I tried it out, but not getting the offer. The only options I got besides the standard join is to join for long-term. The worst part, I never can get my card approved through their billing system so it ends up sending me to ccbill. Maybe I'll send them an email and ask what's going on with both problems. I wouldn't have ever complained about it if Angels updated more frequently. I still really like their content, but my subscriptions have dropped off since I usually prefer Angels. At one time, maybe 2007, I was joining both about every 3 months. As of right now, I don't think I've been a member this year of either. Just like Monahan's post below shows.
Very good review RearAdmiral. I've been a big fan of both ALS sites for a good while. The main thing I'm going to comment on is the ALS Angels site being available for $9.95 with ALS Scan. This originally was the only major problem I had with the ALS sites.
The difference between the two. ALS Angels are models, ALS' webmaster Alex felt were "too curvy" for ALS Scan. If he has made Angels available for $9.95 to Scan members then I probably wouldn't complain too much, but for years, including up to the last membership I had, Scan was $29.95, Angels was $24.95 no matter whether you joined them both or not and it had me almost saying "scam". Various reasons for it, my favorite Euro model, Eve Angel is on Angels only, she is listed as 5'6" 115. not really for sure on what world a 115 pound woman is "too curvy". I think my most recent reviews of the two scored Angels higher than Scan just because I preferred the models, though Angels only updates 7-10 times a month, compared to Scan's much more frequent updates.
It became such a frustrating point for me that I stopped joining either site. Don't remember how I exactly worded it, either in a review or comment, but at one point, it cost nearly $55 to join both and the only bonus from joining both was receiving all the models all other sites offer for one price. This became more frustrating when I signed up for both sites with the same username/password and sure enough, they were going through the same server. I think I've even posted I would be willing to join both for $39.95 combo price, so it at least shows how much I liked the content. I'll have to make a note to join both if Alex keeps giving a discount to Angels for Scan members.
Hey GCode, got good news, bad news and more good news. The good news is, I was a member here about a year ago and the content was better than I Feel Myself, in the sense that it was more pornographic, but kept the real, erotic feel. The bad news, I was only on it for 3-4 days before we moved and ended up not really digging into the site. Also don't think it came with the other sites it does now. Looks like they have combined them all into one now, which would be a big plus. The "more" good news, I had forgotten all about this site and am in a serious site rut right now. So, since I don't have any of the content after the move, I'll give it a shot. I'll get a fairly quick review up of it since I do have a good idea of what the content was like when I was there before. I'll try to list as many of the numbers as possible.
Thanks slutty, I didn't even know about the renew price. I have a cycle I use with types of sites and usually am joining the reality networks each year in June-August, so that may be why we're having the similar subscriptions. Which is also why I didn't know about the renew price. I rarely stay with a reality network for more than a month at a time because I know I will get bored with the same theme. On the models with the fake boobs, I'm with the anti-fake boobs beliefs as much as anyone is and while I do agree that the sites do choose which models they hire, there is still another side to that too. Not all natural models do hardcore. There are so many twists to sites hiring models that I do think they are still limited under the "damned if we do, damned if we don't" position.
I had a Chow-Chow dog growing up, had him for about 13 years before he passed away. Haven't had a pet since. I do like dogs, big dogs at that, but my wife and I live in and had lived in low-maintenance condos since we both work so much. Adding a pet now wouldn't be good for the pet or us. Maybe when we get older and can work less though. Wouldn't mind to have another Chow, loved the loyalty of the breed.
This has some interesting results for sure. I also don't really care for thongs. Went with other, but if I had to pick one of those it would probably be something lace.
I think one of the sexier ones that rarely gets mentioned or used in porn is the mesh hipsters. One model that wore these some was Susanna Spears, it may be more of an athletic thing since she was usually in a set about working out. I still like my imagination to do the work at least at first!
Looks like you're right, that's one of the more natural sets of implants I've seen. I wasn't familiar with her work on Living With Anna, but see on Google that she did get implants. I would call those similar to Sandra Shine's.
These networks are strange like that. 21Sextury used to be the worst for it a couple years ago when they first started operating as a network. If you joined through one of the standalone sites you would still get access to the other sites, but pay a higher price. Not for sure why this one changed, but if you go to the Brazzers main page here on TBP and click to join it's $19.95 and has the same sites including Pornstar Punishment. Pornstar Punishment shows as $24.95 when you click to join it. It's similar to the Tony Bucks sites that lk2fireone has commented on recently where if you join through Spunky Bee, you get the same sites as joining through Teenburg for $5 or $10 less. I don't know if it's just a marketing ploy to hope some would join through the sites not offering the discount or what.
I think what is happening with the price is that this site itself is showing up as $24.95, joining through Brazzers through TBP is still showing up as $19.95.
Check out Abella Anderson if you haven't had the chance. She has a couple of scenes on Brazzers, really sexy, natural young model.
Agree, they're a trustworthy site and I'm sure if they were going to try to pull anything bad off, they would be the first to tell it though it would probably be in a very complex, complicated way!
If you're still on 21st Sextury, they have a whole Blue Angel site, Blue Angel Live, that is really good. It took me a while to take to her. I'm usually not into blondes except Mia Stone, but after awhile, might have even been the ALS content, I really started liking her.
I don't like the music either, but as an example, as a butt man, more than a boob man, I actually prefer less reverse cowgirl, so most of these sites are stuck with making some members happy. It doesn't seem like any site has figured out some kind of a happy medium. On the Porn Pros Network, I was actually thinking there was too much reverse cowgirl and not enough regular cowgirl. Either way, we agree on the music. I don't like any music in any porn.
I hope I did lol! If not, 21st Sextury is going to be really pissed at me. I've always known this company to be a very stand-up company that sometimes seems to have problems explaining their new features, I'm guessing the language difference plays into that, but just couldn't see them using DRM either.
I had initially credited Massage Creep to Brazzers, but caught it last week when I submitted the review. I had been on another Massage site, the one on the Teen Mega World network and thought Massage Creep was way better than it. You do get the feeling that most of their sites are genuinely trying to put a fun plot into their scenes, which is good to see. Kind of reminds me of the late 90s Vivid scenes I loved. The worst part for me on the fake cum/dick sites is the use of great models. Since I download by model, instead of by site, I ended up seeing some of my favorite models on these gallons of cum sites and thought, "what a waste".
Jurassic Cock is a fun one. I get some kind of kick out of watching Ron Jeremy work his charm and the girls seem really into him and the little skinny old guy too. I believe the network has more potential to go up as they start adding more to these better sites. What I didn't understand, on Public Violations, I downloaded a few videos from it that said 27-42 minutes on each one, then they were only 2-3 minutes. Maybe it was another of those download glitches and only downloaded a section of a full scene?
Going to take a stab at it based on the way I understand it.
21st Sextury has the lifetime membership feature now. This allows you to stay a member without member benefits. Meaning you can view everything the members can, like new updates, check to see if favorite models have new content, without having an active membership. You just can't download anything. I'm pretty sure on that part.
The new credits, in my thinking, are saying even if you're not an active member, but have credits left in your lifetime membership, you can download a scene. For example, if Eve Angel had a new scene and my membership expired 2 days before it came out, but I had credits, I could use them to download that scene.
I'm simply basing this one how the lifetime membership works and the mention that in the future, the credits could be used to subscribe to the network. There's a comment on ALS, believe Pink Panther made it, about the ALS On Demand sites where you don't have to be an active member of ALS to download a scene, but just pay for that one scene instead. It looks like 21st Sextury is doing something similar to that by giving the option of buying credits or earning them over time.
That "at least for a month" has become my motto with all sites anymore. I've kept quite a bit of the content I downloaded from Brazzers, over 200 GB kept, so I'm definitely satisfied with their site especially since they've stopped the shady practices.
I had joined through Spunky Bee before as well, after reading the previous comments about Teenburg being included, since I was more interested in TB than Spunky, but it was $10 cheaper. I got 9 sites with Spunky Bee, but there is definitely something different on that join page now. Seems like when I joined it, about 3 months ago, there was a box with the 9 included sites on it. Good content on this network, but I couldn't see paying that full price for any one of the sites without at least some access to the others.
I went on design only. The best way for me to say it is I think I made a comment once about a site having a really nice layout and design and that was Teen Models. I would assume since their site is newer it is running on a newer software so that probably explains it. I think I've commented that some sites look really plain and my only concern with those is that they may have older content, not updated, etc...
I will always say that Sandra Shine has the most natural looking implants I've ever seen. I collected Sandra for 4-5 years before I realized she had implants and wouldn't have known it then if not for an interview on her site where she talked about them. I would say in most other cases I almost always notice, but there have been a few models that I'm particular "proud" of for getting implants, but not going outrageous, not talking to you Aletta Ocean, but Cindy Hope. Even with implants she still is small-chested and ATK, ALS or one of the sites has an interview with her where she was believably, tears streaming down her face about how people had made fun of her next to nothing boobs before implants. Also thought it was kind of funny to see Zafira talk about her implants since they were for a rare genetic deformity, like Zafira ever had a deformity! She told, "I have many, many nude picture of myself. I look one day and said out loud, why is one of my boobies bigger than other?" I had never noticed it until after seeing the interview and now can notice it, so I could understand her just wanting her boobs to be the same size.
I went with a little too much. I think where it reached the point of a little too much is when I started seeing scenes that start and end with anal. If it's blended in with the various action, oral, vaginal, I'm okay with it, but when there's 1 minute of oral then straight in the butt, it's a bit too much. The only other negative with it, I think the anal gape parts aren't the least bit sexually erotic. While he is one of the more respected male porn stars, Kid Jamaica scenes, especially on the 21st Sextury network go way too much into the anal gape, he'll hold the woman there for a minute with the camera zoomed in.
I don't think anything was removed since our numbers are the same. Maybe I had one more video, my folder for the site shows 109 videos. The thing is, I had been a member of Pacino's Adventures, his flagship site several times and had never even paid any attention to Pamela's content. For one, Pacino did get a little too cutesy with her in some content with the dress-up/costume, make her look as young as possible outfits. Where I did find a good scene though was with the model Karen. She has several videos with Karen including one that is outdoors, looks like maybe at a hotel, not really for sure, but there is a bridge not too far behind them and they are using a strap-on with each other with as many as 5-6 people, mostly men, standing in one spot staring at them from the bridge.
There also could be a difference if you see the scenes without subtitles, but don't know the language. My wife is Spanish, so I've learned enough Spanish and Portuguese to at least have an idea of what is being said. Some of the scenes with exhibitionism in them may not look like it at first. I seem to discover ones I hadn't noticed each time I watch her videos. The most recent one, a public outdoor shower used to wash salt, chlorine off after swimming and she decides all of her needs the water!
It could also say something for her content since it was readily available for me, but I hadn't downloaded any of it until my 3rd membership at Pacino's Adventures. Pamela's site is a bonus site to it. A few others of note, there is one in the backseat of a car. While not directly out in the public, it is a small car, looks like maybe a Dodge Neon or Toyota Corolla and several times they pull up beside the tour buses which are very high. I think a big part of me liking her content is the playfulness she has. Her legs are mostly closed while they're sitting beside the bus and she says something about "if you see me close my legs it's because people are looking at me". You can see in the background, a very tall bus filled with people, but the playfulness there. Right as she says it, she opens her legs even more and touches herself. The taxi scene adds to the exhibitionism, not for sure how believable it is, but with a little imagination it is really good. Those are a few that wouldn't stand out as exhibitionism unless you watch through them.
I'm actually originally from the LA area and lived there for 30 years, but still hadn't joined that site just because it's LA and honestly, seeing women half naked, naked, flashing in LA isn't that out of the norm. And didn't mean for any of that previous one to be negative. I just wondered if maybe some of Pamela's content had slipped by like it had by me and still does.
I tested each of the servers with a newer scene and these are the results.
Game 57 from North American server downloaded at 2.0 MB/s consistently.
Game 57 from Europe server downloaded at 591 kb/s, dropped as low as 250 kb/s
So that's a really big difference and glad you mentioned the connectivity wizard since I hadn't ever seen that on any other site and hadn't ran it. Once I ran it, it recommended North American server, ultra-hi photos and the 6000 bitrate videos.
On the ones I had downloaded that I commented on in the original comment, those were older games, namely the first 2 with Cindy Hope in them and I ran into the 600-800 kb/s speed on those.
I will edit my original comment to add the tip of running the connectivity wizard. Knowing most porn fans are like me and anxious to download, I bet a lot of members just look over that wizard. I especially like some of the models I've seen in the newer updates. I'm the one who is a big fan of Simony Diamond, so anything with her is good and kind of surprised me since I usually like the taller, more built models like Simony, I really enjoyed game 56 with Lyla Storm and Alexa James, I wasn't familiar with either of these models before seeing this scene and for what it's worth, your site is the first one that features hardcore that my wife likes. She likes the playful nature of your site instead of the typical hardcore these days that have the rougher, more physical parts in them. Thanks again for the tip.
Thanks Rusty, For some reason I can't view their previews or download them. I had even went to one TGP site I trust, Tiava's, searched public disgrace and got around 40 results, but when I clicked them to download the samples the pages were blank. Maybe they were just having some technical issues.
That indoor, dark, repetitive part was the part I was worried about since I've been a member on 3 of their sites and all 3 sites seemed to shoot in the same general area. Feel the same about the tied part. I noticed in one of the pictures, a woman covered with clothespins clipped onto her body and that's one of those things I don't think I could get into either. Maybe I can get some of the samples to start working and start re-considering whether to join or not.
I was surprised to see the word exhibitionism-lite. I actually looked back to see my review of a public/exhibitionist site, Public Flash, from back 4 years ago. Then noticed your much newer review of it. To me, Pamela does as much as the models I saw on Public Flash. I'm not an overly-critical person of any genre except exhibitionism. To me, this site's exhibitionism is as believable as any I've seen and includes ass, pussy, boobs. More and more sites these days are selling themselves as public/exhibitionism, but take Money Talks on Reality Kings as example, they actually show their guys paying restaurant owners to let them film in the restaurant after closing hours. Which kills any believability for me. One of the things I look for in exhibitionism videos is frustration. And you see that a lot in Pamela's scenes. Maybe I'm just reading the "lite" part wrong, but I would take that as not showing everything.
I think the category is too inaccurate to be considered anything except taboo. For example, white person with Hispanic person is rarely labeled interracial. White person with Asian is rarely labeled interracial. The label doesn't seem to consistently come into play unless there is a black person in the scene. Don't know if it was the first black/white scene, but do know that Hustler had a black man with a white woman in the 70s. Surely the porn producers today don't think they're still creating a taboo with something that has been around over 30 years?
Of course, we are talking about the same industry that has a model listed as barely legal one week and mature the next.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
