| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1351
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
Their business practices also suck. Refer to the comments and earlier reviews.
50 is too high a score for this once terrific, but no longer, site. (Yes, I know that we cannot score any site lower than 50, but in this case I wish we could.
|
02-26-15 11:10pm
|
Reply
1352
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
tikkit's Reply
I rejoined for one month using a special deal. They modified the cross promotion formats so they aren't "quite" as likely to be accidentally activated.
However I agree that NA now qualifies to be banned from pU/TBP because of their lousy and deceptive business practices.
The Bang Bros scam is just a tad different because their game is played via a promotional email and not on the site itself. It's lousy, but if you sign up for the site and don't respond to their emails, you're safe...at least for now.
|
10-11-14 07:59pm
|
Reply
1353
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Thanks Squirrel. My first reaction was more positive because the reversal required only one communication; but you made me think. The outfit with the great service was Epoch, not Naughty America.
The Naughty America site is a very well constructed site with superb creativity. They don't need this kind of sketchy business practice.
|
09-02-13 02:28pm
|
Reply
1354
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Slutty nailed it. They have a lot of "altered ladies."
Bogus boobies are a real bummer, but NA lets you find the God given tits vs. the aftermarket enhancements.
Extracted from their (outstanding) search function:
Big Fake Tits (676)
Big Natural Tits (266)
Big Tits (1379)
Fake Tits (1312)
Natural Tits (1448)
|
07-17-11 12:18am
|
Reply
1355
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
goatyboy's Review
I'm with Badandy on this.
I've been a member for a year now and am very happy with the site. Very fast download speeds, great quality videos, a lot of variety and plenty of imagination that sets the site apart from the Brazzers/Bang Brothers kind of sites.
Scoring a site is a subjective process, of course, but in my view this site is at least an 85 and probably is worth a lot more if cost is added as a consideration.
|
04-01-10 10:00am
|
Reply
1356
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Review
I agree with the comments about the navigation and site design, but one thing I'd like to see added is a posting history with dates PLUS a preview of upcoming material. A calendar would work fine.
By the way, I really enjoyed your review and suggest you not try to condense your writing. Rather do as others have done...continue your review in a reply.
Keep 'em coming. Good stuff, friend.
|
12-06-09 10:25am
|
Reply
1357
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
I just went to the site and they still want $14.95. What is the "student discount?" I couldn't find it mentioned anywhere.
|
09-14-09 08:39am
|
Reply
1358
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
The $14.95 price is what made me enroll. I like the concepts and the very attractive style in particular, but I also pretty much agree with the score. The only thing that might make me up the points a bit is that the site has an unusually large number of models I like and all with original content.
|
05-23-09 12:15pm
|
Reply
1359
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Super good news. TBP just posted a PU price of $14.95 a month. Even better news (for me) is that procrastination pays off. I budgeted $25 in my horndog allocation to sign up for NA on payday (3/25), but with the $14.95 deal, I signed up today just to make sure they didn't change their mind on that discount.
So far I've pissed away an hour and a half just checking things out. It's a helluva good site with great stuff.
|
03-18-09 02:38pm
|
Reply
1360
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
monty2222's Reply
Monty, either they are monitoring the PU site and added Victoria right after I entered my reply or I simply missed it when I checked the public site...because her name is there (as you said) and the preview clip is similar to the one I found on AskTiava.com. (I suspect it was my error, not a last minute fix by NA.
So NA passed that test perfectly (but I didn't). Thanks for that.
The basic style of the NA site is quite similar to the style of RK, BB and Brazzers but it looks like a big notch better in its design.
I'll be spending $25 on a membership tomorrow (when I have more time to explore and download).
Thanks for your help.
|
02-20-09 11:40am
|
Reply
1361
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
Thanks. Now the last issue. Accuracy.
Using Gianna as an example, one site (Video Box) spells her name three ways; Giana, Gianna and Jianna and has some videos with Gianna in them but she's not listed at all. To find all of Gianna Michaels' stuff one must try all the various spellings in a search and then check every video in the inventory.
Brazzers has an outstanding babe (Victoria Vonn) who can be found only by paging through all of their content because she's not listed in their index at all.
So because I'm now very interested in the Naughty America site, I decided to do some testing.
I checked on AskTiava.com and, lo and behold, there's a clip there from a Naughty America site, Neighbor Affair. When I went to the Naughty America main preview site and did a search for Victoria Vonn, I came up dry.
So then I went to the Neighbor Affair site. I found Victoria Vonn in the list of models and a link to her video on that site.
Thus it looks like NA has the same problem with accuracy in its indexing function as other sites do.
While perfection is an unrealistic expectation, sloppiness in indexing is a big problem with me. The search function for NA is terrific, but if it isn't accurate then what's the point?
The NA site looks great, but with a sloppy indexing process, I would find it hard to give it a score of 100.
|
02-20-09 09:00am
|
Reply
1362
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Great review, although I have yet to see anything worthy of a 100. 99 maybe, but 100?
One thing you didn't mention in either your review or in your replies is the accuracy of the search capabilities of the various sites.
VideoBox is sloppy in identifying the models in each video. Way too often they misname a babe in a video which makes it nearly impossible to find all scenes for that babe. Brazzers.com is also rather bad at that as well. Bang Bros has an inefficient search capability and seems to have a bad time spelling even simple model names. RK, while they have an "intelligent search" capability similar to what you describe for NA, they also have accuracy issues.
TrashMan, can you comment on how accurate NA's identification and labeling efforts are? When I find a babe I want to see more of, I want to be reasonably confident that the search function is accurate so I don't have to look for the needle in the haystack.
Again, thanks for a superb, well written review. Love your stuff.
|
02-20-09 08:20am
|
Reply
1363
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
According to the TBP notes, no. A trial does not get you full access.
|
12-17-08 04:08pm
|
Reply
1364
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Rattrap's Review
The various "teaser" sites that offer clips of specific babes are, more and more, posting clips from Naughty America. More to the point, many of the newer babes in the biz seem to have stuff on this site.
So, Rattrap, thanks for your review. Yours, and the ones posted earlier, all say that this is a great site. At $25 it's also reasonably priced but as said elsewhere, it's too bad they don't offer a 3 month or 6 month deal at a lower price per month.
One question. Have you had any problems with their billing service? It's not CCBill or Paycom, who are, in my opinion, fully trustworthy. They show their billing service as DHDmedia.com (which is likely Danni's Hard Drive [DHD] getting into the billing business)
I'm always leery of non mainstream billing services.
|
12-09-08 11:31am
|
Reply
1365
|
Naughty Staff
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
My point was that the site itself is part of the Twistys site, a fact not mentioned in your review.
Apart from that, I agree completely with your comment about the point score. If this site was a stand alone site and not part of Twistys, a 69 is too high for the reasons you stated.
Also, if you go to the preview site there is no mention made that it is a part of Twistys, so I'm not even sure that, if you sign up for Naughty Office from the preview site, you are also getting Twistys.
The best thing Twistys could do is to move the 15 videos over to Twistys and shut down the Naughty Office site altogether.
|
12-16-09 02:55pm
|
Reply
1366
|
Naughty Staff
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Naughty Staff is a part of the Twistys site and is not an independent site. Twistys announced last year that it was discontinuing the site and the content being created for it would appear on the primary Twistys site instead of the "Naughty Staff" site.
|
12-15-09 05:55pm
|
Reply
1367
|
Naughty Staff
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
There are a few duplications with other network sites that the site says will be corrected. I'm looking forward to the Naughty Staff site growing with more of the super-high quality of material it has already provided.
|
07-19-08 10:21am
|
Reply
1368
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
insomniacxxx's Review
I'm a current member and still draining off content from the large inventory, but I agree with this review. I'm easier on the score, however. I would go with a 65-69 because the quantity of decent quality material is far better than many sites at equivalent pricing.
I see a 60 score to be one to use for a site with a few (very few) redeeming qualities such as feeding a fetish, a single model who is spectacular but little content, etc.
An example of a 60 is a solo model site I found a few years back that I was able to drain completely in a few days' time.
That said, NS is a big site with a bunch of good stuff in its archives, so it's worth a month or two membership, but unlike other popular sites like BZ and BB, it looks like they've lost their mojo.
|
09-26-10 08:49am
|
Reply
1369
|
Nextdoor Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Drooler,
I just found this site and of course I immediately went to PU to see what has been said about it.
Yours is the only posting and it's 15 months old so I'd like to know if you've gone on the site recently. Their preview site looks good but has no info about how many videos are available. It also brags about 5 updates per week, but it also talks about "new model Mondays." Does that mean that the other four are recycled or are they new shoots of current models?
Thanks,
Jack
|
09-26-11 08:27am
|
Reply
1370
|
Nicole Peters
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree. I probably gave too much weight to the nice titty action by Nicole which was, in turn, nicely recorded by the cameraman.
I've given 50's to totally worthless sites like Angelica Costello's site (aka Venus) and one of Jana Foxy's lousy sites.
On reflection, this site is probably worth a 60 overall, not 69.
|
05-06-13 10:42pm
|
Reply
1371
|
Nubile Films
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Reply
I don't think so. Reading through all of the details on TBP, it looks like the two sites are totally different and are shown as being owned by different companies.
Unfortunate that the newer site (Nubile Films)chose that name.
|
05-09-13 11:09am
|
Reply
1372
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
I agree with your point and will add another element.
I, as you, would go for the cost per day bargains of 1 year memberships. But when new (to me) sites showed up on PU I would sign up for one month with the idea of going for the 1 year deals if I liked the site.
That tendency created a serious overload where I had 3 sites at once with 1 year memberships and found that I was unable to take advantage of them all (the time aspect). In fact I discovered that I would access one of those sites only once or twice a month which negated the economic benefits altogether.
Nubiles, however, by their misguided pricing strategy, makes it easy to opt out of signing up for a full year.
These days I will go in steps; one month, three months (if it is cheaper on a daily rate basis) and, after seeing what my visit rate has been during the 3 month membership period, will decide that the annual membership makes sense.
|
04-27-14 11:22am
|
Reply
1373
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Nubiles Captain's Reply
My personal preference is for a 50/50 mix of new vs. repeaters.
|
06-24-12 09:49am
|
Reply
1374
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
Now this is one great review. Well written and it held my interest beginning to end.
I've been keeping this site near the top of my round tuit* list of sites and tjhis review may just get me off my ass and signing up for it.
*Round tuit=when I get around to it.
|
08-13-09 09:01am
|
Reply
1375
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
obsessedoverit's Reply
"For future reviews... maybe curtail my personal preferences a tad."
Don't do that. References to your personal interests are what make a review useful and provides context to your ratings.
|
10-29-08 07:19am
|
