| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1051
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
EverNight's Review
Good review because it says what I also think. I dropped Brazzers after a long spell and joined Bang Bros, primarily because BZ has far too many babes with breasts distorted by lousy silicone "enhancements."
|
12-30-14 11:41am
|
Reply
1052
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
slategrey's Review
Good review and it summarizes most of my own feelings about the site.
But I wouldn't score it quite as high because the site has way too many bogus boobies. But that's just me. The search function lets you filter out the aftermarkets when you're searching for specific body styles.
The price is right and the site is very stable with no technical issues at all during my 2 years of membership, and as slategrey says, it has the best search feature in the business.
|
11-06-11 09:31am
|
Reply
1053
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
dogspoon's Review
Good site but I am more interested in watching babes whose tits move a little whilst they are boinking the dudes. I swear that Brazzers girls have arranged for a group discount on aftermarket breast enhancements. The silicone market soared when they created this site.
|
02-28-10 10:28am
|
Reply
1054
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
jimmy71's Comment
Happened to me too. The security (or detection) problem is at the source, not with you.
I've had it with these jerks.
I'm a proud to join the swelling ranks of EX members of Brazzers and their sister site, MoFos.
|
12-20-09 11:35am
|
Reply
1055
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
To be sure, one must go through the full credit card process to sign up, they make it way too easy to join an unwanted site.
|
12-13-09 11:27am
|
Reply
1056
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
big johnny's Review
Just an observation. I've been a member of Brazzers for at least a year and have not experienced any customer service issues. But if I remember correctly, they have a pre-ticked cross-sell box for additional site sign-ups that any porn user MUST watch for and uncheck when signing up.
These site count on the male libido getting a prospect to do whatever it takes to get into that Members Area and get their rocks off so the prospect will skip past the boxes and terms of service details to their peril.
And Brazzers also has cross-selling adds that look a lot like just content boxes so it's possible you thought you were clicking on a babe's latest update but were really clicking on a link to another site.
|
12-13-09 07:45am
|
Reply
1057
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Reply
Fancy that. I am amazed at the DDFBusty site which I joined during their promotional deal. The number of beautiful babes with outstanding figures and superb natural titties on that site is incredibly huge.
I remain a member of Brazzers...for now...but I am thinking about saving the money and moving on. Sounds like I need to start the cancel process early to get it done and over with.
|
10-08-09 10:38am
|
Reply
1058
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Review
The babes on this site must have used up the world's supply of silicone. Almost all of the big titters have had aftermarket enhancements. For me seeing a 36DD doing the deed reverse cowgirl style does my heart and other body parts good, but seeing the mammaries not move at all as the babe bounces on the rod is rather unappealing.
Brazzers has a few models with nice soft big naturals, but there's not enough of them.
|
10-07-09 09:00pm
|
Reply
1059
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
HeyManNiceShot's Review
Excellent review. Looking forward to many more, my friend.
I agree with the previous replies that Brazzers is getting boring with its emphasis on large fake tits and hard as hell looking babes. I joined originally because it had a wide variety of babes, some natural, some cute, some outrageous, etc., but in the last few months they have become way too repetitive.
BTW, the cross selling is a bit aggravating, but can also be useful for finding new and different sites, occasionally at rates better than offered on PU.
|
03-24-09 09:22am
|
Reply
1060
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
laxattack34's Review
Another issue is that their search function, while it functions well, is inaccurate. A babe who appears in one scene, Victoria Vonn, is featured in many of their ads on other sites but cannot be found anywhere unless you just happen to know that she's in their Babys with Boobs site and page through the chronological listing.
And they choose not to reply to email communications suggesting that they make the correction.
In addition, they lest several babes in their index that have only a brief bio and photo but no videos or photos.
I'll be writing a review soon but thought I'd toss this minor "con" in for consideration.
|
10-13-08 12:30pm
|
Reply
1061
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
When I go to the site the banner says "Shocking Price $1.00 unlimited access. No mention of how long that access is.
The sign up page has these options:
$1.00 - 1 day unlimited membership
$19.95 - Special for 1 month membership
$49.95 - 3 Month Membership
$95.40 - $7.95 per Month Billed Anually
I'm currently on a 3 month deal but had the 1 year deal been available when I signed up, I would have pounced on it. This site is a Hell of a deal at $8.00 a month.
|
09-01-08 12:07pm
|
Reply
1062
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Thaeral's Review
Ditto the others. I'm a 4 month member and agree totally with this review,
A few minor adds to the review:
1. I'm quite sure all of their primary stuff is exclusive material. At least I haven't seen any of it anywhere else.
2. They are good with a variety of silly plot lines that add a bit of interest to the subject.
3. Excellent videography. The care they take to show off the babe's assets to their greatest advantage is superb.
4. The more recent updates seem to be mostly of babes with overinflated aftermarket boobs. I want naturals...at least 50% of the time.
5. The search feature is quite well done.
In addition, I'm good with the 87. If they'd switch to more natural babes from the aftermarket boob babes, I'd be ready to give them a 90+.
|
09-01-08 11:59am
|
Reply
1063
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Comment
Just FYI, I'm a member of Brazzers and live in the USA. I am billed in dollars and I am paying the USD19.95 rate.
I see no reason why you should be paying at par in Euros. By my calculation, the Euro price should be Euro13.12 at the current exchange rate of USD1.52 per Euro1.00.
Please post the reply you get from Brazzers. It should be interesting.
|
03-27-08 02:27pm
|
Reply
1064
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
powerman's Reply
Fair enough, powerman.
Now if you're free tomorrow, I'd like you to chat with my boss about how one can achieve 100 with a few minor "cons." His perspective is that it takes 100 attaboys to offset one you dumb shit...and that a score of 100 means perfection, no improvemt is possible.
For what it's worth I agree that in a sea of relative mediocraty in the Porn Site field, Brazzers definitely rises far above the norm, and in the genre of exclusive material, these Brazzers guys do a fabulous job in producing their stuff.
I can only dream of being a part of the production crew, who seem to be swimming in a constant stream of gorgeous fucking ladies. And I can't imagine life with a magic wand even remotely as prodigious as the dudes on this site carry in their charlies.
By the way, you write like a pro. Great reviews.
|
02-25-08 07:25pm
|
Reply
1065
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
powerman's Review
While I'm troubled by a 100 rating as well, I've now been a member for a few months and plan to stay a few more months.
My issue is that many of the more recent ladies are the "reconstructed" type (excessively exaggerated aftermarket tit jobs, excess botox fills, etc.) rather than basicly beautiful women (even those with more modest body shop work.
All natural babes like Jenna Doll and Natasha Nice get a lot of excellent exposure in exclusive content that, by itself, is worth the price of admission, and gorgeous babes like Bree Olsen and Carmella Bing also predominate.
The best kept secret is that their alphabetic listing of models in a plain drop down located in a hard to find box on the lower left of the Home page is loaded, and far more accurate (comprehensive) than the other, more visible indexes. The search function is a waste of time.
I will be writing a review shortly, once I get more experience using the site, but right now I would give it a 90-93 score; excellent but room for improvement.
|
02-25-08 11:41am
|
Reply
1066
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Comment
OK, I give. I'm signing up. Been at the top of my "Gotta Check it Out" list so with an extra nickel discount, I'm good to go.
|
11-11-07 07:48am
|
Reply
1067
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
One year update...still nothing added since June 9, 2009.
Unless you have never been to the site and grabbed some of it's rather good, but low def content, in which case it's worth the $18 for one month, there's no reason to become a member.
Bang Bros. is promoting this site big time which is why I checked it out again, but nada, bupkus, zilch.
3-1/4 years without any updates and they're still trying to peddle it!
|
09-14-12 10:35am
|
Reply
1068
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Looks like Ken worked his magic. The price is now as TBP advertised. It's now $17.95 and, as a result of Ken's efforts, they now have a new (or, more accurately, returning) member.
By the way, the limited (very limited and not particularly good) trial is $1 for 2 days, not $2 as in the header.
|
02-16-10 10:13pm
|
Reply
1069
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
By the way, the 2 day (limited) trial is still $1,00, not $2.00 as per TBP, but the trial offers only the first of three segments. The first segment has no hardcore and in most cases no full nudity.
And the last update was in June, 2009, which means the site has gone dormant; another reason it isn't worth $24.95.
|
02-07-10 04:17pm
|
Reply
1070
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Public site still shows $24.95 and TBP still shows $17.95. I'm interested if they offer a $17.95 price but not a $24.95 price.
|
02-07-10 04:04pm
|
Reply
1071
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Yes, Khan, that's exactly what I wanted. I'm sorry that they've apparently become dormant, which, I guess, must be just a part of the free market system. Those of us who liked the site simply moved on and there were not enough newbies to warrant the cost of adding more content.
|
10-26-09 07:54am
|
Reply
1072
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
As always, a great review.
Yours echoed most of my "cons" but there are two more.
1. Almost all (not all but almost all) scenes have the same guy with a hideous tattoo on his face. He usually stays appropriately quiet, and is excellent at making sure the babe is always the highlight of the scene. I'd really like to see different guys just for variety.
2. The concept is dreadfully boring with scene one (the only scenes available for the "trial" subscribers) being some overly long pickup scene that usually ends with the babe getting ready to show some boob. Scene 2 is usually a solo adn Scene 3 is the hard stuff (except in a few cases there's no actual sex). There is absolutely no variety at all, so the only reason to sign up is to check out the superb tits (all natural) on the flat out gorgeous babes, but frankly that's why I sign up every 10-12 months to drain off the updates since the last time.
On the positive side the lighting is always excellent and the cameraman does a great job of catching all the body parts at their most flattering and in getting great camera angles.
As for video quality, I concur with Denner, but most of the new stuff is crisp enough (640) to be fully satisfactory, if not as super sharp as current technology permits.
But these guys have to be pulling in big bucks so is it too much to ask that they maximize the quality of their product?
Final add: For those who care, the vast majority of the talent are European and most of the scenes are taken in Prague.
|
09-23-08 01:48pm
|
Reply
1073
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
Just reporting in. I signed up for one more month and the site navigation has been improved.
With one update per week I had no problem grabbing all the new stuff I wanted to keep in the 4 weeks I was a returning member.
Suggest no more than 2 sign-ups per year...not enough new stuff to sign-up more frequently.
|
09-18-07 06:46pm
|
Reply
1074
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
Two adds to NYGiants' review.
1. One of the sites included in the subscription is Big Ass Adventure, which stopped all updates back in February. Another site is he phony chance encounter stuff which generally finishes with a BJ in a dark alley or garbage area of an apartment bldg. even after 30 minutes you might get a glimpse of a nipple and a pussy. In other words, sign up for the boobies (wow!) but don't count on the other sites to add much to your value.
2. All scenes, whether the low res 320's or the high res 640's, are in three parts; the first is the phoney chance encounter with a bit of nudity near the end. The second is solo tease/masturbation, and the third is hard core...most of the time. The cameraman is clearly a big tit lover because he gets a lot of great angles and movement.
PS for Snow Dude...all models are natural, a very good thing. And unless you are a BBW fan, the ladies are, for the most part very well built with a few that are borderline BBW's. You should be satisfied spending $24.00 for one month.
|
07-26-07 08:35pm
|
Reply
1075
|
Busty Brits
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Nope. Slipped my mind. But I think I'll give it a go right now. $20 isn't bad and Brits are well represented in the large and beautiful mammary department.
(My favourite activity in London is checking out the bouncing braless boobie beauties in flimsy tee shirts on Oxford Street on a hot August day.)
|
07-02-11 09:25am
|
