| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1076
|
Busty Brits
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I'll be waiting until next week (no time to do my thing until then) but will join then for a month and will post comments or a full review after I've given the site a full workout.
|
10-13-10 11:46pm
|
Reply
1077
|
Busty Brits
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes, I suppose so.
But now my question. Have you taken the leap yet? TBP gave this site a rather high score and the price isn't terrible. I'm giving some thought to a one month run but would like some comments from any who may have already given it a shot.
|
10-13-10 12:34am
|
Reply
1078
|
Busty Buffy
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks, Pat. I think I'll hang for a few months before I do anything.
|
08-28-14 06:55pm
|
Reply
1079
|
Busty Buffy
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
Lucie Wilde did some work that appears on DDF Prod. The first video is so tame where she exposed only her boobs (and what wonderful boobs they are), that I suspect it was her first gig. There are a few other DDF videos, but now that I know about this site I may well wind up dropping some coin on a membership.
|
08-28-14 12:11pm
|
Reply
1080
|
Busty Ones
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Just found this out with the Twisty's review. I've been holding off signing up again (had a 10 month membership in late 2006 for $99 before they dropped that deal) but with the three bonus sites and the PU/TBP $19.99 price, I'm in. Too bad they dropped the $99 for 10 month deal, but the 6 month price is still pretty good.
|
06-16-08 06:35pm
|
Reply
1081
|
Busty Pam
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks, Pat. I didn't go back that far but your observation about the apparent update schedule matches what it looked like to me.
Considering that I get more great content each day on 21Sextury than this site offers in a year for a much lower price means I'm skipping this site.
|
04-08-12 10:44am
|
Reply
1082
|
Busty Pam
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Hi Pat,
I went to bustypam.com/2011/12/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">her blog but found nothing helpful except that the blog stopped suddenly on 12/20/11.
Was there something in her blog apart from that?
For now I'll just enjoy her stuff on Score and DFF Busty and save my money by not joining her site.
|
04-07-12 07:38pm
|
Reply
1083
|
Cathy's Craving
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Because messmer seldom misleads, I decided to check this site out. I found something on the preview site that I've never seen before so I thought I'd share it with my fellow PU's.
Cathy (and her hubby) clearly enjoy doing porn and open the door to any who want to join them.
---------------------------------------------
- Send me a picture of yourself :
You know what I look like so I would like to know what you look like. A nude photo is not necessary .. but please send one if you want to. I do want to be able to see your face and preferably some of your body. If you want to also show me your cock then please do .. I would love to see it .. hehe.
Stuff You Need To Know
The following is VERY important stuff that you really need to know. Before we meet you must agree to everything below.
- You will need to get tested :
I am allergic to latex .. and plain don't like condoms .. so if you are going to fuck me you must get tested for HIV+ Std's and then bring with you the original test results showing that you have tested negative. This test can not be older than 30 days. I will also get tested and show you my results. ** NO TEST = NO SEX **
etc.
|
03-09-09 01:48pm
|
Reply
1084
|
Cherry Red Lips
(0)
|
Reply of
NMC2008's Comment
Thanks for the warning! When I see "Full Trial" in a TBP listing the site gets a big uptick with me.
Your post will same a lot of us $4 for this and the sister sites.
You know when a site is pulling this kind of crap they assume we horndogs don't share the negative 411 with anyone so they think they can just go to the bank. The good news is that we've got PU, the Consumers Reports of Web Porn, so the scammers' opportunities will shrink faster than my willy in a cold swimming pool.
|
07-11-08 07:01am
|
Reply
1085
|
Chick Trick
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Completely correct, Kahn, and I thought I was clear.
I read the posted review that gave it a 50 and thought I'd check out the site. What I found as a non-subscriber was a site that appeared to be seriously out-of-date and that the low score review was likely to be spot on. The "beware" was a direct result of those observations and nothing more.
The site may be wonderful but because I didn't sign up, I really can't say. But I can say the webmaster for that site has done a lousy job promoting it and, apparently, chooses not to provide any support to paying customers of the site, based on the reviewer's comments.
Low odds that they'll see any of my money. ;-)
|
10-30-07 08:37am
|
Reply
1086
|
Chick Trick
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Exactly.
My comment followed a 50 point review of this site by another member who reported that the site support function was totally non responsive to his calls for help. He also said that the content updates stopped a long time ago. That's why I checked out the tour for myself just to see what this site looked like. It reminded me of my early searches back in the early 2000's both in the quality of the videos and the nature of the content.
I've seen similar thematic approaches (phony scam perpetrated on supposedly innocent and unsuspecting babes), but all of them were two or more years ago. The tour is intended to get the user to spring for a subscription, so if it's a crappy tour, why should I expect the real thing to be any better?
|
10-28-07 04:10pm
|
Reply
1087
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Ditto what messmer said. Thanks.
|
10-13-08 12:18pm
|
Reply
1088
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
As with CT, I like a bit of firmness too but well developed floppers are still a turn on for me. This babe's mam's are spectacular anyway and she knows how to play with them and other body parts to great effect. The public site's video samplers made little Willy excited until he became big Dick.
I've learned my lesson on single model sites, but at $30 for three months, and with the fact that the site seems very actively updating, I may just toss a few bucks in the bucket and go for it.
Questions for atrapat. You said, "Extras section is just a couple of videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova." Does that mean her site is a bonus site or just that there are a few videos in Christy's site? Also are there any bonus sites or other "girlfriends" material in this site?
|
10-13-08 08:17am
|
Reply
1089
|
Club Anita
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yes, but not all of the "Company Sites" are necessarily part of a subscription to one of the sites.
Example - Membership to GlamourModelsGoneBad does not give you access to their Shay Laren site.
Example - GiveMePink is affiliated with many other sites (see indexxxed.com to see the closest this Company comes to cross pollination of its sites).
|
05-05-08 08:29am
|
Reply
1090
|
Club Anita
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
Can you list the other sites that you get access to in addition to Glamour Models Gone Bad?
|
05-04-08 11:04am
|
Reply
1091
|
Club Jana Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
My hope for new Jana Jordan stuff continues to fade. Once in a while VideoBox posts something I haven't seen before (a new one - for me - was just posted this week) but I doubt we'll see much of anything more.
|
08-04-11 08:48am
|
Reply
1092
|
Club Jana Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Pat,
See my review of this site posted on 2008. I gave it a 51. Unless the site has improved substantially, it's unlikely to be worth even 10% of the $25 they are asking.
|
08-03-11 11:52pm
|
Reply
1093
|
Club Met Art
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Great review. It matches my own current evaluation of Met Art except I would give it a score closer to the high 80's.
The Met Art site has excellent navigation and its advanced search function is the best in the business.
BUT, until I saw this review, I was totally unaware that Club Met Art even existed. The site makes no sense unless they've got something up their sleeve such as making it a network with other sites or are thinking of expanding into heavier stuff like insertions or bg shots.
|
03-25-16 08:53pm
|
Reply
1094
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
clubseventeen's Reply
Will clubsweethearts.com be listed on the PU/TBP site?
|
12-13-14 01:05pm
|
Reply
1095
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
International M's Reply
I just received an email from Club Seventeen and have always deleted them immediately. With the amount of governmental cyberspying these days, the last thing I need is to have the Federal authorities snag me for possessing child pornography on my hard drive; a felony with prison time in the USA.
This is from the US Dept. of Justice website:
http://www.justice.gov/criminal/ceos/citizensguide/citizensguide_porn.html
While I appreciate your statement that you do not offer any images of girls who are under 18, I hope you understand why I am unwilling to take any chances. I doubt you will be able to testify on my behalf if I'm brought up on Federal charges for downloading any material from Club Seventeen and, more importantly, convince the jury that your site has no images of underage girls.
|
08-31-14 11:17am
|
Reply
1096
|
Club Silvia Saint
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
This looks like a "one month drain" site (a site that you sign up for and can drain all of the good stuff in one month or less).
Is that correct?
|
03-03-09 08:28am
|
Reply
1097
|
Cum In My Wife Please
(0)
|
Reply of
Jimmi's Reply
What about his points about the discount and the technique of splitting videos into small segments?
|
12-09-09 08:02am
|
Reply
1098
|
Czech Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for this review! Well done. I hadn't heard of this site until your review today so I checked it out (no pun intended).
First things first. Boy, the gene pool in Eastern Europe is just wonderful when it produces so many fine, innocent looking and just gorgeous women.
Now, after checking out some of the sample videos, the reproduction quality isn't up to current standards. If the site has been stagnant for a year or two, I suspect the member access videos are equally not as crisp and sharp as they could be. Am I right?
Also, based on your comments and what I saw in the samplers, the content could be described as a bit edgier than what is on Met-Art.com (where several of the models can be found in shoots and videos that are less erotic than the ones on this site).
I'm tempted to sign up for a month and, as you did, drain off as much as I can, then cancel.
Thanks for finding this site and for your review.
By the way, for you Silvia Saint fans out there, on page 5 of the models directory there is a small set and a sample video of the Saint herself when she was very young. Take the time to check it out.
|
06-17-08 08:19am
|
Reply
1099
|
Dancing Bear
(0)
|
Reply of
raffles's Review
Raffles is right with 65. It's not quite bad enough to fall in the 50's (that should be used for the total crapola sites) but it definitely has so little to offer even in the CFNM genre that it deserves no higher score.
I wasted the price of a Latte at Starbucks on the trial. Save your money! In The VIP is far better for good CFNM material...and you CAN download stuff from the In The VIP site!
|
08-27-11 09:22am
|
Reply
1100
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
I'm still pissed about the misleading (fraudulent?) Danni's Pledge and how they totally misrepresented their DRM policy when they had it.
They promised that anything downloaded would continue to be accessible even after a member resigned so long as it was not moved to another drive.
I loaded up some external hard drives based on that promise, only to find out they lied. Even after signing up again my entire stash remained inaccessible.
That experience left a very bad taste in my mouth and should be a warning to others who believe the site actually cares about its customers.
|
12-08-09 11:58pm
|
