I'm laughing on this one. First of all, a lot of women wouldn't admit it. I can tell you all from my wife to her circle of friends, all they talk about is sex toys, masturbating and sex. Because of my past as a psychologist, they have no problem talking about it in front of me. One even made the comment, "How many sex toys are there for women? How many for men? Shouldn't that tell you something?" I'm not buying it guys. I would go as far as saying I think it's more than men. They got their little pocket rocket vibrators for in the car on the commute home. They've got the ultra-quiet, tiny thumb vibrators for at work.
Just a random opinion, but I can count over 20 women that are friends with my wife who talk very freely about masturbation and they all say the same things, "I don't talk to my husband/boyfriend about it because I'm afraid it will make him feel like he's inadequate." to "I wouldn't tell most people! I was raised to believe masturbation was nasty and I'm not nasty!"
I could probably put a camera on them talking and sell it as a website! I do think it is also an age thing, most of these women are in their 20s and I think it's an American thing too, as the studies estimate the average American woman owns 2.5 sex toys and as much as most of us hate that damn Hitachi Wand, it is sold in Wal-Marts across the country as a personal massager. I think they got us fooled.
I feel like I'm beating a dead horse, but no model, in my opinion, did the tease as well as Eve Angel in her older sets. She's lost most of it now in her newer content, but her content from say 2004-2008, the striptease would last for, on average, half of a video. And you could tell she thoroughly enjoyed it. Having seen some of her newer content, the tease has been cut in about half. I don't know if that's the new producer's fault or if Eve is just getting tired of the business.
Seems to be a growing trend with the Euro models and even worse, the videos that show the picture shoot and the photographer tells the model to give him the orgasm face! It seems to have replaced the finger touching the bottom lip, "I've been naughty" look though I don't know which is worse.
Thank you Pat, I will have some more low score reviews. I spent the last month or two taking some risks on sites that I had always been curious about and most turned out to be not near as good as I hoped. As I was saying in my other reply on this review, a lot of my lack of poor scoring sites has been me just playing it safe by joining sites I had been a member of before, but the same models are starting to bore me so I've had to expand my view of sites and take some risks.
And I agree about Regan. I don't mind tattoos, but I'm not drawn to them either. She just seems to have that little something extra that most models don't have these days. The other Regan Reese site that I left a comment on is really good for pictures as long as you have an image downloader since it doesn't have any zips. And as bad as I hate to say it, the best source for her videos is Videobox with a channel subscription to Vivid and Evil Angel, that combination has around 23 videos of her.
Thank you, there are all kinds of pitfalls to watch out for in the porn world. Besides the ones you named off, there's the "lets change this model's name and sell her as a new model" this one is so bad that one of the more respected sites, Nubiles, actually still has one model listed under two names, meaning if a member didn't know her other name, they would miss half of her content they have. In this particular case, the model, now very commonly known as Cindy Hope, was originally known as Klaudia. She had a pretty big transformation in her look, going from an average, girl next door, cute, flat-chested model to a glamorous, very pro looking model with implants. And even though Nubiles is a good site with a very good webmaster, they still haven't put her content under one name despite me posting a comment about it here. One of the other reasons I haven't had a lot of bad sites, I have learned which sites deliver what I'm looking for and join those multiple times per year. Meaning I'm kind of playing it safe, but when I saw this Regan Reese, I was drawn in by her uniqueness and willing to take a risk.
A lot of times, you will notice that the members who like photos more than videos are older. I'm not quite into the older group, but am old enough to say the first 5-6 years I saw porn, it was in magazines, Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler. Photos also seem to be favored by those that like using their imagination. I seem to go back and forth. I'll have months where I just join DVD sites, no photos at all, then I will jump to a site that has photos and videos, then find myself on the more artistic very softcore sites. Which most have videos, but they are usually extremely boring. I may be trying to find some kind of balance too. My wife "almost" hates hardcore, she loves softcore, so I find myself trying to balance them out, but I do think the nostalgic, remembering old magazines and the photos, does play a big role in these photo only sites surviving.
As the others have said Sandy's Fantasies dates back several years. I actually complained about them removing it from their network a few years ago since it has a lot of good, older content of some of the bigger Euro stars.
You can also see here on PU that I have a review of it on here from 3 years ago.
The two I don't like are the, "I've been a naughty girl and you just caught me with my finger in my mouth" expression.
And the, mouth open, "Can you tell I'm faking an orgasm" expression.
I prefer to pick my own, but I'm noticing more and more sites are going to assigning you a username and password. The last four sites I joined all assigned me a username and password. Hey, at least it's giving us reason to use our computer for something besides porn, who knew I had a software on my PC that lets me save usernames and passwords in doc files? Now if I could find a software to find the damn things!
No need to ignore it. I have always had slight problems enjoying any of the non-explicit sites, I mean, it could be just one explicit picture out of 60 and I would be happier with the site as a whole. My use of artsy, I noticed that the main guy behind this site allows members to send a few pictures to friends and I also found an entire site where aspiring photographers talk about these pictures and aspiring artists, charcoal, watercolors, reproduce the photos in charcoal and paintings. That's a little more complex than I like my porn. In my porn brain, there are two types of porn sites, sexual and artistic and I'm not expanding that view lol!
Goddess Nudes does have some clothed pictures, but I wouldn't call them stripteases. You know the kind, there will be five completely clothed pictures then in the 6th picture the model is completely nude. Not much in-between clothed and nude. I'm like you, I like the progression, anticipation and tease then the nudity. I do at least like that they have some clothed since that at least let me know what the model looks like clothed. The other thing Goddess Nudes adds is that some of the pictures show more pink, more provocative poses. On Domai, the provocative poses are often planned out not to show everything. Like one model, believe it is Victoria, has a great body, curves and there is a picture of her in doggystyle, but the photo is taken looking at her face so you don't get to see the other side of the pose. Another of this Zulfija, she's in rushing water, two photos in this pose, legs spread open and the water is rushing right between her legs blocking any explicit view. I guess that could be considered a tease in a way, but teases that don't ever let me see what was being teased frustrate me!
But it is hard to beat that Goddess Nudes price at $4.95 a month. I'm not going to post a review on it since Drooler's review covers most of it, but I am going to post a comment with updated content numbers.
Thanks for this info. This model must have had a very short career and everything she does seems to start out nude. I had wondered about Teen Dreams, noticed that they were updating a lot or what appeared to be more than they used to, but didn't see many models that caught my eye. It does look an error on the Zulfija content since the front feature model says 5 sets, the other I linked says 4, but there's only 1. Another thought, all of Zulfija's sets I have are very short on the picture count. The ones from Domai and Goddess Nude have around 20 photos in each only, so maybe Teen Dreams once had 4-5 small sets and just combined them into one regular sized one. Again, thanks, I will keep looking elsewhere.
I do think part of the problem is our language difference, but I do understand the points you are making and appreciate you doing your best to explain them in a language that isn't your native language.
What I'm going to do, to be fair to you and to the members here, potential members of your sites is review each of your sites with updated information. I'm afraid if the information doesn't get updated you're going to have more upset customers and hopefully, I've at least been friendly about it. I know others won't be if they are expecting more.
I also understand about the price. My comment about worth $5 was based solely on the amount of Regan content, not the whole network. I'm going to leave the recycle comment because some of it is recycled, not exclusive, but I am going to remove the part about you running a dishonest company. Maybe that was unfair of me to say without an explanation. I will review your other sites over the next week, some of the scores may not be that high, but I will also be fair in those.
That is a shame about Tonya. I found her and Regan both to be excellent performers. Thanks for working around the language barrier and just to add, I think the Capri site is one of the best looking sites I've seen. I did think it looked like a new site with the clean design menus in the sidebar.
I used to, grew up about 10 minutes from Dodger Stadium, loved pro baseball as a kid. Never really liked pro football, but loved college football. I guess growing up I liked almost all sports, but I don't follow any now.
I'm going to take into consideration that English is not your native language.
You say that "with your membership get access to lots of fresh content weekly". In all fairness, I am just reviewing Regan's site. The score would be higher if I reviewed the whole network as one site, however, all of your sites are not updating weekly either. Tanya's site last update was 4/25/11, that was 4 months ago. Then Regan's isn't updating, so 2 of 5 are not updating. I'm not trying to be too rough there, but I do want you to understand that as a whole network, I would be nicer with my score.
On Regan, I'm not for sure why her leaving the business two years is relevant. I'm not complaining about the lack of updates. I had already read from The Best Porn that the site had not updated since 2009. So that's a non-issue.
Where I do take an issue is with you saying I should appreciate the content that is still there on Regan's website. I complimented the content, I complimented the site's navigation and setup, ease of use. So I did appreciate the content, but your wording of it says, "we had to delete some of the content" you all went from having 83 photo sets to 22. That means you all deleted 73% of the photo sets. That's not some, that's most. The only way I know to show you this is to say would you be happy if your subscribers only paid 27% of the price of your site? You wouldn't appreciate that or else you would lower your price 73%.
I'm not fully believing the non-recycling comment and I will explain why. On Freeones, I can pull up the old version of "Cake Friends". The only difference in the watermark is it moved from the left top corner to the bottom right corner and is a different logo, removing Capalli from Capri's name and adding XXX. Where you hurt yourself here is that you're telling me that Capri also has sets being re-released with a different watermark.
If I go look into Capri's updates I see that all of her updates that had the old watermark on them were re-released on 8/7/11. In photos, Capri has a total of 17 photosets and 11 of those 17 were re-released on 8/7/11. In videos, the newest released video is 8/7/11. You just told me that these 8/7/11 releases were due to a change in the watermark. If I look back before these re-releases, the newest video on Capri's site was 7/15/10. The newest picture set before the re-releases was 7/14/10 and her newest webcam archive video was 11/29/09. So, by this theory, Capri's site is not updating either unless it's recycled content.
That one new Capri photoset has 33 photos in it, all the previous ones had well over 100, some over 200. So that update looks questionable too. If I had the time, I could go through all of the sites and check this, but I now believe 3 of 5 sites are not updating with new content.
I think I've caught the messmer-bug! I've always collected by favorite models, but my favorite models are either disappearing or they are calling in their performances based on their names selling a set, Eve Angel and Sophie Moone, on that one. There's something about this Zulfija though. The sets I have found of her so far wouldn't really be to my usual liking except for the one on Met-Art, which is now one of my favorite photo sets I've ever seen, but only one set on Met. It's like she's teasing me! The sets on Domai and Goddess Nudes would not be to my normal liking. The one on Met-Art she starts dressed in a dress and at least poses several times with her clothes still on. The sets on Domai and Goddess Nudes start nude. So my thinking when I saw Teen Dreams had her content was based on the knowledge I have of Teen Dreams sets in the past, they rarely start the model out nude in a photo set.
Oh, here's the link to the other preview page they have of her.
http://tour.teendreams.com/featured/zulfija.php
The TBP/PU screencap of Teen Dreams actually shows the top of her head as the front page featured model. When she pops up there that one says the five sets, 500 photos, 2250px. It just seems like as good of a site as Teen Dreams has been that making fairly big errors on two different pages isn't that likely.
What has happened, I've become once-bitten recently with another site removing content. I normally wouldn't post a review of a site I would score as low as I'm going to score this one, but I think the amount of content removed needs to be reviewed for future warnings to others. As you will see in that review, Club Regan Reese, I seem to be running into more and more problems with sites these days, two billing issues, one site removing content, in just the last few weeks and then not knowing if Teen Dreams has made two big errors or has maybe removed content too. I seem to be more on a photo kick lately, but I'm not finding much to try since, as mentioned at the first, I can be picky about photos because I like the model dressed to begin the set. It's kind of funny as I have laughed through most of this post because I always aggravate messmer about being picky, now I've seemed to become the same way. Oh and yes, I've been a member of TD more than 10 times over the years, but not since 2009 or so. Now to go write my first negative review in years.
Well, considering how many times I've seen Eve Angel and Sophie Moone naked, I kind of feel like I know them personally!
Similar to the above Californians, I know of at least 3 pornstars that went to the middle, high schools I did, but didn't really know them. It usually works the other way for me. I've met them after they become porn stars since they blend in with everyone else in California.
I do believe I made an error on my first ticket. I submitted a second one and you replied to it in less than a day, so the cancel went through. I will edit the original comment here to say that the problem was resolved. As I was saying above, the last thing I wanted to do was give you all negative, undeserved feedback based on something that wasn't your site's fault, but on the other hand, I try to give our members here a heads up of any potential problems in case they then run into them too. It's always appreciated by most of our members here to see a webmaster doing their best, like you have here, to be active with your members and helpful. Thanks again.
I do understand that problems like this will happen and I'm fairly well-known around this site for being really laid-back and easygoing. I'm not going to be one of those customers that panics and goes into a cussing frenzy, though it probably would humor the members here!
As I told the others above, I believe you all are a honest company and honest mistakes happen. I do see where the cancel page for netbilling customers has been changed to send potential canceling customers to a support ticket system, but I opened a ticket, estimating around 32 hours ago, still haven't received a ticket number so I can't check the status of the ticket and don't have any type of cancel confirmation. At this point, I feel like I'm being the annoying one since I'm accepting that maybe I did something wrong in the opening a support ticket part. It's entirely possible that I used my work email instead of my personal email address in opening the support ticket. Though the account is registered to my personal email address.
I'll blame those damn auto-fill in the blanks settings on that since my wife and I both use the computer and four possible emails pop up when I come upon an area to fill in email.
So my question now is, should I open another ticket just in case I did use the wrong email? That's me trying to be respectful of your staff by not opening more than one support ticket. It did hit me though that it's possible I could have clicked on the wrong email address. And thanks for the fast reply and working on this issue. It says more for your site's support than the majority of sites these days.
The worst part, I've sent the email/support ticket, but still haven't gotten it canceled or any confirmation of it. I don't understand these sites either. I know that it costs them more to have the top billers, but like with this site, they have ccbill and epoch listed, why not just let everyone join through those? Would make it much easier for us customers. I'm still holding onto the fact that I believe this site is a reputable one and we're just having crossed-up communication, tech problems maybe with their site, etc...
Heck, at this rate, I can probably cook a meal, eat it, sleep, go to work, take a weekend getaway and it will be still be trying to cancel! I really hate to be this negative with a site that seems to work hard on delivering what they promise their site has, but it's getting harder by the day.
Getting ready to reply to their webmaster below because I opened a support ticket on Monday morning. The cancel option takes you directly to the open a support ticket area now, but here it is 5 PM EST on Tuesday and I have yet to receive a ticket #, check both email inbox and spam box. This ticket # is required to access their reply to my ticket. The only thing that's stopping me from being too infuriated is that the subscription still has 10-11 days on it, so surely they will get something worked out by then. If the problem persists the scoring will continue to go down.
And here I was thinking I would never use 5,000 character limit, but ended up cutting a line or two out just to fit everything in. I at least wanted to get something up for anyone that maybe wants to try it out. The expired reviews seemed to be before they merged their sites together so it made a huge difference in the amount of content.
The male site worked for me since my wife likes porn too, but not the real hardcore sets. She did say the videos she watched were okay, but said the camera was too far away in them, in her words, "making the dicks all look tiny". I think from reading the forum on their site that's kind of what they were aiming for by having a male and female site. A few sites have tried this in the past that I can remember. Though I do want to mention that I still don't know what all I have access to. Things become really confusing once away from the Yanks main site since they list "our sites" but have a "join" page on them. It could just be that the sites are older in design and require a join verification instead of going straight to them, but it's confusing nonetheless.
I wasn't for sure I wanted Golden Girls to be too believable! I remember really liking the show, but don't remember too much arousal factor. The one I noticed most was That 70s Show since I always thought Mila Kunis was really sexy and it looks like they pulled it off pretty well. Really, I'm surprised more sites don't try the celebrity look-a-like sets more often.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
