, nipple tweaking, etc. I also enjoy public scenes where a gorgeous girl with erect nipples in a tight sweater, a nice pair in a low cut blouse, short plaid skirt and pantiless, etc. is showing off her PTA [pussy, tits and ass] in subtle and not so subtle ways.
The issue we both face, you as a content creator and me as a consumer, is that I don't see how you can make a video that is longer than 10-15 minutes without losing my attention. That's why, although I prefer "soft core" (PG and masturbation) over hard core (damages the fantasy to some degree), I can see the need to include some HC just to add variety to the offerings.
I'll probably be joining Nubiles in the next few weeks so I'll add more comments then.
If you'd like to chat directly feel free to PM me on PU or to email me directly at jackmonahn@hotmail.com .
Thanks,
Jack
|
09-27-08 01:50pm
|
Reply
1378
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
I'm into this genre (I really like FTVGirls, for example) and this site looks like it is as good, if not better. Hardcore is good occasionally but I prefer the masturbation/pretty girl (no insertions) genre more.
I will be joining shortly based on this review, and more importantly, because Nubiles Captain posted such informative responses to the comments in this thread. He reassures me by his thorough and literate comments that I'll be getting just what I want and that he'll be there if I have any problems or beefs.
As for Nubiles not being a video site, anyone who checks out the public site will see that it is very heavily loaded with video content; perhaps more than most other sites in this genre. For those who haven't checked out the public site, I suggest you do. The number of models is huge and growing, and the site provides very well done 20 second samplers for almost every model.
BTW, the quality of female talent emanating from Eastern Europe is, simply, jaw dropping and I'm hoping it continues forever. Yes, US talent is fine as well but there is something about all natural bodies not messed up with "body art" (tattoos) that I find extremely appealing.
|
09-27-08 01:17pm
|
Reply
1379
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
indybt30's Review
Excellent review, indybt30. I really like your writing style because it reads like a real review and not like responses to a questionnaire.
Nubiles is on my short list of sites to join when I get tired of a site I'm currently on because I do like the genre...but because I'm more a video guy your comments about the vids are important to me.
Bubble butts are not important to me but variety and quality is. I may lower Nubiles one notch on my short list.
Thanks.
|
09-13-08 11:16am
|
Reply
1380
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
Thanks. Your comments really help. I've been trying to decide whether to switch or to continue to find as much good stuff as I can on FTV before I switch. With FTV I can always skip past the boring stuff, but I totally hate lousy and unprofessional camera work that fucks up a great scene with a gorgeous babe.
I think I'll stay with FTV for another month before I switch.
|
08-30-08 09:00pm
|
Reply
1381
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Not being a big photo guy I totally forgot about that. FTV is way below average as a photo site vs. a video site.
But you and Denner tend to match my tastes so as I said to him, I'm going to switch over to Nubiles for a month to give it a go.
|
08-21-08 01:23pm
|
Reply
1382
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
You and Drooler (see comment #3) tend to match my tastes and your comments tell me that I should cancel the auto-renewal of FTV and use the $30 on Nubiles instead.
Thanks.
|
08-21-08 01:21pm
|
Reply
1383
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
kkman112's Reply
We're on the same page about FTV.
They make it hard to love with the unnecessarily long and boring stuff interfering with the really good stuff. My sense in checking out the Nubiles previews is that they are more conventional with single episode videos that get to the point much quicker than FTV.
|
08-21-08 01:18pm
|
Reply
1384
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yes, it helps a lot. I prefer video and softcore so this looks like a good site. I think I'll check it out.
Thanks.
|
08-17-07 07:43pm
|
Reply
1385
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Your review makes it sound like Nubiles is primarily a photo side with some video. Is that the correct impression?
|
08-17-07 05:25pm
|
Reply
1386
|
Nude Fight Club
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Rusty's review and the two that precede his, are accurate and all three are from the same basic perspective; guys who aren't into the genre but who checked out the site as part of the 21Sextury network.
I agree that the video quality and photo quality are top notch and the videography is generally well done such that it captures what those who enjoy the "catfight" genre are interested in. And that would be checking out gorgeous babes and their body parts in some lesbian action beyond basic mutual masturbation and pussy munching.
The only possible quarrel I would have with the site is the inclusion of videocams in so many of the scenes. On the one hand they're a distraction but on the other hand, it adds a bit to the reality of the scenes by suggesting that the action is spontaneous and not staged.
As for a score, I give it an 88. I ranked it at a mid to high 80 because of the high quality, the consistently gorgeous babes and the loyalty to the genre. It doesn't get a 90+ score because it doesn't have a lot of content, yet, and the scenes are very repetitive...but I'm not really sure how they could introduce any more variety than they already have.
|
03-18-11 08:12am
|
Reply
1387
|
Old Spunkers
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Great review, as always, Messmer. It's efforts like this that make Porn Users so far superior to any other porn review sites.
|
11-14-08 01:22pm
|
Reply
1388
|
Only Blowjob
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
As with my other favorite network, 21Sextury, I suppose yet another review is pointless unless there's something that needs to be mentioned.
That's where comments come in. 21Sextury just added yet another feature; a point system so that members leaving the site can have some post membership benefits.
I read the comments section first then the reviews of sites that interest me second.
|
06-26-11 12:27pm
|
Reply
1389
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
Being 29.95 Euros, the cost of this site can vary in US$ terms (they charge your credit card in Euros, they say.) Right now it's about US$42.00. Also, their preview site claims on one place that there are 18 sites in the network, and, in another, 13 sites.
In any case I really liked the review. It told me everything I wanted to know and, because I like the same things, I'm seriously considering joining up.
|
06-06-09 10:12am
|
Reply
1390
|
Oversized Erect Nipples
(0)
|
Reply of
KeiraFx's Review
Makes me wonder if PU/TBP should indicate on their summaries that a site is inactive.
More troublesome is that the TBP summary says 26+ videos which compares to the two you mention. Could the remaining 24 be the random, off subject, videos you mention?
|
01-25-14 11:48am
|
Reply
1391
|
Ox Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
To be honest there are a few more than "three ugly ones" but I used that phrase as a take-off (so to speak) of the old Deja Vu Gentlemens' Club ads.
In an effort to fill the ranks of the Big Tits Round Ass site, they chose a few ladies whose avoirdupois is likely tipping the scale past the 200 pound mark and there are a few that couldn't do any damage over the 100 pound mark even when soaking wet.
To their credit, however, almost all of their stuff is definite woody generating material.
|
08-25-07 04:32pm
|
Reply
1392
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RedRoger's Comment
Great heads up. Lost interest fast. No way I'm signing up.
|
10-31-13 11:51pm
|
Reply
1393
|
Perfect Gonzo
(0)
|
Reply of
mike11w's Comment
I understand Mike11w's point completely. There are way too many porn productions that way overdo the close-ups, in some cases never showing other body parts...or even the faces of...the models. And, yes, the Perfect Gonzo videos do have a lot of extreme close-ups.
I, for one, enjoy the video style of these videos. Yes, there are a lot of "extreme" close-ups, but they are nicely integrated into fully well structured episodes.
As Mike says, some people will like this site. I'm one of those people.
|
05-13-14 11:43pm
|
Reply
1394
|
Photo Dromm
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
This review brings back memories, and not fond ones, of the early days of what looked like great material on sites with lousy D/L speed. I'm spoiled these days and sites that get cheap on the delivery side of the business will have wasted their money building the content side because no one will buy, or if they do they won't stick around.
|
06-23-08 06:23am
|
Reply
1395
|
Pinup Files
(0)
|
Reply of
runnoft's Review
Thanks for your review. Just got an offer for the site at $14.97 per month and I'm OK with that for one month of gorgeous babes with great natural knockers.
You implied that all updates are dated so it's easy to find the newer stuff...and if I drop $15 and quit, I'll have no problem finding new stuff next year when I rejoin. Am I correct?
|
12-12-15 01:06pm
|
Reply
1396
|
Piss Bank
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
The price is actually $34.90 for one month and $39.90 for two months ($19.95 per month). Still, not a terrible price to check out the site.
|
03-05-14 09:00am
|
Reply
1397
|
Piss Domination
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Review
Good review. I think they made a huge mistake, however, starting off at $30 with a very limited amount of content. The preview site is well done, but I think I'll be hanging loose for a few months before whacking my porn budget for a membership.
|
08-28-15 11:19pm
|
Reply
1398
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
I like the site and the quality of the content but I am with Squirrel on this one.
Navigation is everything and as he says it sucks big time on the 21Sextury sites.
That said I would not go as low as a 50 because in my evaluations I give quality and variety of content and frequency of updates as much weight as navigation. But if one of those elements is just awful, I will never give the site a score higher than 70, and then only if the other elements are high quality. I just joined 21Sextury and am not ready to post a review or post a rating.
But Rusty J's right click suggestion may well help me be more generous just because it greatly reduces the frustration of wading through the swamp to find the good stuff.
|
10-23-10 07:46pm
|
Reply
1399
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Another point that I really find lousy is the fact that, when servers go down and access to all, or a major portion, of a site is gone, there is seldom, if ever, any remedy such as an extension of membership for a day or two.
It wasn't mentioned in Panther's rant, but I'm guessing that he just lost the time with no recompense.
|
10-23-10 07:22pm
|
Reply
1400
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Yes I did see your review of Club Sandy. In fact that was the review my reply was intended for. I got them confused.
The deal you mentioned in that review is very appealing and is likely to get me to subscribe. I have jumped into other seemingly great deals and have been disappointed because all, or most of, the sites in the group have become dormant...which is why the great pricing deal.
It sounds like, based on your reviews, that's not the case here; a good thing.
|
11-02-09 11:29pm
|
